Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionaire_PPQ.doc
DOC document 45 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Environmental Compliance & Conservation Services (ECCS) MAIDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W9124J-20-R-EE15
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 44
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation: W9124J-20-R-EE15
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) INSTRUCTIONS
Instructions to the Evaluator: Please include evaluation of Contractor's performance based solely on the performance for which the contractor was/is liable. Do not let factors beyond the control of the Contractor which have resulted in performance delays or other problems bias the evaluation of the contractor's performance. In completing the questionnaire please circle a letter corresponding to your rating, or "N/A" if you are unable to provide an evaluation for any area. Please provide clear and concise narrative explanations (both positive and negative) for your answers. This is especially important for any rating above or below “satisfactory”.
The following is a definition of the scoring system used:
Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the area being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
I. CONTRACTOR/CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
a) Contractor (Company/Division):
b) Contract Number/Identification:
c) Contract Title (Brief Description of Work and Location):
d) Contract Type:
e) Owner: Federal/State/Local Government or Private/Commercial
f) Period of Performance:
g) Original Dollar Amount of Contract:
h) Number of Modifications:
i) Dollar Amount at Completion (or current amount, if not complete):
II. PAST PERFORMANCE/QUALITY EVALUATION:
Quality of Product or Service - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards):
FORMCHECKBOX
Exceptional
FORMCHECKBOX
Very Good
FORMCHECKBOX
Satisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
Marginal
FORMCHECKBOX
Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
Not Applicable Comments:
Schedule - Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, administrative requirements and overall responsiveness (e.g., efforts that contribute to or effect the schedule variance):
FORMCHECKBOX
Exceptional
FORMCHECKBOX
Very Good
FORMCHECKBOX
Satisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
Marginal
FORMCHECKBOX
Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
Not Applicable Comments:
Business Relationships - Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective actions plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and the timely award and management of subcontracts. Additionally, please comment as to whether the contractor met small/small disadvantaged and women-owned business participation goals:
FORMCHECKBOX
Exceptional
FORMCHECKBOX
Very Good
FORMCHECKBOX
Satisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
Marginal
FORMCHECKBOX
Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
Not Applicable
Comments:
Technical Competence - Assess the knowledge of, and skill in the exercise of, practices required for successful completion of the contract (understanding of laws, regulations, and procedures):
FORMCHECKBOX
Exceptional
FORMCHECKBOX
Very Good
FORMCHECKBOX
Satisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
Marginal
FORMCHECKBOX
Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
Not Applicable Comments:
If you had a choice, would you use this company again? Yes No
Explain:
***YOUR NAME WILL NOT BE RELEASED OUTSIDE OF THE GOVERNMENT***
Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
Address:
E-mail Address:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .