Attachment 14 Past Performance Questonary.doc

DOC document 64 KB Posted

Attached to
The Maneuver Center Of Excellence (MCoE)
Solicitation number
W9124710R0002
Issued by

About this file

From the source

Attachment 14 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
MCOE REGISTRATION SIGN-IN.pdf PDF
MCOE 2nd Industry Day - Mr. Brown's Comments.doc DOC document
2nd Industry Day Slides.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment 1 MCOE PWS.doc DOC document
Attachment 9 Acronyms' List.doc DOC document
Attachment 2 Contract Manpower Report.doc DOC document
Attachment 5 QASP.doc DOC document
Attachment 4 Service Contract Act Wage Determination WD-05-2137.doc DOC document
Attachment 13 Sample Task Orders Price Proposal.doc DOC document
Attachment 8 DA Form 5479.xfdl XFDL file
Attachment 6 DA Form 5475.xfdl XFDL file
Attachment 10 Publications' List.doc DOC document
Attachment 3 Pricing Worksheet.doc DOC document
Attachment 7 DA Form 5477.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 Sample TO 1.doc DOC document
Attachment 12 Sample TO 2.doc DOC document
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Past Performance Questionnaire

FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF

TRAINING, DOCTRINE, CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, ANALYSIS,

INSTRUCTION, ROLE PLAYERS AND SUPPORT SERVICES

AT FORT KNOX KY, AND FORT BENNING GA

MANEUVER CENTER OF EXCELLENCE

Contractor Name: ____________________________________________________________________ Total Contract Value: _________________________________________________________________ Contract Award Date: ________________________________________________________________ Contract Completion Date: _____________________________________________________________ Respondent Point of Contact: ___________________________________________________________ Respondent Address: __________________________________________________________________ Respondent Phone Number and e-mail: ___________________________________________________ Contractor performed as:

PRIME Contractor

FORMCHECKBOX

SUB Contractor

FORMCHECKBOX

Description of Requirements (tasks, volume, scope, complexity):

Rating Scale:

Please rate (the contractor) as described below. If you are unable to rate an item because it was not a requirement, never an issue, or you have no knowledge of the item in question, then you should mark “N/A”. Please add any comments you may have in the space provided after every question.

Evaluation Criteria:

1
2
3
4
5
6
NO CONFIDENCE (NC)
LITTLE CONFIDENCE

(LC)

SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE

(SAC)

SIGNIFICANT

CONFIDENCE

(SIC)

HIGH CONFIDENCE

(HC)

UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE

(UC)

Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

Contractor’s Past Performance:

The contractor:
NC
LC
SAC
SIC
HC
UC
1.
Provide experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirement.
1
2
3
4
5
6
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
1
2
3
4
5
6
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements
1
2
3
4
5
6
4.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
6
5.
Complied with all federal, state and local laws and regulations to include appropriate licensing.
1
2
3
4
5
6
6.
Provided adequate oversight of teaming partners/subcontractors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7.
Identified problems as they occurred.
1
2
3
4
5
6
8.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
9.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
10.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner
1
2
3
4
5
6
11.
Developed realistic schedules.
1
2
3
4
5
6
12.
Met established project schedules
1
2
3
4
5
6
13.
Was responsive to contract changes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
14.
Provided adequate project supervision.
1
2
3
4
5
6
15.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
1
2
3
4
5
6
16.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
1
2
3
4
5
6
17.
Contractor met subcontracting goals
YES
NO
18.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES
NO
19.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES
NO
20.
Is this contract rated in CPARS?
YES
NO

Remarks:____________________________________________________________________________

SIGNED ___________________________________ DATE ________________

Please return this document to Christian Freire at the address below:

Regular Mail:

Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) Center – Fort Bragg

ATTN: CCMI-RCB (Mr. Christian Freire)

2175 Reilly Road, Stop A

Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000

Via UPS or FedEx:

Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) Center – Fort Bragg

ATTN: CCMI-RCB (Mr. Christian Freire)

Bldg 2-1105 C Stack Macomb Street

Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000

[Type text]

Attachment 14, Past Performance Questionnaire

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .