W9124922R0006 Amended Solicitation.pdf

MICC - FORT GORDON

VANDELLA SQUIRE

CONTRACT SPECIALIST

VANDELLA.M.SQUIRE.CIV@MAIL.MIL

FORT GORDON GA 30905-5904

0011719536 DE-05323-1P

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The Purpose of this Amendment to make administrative changes to Solicitation W9124922R0006. Project # DE05323-1P. Attachments 1 (experience Overview ), 2. (Experience Information Sheet) , Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire and the repsonses to questions submitted in respone to the posted Solicitation w ill be uploaded in SAM.GOV w ith the amended Solicitation.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 20-May-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W9124922R0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06-May-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-May-2022

CODE

MICC - FORT GORDON

271 HERITAGE PARK LANE

BLDG. 35200

FT GORDON GA 30905

W91249 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE W91249

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9124922R0006

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

CLIN 0001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The contractor shall provide all material, labor, equipment, and tools required toperform the services specified in Section C and individual task orders when issued. Task order prices will be determined by application of the appropriate coefficient against The R.S. Means Unit Price 2021 Book or current year (whichever is most applicable). The value of non-prepriced work will not exceed 10% of the total value of prepriced items.Coefficient for Normal Work Hours __________Coefficient for Other Than Normal Work Hours __________Non-PrePriced Coefficient __________Dollar ceiling: Not to exceed $5,000,000. The Government, at time of award, will insert this figure into the maximum amount column. Bidders are to insertproposed coefficients above.

To:

The contractor shall provide all material, labor, equipment, and tools required to perform the services specified in Section C and individual task orders when issued. Task order prices will be determined by application of the appropriate coefficient against The R.S. Means Unit Price 2022 Book or current year (whichever is most applicable). The value of non-prepriced work will not exceed 10% of the total value of prepriced items.Coefficient for Normal Work Hours __________Coefficient for Other Than Normal Work Hours __________Non-PrePriced Coefficient __________Dollar ceiling: Not to exceed $4,999,999.80. The Government, at time of award, will insert this figure into the maximum amount column. Bidders are to insertproposed coefficients above.

CLIN 1001

The contractor shall provide all material, labor, equipment, and tools required toperform the services specified in Section C and individual task orders when issued. Task order prices will be determined by application of the appropriate coefficient against The R.S. Means Unit Price 2021 Book or current year (whichever is most applicable). The value of non-prepriced work will not exceed 10% of the total value of prepriced items.Coefficient for Normal Work Hours __________Coefficient for Other Than Normal Work Hours __________Non-PrePriced Coefficient __________Dollar ceiling: Not to exceed $5,000,000. The Government, at time of award, will insert this

The contractor shall provide all material, labor, equipment, and tools required to perform the services specified in Section C and individual task orders when issued. Task order prices will be determined by application of the appropriate coefficient against The R.S. Means Unit Price 2022 Book or current year (whichever is most applicable). The value of non-prepriced work will not exceed 10% of the total value of prepriced items.Coefficient for Normal Work Hours __________Coefficient for Other Than Normal Work Hours __________Non-PrePriced Coefficient __________Dollar ceiling: Not to exceed $4,999,999.80. The Government, at time of award, will insert

CLIN 2001

The contractor shall provide all material, labor, equipment, and tools required toperform the services specified in Section C and individual task orders when issued. Task order prices will be determined by application of the appropriate coefficient against The R.S. Means Unit Price 2021 Book or current year (whichever is most applicable). The value of non-prepriced work will not exceed 10% of the total value of prepriced items.Coefficient for Normal Work Hours __________Coefficient for Other Than Normal Work Hours __________Non-PrePriced Coefficient __________Dollar ceiling: Not to exceed $5,000,000. The Government, at time of award, will insert this

The contractor shall provide all material, labor, equipment, and tools required to perform the services specified in Section C and individual task orders when issued. Task order prices will be determined by application of the appropriate coefficient against The R.S. Means Unit Price 2022 Book or current year (whichever is most applicable). The value of non-prepriced work will not exceed 10% of the total value of prepriced items.Coefficient for Normal Work Hours __________Coefficient for Other Than Normal Work Hours __________Non-PrePriced Coefficient __________Dollar ceiling: Not to exceed $4,999,999.80. The Government, at time of award, will insert

CLIN 3001

The contractor shall provide all material, labor, equipment, and tools required toperform the services specified in Section C and individual task orders when issued. Task order prices will be determined by application of the appropriate coefficient against The R.S. Means Unit Price 2021 Book or current year (whichever is most applicable). The value of non-prepriced work will not exceed 10% of the total value of prepriced items.Coefficient for Normal Work Hours __________Coefficient for Other Than Normal Work Hours __________Non-PrePriced Coefficient __________Dollar ceiling: Not to exceed $5,000,000. The Government, at time of award, will insert this

The contractor shall provide all material, labor, equipment, and tools required to perform the services specified in Section C and individual task orders when issued. Task order prices will be determined by application of the appropriate coefficient against The R.S. Means Unit Price 2022 Book or current year (whichever is most applicable). The value of non-prepriced work will not exceed 10% of the total value of prepriced items.Coefficient for Normal Work Hours __________Coefficient for Other Than Normal Work Hours __________Non-PrePriced Coefficient __________Dollar ceiling: Not to exceed $4,999,999.80 The Government, at time of award, will insert

CLIN 4001

The contractor shall provide all material, labor, equipment, and tools required toperform the services specified in Section C and individual task orders when issued. Task order prices will be determined by application of the appropriate coefficient against The R.S. Means Unit Price 2021 Book or current year (whichever is most applicable). The value of non-prepriced work will not exceed 10% of the total value of prepriced items.Coefficient for Normal Work Hours __________Coefficient for Other Than Normal Work Hours __________Non-PrePriced Coefficient __________Dollar ceiling: Not to exceed $5,000,000. The Government, at time of award, will insert this

The contractor shall provide all material, labor, equipment, and tools required to perform the services specified in Section C and individual task orders when issued. Task order prices will be determined by application of the appropriate coefficient against The R.S. Means Unit Price 2022 Book or current year (whichever is most applicable). The value of non-prepriced work will not exceed 10% of the total value of prepriced items.Coefficient for Normal Work Hours __________Coefficient for Other Than Normal Work Hours __________Non-PrePriced Coefficient __________Dollar ceiling: Not to exceed $4, 999,999.80 The Government, at time of award, will insert

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been added by full text:

SECTION L INSTRUCTIONS

SOLICITATION/PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

a. Proposals shall be submitted prior to the closing date and time identified on the SF 1442.

b. Only Electronic submissions via email will be accepted. Mailed, faxed or Hand carried proposal will NOT be accepted.

c. The point of contact responsible for providing additional information and answering all inquiries is the Contracting Specialist, Vandella M.Squire, at vandella.m.squire.civ@army.mil, Contracting Officer, Sterlyn D Frazier via email at sterlyn.d.frazier.civ@army.mil and Contracting Officer Angelynn Gunn, angelynn.l.gunn.civ@army.mil. All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing via email, on or before 13 May 2022 at 1300 PM EST, using the following format in the subject line, W91249- 22-R-0006 – MICC-Fort Gordon-Job Order Contract (JOC).

d. Site Visit. No site visit will be conducted. Site visit may be conducted with each the Task order.

e. The selection of sources for award purposes will be conducted utilizing negotiated source selection procedures as delineated in FAR Part 15.3. Offers will be evaluated using the criteria under Section M, “Evaluation Factors for Award.” Noncompliance with the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements may hamper the Government's ability to properly evaluate the proposal and may result in elimination of the proposal from further consideration for Contract award.

f. The Offer. The submission of the documentation specified below will constitute the offeror's acceptance of the terms and conditions of the RFP, concurrence with the Statement of Work, and the proposed Contract type.

g. The Government intends to award one single contract as a result of this solicitation. It is the Government’s intention to award without discussions. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and price in their initial proposal submission. However, in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined and offerors notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency IAW FAR Part 15.306 (c)(2).

h. Instructions outlined in paragraph C below, prescribe the format for the proposal and describe the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. These instructions are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals.

i. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

j. If an offerorer believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

k. All referenced documents for this solicitation are available at Sams.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

2. NOTIFICATIONS/DEBRIEFINGS

In accordance with FAR 15.503 the Contracting Officer will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range, if rendered, whereupon they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. The Contracting Officer will notify offerors who were in the competitive range but not selected for award of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.503(b)). Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing.

3. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

a. Offerors shall submit a electronic copy of the listed in paragraph (c) below of their proposal.

b. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. .

c. All emailed copies shall be provided no later than the date and time set for receipt of proposals as stated on the Standard Form (SF) 1442, or amendments thereto if any.

d. Only electronic submissions via email will be accepted. Mailed, faxed or Hand carried proposal will NOT be accepted.

4. PROPOSAL FORMAT

a. Offeror shall submit emailed copies of each volume of their proposal.

(1) Volume number(s)

(2) Solicitation number

(3) Solicitation title

(4) POC name and contact information.

b. All written proposals shall be prepared on standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper (charts may be landscaped) and shall be in a size 12 font. Information printed on charts and graphs may be a smaller font; however, the information shall be legible. All pages of each proposal shall be appropriately numbered, and be identified with solicitation. For ease of reference, consecutive page numbering with tabs is requested. Only Volume III, Price Proposal, shall contain price information. All other proposal parts shall be void of price information. Page limitations are as follows:

VOLUME TITLE PAGE LIMITS

I RFP Documents No Limitation II Technical Capability 30* III Past Performance 10 IV Price Proposal 10

* Excludes attached charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, and drawings (see 4 (f and g)).

c. The offeror should apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e) “Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data,” and FAR 3.104-4 “Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.”

d. Proposal Limitation. The proposal shall not exceed the limits stated above. If the page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit shall be removed and returned, unread, to the offeror.

Tabs will not be included in page count limitations. The Government will not accept any changes to the Contractor’s proposal after the closing date of the solicitation (See FAR 15.208 for further information regarding late proposals). If discussions become necessary, page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors.

e. Page Limit does not include covers for volumes, tables of contents, glossary of abbreviations and acronyms, indices, title pages, cross reference indices, and section dividers/tables if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal. They will be counted if they contain any other information, i.e., diagrams, extraneous data, etc. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted.

f. A page, for purposes of the RFP, is defined as one side of standard 8 1/2" x 11" paper, font size (12), proportional spacing permissible. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom and 1inch side margins. The Contractor shall number each page in order to eliminate any confusion. Any charts, tables, matrix, or graphs shall be clearly legible, regardless of font size. Foldouts are permissible; 11 x 17 foldouts are permissible but included in the page count. All pages included in the page count shall be numbered. In the event Contractor creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

g. Indexing. Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.

h. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each.

5. PROPOSAL CONTENT

a. VOLUME I – RFP Documents –Failure to follow the below Proposal preparation instructions may cause your proposal to be deemed unacceptable by the Government. The proposal volume is to be organized as follows and contain the identified information.

(1) TAB A, Section A of the Solicitation; Standard Form 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award.

Acknowledgment of Amendments can be made on the face of the SF 1442 or signed copies of the amendments can be included in this Section. The SF 1442 shall be submitted fully completed. The offeror is cautioned that the SF 1442 must contain an original signature in block 20B of the form. The Contractor shall acknowledge any amendments to the RFP in accordance with the instructions on the SF 1442 and with Section L, FAR 52.215-1, Instruction to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition.

(2) TAB B, Executive Summary. Provide an executive summary that introduces the Contractor team and proposal submission.

(3) TAB C, Offer’s Point of Contact.

(4) TAB D Section K (Representation and Certifications). The offeror shall ensure that Section K is submitted thoroughly completed with all blocks in each certification/ representation completed truthfully and completely.

b. VOLUME II – Technical Capability – Evaluation Factor 1. The Technical Proposal shall consist of a written narrative that addresses the following subfactors. Volume II shall have NO pricing information included. The Technical Proposal Volume shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. Proposal responses will be evaluated against the criteria defined in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal.

(1) TAB A: Subfactor 1 – Program Management: Provide a program management plan that includes the following requirements (refer to Statement of Work, Paragraph 23 Program Management for additional information). At a minimum, offerors shall:

(a) Provide a graphic organization chart identifying specific functions and levels of authority for management and construction teams. The organizational chart shall thoroughly demonstrate the offerors capabilities to comply with the JOC requirements.

(b) Provide a management plan with key management personnel and key personnel who will be assigned to perform the duties of managing the contract. The Key Program Management plan should be detailed enough to address responsibility for proposal preparation, subcontract management, surveillance of work, acceptance, rejection, documentation and resolution of deficiencies, trend analysis and shall include corrective actions, and interface with Government inspectors during construction.

(c) Provide resumes, job qualifications, certifications, etc. for each proposed key personnel.

See Statement of Work, Paragraph 23 for key personnel requirements and minimum acceptable qualifications. Information shall demonstrate the offeror has the requisite qualifications and experience to perform under the contract and on future task orders. . Offeror with key personnel that do not meet the minimum qualifications will not be considered for award. Any changes to key program management after award will need to be resubmitted and requires approval by the Government.

(d) Provide a detailed narrative of ability to successfully construct multiple projects simultaneously on Fort Gordon. The offeror shall propose a sound and logical approach demonstrating their ability to respond to any task order under this contract and their ability to acquire the necessary personnel.

(e) Provide a sample of the schedule format that will be used for this contract. Provide a detailed narrative thoroughly demonstrating the offeror’s capability to successfully develop and execute the project schedule and meet project completion durations. Narrative shall include the offeror’s understanding of events that must be considered in the schedule associated with, but not limited to, submittals, holidays, long lead items, anticipated weather delays, inspections, and closeout.

(2) TAB A: Subfactor 2 - Experience: Offerors shall submit the two attachments at the end of Section L, Attachment 1 (Experience Overview Sheet) and Attachment 2 (Experience Information Sheet) detailing previous work experience (projects) meeting the requirements of this solicitation.

(a) Information for completing Solicitation Attachments 1 and 2:

(i) Offerors shall complete an Experience Overview Sheet, Attachment 1, with a total listing not-to-exceed (NTE) ten (10) IDIQ-based projects, performed within the past six (6) years from the issuance of this solicitation or currently being performed (at least 50% complete), that best represent the Offeror’s work experience required on this solicitation. If more than ten (10) projects are submitted, only the most recent ten (10) projects will be evaluated.

(ii) Offerors shall provide an Experience Information Sheet, Attachment 2, for each project listed on Attachment 1, Experience Overview Sheet.

(b) Projects provided for experience should show the Offeror’s ability to manage multiple projects performed simultaneously, and in the following categories of work:

(i) Building renovations, including roofing, floors, doors, walls, windows, and external facades;

(ii) Repair/replacement of major building systems such as electrical, mechanical, and

HVAC;

(iii) Civil work, including earthwork and drainage and all forms of horizontal and vertical construction;

(iv) Environmental work.

(c) If a key subcontractor or Joint Venture partner’s experience is submitted for evaluation purposes, clearly address the experience of those entities and relationship thereto on previous and/or ongoing projects.

c. VOLUME III – Past Performance Proposal – Evaluation Factor 2 – The Offeror’s submission of Past Performance shall be in accordance with the following format.

(1) TAB A: Past Performance References:

(a) Describe your past performance on programs or projects with a variety of work size, magnitude, complexity and scope to the work described in this solicitation. Past performance information will be assessed for recency and relevancy. Submit information presently active or completed within the past six (6) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. This information shall include data on efforts performed by other divisions, corporate management, critical subcontractors, or teaming contractors, if such resources will be brought to bear or significantly influence the performance of the proposed effort. Offerors may identify state and local Government and private Contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements.

(b) Offeror shall submit past performance references for up to ten (10) projects; the same projects identified on Attachments 1 and 2. It is incumbent upon the Contractor to present the information in such a manner and in sufficient detail to ensure the Government clearly understands the information provided.

(c) Submissions should explain the aspects of the Contracts/references that are deemed relevant to the proposed effort. Include a discussion of significant achievements or explain past problems considered to be relevant to the proposed efforts, as well as past efforts to identify and manage program/project risk.

NOTE: In assessing past performance, the Government will assess not only overall past performance, but will also examine how well the offeror performed with respect to Quality Control; Timeliness;

Management; Compliance with Labor, Safety and Environmental Standards; and Customer Satisfaction.

The Government may use information from references not provided in the Offeror’s proposal in evaluating the Offeror’s past performance.

Documentation Format:

Past Performance References: Past performance information shall be presented in the following format.

The Contractor is encouraged to ensure the information provided is current. Data that is not current or references that can no longer be reached will be discarded and not considered.

Name of Contracting Activity that awarded the Contract Contract Number and Period of Performance Contract Type (i.e. Firm-Fixed Price, Cost Plus-Award Fee, etc.) and Total Contract Value Name of the Contracting Officer, to include Phone Number and Email address Name of Contract Administrator, to include Phone Number and Email address List of Major Subcontractors Brief history of the work performed on each reference given Discuss how offeror determined that the reference is relevant to the scope of this project Name/organization/position and phone number of knowledgeable individual who can be queried by Government evaluators

(2) TAB B: Matrix of Past Performance to Various Projects: Offerors shall submit a table that cross-references the past performance references to the various types of work set forth in the IDIQ statement of work. In the event an offeror has no relevant past performance, offerors may submit past performance information for the key personnel proposed, major subcontractors included in the proposed team, work performed as part of a team or joint venture, and other reincarnations of its current organization.

(3) Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ): This is not to be provided with the Offeror’s proposal. For the contracts identified in the offeror’s completed Attachments 1 and 2, the Offeror shall forward a copy of the PPQ Survey (Attachment 3) to the points of contact responsible for monitoring performance under those contracts. Offerors are to request their references complete the survey and submit them to the Government point of contact shown on the Standard Form 1442. PPQ’s are due prior to the RFP closing time and date.

d. VOLUME IV – Price Proposal – Evaluation Factor 3:

(1) On separate Microsoft compatible documents of the offeror’s choosing, offerors are to provide a total numerical coefficient that will be applied for the duration of this contract to each Task Order proposal, on a firm fixed price basis. The proposal shall be supported by a narrative that explains what is included in and represented by the coefficient. The offeror shall demonstrate their understanding of the coefficient factor which shall be balanced and reasonable.

(2) The offeror shall provide a sample of the proposal format that will be used for this contract.

Provide a detailed narrative thoroughly demonstrating the offeror’s capability to successfully develop a line item cost estimate utilizing RS Means 2022 unit price books (UPB) or current year UPB or (whichever is most applicable).

SECTION M BASIS OF AWARD

M.1. BASIS FOR AWARD AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

1. BASIS FOR AWARD

a. This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS). Award will be made to one offer who is deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), whose proposals conforms to the solicitation requirements, and whose proposals, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, represents the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable offer.

b. Unreasonably high/unrealistically low, inaccurate or incomplete price proposals may be the grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition.

c. Award for All of the Work. The Government intends to make one award as a result of this solicitation.

However, as set forth in FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), the Government reserves the right to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a).)

2. EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

a. Evaluation criteria consist of factors and subfactors. The proposals will be evaluated under three (3) evaluation factors and two (2) subfactors:

(1) Factor 1: Technical Capability

Subfactor 1: Program Management Subfactor 2: Experience

(2) Factor 2: Past Performance

(3) Factor 3: Price

3. EVALUATION APPROACH. The evaluation will proceed as follows:

Factor 1: Technical Capability. Based on the information provided pursuant to the instructions for content proposal (Section L), the Government will evaluate the proposals for Technical Acceptability, assigning ratings of Acceptable or Unacceptable. The Technical Acceptability evaluation provides an assessment of the offeror’s technical capability to satisfy the Government’s requirements. An Offeror shall be considered technically acceptable in all two (2) subfactors in the Technical Capability Factor in order for its proposal to be considered Acceptable. Any subfactor that receives an unacceptable rating will result in an overall unacceptable rating for the Technical Capability Factor and will render the offeror ineligible for award.

(1) Subfactor 1 – Program Management. The offeror’s proposal shall demonstrate a qualified management team and adequate management processes addressing selecting subcontractors, awarding contracts, subcontract administration, management and performance of services, scheduling and correction of defects prior to, and after government review. The offeror shall demonstrate the ability to manage multiple work efforts of relevant size and complexity at multiple sites often with different subcontractors. The offeror shall demonstrate the ability to develop and execute the project schedule, understanding all events that must be considered.

(2) Subfactor 2 – Experience. In order to be considered acceptable, the offeror shall demonstrate the amount of experience they possess in performing IDIQ contracts of similar scope and complexity. In evaluating offerors’ proposals, the Government will assess:

(a) The similarity of the scope and complexity of offeror’s previous experience to the scope and complexity of the requirements for this IDIQ contract.

(b) The offeror’s experience in managing multiple projects being executed either simultaneously or on an overlapping basis.

(c) The offeror’s experience in performing Federal contracts, and in particular, contracts for the Department of Defense (DoD) and DoD components.

(d) The offeror’s experience in performing contracts, considered to be either critical and/or high-visibility projects within compressed timelines.

(e) The recency of any of the experience offered by an offeror for assessment by the Government for this subfactor.

Adjectival Ratings: Evaluation of the Factor 1, Technical Capability will receive one of the adjectival ratings defined below.

c. Factor 2: Past Performance.

(1) Based on the information provided pursuant to the instructions in Section L, the Offeror shall thoroughly demonstrate, by way of their past performance, their likelihood of successfully performing the solicitation’s requirements. Offerors are cautioned that in conducting the performance risk assessment, the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources, such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Appraisal Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) or similar systems and State Department Watch Lists. In assessing past performance, the Government will assess the Offeror’s overall past performance, and will examine how well the offeror performed in the following areas:

(a) Quality Control (QC)

(b) Timely Performance

(c) Effectiveness of Management Including Cost Management

(d) Compliance with Safety Standards

(e) Customer Satisfaction

(2) There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The more recent and relevant performance will increase the Government’s expectation of how the Offeror will perform in the future.

(a) Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort shall be ongoing or shall have been performed during the past six

(6) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information outside of six (6) years will not be evaluated.

(b) Relevancy Assessment: To be relevant, effort shall be similar in nature, size, magnitude, complexity and scope of single award IDIQ contracts. The Government will conduct an evaluation of recent past performance information obtained via the submissions of questionnaires or other sources to determine its relevancy to the effort being procured under this solicitation. Effort exerted in the management and execution of JOC or MATOC-like contracts, requiring the management/execution of multiple projects and multiple trades, are more relevant than effort exerted in stand-alone construction projects. In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the offeror, teaming partner, or sub-contractor whose contract is reviewed and evaluated. Offerors may identify state and local Government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer.

Adjectival Ratings: Evaluation of the Factor 2, Past Performance will receive one of the adjectival ratings defined below.

Rating Description

Acceptable

Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meets the requirements of the solicitation

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does nor a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

d. Factor 3: Price.

The Government will evaluate each offerors’ proposed coefficient to determine if the offerors’ proposed prices for each Task Order will be fair and reasonable, utilizing one or more of the price analysis techniques in FAR 15.404-1. The offeror shall demonstrate their understanding of the application of the coefficient to each Task Order proposal and also their ability to provide complete and/or balanced cost estimates using RS Means. If the Price Factor rating is determined to be unacceptable, it will render the offeror ineligible for Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable award.

Adjectival Ratings: Evaluation of the Factor 3, Price will receive one of the adjectival ratings defined below.

Acceptable The offeror’s price is fair and reasonable and meets the minimum contract requirements.

Unacceptable The offeror’s price is not fair and reasonable and/or does not meet the minimum contract requirements.

Definitions.

Reasonableness. The price proposal of all Offerors will be evaluated in order to determine whether the coefficient is reasonable and reflect a clear understanding of the contract requirements. Coefficient means a numerical factor that represents costs (generally indirect costs) and inclusive of the items as provided in the contract requirements.

Completeness/Accuracy. The offeror’s proposal is in compliance with the Price Volume instructions in the solicitation.

Unbalanced Pricing. Pricing that exists when, coefficient is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques.

The following have been deleted:

BASIS FOR AWRARD

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

(End of Summary of Changes)