About this file

Schedule C QASP

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Copy_of_FY16_Bid_Submission_Format_for_Schedule.xls XLS spreadsheet
FY16_Bid_Submission_Format_for_Schedule_C_(1).xls XLS spreadsheet
FY16_Bid_Submission_Format_for_Schedule_C.XLS XLS spreadsheet
16-T-0011-_Amend__5_to_Grounds_Maintenance_C_ _E.pdf PDF
FY16_Bid_Submission_Format_for_Schedule_C.XLS XLS spreadsheet
BID_SHEET_SCHED_C_FINAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
BID_SHEET_SCHED_E_FINAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
QASP_Schedule_E.DOCX DOCX document
PWS_SCHED_C_FINAL.pdf PDF
SCHED_E_(CAAF)_10OCT2015.pdf PDF
Schedule_C_E_Solicitation_KD.docx DOCX document
SCHED_C_Southern_10OCT2015.pdf PDF
PWS_SCHED_E_FINAL.pdf PDF
SCHED_C_Northern_10OCT2015.pdf PDF
SCHED_E_Sabre_Heliport.pdf PDF
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

For

GROUNDS MAINTENANCE

SCHEDULE C

JANUARY 2016

Insert Contracting Officer Info, e.g.,Insert COR Info, e.g.,
Mr Kevin DayTBD
Contracting OfficerContracting Officer’s Representative
Mission & Installation Contracting CommandDepartment of Public Works
Fort Campbell, KYFort Campbell, KY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Subject Page Number

1. Overview

2. Description of Services

3. Roles and Responsibilities

4. Contract Quality Requirements

5. Government Surveillance

6. Non-Conforming Performance

7. Deduct Plan

8. Data Analysis

9. Acceptance of Services

10. COR Status Report

11. Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA)

12. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)

13. Combating Trafficking In Persons

14. COR/Quality Assurance Surveillance Files

15. QASP Changes

1. Overview.

1.1. Purpose. The purpose of this Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is to identify the methods and procedures the Government will use to ensure it receives the services under this contract as identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

1.2. Intent. The intent of this QASP is to: 1) ensure Contractor performance meets or exceeds contract terms, conditions and specifications; 2) hold the Contractor accountable for quality control; and 3) encourage the Contractor to take appropriate steps to control and improve quality. Accordingly, the Government will perform surveillance on the contract in accordance with this QASP, but reserves the right to monitor the contract in any manner necessary, at any times necessary, and at all places necessary to ensure that the rendered services conform to contract requirements. The Government also reserves the right to perform quality assurance at the Subcontractor level and perform quality assurance at the contractor's place of business, if applicable. Resolution of non-conforming services discovered at the Subcontractor level will be addressed with the prime Contractor.

2. Description of Services.

2.1. Scope of Work. The Contractor shall provide all services, personnel, materials, equipment, and supervision (except that specified as Government-furnished) required for Grounds Maintenance for Schedule C for Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

The Contractor shall ensure all work accomplished maintains and presents a healthy, clean, neat, and professional appearance to all grounds included and covered by this contract in support of mission requirements for users, residents, and visitors to the installation). The installation uses contract grounds maintenance services to manage between 7,500-8,000 acres per year. Grounds Maintenance is divided among multiple contracts. This PWS pertains to Schedule C only.

2.2. Type of Contract. This will be a requirements contract; as the contractor shall be required to set up and operate on an “on call” basis and as needed by the Government. Upon notification of work to be performed, the contractor shall set up a tree-trimming, leaf collection, or landscaping operations and be fully operational within 5 calendar days.

3. Roles and Responsibilities. The contractor, and all contractor employees shall be trained, qualified, certified or licensed as required to perform the work specified. They shall conform to all security regulations which may be in effect during the contract period and shall be subject to such checks as may be deemed necessary to assure that no violations occur. No employee shall be permitted on the reservation when such a check reveals that his presence would be detrimental to the security of the installation or the accomplishment of the work. The Contracting Officer may require the Contractor to remove any employee for security and misconduct reasons. A listing of all Contractor Employees shall be provided to the Contracting Officer no later than 30 days after contract award and shall be updated as changes occur. The Contractor’s failure to ensure their employee’s compliance with these requirements may be deemed as compromising the security and safety of the installation. Such conditions fostered by the Contractor or Contractor personnel may be grounds for the Contracting Officer to halt any and all Contractor performance with a commensurate deduction of monies due the Contractor until such unsafe conditions are corrected. The Contractor shall take due caution not to endanger personnel during performance of this contract. The contractor shall not employ any person who is an employee of the United States Government if the employment of that person would create a conflict of interest; nor shall the contractor employ any person who is an employee of the Department of the Army, either military or civilian, unless such person seeks and receives approval in accordance with Joint Ethics Regulation DOD 5500.7-R.

3.1. Government.

3.1.1. Contracting Officer (KO). The KO is the only person with the authority to enter into, administer, and or terminate contracts, and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the Government. Note: The only individual who can legally bind the Government.

3.1.2. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). The (COR) will be identified by separate letter. The COR monitors all technical aspects of the contract and assists in contract administration. The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the Contractor performs the technical requirements of the contract: perform inspections necessary in connection with contract performance: maintain written and oral communications with the Contractor concerning technical aspects of the contract: issue written interpretations of technical requirements, including Government drawings, designs, specifications: monitor Contractor's performance and notifies both the Contracting Officer and Contractor of any deficiencies; coordinate availability of Government furnished property, and provide site entry of Contractor personnel. A letter of designation issued to the COR, a copy of which is sent to the Contractor, states the responsibilities and limitations of the COR, especially with regard to changes in cost or price, estimates or changes in delivery dates. The COR is not authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of the resulting order.

3.1.3. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator for this requirement will be Wanda Jobe, until further notification.

3.2. Contractor.

3.2.1. Contract Manager. The Contractor shall designate a Project/Contract Manager/Supervisor (i.e., Contractor’s Representative) with the authority to receive and perform work assignments, receive and implement changes to scheduled work, and receive and direct additional work assignments to be accomplished. Delivery of correspondence to this Contractor’s Representative shall be deemed delivered to the Contractor

3.2.2. Quality Manager. The Contractor shall establish and maintain a complete Quality Control (QC) Plan to ensure the requirements of the contract are provided as specified. One copy of the Contractor’s Quality Control Plan shall be provided to the Contracting Officer 14 days after contract award and as changes occur

4. Contract Quality Requirements.

4.1. Contractor’s Quality Control Program. The Contractor’s quality control program is the means by which he assures himself that his work complies with the requirement of the contract. The Contractor shall ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The Contractor shall identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services.

4.2. Government Quality Assurance. The Government shall evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance with this QASP. This plan is primarily focused on what the Government must do to ensure that the Contractor has performed in accordance with the performance standards. It defines how the performance standards will be applied, the frequency of surveillance and minimum acceptable defect rate(s).

5. Government Surveillance.

5.1. Methods of Surveillance. The following Methods of Surveillance will be utilized in monitoring the Contractors’ performance:

5.1.1. Periodic Inspections

5.1.4. Customer Feedback. The DA Form 5477, Customer Complaint Record, Attachment 2, will be used to document/record all complaints. The following procedures will be followed when a complaint is received.

· The COR will investigate and determine the validity of the complaint.

· If the complaint is determined to be invalid, the COR will inform the person who submitted the complaint of the reason(s) as soon as practical.

· For validated complaints that are true contractual non-conformances, the procedures in paragraph 6 below will be followed.

5.2. Surveillance Schedule. A Surveillance Schedule will be created each month utilizing the DA 5475, COR Surveillance Schedule, Attachment 3. The schedule is “FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY” and is not releasable to anyone other than authorized Government personnel. A copy of the Surveillance Schedule will be filed in the Virtual Contracting Enterprise (VCE), COR Management Tool, https://cor.army.mil/, (Either as an Attachment to the Monthly COR Status Reports or uploaded separately in the Miscellaneous Documents Section of the CORs’ Online File.).

5.3. Surveillance Instructions/Checklists. Surveillance Checklists, Attachment 4, will be utilized and completed when surveillances are conducted.

5.4. Surveillance Documentation. The applicable Surveillance Checklist(s) will be completed when/as Surveillances are conducted. Completed Surveillance Checklist(s) will be filed in the Virtual Contracting Enterprise (VCE), COR Management Tool, https://cor.army.mil/, (Either as an Attachment to Monthly COR Status Reports or uploaded separately in the Miscellaneous Documents Section of the CORs’ Online File.).

6. Non-Conforming Performance. Non-conformance occurs when a Contractor fails to meet Contract or Task Order terms, conditions and/or specifications. All instances of non-conformance will be documented and the Contractor will be notified. Resolution of non-conformance discovered at the Subcontractor level will be addressed with the prime Contractor. Non-conformance is classified as either: Level I (Minor); Level II (Major); or Level III (Critical).

6.1. Level I (Minor). Level I non-conformance is not likely to materially reduce the usability of services for their intended purpose or is a departure from established standards having little bearing on completing the contract requirement. Minor non-conformances can usually be corrected on the spot and can be issued to the Contractor through either a verbal or written Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR). However, the Government is still required to document verbal Level I CDRs. The COR may issue verbal Level I CDRs directly to the appropriate level of Contractor management. The COR will notify the KO as soon as practical when a verbal Level I CDR is issued and document them in their Monthly Reports. If the non-conformance cannot be corrected on the spot, the Contractor shall be given a suspense date to correct the deficiency. The KO will issue and sign written Level I CDRs, Attachment 5.

6.2. Level II (Major). Level II non-conformance is likely to result in failure of the services to meet contract requirements. Also, repeated discrepancies, a large number of documented Level I CDRs and trends indicating failure of the Contractor’s quality control program can be classified as Level II CDRs. The KO issues all Level II CDRs in writing, Attachment 5. The COR will notify the KO as soon as practical when a major non-conformance is identified.

6.3. Level III (Critical). Level III non-conformances result in hazardous or unsafe conditions due to the manner in which the services are performed; prevent or impact a vital agency mission as a result of performance; or are for repeated or uncorrected Level II CDRs. The Contracting Office Director or Deputy Director issues written Level III CDRs. The COR is responsible for notifying the KO immediately upon discovery of a critical non-conformance.

6.4. Documenting CDRs. Documentation, as a minimum, will include: the Contract or Task Order number; reference to the specific contract requirement; the specific discrepancy to the requirement; where it was discovered; the date and time it was discovered; Contractor representative who was notified; and the suspense date for Contractor response/corrective action.

6.5. Tracking and Resolving CDRs. All CDRs, verbal and written, regardless of issuer will be included in the COR’s Monthly Report. The COR and KO shall track CDRs to ensure the Contractor indentifies and takes appropriate corrective action to the root cause and the specific non-conformance is corrected within the required timeline. The KO will make a final written determination of the Government’s remedies if the non-conformance is not corrected by the Contractor after receiving notice and a reasonable opportunity to correct the work.

7. Deduct Plan. This acquisition does not include a Deduct Plan. \

8. Data Analysis. Data Analysis will be performed to identify trends in cost, schedule and/or performance risks. The results of Data Analysis will be documented in COR Status Reports and may be used to make adjustments to surveillance schedules, increase or decrease surveillance, if deemed appropriate. Negative trends noted using Government data/observations could result in issuing the Contractor a Contract Discrepancy Report. Trends noted using Contractor data will not result in a CDR unless the Contractor is not addressing the negative trend.

9. Acceptance of Services. When all services have been deemed acceptable and there is documented objective quality evidence to support acceptable performance the COR will accept the services provided and authorize payment of the Contractor. This is accomplished by approving the Contractor’s Receiving Reports in Wide Area Workflow at https://wawf.eb.mil/.

10. COR Status Report. COR Status Reports will be submitted on a Monthly basis to the Contracting Officer via the COR Management Tool. COR Status Reports will provide a synopsis of the Contractors performance for the inclusive dates of the report. The synopsis will contain a summary of: surveillances performed; Customer Feedback, if any; CDRs, if any; an analysis of the Contractors performance; recommended adjustments to surveillance schedules; and any other pertinent contract information. Completed Surveillance Checklists and CDRs, if any, will be included as attachments to COR Status Reports or uploaded separately in the Miscellaneous Documents Section of the CORs’ Online file.

11. Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA). In accordance with Office of the Secretary of Defense Memorandum, Enterprise-wide Contractor Manpower Reporting Application, dated 28 Nov 2012, the Contractor must report contractor manpower to the Contractor Manpower Reporting website at https://cmra.army.mil. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than October 31 of each calendar year. The COR shall verify that the Contactor has complied with the required contractor manpower reporting annually and document the results in the VCE, COR Module, CORs’ Online File, CMRA section.

12. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Documented surveillance data (COR Status Reports, Completed Surveillance Checklists, Customer Feedback and CDRs, if any) will be used to support CPARS ratings. CPARS will be completed in accordance with AFARS, Subpart 5142.15 – Contractor Performance Information.

13. Combating Trafficking In Persons (CTIP). In accordance with PGI 222.17 and FAR 52.222-50, the KO will be notified immediately of any information from any source that alleges a Contractor employee, subcontractor and/or subcontractor employee has engaged in conduct that violates the United States Government “zero” tolerance policy regarding trafficking in persons.

14. COR/Quality Assurance Surveillance Files. The official COR/Quality Assurance Surveillance File will be maintained in the on-line COR Management Tool per Army Contracting Command Pamphlet, 70-1.

15. QASP Changes. This QASP is a living document and, as such, may be changed as needed based on Data Analysis (trends), contract modifications, etc. The COR will send any recommended changes to the Contracting Officer for approval and the Contracting Officer must approve all changes.

KEVIN J. DAY

Contracting Officer

4.0 Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) Matrix.

Required Services (Tasks)

Performance Standard
Acceptable Quality Level
Method of Surveillance

Remedy

# 1 The contractor shall comply with grass mowing, trimming, and clean-up (i.e. blowing grass back onto mowed areas)

IAW PWS Part 5 and subsections. Contractor shall completely mow, trim, and clean-up mowing areas.
Successful completion of areas submitted as completed per cycle. (Per contractor’s Daily Reports.) No more than 2 uncorrected deficiencies per cycle.
Periodic: based on Contractor’s submitted Daily Reports for completed areas
Correction of deficiencies within 24 hours of notification or Unsatisfactory Performance may be annotated for not meeting AQL.

Identified areas with uncorrected deficiencies shall be deducted from the payment for that cycle

#2 Contractor shall comply with debris removal
IAW PWS Part 5 and all subsections. Contractor shall remove debris prior to mowing.
Successful completion of areas submitted as completed per cycle. (Per contractor’s Daily Reports.) No more than 2 uncorrected deficiencies per cycle.
Periodic: based on Contractor’s submitted Daily Reports for completed areas
Correction of deficiencies within 24 hours of notification or Unsatisfactory Performance may be annotated for not meeting AQL
#3 Contractor shall comply with trimming fenced lots (CLIN C0003)
IAW PWS Part 5 and all subsections. Contractor shall mow/trim fenced lots.
Successful completion of areas submitted as completed per cycle. (Per contractor’s Daily Reports.) No more than 1 deficiency per cycle.
Periodic: based on Contractor’s submitted Daily Reports for completed areas
Correction of deficiencies within 24 hours of notification or Unsatisfactory Performance may be annotated for not meeting AQL
#4 Contractor shall comply with submitting accurate Daily Reports for areas completed NLT 0800 on the following work day.
IAW PWS Part 5 and all subsections.
100% received on-time and accurate, per cycle. Contractor shall submit a Daily Report, which accurately reflects all areas completed.
Daily electronic receipt of completion reports (includes deficiency correction reports when applicable).
None. Accurate reports must be submitted on-time or Unsatisfactory Performance may be annotated for not meeting AQL
#5 Contractor shall comply with submitting accurate cycle schedule(s), after 1st cycle, within 24 hours of changes and within 3 work days prior to start of subsequent cycles, where applicable.
IAW PWS Part 5 and all subsections.
100% received on-time and accurate, per cycle.
Electronic receipt of schedule within specified timeframe.
None. Accurate schedules must be submitted on-time or Unsatisfactory Performance may be annotated for not meeting AQL.

Evaluating Performance. The performance thresholds described in the service delivery summary are minimum acceptable levels of service required for each requirement. Government evaluations that support minimum acceptable levels of performance result in payment of the Line Item(s) amount reflected in the Schedule. Government evaluations that support an unacceptable level of performance result in reduction of payment. Total monthly payment for line items are reduced as identified in the QASP.

Attachment 2

Customer Complaint Record, DA Form 5477

Attachment 3

Surveillance Schedule, DA Form 5475 Comment by Administrator: You will need to develop a monthly schedule for conducting surveillance. You can use this form. The date you are going to conduct surveillance would go in the far left column. You would list the PWS, paragraph number for the task you are going to surveill on the top line. Comment by wanda.jobe:

Attachment 4

Surveillance Checklist(s) Comment by Administrator: You will need to create a checklist or checklists that you will complete/fill out when you conduct surveillance. You would start each task to be surveilled in the form of a question (Did the Contractor…?). Also, include the PWS, paragraph number for each question.

COR Inspection Checklist & Data Report (Fixed Firm Price Contract)
Meeting Contract Requirements

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Service Provided:

COR Name:

Date:
YES
No
N/A

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments summary, to include, positive trends, negative trends, concerns, customer comments, and any additional COR comments:

Attachment 5

Contract Discrepancy Report, DA Form 5479 image1.emf

DATE OF COMPLAINT TIME OF COMPLAINT

NATURE OF COMPLAINT

CONTRACT REFERENCE

VALIDATION

DATE CONTRACTOR INFORMED COMPLAINT TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT

ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR (Responsible officer)

RECEIVED AND VALIDATED BY

ORGANIZATION

INDIVIDUAL

NOTE: ( ) Used for in-house operation.

CUSTOMER COMPLAINT RECORD

For use of this form, see DA PAM 5-20; the proponent agency is ACSIM.

SOURCE OF COMPLAINT

(Responsible officer) (Responsible officer)

DA FORM 5477, MAR 2008 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. APD PE v1.01ES initiator:ralph.gaines@us.army.mil;wfState:distributed;wfType:email;workflowId:b71742b09d8a4c49a6eb59ab36d6e236

DATE OF COMPLAINT:

TIME OF COMPLAINT:

ORGANIZATION INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OF COMPLAINT:

NATURE OF COMPLAINT:

CONTRACT REFERENCE:

VALIDATION:

DATE CONTRACTOR INFORMED COMPLAINT Responsible officer:

TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT Responsible officer:

ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR Responsible officer:

RECEIVED AND VALIDATED BY:

NOTE Used for inhouse operation:

undefined: Off

Text2:

SubmitButton1:

image2.emf

DA FORM 5477

DATE OF COMPLAINT TIME OF COMPLAINT

NATURE OF COMPLAINT

CONTRACT REFERENCE

VALIDATION

DATE CONTRACTOR INFORMED COMPLAINT TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT

ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR (Responsible officer)

RECEIVED AND VALIDATED BY

ORGANIZATION

INDIVIDUAL

NOTE: ( ) Used for in-house operation.

CUSTOMER COMPLAINT RECORD

SOURCE OF COMPLAINT

(Responsible officer) (Responsible officer)

DA FORM 5477, MAR 2008 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. APD PE v1.01ES initiator:ralph.gaines@us.army.mil;wfState:distributed;wfType:email;workflowId:b71742b09d8a4c49a6eb59ab36d6e236

DATE OF COMPLAINT:

TIME OF COMPLAINT:

ORGANIZATION INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OF COMPLAINT:

NATURE OF COMPLAINT:

CONTRACT REFERENCE:

VALIDATION:

DATE CONTRACTOR INFORMED COMPLAINT Responsible officer:

TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT Responsible officer:

ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR Responsible officer:

RECEIVED AND VALIDATED BY:

NOTE Used for inhouse operation:

undefined: Off

Text2:

SubmitButton1:

image3.emf

DATE

COR/QAE SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULE

When completed stamp "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY"

DA FORM 5475, MAR 2008 APD PE v1.00

SERVICE

PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.

image4.emf

DA FORM 5479

6.

2. 3.

PREPARED ORAL NOTIFICATION RETURNED BY CONTRACTOR ACTION COMPLETE

4. DISCREPANCY OR PROBLEM (Describe in Detail: Include reference in PWS / Directive: Attach continuation sheet if necessary.)

5. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

7.

8. CONTRACTOR RESPONSE AS TO CAUSE, CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE. ATTACH

1. CONTRACT NUMBER

9. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE 10. DATE

11. GOVERNMENT EVALUATION (Acceptance, partial acceptance, rejection: attach continuation sheet if necessary)

12. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS (Payment deduction, cure notice, show cause, other.)

CONTRACT DISCREPANCY REPORT

TO: (Contractor and Manager Name)

DATES

CLOSE OUT

CONTRACTOR

NOTIFIED

NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE DATE

QAE

CONTRACTING

OFFICER

CONTINUATION SHEET IF NECESSARY. (Cite applicable Q.A. program procedures or new A.W. procedures.)

DA FORM 5479, MAR 2008 APD PE v1.01ES

FROM: (Name of QAE)

TO: (Contracting Officer) FROM: (Contractor) image5.emf

6.

2. 3.

PREPARED ORAL NOTIFICATION RETURNED BY CONTRACTOR ACTION COMPLETE

4. DISCREPANCY OR PROBLEM (Describe in Detail: Include reference in PWS / Directive: Attach continuation sheet if necessary.)

5. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

7.

8. CONTRACTOR RESPONSE AS TO CAUSE, CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE. ATTACH

1. CONTRACT NUMBER

9. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE 10. DATE

11. GOVERNMENT EVALUATION (Acceptance, partial acceptance, rejection: attach continuation sheet if necessary)

12. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS (Payment deduction, cure notice, show cause, other.)

CONTRACT DISCREPANCY REPORT

TO: (Contractor and Manager Name)

DATES

CLOSE OUT

CONTRACTOR

NOTIFIED

NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE DATE

QAE

CONTRACTING

OFFICER

CONTINUATION SHEET IF NECESSARY. (Cite applicable Q.A. program procedures or new A.W. procedures.)

DA FORM 5479, MAR 2008 APD PE v1.01ES

FROM: (Name of QAE)

TO: (Contracting Officer) FROM: (Contractor) image6.emf

DA FORM 5475

COR/QAE SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULE

When completed stamp "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY"

DA FORM 5475, MAR 2008 APD PE v1.00

SERVICE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .