W9126G18R00100002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04 EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The Solicitation for Airmen Training Complex Dorm 5 and Dining Facility 3 at Lackland Airforce Base is amended as follows: This amendment affects the package containing DIV 00 – 01 and the ATC 5 technical specs and drawings & DCF3 technical specs and drawings.

See SF30 Continuation Sheet(s)

NOTE: Proposal Receipt date is 31 Jan 2018, 10:00 a.m., CST, as previously announced.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15C. DATE SIGNED 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer) (Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

W9126G18R0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Nov-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

23-Jan2018

CODE

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, FORT WORTH

ATTN: CESWF-CT

819 TAYLOR ST, ROOM 2A19

P.O. BOX 17300

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300

W9126G 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODE CODE

EMAIL: TEL:

W9126G18R0010

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

CHANGES TO CLIN SCHEDULE

1. CLIN Schedule: Replace the CLIN Schedule with the accompanying new CLIN Schedule, bearing the notation W9126G18R0010-0002.

CHANGES TO DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

2. Section 00 22 11 Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Proposal Preparation – Replace this section with accompanying section of the same name bearing the notation W9126G18R0010-0002.

3. Section 00 73 46 Wage Determination Schedule: Replace this section with accompanying section of the same name bearing the notation W9126G18R0010-0002.

CHANGES TO THE SPECIFICATIONS

4. New Sections - Add the following accompanying new sections, each bearing the notation W9126G18R0010- 0002:

01 45 35.01 SPECIAL INSPECTION FOR PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE/SIDE PLATE SYSTEMS

01 57 20.17 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE

01 57 24.02 44 STORM WATER POLLUTION PLAN (TEXAS) ATC 5

5 Replacement Sections: Replace the following section with the accompanying new section of the same number and title bearing the notation W9126G18R0010-0002:

01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

01 33 29 LEED TM DOCUMENTATION

01 35 35 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERNCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL

01 45 35 SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES FOR PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE

01 56 00 DUST CONTROL

01 57 23 TEMORARY STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

01 57 24.01 44 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (TEXAS)

01 57 25.00 44 SWPP PLAN INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM

01 91 00.00 40 COMMISSIONING

ATC #5 TECHNICAL SPECS

02 81 00 TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

02 82 13.00 10 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT

02 83 13.00 20 LEAD IN CONSTRUCTION

02 84 16 HANDLING OF LIGHTING BALLASTS AND LAMPS CONTAING PCBS AND

MERCURY

05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS

09 83 13 ACOUSTICAL WALL TREATMENT

22 00 00 PLUMBING, GENERAL PURPOSE

DCF #3 TECHNICAL SPECS

05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS

11 40 00 FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT

22 00 00 PLUMBING, GENERAL PURPOSE

CHANGES TO THE DRAWINGS

6. Replacement Drawings.- Replace the drawings listed below with the attached new drawings(s) of the same number, bearing the DELTA “b” notation in the Remarks Box:

ATC5 DRAWINGS

A5 – A109 TYPICAL SECOND THIRD FOURTH FLOOR PLAN AREA B

A5 – A602 DOOR SCHEDULE

A5-ES101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN I

A5-ES102 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN II

A5-ES601 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES

A5 – ES602 ATC5 ONE-LINE KEY NOTES

A5 – ES603 ATC5 SITE ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM I

A5 – ES604 ATC5 SITE ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM II

A5 – I601 FINISH SELECTIONS

A5 – S603 CONCRETE BEAM SCHEDULES

A5 – S604 CONCRETE BEAM SCHEDULES

DFC3 DRAWINGS

D3 – KA101 KITCHEN FLOOR PLAN

D3 – KA601 KITCHEN SCHEDULES

D3 – S101 FOUNDATION CRAWL SPACE AREA A

D3 – S106 FIRST FLOOR PRECAST DOUBLE TEE PLAN AREA A

D3 – S108 FIRST FLOOR TOPPING SLAB PLAN AREA A

CHANGES TO ATTACHMENTS

7. The following attachments bearing the notation W9126G18R0010-0002 have been added:

ATC #5 Attachments:

Lackland Lead Paint Report Merrick LAFB Final Asbestos Report HAZMAT Letter LEED scorecard Foundation and Pvement Design Analysis 25 50 00.00 20 Control System Inventory Spreadsheet (Separate .xlsx file)

DCF #3 Attachments:

Lacklane DCF#3 Final Geotechnical Report LEED Scorecard 25 50 00.00 20 Control System Inventory Spreadsheet (Separate .xlsx file)

End of Summary of Changes

ATC #5 and DCF #3 Consolidated Solicitation W9126G18R0010 JBSA - Lackland, San Antonio, TX Page 1 of 2

Section 00 11 00 - Standard Form (SF) 1442 and CLIN Schedule

Item Estimated Unit Estimated No. Description Quantity Unit Price Amount___

0001 All work required to construct the ATC Dormitory #5 Complex complete (excluding other items listed separately). 1 JB *** $____________

0002 Concrete Piers for ATC Dormitory #5 *** *** *** $____________

0002 AA Pier Type I 394 VLF $_________ $____________

0002 AB Pier Type II 2066 VLF $_________ $____________

0002 AC Pier Type III 1258 VLF $_________ $____________

0002 AD Pier Type IV 991 VLF $_________ $____________

0002 AE Pier Type V 1218 VLF $_________ $____________

0002 AF Pier Type VI 1198 VLF $_________ $____________

0002 AG Pier Type VII 270 VLF $_________ $____________

0002 AH Pier Type VIII 1399 VLF $_________ $____________

0003 All work required to construct the DCF dining/classroom facility #3 (DCF #3) complete. 1 JB *** $____________

0004 Concrete Piers for DCF #3 *** *** *** $____________

0004AA Pier Type I <AM#0002>41425729</AM#0002> VLF $__________ $____________

0004AB Pier Type II 449 VLF $__________ $____________

0004AC Pier Type III 1697 VLF $__________ $____________

0004AD Pier Type IV 236 VLF $__________ $____________

0005 All work required to construct the Equipment Building. 1 JB *** $____________

0006 <AM#0002> All work required to provide and install MEP equipment in the Equipment Building that supports

ATC #5 dormitory.

All work required to provide and install MEP equipment in the Equipment Building that supports DCF #3 dining/classroom facility.

Equipment Includes:

One (1) 437 ton chiller One (1) 387 ton chillers

W9126G18R0010-0002

ATC #5 and DCF #3 Consolidated Solicitation W9126G18R0010 JBSA - Lackland, San Antonio, TX Page 2 of 2

One (1) cooling tower Two (2) 12,000 boilers One (1) chilled water pump One (1) condenser water pump One (1) hot water pump 1 JB *** $____________

0007 All work required to provide and install MEP equipment in the Equipment Building that supports

DCF #3 dining/classroom facility All work required to provide and install all MEP equipment in the Equipment Building excluding what is Identified in CLIN 0007 (DCF#3). 1 JB *** $____________

</AM#0002>

0008 Enterprise Products, Inc. high pressure gas pipe line inspection fee for the ATC West Campus temporary construction haul road. 1 JB *** $____________

TOTAL BASE BID $_________________

NOTE: See specification section 01 78 00, Closeout Submittals for withholding amounts for Operation & Maintenance (O&M) manuals and As-Built drawings.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

SECTION 00 22 11

LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA)

PROPOSAL PREPARATION

PART I – GENERAL INFORMATION

1. INQUIRIES

OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via e-mail or mailed to:

Contract Specialist – Primary POC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District ATTN: Vernon N. Valigura Federal Building 819 Taylor Street, Rm 2A17 Fort Worth, Texas 76102-0300

Phone: (817) 886-1022 Fax: (817) 886-6403

Email: Vernon.Valigura@usace.army.mil

Bidder Inquiry Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via:

Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet

To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login.

Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue.

From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry.

Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to

W9126G18R0010-0002 mailto:Vernon.Valigura@usace.army.mil http://www.projnet.org/projnet their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Solicitation Number is: W9126G18R0010 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 6FEYTW-NTD734

Last day to submit ProjNet questions is 19 January 2018 in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Standard Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals

Oral explanations or instructions are not binding. Any information given to an Offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

As this is a competitive negotiation acquisition, there is no public bid opening and no information will be given out as to the number of Offerors or the results of the competition until all awards are made.

2. DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS

a. Offers MUST be sent on or before bid proposal date through AMRDEC Safe website.

b. OFFERS BY TELEGRAPH. Offers received by telegraph, modifications thereto, or cancellations of offers will or will not be accepted.

c. FACSIMILE OFFERS. Facsimile offers, modifications thereto, or cancellations of offers will or will not be accepted.

d. EMAIL. Modifications and cancellations of offers will or will not be accepted. Only the AMRDEC submitted proposal will be accepted and evaluated by the Government.

3. PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE / SITE VISIT

SITE VISIT. See FAR clause 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) –

ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

IMPORTANT NOTES. (1) Remarks and explanations addressed during the conference shall not qualify or alter the terms and conditions of the solicitation. (2) The terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is formally amended in writing.

PART II -- PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

a. REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS.

(1) Each Offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Technical Proposal. The Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be submitted as separate volumes. Ensure that the outside of each separate volume is clearly marked to indicate its contents; and the identity of the Offeror.

(2) Both the Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

(3) No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical Proposal.

(4) All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa. Also, do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into your proposal.

(5) Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined "unacceptable" and thus ineligible for award. Should the Offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these should be resolved prior to submission of the offer.

b. DISCUSSIONS. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors— Competitive Acquisitions. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

c. COST OR PRICING DATA. Offerors are not required to submit Cost or Pricing Data with their offers.

d. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

(1) Submit only the electronic-documents. Submit only the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. All pages shall be numbered.

(2) PDF pages should be formatted to print on 8 ½ by 11 inch paper size, unless another paper size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Spreadsheets must fit to (e.g., 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” sheets) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10 or unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide, but may include headers and footers of the solicitation, project title and company.

(3) Hard copies will not be submitted.

(4) “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215- 1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

(5) In the case of an Offeror that is part of a large, multi-segmented business concern, provide information directly pertaining to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) that will perform work under the prospective contract.

(6) For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: One side of the paper is one page; information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper will be counted as two pages. Where authorized, fold-out pages (11" x 14" or 11" x 17") will count as one page.

Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a “Table of Contents” or divider tabs, are not included in the page limitation.

(7) Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, or Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision.

Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered, shall be clearly marked “REVISED” and shall show the date of revision.

e. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

(1). Submit the price proposal as one separate PDF file titled:

W9126G18R0010_COMPANY NAME_PRICE

*Enter your firm’s name for Offeror’s Name

(2) Size Restrictions and Page Limits. Use only 8 ½” x 11” pages in PDF format. There are no page limits set for the price proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation. Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation.

(3) Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart. Note: If the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab in accordance with the instructions below, that tab can be omitted. However, do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

#1 The Proposal Cover Sheet

#2 The SF1442 and Acknowledgement of Amendments

#3 Section 00 11 00, Pricing Schedule

#4 Section 00 45 00, Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors or Clause 52.204-8 if Offeror has electronic certifications in SAM

#5 JV Agreement and/or Articles of Organization for LLC, if applicable.

#6 Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond) Required.

#7 Subcontracting Plan – See Attachment 1

(4) Detailed Submission Instructions for the Price Proposal

TAB 1: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(2) (c) (i)-(v) and must be submitted by all Offerors. This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” and the format for the proposal cover sheet as shown here:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number: W9126G18R0010

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror (and electronic address if available):

3. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

4. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

TAB 2: The SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award is to be completed by all Offerors and duly executed with an electronic or PDF scanned signature by an official authorized to bind the company in accordance with FAR 4.102. All amendments must be acknowledged by all Offerors in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation.

TAB 3: Section 00 11 00.02, Pricing Schedule is to be completed in its entirety by all Offerors.

See Section 00 11 00.02 with attached notes, for further instructions.

TAB 4: All Offerors must have electronically completed the annual representations and certifications on the “System for Award Management” (SAM) website or respond with the completed representations / certifications found in the solicitation. The Offerors are responsible for ensuring that these on-line Representations and Certifications are updated as necessary to reflect changes, but at least annually to ensure that they are kept current, accurate and complete.

Additionally, the Offeror must also complete and return the “Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors” included in the solicitation. If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, all participants must separately complete the SAM Representations and Certifications.

TAB 5: If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), include a copy of the JV Agreement. If a JV Agreement has not yet been finalized /approved, indicate its status. JV Agreements must clearly indicate the percentages of the JV participants, in particular the percent of the controlling party, and a clear delineation of responsibilities and authorities between the JV parties. If the Offeror or any member of the JV is a Limited Liability Company, include a copy of the Articles of Organization.

TAB 6: Provide a fully executed Bid Bond as required by FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee.

Submit a scanned copy of the complete Bid Bond, Standard Form 24, with the proposal. Mail the original bond to the Contracting Officer post marked no later than the date the proposals are due.

TAB 7: FOR LARGE BUSINESS OFFERORS ONLY. Subcontracting Plan shall be prepared in accordance with FAR 52.219-9. Either the contracting officer, the small business representative, or both, shall evaluate and rate the subcontracting plan as “acceptable” or “unacceptable,” in the context of the particular procurement. To receive an “Acceptable” rating, the contractor must satisfy all objectives in Part 2 and meet each statutory subcontracting plan requirement outlined in Part 3. Failure to receive a subcontracting plan rating of acceptable could jeopardize the offeror’s selection for contract award.

d. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

(1) Number of Sets of the Technical Proposal. In an effort to reduce paperwork and cost, ALL proposals shall be submitted electronically via the AMRDEC SAFE website at:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx.

At the AMRDEC SAFE website, select the link: I do not have a CAC or this machine is not configured to read my CAC and I would like to access SAFE as the Guest User, to register, access the site and submit your proposal(s). When completing the information for transmittal at the AMRDEC SAFE website, notification should be submitted to Contract Specialist, Vernon N.

Valigura, email Vernon.Valigura@usace.army.mil and Contracting Officer,<AM 02> Gerard Henry, email Gerard.Henry@usace.army.mil.

Submit the technical proposal in a searchable, unsecured PDF file titled:

<AM 02>

W9126G18R0010-0002 https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx mailto:Vernon.Valigura@usace.army.mil mailto:Gerard.Henry@usace.army.mil

“W9126G18R0010”_*OFFERORS NAME_”TECHNICAL”

* Enter your firm’s name for Offeror’s Name

(2) Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL

1 – Factor #1 CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE

2 – Factor #2 PAST PERFORMANCE

3 - Factor #3 ORGANIZATIONAL AND

MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

APPROACH

4 - Factor #4 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

5 – Factor #5 OFFEROR'S COMPLIANCE WITH

FAR CLAUSES 52.219-8 AND 52.219-

(3) Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Factor #1, Construction Experience – Construction Experience form plus four (4) additional 8½” x 11” pages.

Factor #2, Past Performance – No page limitation.

Factor #3, Organizational and Management Effectiveness Approach - Limited to five

(5) 8 ½” x 11” pages.

Factor #4, Construction Schedule - Limited to ten (10) 8 ½” x 11” pages total or five (5) 11" x 17"fold-out pages.

<AM 02>

Factor #5, Offeror’s Compliance with FAR Clauses 52.219-8 and 52.219-9- No page limitation.

Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal. All pages after the page limitations described above will be deleted from the proposal for evaluation purposes!

Part III. EVALUATION OF OFFEROR PROPOSALS

1. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD. In accordance with the FAR, no contract shall be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

2. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE LOW-PRICE, TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

PROCESS. An evaluation for acceptability will be performed on each proposal in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b)(3). The proposal that provides the lowest price and is otherwise technically acceptable in all factors will be selected for award. To be considered technically acceptable, no technical factor in the proposal may be determined to be unacceptable. The failure of a proposal to meet any of the acceptability standards for non-cost factors will result in a technically unacceptable rating and preclude award.

3. BASIS OF AWARD. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Tradeoffs are not permitted. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using non-cost/price factors.

4. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSALS

a. Price will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed prices will be analyzed for reasonableness. They may also be analyzed to determine whether they are realistic for the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with the information provided by the Offeror. Additionally, all offers will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

b. The otherwise technically-acceptable, lowest-priced Offeror may be required to confirm its price on either a CLIN, element, or total price basis, and/or provide additional information in support of their price, prior to contract award at the Government’s request and discretion.

5. EVALUATION OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. The technical proposal will be evaluated based on the criteria identified in the individual attachments for the factors.

<AM 02>

6. GENERAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA

a. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be UNACCEPTABLE.

b. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail may be considered UNACCEPTABLE. The Offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included in the proposal may result in the offer being found deficient.

c. The Government cannot make award based on a deficient offer. Therefore, receipt of an UNACCEPTABLE determination of acceptability for any factor will make the offer ineligible for award, unless the Government elects to enter into discussions with that offeror and all offerors and all deficiencies are remedied in a revised proposal.

PROPOSAL PREPARATION

TAB 1: FACTOR #1, CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE: Demonstrate the construction experience of the offeror on projects that are same/similar in size, scope, and complexity to that described in the solicitation for same/similar construction type projects such as multi-story construction of large hotels or college campus style dormitories of at least 250,000 Gross Square Feet (GSF) and valued at over $100,000,000; and a college campus style facility of at least 106,000 Gross Square Feet (GSF) and valued at over $50,000,000 that includes classrooms with stadium seating, central utility/equipment plant (i.e. CUP/CEP) and commercial kitchens will satisfy this solicitation relevancy requirements. If using subcontractors as team members in demonstrating construction experience describe the roles the prime contractor and sub-contractors will play in the project and the percentage and type of work each will perform.

The Contractor shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Construction Experience Information” forms, (See Attachment 2), in response to this factor.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) and specialized construction experience cannot be provided as a JV, each partner can submit no more than five (5) projects each. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. At least one (1) of the same/similar projects submitted must be valued at over $100,000,000 as described above and must be at least substantially complete * within the last 3 years as of the closing date of this RFP. At least one of the same/similar projects submitted must be valued at over $50,000,000 as described above and must be at least substantially complete * within the last 3 years as of the closing date of this RFP.

(*) SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE as defined for this solicitation: “A project is considered substantially complete when the facility is sufficient for occupancy, for the use of which it is intended, as of the closing date of this RFP.”

If any of the information required is not included in the form then the contractor may be considered nonresponsive and evaluated as “UNACCEPTABLE”.

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE WILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON THE

FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

The Government will review the project construction experience of the offeror on projects provided in response to the Construction Experience Factor. Offerors must meet all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor:

(1) Offeror must have at least three (3) projects that are same/similar in size, scope, and complexity to that of the work described in this solicitation;

(2) At least one (1) of the same/similar type projects submitted must be valued at over $100,000,000 and be at least 250,000 GSF, and must be at least substantially complete * within the last 3 years as of the closing date of this RFP, AND;

(3) At least one (1) of the projects submitted must be valued at over $50,000,000 and be at least 106,000 GSF and must be at least substantially complete * within the last 3 years as of the closing date of this RFP.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and may be eliminated from further consideration for contract award.

TAB 2: FACTOR #2, PAST PERFORMANCE: For each project submitted under the Construction Experience factor that does not have an evaluation in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), which includes evaluations submitted in ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS, Offerors shall forward a copy of the Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation to the points of contact responsible for monitoring performance under those projects. Completed PPQs shall be submitted by the Offeror with the proposal. If unable to obtain a completed PPQ for a project timely the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). If a PPQ is received on a project that has an evaluation in PPIRS, the PPQ will not be considered.

The Government may contact references provided as part of the factor for Construction Experience, for information regarding the Offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed. Offerors shall provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions.

If any Offeror has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer.

If the Offeror is a joint venture, the offeror shall not provide more than five (5) Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment 3) total on projects demonstrating construction experience relevant to their role on this project. Any offeror under the joint venture can submit a past performance questionnaire so long as the total for the joint venture does not exceed the maximum limitation.

The Government may contact references provided, for information regarding the Offeror’s past performance on the submitted project(s) and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed. The Offeror is to ensure correct/current phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ which will provide contact and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Vernon Valigura via email at Vernon.N.Valigura@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rest with the Offeror.

Do not request past performance questionnaires on projects that have final CCASS, or CPARS evaluations. If a past performance questionnaire is received on a project where a final CCASS, or CPARS evaluation exists, the CCASS, or CPARS evaluation will serve as the official rating of record for evaluation purposes and the PPQ will not be evaluated.

Projects cited on the Factor 1 – Construction Experience, Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 2) shall be completed, significantly underway (at least 50% construction progress completed), or construction substantially complete within three (3) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

In addition, the solicitation will establish the criteria for recency and relevancy. In establishing what is relevant for this acquisition, present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

PAST PERFORMANCE WILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON THE FOLLOWING

CRITERIA:

The Government will review, as a minimum, the past performance information for the projects submitted for Factor 1, Construction Experience. The Government will also review recent and relevant evaluations in the CPARS as well as any other source deemed appropriate by the Government. In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or neutral) past performance and shall be considered “acceptable.” In addition, the Government will review the past performance information for the projects submitted for Factor 1, Construction Experience for recency and relevancy per the below evaluation criteria.

One of the following ratings will be assigned:

Rating Description Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below). The offeror has received satisfactory or higher on the overall rating on the PPQ or CPARS with an overall rating. CPARS which do not include an overall rating may not have any unsatisfactory ratings.

Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or neutral) past performance and shall be rated “acceptable.” The Government will review the past performance information for the projects submitted for Factor 1, Construction Experience and assign a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable, as defined above. The Government will also review recent and relevant evaluations in the PPIRS as well as any other source deemed appropriate by the Government.

RECENCY EVALUATION CRITRIA. Projects will be considered recent to this procurement if they have been completed or substantially underway within the past six (6) years of the date of this solicitation.

RELEVANCY EVALUATION CRITERIA. The Government will considered projects submitted for Factor 1 – Construction Experience relevant to this procurement if they are determined to be same/similar in size, complexity to that described in the solicitation for same/similar construction type projects such as multi-story construction of large hotels or college campus style dormitories of at least $100,000,000 and 250,000 Gross Square Feet (GSF), a college campus style facility of at least 106,000 Gross Square Feet (GSF) and valued at over $50,000,000 that include classrooms with stadium seating, central utility/equipment plant (i.e.

CUP/CEP) and commercial kitchens will satisfy this solicitation relevancy requirements.

If any negative past performance information is received to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond, the Offeror will be given an opportunity to provide rebuttal.

FAR 15.101-2(b)(1) requires if the KO determines that a small business' past performance is not acceptable, the matter is referred to the SBA for a COC determination.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptable criteria under this factor may result in an “UNACEPTABLE” rating and may be eliminated from further consideration for contract award.

TAB 3 – FACTOR 3 – ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

APPROACH. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s organization and management effectiveness approach by considering the Offeror’s understanding and capability to successfully manage RFP requirements to completion. The following elements will be evaluated:

• Organizational Chart or Structure

• Preliminary Contractor Quality Control Plan (CQC Plan).

• Contract Closeout Plan.

Organizational Chart or Structure Information. Provide an organizational chart that clearly shows lines of authority and communication chain of the organization, including but not limited to, Project Manager, Construction Quality Control System Manager, Superintendent, and Site Safety and Health Officer(s) (SSHO). Refer to specification sections 01 35 26 and 01 45 00.00 01 for SSHO and Contractor Quality Control staff minimum qualifications and responsibilities.

(1) Describe Offeror’s team members, their roles and responsibilities to include major sub-contractors. Identify the number of Project Manager(s), Construction Quality Control System Manager(s), Superintendent(s) and Site Safety and Health Officer(s) assigned to execute RFP requirements.

(2) Explain how the Offeror will communicate and coordinate construction issues and other concerns identified by the Offeror throughout the construction period with major sub-contractors and the Government.

Preliminary Contractor Quality Control Plan (CQC Plan). Provide preliminary plan for quality control of all work in accordance with sections 01 45 00.00 10 and 01 45 00.10 10. After award, the successful Offeror will be required to expand this preliminary plan to comply with contract requirements for Quality Control. The preliminary plan must address the following as a minimum:

(1) CQC organizational chart identifying the chain of command of the CQC organization, number of individuals required to comply with RFP requirements and disciplines of qualified CQC staff.

(2) Authority and functions of the CQC Manager and each key CQC position.

(3) Maintenance of As-builts: Describe procedures for maintaining up-to-date plans and specifications on the job site and for preparation and submittal of as-builts. Include narrative describing document control and production of electronic “as-built” drawings and their transfer to the Government. Describe how the Offeror’s CQC staff will assist the Government with providing updated information on completed contract modifications. In addition, explain how the CQC staff will assist the Government in the development of the DD1354 Transfer Document (see section 01 78 00 - Closeout Submittals for DD1354 requirements).

(4) Explain CQC staff’s corrective procedures for construction deficiencies and/or discrepancies.

(5) Explain CQC staff’s system for tracking Requests for Information (RFI) submitted to the Government.

(6) Describe the Offeror’s plans and procedures for internal completion inspections, prior to scheduled joint inspections with the Government QA personnel.

(7) Describe Offeror’s quality control approach, corporate systems that will be used to monitor quality and capabilities for maintaining quality control throughout construction.

(8) Describe how Offeror plans to integrates sub-contractors into quality control process.

Contract Closeout Plan. A Closeout Plan shall be provided showing Offeror’s compliance with Section 01 78 00 requirements. Minimum items to be included:

(1) Testing of equipment and systems.

(2) Equipment instruction and training schedules.

(3) O&M Manuals completion schedule and transfer.

(4) Record as-built drawings completion schedule and transfer.

(5) Pre-final and final inspection procedures and correction of deficiencies.

(6) Warranty data submission and planned implementation.

(7) Closeout of administrative deficiencies.

ORGANIZATION AND MANGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS APPROACH WILL BE

EVALUATION BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

Organizational Chart or Structure. The Offeror’s organizational chart will be evaluated for chain of command, lines of communication and logical management structure. The Offeror shall identify the personnel fulfilling the roles of Project Manager, Construction Quality Control System Manager, Superintendent and Site Safety and Health Officer and the number of assigned personnel in each role.

Contractor Quality Control Plan. The Offeror’s Quality Control (CQC) Plan will be evaluated to ensure the Offeror meets all quality control requirements per sections 01 45 00.00 10 and 01 45 00.10 10.

Closeout Plan. All items discussed in Contract Closeout Plan above will be evaluated to determine if the Offeror meets RFP closeout requirements per section 01 78 00.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptable criteria under this factor may result in an “UNACEPTABLE” rating and may be eliminated from further consideration for contract award.

TAB 4: FACTOR #4, CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: The Offeror shall provide a Narrative and a time scaled Gantt Chart summary network construction schedule.

Indicate the total contract duration in calendar days on the Schedule. The Schedule shall fully demonstrate how the Offeror plans to complete all contract work, within the specified period of performance from the receipt of contract Notice-to Proceed (NTP) in accordance with Section 01 00 00.00 44 Construction Schedule. The submitted schedule is to include sequencing of work for demolition, construction activities, mandatory tasks, specified time for Government required review and approval periods for construction submittals and RFIs, long lead procurement items, all required construction phasing of work, and contract closeout requirements as specified in Section 01 32 01.00 10 Project Schedule, Section 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures and Section 01 78 00 Closeout Submittals. The submitted Schedule shall identify and include any specified phasing of work in accordance with the Contract Line Item Schedule, Section 00 11 00.02. Offerors are to base proposed schedule start date on an anticipated AWARD date of 30 May 2018.

The Narrative shall include discussion of any construction challenges the Offeror foresees that may jeopardize the successful completion of all contract work to include required construction phasing and Option work items. The Offeror shall describe the plans for overcoming these challenges. If no challenges are foreseen then state so. (Any deviations from the solicitation requirements will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable).

OFFEROR’S WILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

The narrative and time scaled Schedule will be evaluated by the Government based on the Offeror’s demonstrated understanding of the solicitation scope of work, logical sequencing/scheduling of work activities, to include time periods for required Government submittal approvals and construction phasing as specified.

STANDARD FOR ACCEPTABILITY: This standard is met when the Offeror demonstrates a logical approach and a schedule to complete the project within the specified construction duration(s).

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and may be eliminated from further consideration for contract award.

TAB 5: FACTOR #5, OFFEROR’S COMPLIANCE WITH CLAUSE 52.219-8

All Offerors (both small and large businesses) are required to submit a Small Business Participation Plan (see format at below). The Offeror shall articulate how small businesses will participate through performance as a small business prime Offeror and/or through small business subcontracting. Minimum of 25% must be identified for Small Business.

Small Business Participation Proposal (Sample Format)

The Small Business Participation Proposal format is designed to streamline the process and bring uniformity to responses and evaluations for Small Business Participation (FAR 15.304).

Small Business Participation Proposals (Format)

All Offerors (both large and small businesses) are required to complete a Small Business Participation Proposal. Offerors should propose the level of participation of small businesses (as a small business prime and/or small business subcontractors) in the performance of the acquisition relative to the objectives/goals set forth in the evaluation of this area.

(a) Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror only – Check all applicable boxes:

{ } Large Prime { } Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU) or { } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a { } Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) { } Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) { } Historically Underutilized Zone (HUBZone) Small Business { } Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB) { } Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)

(b) Submit the total combined percentage of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (include the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime and Subcontractors):

Example: If Prime proposes a price of $1,000,000 (including all options), and small business(es) will provide $250,000 in services/supplies as a prime or subcontractor, the % planned for small businesses in 25%; and 75% for large business equaling 100%.

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es) ____________%

Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es) ____________%

100% (When combined, Large and Small Business totals must equal 100%)

(c) Please indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of subcategory small business. The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

Example: Victory Prop Mgt (WOSB and SDVOSB) performed 2%; and Williams Group (SDB, HUBZone and WOSB) performed 3%. Results equate to: SDB 3%;

HUBZone 3%; WOSB 5%; SDVOSB 2%; VOSB 2%). SDVOSBs are also VOSBs automatically; however, VOSBs are not automatically SDVOSBs.

Small Disadvantage Business ___________% HUBZone Small Business ___________% Woman Owned Small Business ___________% Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB ___________% Veteran Owned Small Business ___________%

HBCU/MI ___________%

Small Business Total ___________%

(d) List principle supplies/services to be performed by Small Businesses:

Example: If a Small Business qualifies also as a WOSB and a SDVOSB, and you can add them to each category below in which they qualify.

Name of Company Identify Type of Service/Supply

Small Business (SB):

Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB):

Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB):

Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUB Zone):

Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB):

Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVO):

Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI):

(e) Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (for example, what types of commitments if any are in place for this specific acquisition either – small business prime, written contract, verbal, enforcement, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.)

OFFEROR’S COMPLIANCE WITH CLAUSE 52.219-8 WILL BE EVALUATED BASED

ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

The…