W91247-15-R-0005_Amendment_0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate revisions in the folllow ing (highlighted yellow ):

a. Revisions to Section L

b. Revisions to STO 1, 2, 3, and Attachment 5, Sample Task Order Price Proposal

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 18-Mar-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91247-15-R-0005

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-May-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-Mar-2016

CODE

MICC CENTER - FORT BRAGG

MICC - FORT BRAGG

2175 REILLY ROAD STOP A

FORT BRAGG NC 28310-5000

W91247 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W91247-15-R-0005

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

L.1. PROPOSAL INFORMATION

A. General Instructions.

(1) The selection of Contractors for award purposes will be conducted utilizing source selection procedures as delineated in FAR Part 15.3. Offers will be evaluated using the criteria under Section M, “Factors to be evaluated.”

Noncompliance with the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from further consideration for contract award.

(2) The submission of documentation specified below will constitute the offeror's acceptance of the terms and conditions of the RFP, concurrence with the Performance Work Statement (PWS), and the proposed contract type.

(3) It is the Government’s intention to award WITH discussions. Offerors are encouraged to present their best mission capability proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission. However, in accordance with FAR Part 15.306, the Government reserves the right to not hold discussions. A competitive range may be determined and offerors notified if discussions will be held. The Government will establish a competitive range based on initial technical evaluations and proposed price. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition in accordance with FAR Part 15.306 (c).

(4) These instructions prescribe the format for the proposal and describe the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. These instructions are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals.

(5) In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.803 (Contents of Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals.

(6) If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contract Specialist in writing with supporting rationale.

The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

(7) All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) web site at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

(8) It is an offeror’s responsibility to submit a LABELED well-written proposal, with adequate detailed information that clearly demonstrates compliance with the solicitation.

(9) Debriefings. The KO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range IAW FAR 15.503(a), if one is established, whereupon they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. The KO will notify unsuccessful offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.506. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

(10) The Government will consider the offeror and all subcontractors a “team” when evidence of a signed Teaming Arrangement or Letter of Intent is provided. This Request For Proposal (RFP)will refer to the offeror and all identified teaming subcontractors as a “team.” This RFP will refer to all identified teaming subcontractors as “team members” or “teaming partners.” The offeror shall identify any Team/Team Members in their Executive Summary and briefly describe how the Teaming Arrangement will support this requirement.

(11) Deleted

(12) NOTE: All Offers shall be electronically submitted through the U.S Army Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center (ARMDEC) SAFE ACCESS FILE EXCHANGE (SAFE):https://safe.amrdec.army.mil to gregory.a.haynes.civ@mail.mil and ronald.r.newlan.civ@mail.mil mailto:no later than 10:00 a.m., 22 March 2016. ARMDEC SAFE submission instructions. Offerors should select “Guest User” option and fill out all required information. Offerors shall input their legal business name for the “Personal Information” field, “Business Name.” Description of file should identify the total number of files being submitted. Deletion date shall not be less than 14 days from submission date. “Recipient Information” shall include: gregory.a.haynes.civ@mail.mil and ronald.r.newlan.civ@mail.mil. No other recipients should be specified under “Recipient Information.” Select email setting preferences to set desired security level of submission of “FOUO” and “SENSITIVE”. Files cannot be downloaded by recipients until sender verifies sender email address. Verification process is identified in email through AMRDEC SAFE and is the offeror’s responsibility to verify their email address. Proprosals outside of ARMDEC will not be accepted. Zip Files are not permitted

L.2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

A. Each offeror’s proposal shall be submitted as listed below and all information shall be confined to the appropriate volume to facilitate independent evaluation. Proposals which do not follow these guidelines or which do not include the requested minimum information will be eliminated from further consideration for award. The overall proposal shall consist of five (5) Volumes (Volumes I through V). Volume I - RFP Documents and General Information, Volume II -Technical Submission for Factors 1 through 2: Management/Teaming/Staffing Approach, and Training Approach, Volume III - Technical Submission for Factor 3: Scenario responses for each of the three (3) Sample Task Orders (STO), Volume IV – Technical Submission for Factor 4: Past Performance, and Volume V Price Submission for Factor 5: Price.

Table 2

VOLUME TITLE

I RFP Documents and General Information II Technical Submission for Factors 1 through 2:

Management/Teaming/Staffing Approach and Training Approach III Technical Submission for Factor 3: Scenario responses for each of the three (3) Sample Task Orders (STO) IV Technical Submission for Factor 4: Past Performance V Price Submission for Factor 5: Price

B. Offerors are responsible for submitting proposals, and any revisions, and modifications, so as to reach the Government office designated in the solicitation by the time specified in the solicitation.

(1) Facsimile and regular mail proposals will not be accepted.

(2) The Contract Specialist is the main point of contact for this acquisition, however, at this time no additional questions will be received and answered

L.3. PROPOSAL FORMAT

A. Each volume of the proposal should be separately marked and labeled with the appropriate volume, i.e., Volume I, Volume II, Volume III, Volume IV and Volume V. A cover sheet should accompany each volume marked with the following: Volume number, title, solicitation number and the offeror's name. All text shall be single spaced and printed black on white paper (Black and white requirement does not apply to graphics, photos, etc., Company stationary and logo’s are acceptable). Printing shall be easily readable (12 point font, Times New Roman) cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections. I The files are to be unlocked, while the file names shall be labeled “Company Name – Initial – Volume X – Document Title” for the first submission with X indicating the Volume number. File name of later submissions (if necessary), shall be “Company Name – Revision X – Volume X – Document Title’ with X indicating the number of the revision and Volume number. Page limitations are as follows:

Table 3

VOLUME TITLE PAGE LIMITS FORMAT

I RFP Documents and General

Information None MS Word 2010; or earlier; or PDF

II

Factors 1 - 2 Management/Teaming/Staffing Approach and Training Approach

Not to exceed 50 MS Word 2010; or earlier; or PDF

III Factor 3 Responses to Sample Task Order Scenarios

Not to exceed 30 per STO

MS Word 2010; or earlier; or PDF

IV Factor 4 Past Performance 20 MS Word 2010; or earlier; or PDF

V Factor 5 Pricing None Excel 2010 or earlier un protected

B. Proposal Limitation. The proposal shall not exceed the limits stated above. If the page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit shall be removed from the proposal. The Government will not accept any changes to the Offeror’s proposal after the closing date and time specified in the solicitation (See FAR 15.208 for further information regarding late proposals). If discussions become necessary, page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (EN). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters requesting ENs to the offerors.

(1) Page Limit Includes: All executive summaries, appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, pictures, drawings, etc.

(2) Page Limit does not include teaming agreements, letters of intent, cover sheets for volumes, tables of contents, glossary of abbreviations and acronyms, indices, title pages, cross reference indices, and section dividers/tables if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal.

They will be counted if they contain any other information, i.e., diagrams, extraneous data, etc. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted.

(3) A page shall be an 8 ½” X 11” sheet of paper. A page printed doubled-sided shall be counted as two pages.

Font size and spacing requirements for illustrations and tables can be at the discretion of the offeror but must be easily readable. Fold-outs will be counted as the appropriate number of pages based on an 8 ½” X 11” sheet of paper. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom, and 3/4 inch side margins. The Offeror shall number each page in order to eliminate any confusion. In the event Offeror creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may clarify or exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

(4) All spreadsheet documents shall be in Microsoft Excel. Spreadsheets will not contain hidden worksheets. All formulas, lookup tables, and links shall be intact, and no links shall exist to files not included with the submission.

Excel files saved as PDF or flat files will not be considered adequate.

L.4. PROPOSAL CONTENT

A. Volume I – RFP Documents and General Information.

(1) Documents shall contain the signed copy of all documents requiring signature of the offeror. This includes the Standard Form (SF) 33. Offerors are cautioned that the SF 33 must contain a signature in Block 17 of the form.

Each offeror shall complete (fill-ins and signatures) and submit the original as stated below. An authorized official of the firm shall sign the offer and all certifications requiring signature. All proposals shall be valid for 120 calendar days.

(2) RFP documents shall include the following information:

-TAB A - Standard Form 33, Solicitation Offer and Award with signature. Acknowledgment of Amendments can be made on the face of the SF 33 or signed copies of the amendments can be included in this Section.

-TAB B - Executive Summary, the offeror shall provide an executive summary of the entire proposal, including proposal solutions, and highlight any key or unique features, excluding cost. The offeror shall include a list, including addresses, of all companies participating on the offeror’s team, including the prime Offeror, any partners, subcontractors, etc. Any material presented in this summary shall not be considered as meeting the requirements for any other parts of the proposal.

-TAB C - Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Mitigation Plan - Each offeror shall provide an OCI mitigation plan, if applicable, to its proposal.

- TAB D - General Information - Identification of the proposal point of contact (POC), e-mail address, and phone number; a list of the proposal package contents.

- TAB E - Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors.

- TAB F - Removed

B. Volume II - Factors 1 – 2 Management/Teaming/Staffing Approach and Training Approach.

(1) General. Volume II shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. Responses will be evaluated against Factors 1 - 2 as defined in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the PWS (including referenced publications, technical data, etc.); statements paraphrasing the PWS or parts thereof (including applicable publications, technical data, etc.); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used“, etc., will be deemed unacceptable. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

(2) Volume II shall be organized according to the following general outline:

-TAB A - Table of Contents

-TAB B - List of Table and Drawings and Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations

-TAB C - Technical Submission. Include an Executive Summary specific to Volume II.

- TAB D - Signed Teaming Arrangements or Letter of Intent

(3) Content. The proposal information described in paragraphs L.4.B (3)(a) and L.4.B(3)(b) below relate to the overall ID/IQ contract.

(a) Factor 1: Management/Teaming/Staffing Approach: The offeror shall demonstrate the ability to organize, so as to successfully manage and accomplish the primary tasks identified in Part 5, Specific Tasks, and the supplemental tasks identified in paragraph 1.6 in the PWS. The offeror shall demonstrate the ability to fully perform simultaneous tasks identified in multiple TOs in at least two (2) Geographic Combatant Commands (GCC). Each offeror shall submit a Management Plan that demonstrates how the offeror intends to provide contract support to the contracting team in CONUS and OCONUS, to include communication and reporting with the Security Assistance Teams (SATs) managers while deployed. The offeror shall describe the ability to manage, schedule, and integrate teaming partners/subcontractors into their organization. The offeror shall describe the working relationship between the prime and its teaming partners/subcontractors at the corporate level and employee level and when teaming partners/subcontractors are performing the work how will the offeror ensure adequate oversight of teaming partners/subcontractors to include performance monitoring and timely resolution of any issues that may arise. Each offeror shall describe their staffing approach so as to demonstrate their ability to execute the PWS mission requirements utilizing Attachment 1 – CAP Labor Rates Price Matrix. The Offeror’s staffing approach shall demonstrate their recruiting and retaining plan as well as how they will replace qualified personnel to ensure the tasks identified in the PWS are successfully executed without mission delay. The offeror shall demonstrate a thorough understanding of, and the capacity to accomplish, export compliance, including international trafficking and arms regulations (ITAR) and export administration regulations (EAR); the capacity to obtain VISAs, business license and exemptions for service and products to international customers; and the ability to obtain facility clearance and security clearance for their personnel.

(b) Factor 2: Training Approach. The offeror shall provide a detailed training approach for accomplishing the training requirements outlined in the PWS. The PWS lists examples of mission types that could be reasonably be expected to be conducted by the contractor. The training approach shall demonstrate how the contractor's training shall be employed to select instructors, resource materials, develop plans, and effectively execute the training to support these mission types.

C. Volume III – Factor 3: Response to STOs.

Each response should include sufficient information to describe the Offeror’s policies, procedures, processes, and control mechanisms that are established at the Sample Task Order (STO) level. For each STO, the offeror shall specifically identify and explain their process to achieve full capability of performance as identified in section (i) through (iv). The offeror shall demonstrate how tasks will be scheduled and executed, and identify and explain their staffing approach, to include identifying necessary skill sets to complete each task. Labor categories shall be selected from the labor categories listed in the CAP Labor Rates Price Matrix – Attachment 1.

Volume III, shall be organized as follows:

(1) TAB A – Response to Scenario 1 (Mexico)

(2) TAB B – Response to Scenario 2 (Turkey)

(3) TAB C – Response to Scenario 3 (Thailand)

(i) Each TAB will include: Table of Contents, Executive Summary, detailed explanation of how the offeror will accomplish the STO.

(ii) For depicting staffing, offerors shall provide the following information:

a. A defined SAT composition with a detailed list of labor categories, number of personnel proposed for each labor category, and associated labor hours deemed necessary to perform the requirements. Clearly depict in a staffing chart the total number of productive man-hours and associated Full Time Equivalents (FTE's) for each proposed labor category. All cross utilization of the labor force shall be clearly explained and depicted.

b. Job qualifications associated with each key labor category to demonstrate the skills necessary for each labor category proposed to meet or exceed the qualifications required in the STO. For each labor category in attachment 1, the job qualifications should include at least the DOD grade equivalency, civilian education, military experience, and skill set noted in table 1.

c. A complete manning schedule which depicts planned employee hiring, training and deployment timelines for SAT employees.

(iii) A detailed training plan and schedule that demonstrates to all task areas and training as defined in

Section 5 of the STO to include the method and plan for efficiently and effectively performing all tasks.

(iv) Each TAB of Volume III shall be prepared in a form consistent with the STO. The response shall be prepared in an orderly format and in sufficient detail to enable the Government to make a thorough evaluation of the Offeror’s technical capability and ability to comply with the contract task requirements specified in the STO. The offeror shall specifically address the methodology used for accomplishing the tasks.

D. Volume IV – Factor 4: Past Performance

(1) General: The Past Performance evaluation will be accomplished by reviewing aspects of an Offeror's recent and relevant Past Performance, focusing on and targeting performance which is relevant to the effort of the SATMO aviation services, IDIQ requirements, and / or the STOs. Recent and relevant past performance shall be discussed for the prime offeror and any “team members” or teaming partners” proposed to support this contract. The offeror is provided an opportunity to submit no more than three (3) of the Offeror’s most recent and relevant past performance information on projects: similar in size, scope, and complexity to the services being procured under this solicitation), performed for Government agencies and/or commercial customers within the last three (3) years from the solicitation release date.

The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance data from other sources than those identified by the Offeror in evaluating past performance. This includes, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and the Defense Contract Management Agency. Offerors are reminded that both independent data and data provided by Offerors in their proposals may be used by the Government to evaluate the Offerors past performance.

The KO may also evaluated Past Performance based on direct knowledge of the Offeror’s performance on current or recent contracts. However, the burden of providing thorough, complete, and current past performance information as requested in this paragraph remains with the Offerors. All past performance received will be taken into account and could affect the overall rating. The overall past performance evaluation is a subjective decision based on the whole of all data received. In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR

15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

(2) Content. Past Performance Submission Requirements. The Offeror shall submit Past Performance information within the past three (3) years that is both recent and relevant, if applicable.

E. Volume V – Factor 5 Price

(1) Format. The format for the price proposal shall be as follows:

TAB A – Executive Summary TAB B – Section B TAB C – CAP Labor Rates Price Matrix TAB D - Sample Task Order Price Proposals

(a) Tab A – Executive Summary – The executive summary shall describe the offeror’s rationale/methodology for its pricing approach. The offeror shall identify any pricing assumptions made and the overhead, G&A, subcontractor overhead, profit rates used to develop the Price Matrix. No information from subcontractors is required as the prime is expected to exercise a certain amount of discretion in evaluating the reasonableness of the subcontractor rates before developing its final rate matrix. Should a contract be awarded to the offeror, the proposed labor rates provided on the Price Matrix shall become the maximum rate allowable (CAP) for that labor category. If electronic files are compressed, they must be self-extracting archives (no software required to decompress). If files contain links, the links must be intact and maintained through all revisions.

Additionally, spreadsheets must be easily traceable. None of the files submitted shall have any read/write/password protection. Include all formulas in your spreadsheets and please include any notes deemed necessary to add clarity to the spreadsheets. In the event additional labor categories are required during contract performance, such rates shall be negotiated post contract award at Task Order level.

(b) TAB B, SF 33, Section B –The CLINs will be the program maximum. (Contractor leave blank)

(c) Tab C - CAP Labor Rates Price Matrix - Attachment 1 The offeror’s price proposal will consist of information to support the CAP Labor Rates Price Matrix as provided. The Contractor shall clearly explain the basis of the CAP Labor Rates Price Matrix (Attachment 1). The proposed rates in the CAP Labor Rates Price Matrix shall be Capacity (CAP) rates that reflect the maximum rates that will be paid for such labor category and be fully burdened to include profit. To be clear, offerors will propose one CAP labor rate for each labor category listed on Attachment 1; and that labor rate will be the maximum rate that the offeror, if awarded a MATOC contract, may propose for that labor category in any task order competition during the entire duration of the MATOC. Notional Labor hours are based on internal government estimates of the number of hours per category a MATOC holder might expend over a 5 year POP, may not be relied upon to correlate with actual performance during contract performance and are for evaluation purposes only.

(d) Tab D - Sample Task Order Price Proposals – Attachment 5.

(i) For evaluation purposes only, the price proposal shall clearly depict how the TO prices were derived by using the applicable labor categories and fully burdened hourly CAP rates proposed in the CAP Labor Rates Price Matrix - Attachment 1 times the number of hours proposed for each labor category of the STOs. The proposed hours shall coincide with the staffing, labor hours and mix, proposed in the Technical volume. Shown below are some suggested labor categories based on the information provided in the STOs. Although these labor categories are only suggested, the Offeror is responsible for developing the skill sets and labor mix to meet the full requirements of the STO. Only labor categories listed in Attachment 1 – CAP Labor Rates Price Matrix can be proposed by the offeror.

Suggested Labor Categories

STO 1 - Mexico STO 2- Turkey STO 3 - Thailand

SME 3 Senior SME 1 Senior SME 3 Team Chief

Team Chief/ Site lead 2 SME 1 SME 2

SME 2, Flight Duty 3 Technician 2 SME 1

Technician 2/Flight Duty 2 Technician 1 Assistant 3

Technician 2 Local Country National 3 Technician 1

Assistant 2 Local Country National 1 Senior SME 4

Local National 2 SME 3 Technician 3

Team Chief/Site Lead 2 Assistant 1

Local Country National 2

(ii) The offeror shall apply the corresponding CAP rates from the CAP Labor Rates Price Matrix –

Attachment 1. For evaluation purposes, no discounts to the rates in the Pricing Matrix – Attachment 1 shall be applied to the TO Pricing.

(iii) Although the Sample TOs may depict travel and other direct costs (ODCs) requirements, for purposes of proposal evaluations offerors shall NOT propose any travel costs or ODCs in its price proposal.

(End of Summary of Changes)