Amendment_0005_Phase_II.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Project: Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Aw ard Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Construction Services for the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers, South Pacific Division (SPD) The purpose of this amendment is to:

A. Revise section 1.3.7 to change the total value exceeding $12,500,000.00 to $3, 750,000.00.

B. All other terms and conditions remains the same.

C. Revisions are are identif ied w ith change bars.

D. See summary of changes.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 16

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Aug-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91238-15-R-0014

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-May-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Aug-2015

CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO

CONTRACTING DIVISION

1325 J STREET

SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922

W91238 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W91238-15-R-0014

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SECTION - CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

00 22 20 PHASE II

PROPOSAL PHASE II INSTRUCTIONS AND EVALUATION

1 PHASE-TWO PROPOSALS.

1.1 NUMBER OF VOLUME FOR PHASE-TWO PROPOSAL.

Volume I – Price Volume II – Technical

Phase Two Proposal shall consist of Volume I – Price which is to be submitted in one hard “original” copy. Volume II – Technical is to be submitted in one hard “original” and five (5) copies. In addition, submit one complete copy of the volume 1 and 2 on Compact Disk (CD).

1.2 FORMAT, CONTENTS, AND LIST OF TABS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL.

Use only 8-1/2” x 11” pages. Organize your price proposal as indicated below. Tabs will be required to organize the items below. If the proposal does not have the prescribed documents required in volume I and volume II, the proposal will be terminated from evaluation and the offer shall not be considered for contract award. Additionally, any incomplete information or absence of information prescribed for each required document shall be terminated from evaluation and the offeror shall not be considered for contract award. As stated in Phase I in paragraph 3.1.1.

Media, Page Size, Margins, Fonts, and Page Limitations, the same rule applies in Phase II proposals.

PHASE-TWO PROPOSAL VOLUME I – PRICE

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL PAGE LIMITS

1 Proposal Cover Sheet No Page Limit 2 SF 1442; Acknowledgement of Amendments; Joint Venture Agreement No Page Limit 3 Pricing Schedule No Page Limit 4 Work Breakdown Structure, No Page Limit 5 Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors No Page Limit 6 Bid Guarantee No Page Limit 7 Pre-Award Survey Information No Page Limit

1.3 DETAILED SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PHASE-TWO PROPOSAL.

1.3.1 Tab 1 of Volume I-Price: Proposal Cover Sheet.

The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1 (c)(2). This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition” is provided in full text in Section 00 21 00. The format and content for the proposal cover sheet follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number: W91238-15-R-0014

2. The name, address, DUNS number, Cage Code, TIN, and telephone numbers of the offeror.

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the Solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, email addresses, and telephone numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with solicitation W91238-15-R-0014.

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

(End of Proposal Cover Sheet)

1.3.2 Tab 2 of Volume I-Price: SF 1442; Acknowledgement of Amendments; Joint Venture Agreement.

The Standard Form (SF) 1442 must be completed by the offeror and duly executed with an original signature by the official(s) identified in the proposal cover sheet as authorized to bind the offeror in accordance with FAR 4.102, which includes specific instructions pertaining to individuals, partnerships, corporations, Joint Venture participants, and agents. Include the offeror’s DUNS number in block 14 (facility code) and Cage Code in block 14 (code) of the SF 1442, along with the offeror’s address. All amendments must be acknowledged in block 19. If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) and/or Mentor/Protégé the offeror shall include a copy of the Mentor/Protégé and/or JV agreement and indicate its status.

1.3.3. Tab 3 of Volume I-Price: (Attachment 4) Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule.

Submit the completed CLIN Schedule with the offeror’s proposed contract prices inserted in the appropriate spaces in accordance with Attachment 4, (Price Break out Schedule). Prices must be proposed for all contract line items.

Unit prices must be extended to the actual “dollar and cents” amounts (i.e., to two decimal places). Do not round off the extended prices to the nearest dollar. Check your pricing submission very carefully for mathematical and clerical errors prior to submission. Any qualification of pricing may render the proposal unacceptable and therefore not eligible for award.

1.3.4 Tab 4 of Volume I-Price: Work Breakdown Structure,.

Submit a Work Breakdown Structure of the offeror’s proposed contract prices for each CLIN using the format below, in accordance with Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-740-05. The contractor shall submit the following breakdown on the offer due date; this breakdown will support the proposed price at the time of the offer due date. No change in price will be accepted. This shall be submitted via EMAIL to

Kenetta.A.Meares@usace.army.mil , Shirley.M.Yarbro@usace.army.mil .The subject line should read “W91238-

15-R-0014, Work Breakdown Structure”.

01 SUBSTRUCTURE 11 ELECTRIC POWER AND LIGHTING

02 SUPERSTRUCTURE 12 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

03 EXTERIOR CLOSURE 13 EQUIPMENT

04 ROOFING 14 FURNISHINGS

05 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION 15 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION

06 INTERIOR FINISHES 16 SELECTIVE BUILDING DEMOLITION

07 CONVEYING SYSTEMS 17 SITE PREPARATION

08 PLUMBING 18 SITE IMPROVEMENTS

09 HVAC M2 19 SITE CIVIL/MECHANICAL UTILITIES

10 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 20 SITE ELECTRICAL UTILITIES

1.3.5 Tab 5 of Volume I-Price: Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors.

The offeror must submit the firm’s updated entity from the System for Award Management (SAM) website in accordance with FAR 52.204-7. If the entity is unchanged, the offeror must submit a statement stating there entity previously submitted, under Phase 1 still applies.

1.3.6 Tab 6 of Volume I-Price: Bid Guarantee.

All offerors shall submit a bid guarantee Standard Form 24, Bid Bond (Standard Form 24 can be downloaded at http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/115982) which complies with the requirements of FAR 28.101 Bid Guarantees, and any Defense and Army supplements thereto IAW FAR 52.228-1.

1.3.7 Tab 7 of Volume I-Price: Pre-Award Survey Information.

a. The contracting officer is required to make an affirmative pre-award determination of the prospective contractor’s responsibility in accordance with the mandatory requirements of Part 9 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and its supplements. The contracting officer must have sufficient information available to determine that a prospective contractor meets these minimum standards. Therefore, the offeror is requested to provide the pre-award survey information described below with its price proposal:

(1) The completed Construction Contractor Data Form with Supplemental Schedules A-C (see format which follows). If the offeror is a large multi-segmented business concerns, the data provided on the supplemental schedules may be limited to information that directly pertains to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) proposed to perform work under the prospective contract with its own work force. If the offer is being submitted by a Joint Venture, submit a separate form for each Joint Venture participant. The offeror may submit pre-award survey information in another format, provided that the information furnished is substantially the same as that which would be furnished on the Construction Contractor Data Form and its supplemental schedules.

(2) Current financial statements. If the financial statement is more than 60 days old, submit a certificate stating that the firm's financial condition is substantially the same, or, if not the same, state the changes that have taken place. If a Joint Venture, provide this information for each participant in the Joint Venture.

(3) Banking information. Provide letters from banks or other financial institutions with which the contractor conducts business. The letters should contain information about your firm's accounts, loans, lines of credit, etc. The Government is interested in financial stability, timely payments, the length and nature of the relationship between the firm and the financial institution, and the firm's financial ability to perform the contract. The letters should also provide the name and telephone number of the bank representative the Government may contact. If a Joint Venture, provide this information for each Joint Venture participant.

b. The Government will treat the pre-award survey information submitted by the offeror as proprietary.

(Tab 7 of the Price Proposal: Pre-Award Survey Information)

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR DATA DATE:

Firm Name and Telephone Number Main Office Address (Street, City, and State)

Branch Offices Services Rendered Construction Design Consultant

Organization Individual Joint Venture Partnership Corporation

Date Organized Date Incorporated:

State:

Names of Officers and Other Key Personnel

I – PRESENT PAYROLL PERSONNEL (List Number of Each Category Below) Partners:

Officers:

Other Key:

Remainder: Subtotal Permanent:

Maximum Personnel at Any Time:

Date:

Total:

II—EQUIPMENT OWNED III—FINANCIAL DATA AS OF

(DATE): Present Value ($)

Current Assets:

Acquisition Cost ($) Current Liabilities:

Net Worth:

IV—TOTAL VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WORK

IN PAST 6 YRS EXCLUSIVE OF JOINT VENTURE (LIST MOST

RECENT FIRST)

V—LARGEST JOB EVER

CONTRACTED

(If Other Than in Past Six Years)

$ LARGEST JOB IN PAST 6 YRS Contract Amount:

Date:

Description:

Owner:

$ Contract Amount:

Date:

Description:

Owner:

Avg. Annual Income

VI—TYPE OF WORK IN WHICH FIRM SPECIALIZES

NAME AND POSITION/TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING

SIGNATURE

See attachment for explanations or detailed description of item(s) reported above.

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR DATA – SCHEDULE A – EXISTING COMMITMENTS

List below the construction projects your firm currently has under way, including recent awards. Also list construction projects for which your firm is the apparent successful offeror/bidder, but for which a contract has not yet been awarded.

CONTRACT

NUMBER

AMOUNT

DESCRIPTION/

LOCATION

ORGANIZATION/

CONTACT PERSON/

PHONE NUMBER

PERCENT

COMPLETE

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR DATA – SCHEDULE B – COMPLETED PROJECTS

List below the principal construction projects your firm has completed within the past six years, including all DoD contracts with a total value exceeding $ 3,750,000.00.

NUMBER

AMOUNT

DESCRIPTION/

LOCATION

ORGANIZATION/

CONTACT PERSON/

PHONE NUMBER

PERCENT

SUBLET

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR DATA – SCHEDULE C – CONSTRUCTION AND/OR TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT

List total equipment and facilities owned for performing the prospective contract and present status as to whether or not it is currently committed to existing contracts.

QUANTITY

DESCRIPTION

CONDITION

YEARS OF

SERVICE

PRESENT

STATUS

1.4. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF PRICE TO THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

All non-price evaluation factors, when combined, will be greater than price. The Government is concerned with striking the most advantageous balance between technical merit (“quality”) and cost to the Government (i.e., the price). If competing technical proposals are determined to be essentially equal, price could become the controlling factor

1.5. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

a. Price to the Government will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed price will be analyzed for reasonableness. It may also be analyzed to determine whether it reflects a clear understanding of the requirements; and is consistent with the offeror’s Technical Proposal. Additionally, all offers will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

b. The price evaluation adjustment for Small Disadvantaged Businesses will not apply to this procurement as it is currently suspended for Department of Defense.

2 PHASE-TWO VOLUME II - TECHNICAL.

The Government intends to award approximately 4 contracts, as a result of this solicitation

2.1 FORMAT, CONTENTS, AND LIST OF TABS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.

Use 8-1/2” x 11” pages for the narrative portions of the proposal. There is not a page limit for the overall technical proposal; however, there may be limits imposed at the tab level. Organize your technical proposal as indicated below. The tabs directly correlate to the technical evaluation factors. Although the Government may use information contained anywhere within the technical proposal in its evaluation of any technical evaluation criteria, the Government is not obligated to search for or to consider information that is not located in the specified location.

Number the pages. Do not include information pertaining to your proposed pricing for this project in the technical proposal. Limit your submittals to the information specified; excess information will not be evaluated.

PHASE-TWO VOLUME II – TECHNICAL

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL PAGE LIMITS

1 Factor 4 – Technical Solution

a) Technical Narrative

b) NAS Schedule

c) Offeror’s Statement of Compliance with 10 U.S.C. 2858

1a. 6 page Maximum 1b. 2 page Maximum 1c. 2 page Maximum

2 Factor 5 – Management Approach

a) Project Organization Chart

b) Management Plan

c) Approach to Project Quality Control

2a. 1 page 2b. 5 page Maximum 2c. 5 page Maximum

2.3 RELATIVE WEIGHTING OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

The Technical Evaluation Factors are listed below in descending order of importance, as follows:

Factor 1 – Experience and Capability is the most heavily weighted factor. (From Phase I) Factor 2 – Technical Approach is weighted less than Factor 1. (From Phase I) Factor 3 – Past Performance is weighted less than Factor 2. (From Phase I)

Factor 4 – Technical Solution is approximately equal in weight to factor 1. (From Phase II) Factor 5 – Management Approach is approximately equal in weight to factor 2. (From Phase II)

DETAILED SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR THE PHASE TWO

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.

Tab 1 – FACTOR 4 – TECHNICAL SOLUTION

3.1 Factor 4 Tab 1A – Technical Narrative

3.1.1 Technical Narrative.

a. The plan/approach must be in sufficient detail to clearly demonstrate (1) the offeror’s understanding of the principal components of work described in the project specifications and drawings and (2) the offeror’s understanding of the site and other conditions that could impact schedule. The narrative should contain sufficient information to allow the Government to perform a basic analysis of the proposed approach.

b. Describe how the offeror will approach the design and construction of the new General Purpose Maintenance (GPM) Shop at Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO) in Concord, CA. Clearly distinguish the roles and involvement of the Architect-Engineer design firm in the project. Also address any design effort that will be performed “in-house” by the key subcontractor. Describe the roles and planned interaction between the Independent Technical Reviewers and various contractor and government personnel.

c. Describe how the offeror will approach the construction of the (General Purpose Maintenance Shop The Government is interested in information such as: 1) site prep, 2) demolition, 3) utilities, 4) construction work discipline sequencings, 5) site work, and 6) clean-up. Identify any betterments included in the offer, i.e., those items, materials, equipment or processes that exceed the minimum requirements in the contract specifications, and discuss how these betterments increase value to the Government. Betterments will be considered favorable and advantageous, consequently, the lack of betterments will not be considered unfavorably. Provide catalog cuts or other documentation necessary to clearly indicate the quality of the proposed betterments. The offeror shall make a statement that their design complies with the most current regulations, standards, codes, and Design Requirements.

d. Describes any significant problems or major difficulties anticipated in performing or accomplishing the work, challenges associated with this project, and offeror’s plan for avoiding problems and mitigating difficulties which could adversely impact project schedule. If no problems and difficulties are anticipated, state so and why.

e. Formatting and Other Restrictions: The submission is limited to six 8-1/2” x 11” pages total.

f. Evaluation Criteria:

(1). The Government will evaluate the soundness and workability of the offeror’s approach and method to design and construct (design and construction of the new General Purpose Maintenance (GPM) Shop at Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO) in Concord, CA). As part of its evaluation, the Government will consider whether the Offeror’s approach appears reasonable, realistic, achievable, and reflects logical sequencing and progression of activities.

(2). The greater the narrative demonstrate knowledge and understanding based on the specifications, drawings, site, and other conditions; the higher the evaluation rating.

(3). Offerors proposing betterments will receive higher evaluation ratings IF the proposed betterments are considered by the Government to be desirable and to add significant value to the project. The betterment will be evaluated to determine if the creative ideas of the offeror enhance the overall design and function of the project compared to the minimum criteria established. Failure to provide any betterment(s) will not be considered a proposal weakness or deficiency, nor shall it be considered unfavorable.

(4). Offerors will receive a rating of no lower than “Marginal”, as long as the offeror has made a reasonable attempt to respond to the proposal submission requirements. Notwithstanding the above, an offeror who fails to provide the requested information for evaluation will receive an “Unacceptable” rating.

3.1.2 Factor 4 Tab 1B – NAS Schedule

a. Provide a hard copy of the NAS Project Schedule or GANTT chart (not a Pert Chart), broken down to the “Feature of Work” level, that graphically illustrates the proposed integration, scheduling, and phasing of the major features on the critical and near-critical path for this project, including final close-out. Also include an electronic file (e.g., “prx” of the NAS Schedule (Primavera P3 preferred)) on the CD containing the technical proposal.

b. The schedule is to include activities on the near critical and critical paths, including the following:

-NTP

-Charrette Meetings

-Design Reviews:

Government, Contractor, Designer, -Independent Technical Reviews -Design review conferences -Construction activities broken down to the “Feature of Work” level -Adverse weather per section 01 00 00 -Pre Commissioning System Testing -Final Commissioning System Testing -Mechanical System Testing -Electrical System Testing -Test and Balancing -As-Builts -Landscaping -Contractor Punch-out Inspection items -Pre-final Inspection -Correction of pre-final inspection items -Final Inspection -Correction of Final Inspection items.

-Project Complete ……….Long Lead Item

**Note: Missing items from the list above shall be considered non-compliant and will not be considered for award.

**Note: The use of a Pert Chart shall be considered non-compliant and will not be considered for award.

c. Clearly indicate the following time frames:

(1). The durations of the principle components of work with anticipated start and finish dates. For the purpose of this pre-award design and construction sequence plan only, assume a Notice to Proceed (NTP) date of 30 October 2015.

(2). The total number of calendar days allocated to design

(3.) The total number of calendar days allocated to construction

(4). The total number of calendar days from NTP to Project Complete

d. The milestone schedule cannot exceed the contract performance period specified in item #01 of attachment

2, also be in compliance with any contractually required interim completion dates specified in the solicitation for separate parts or stages of the work. (Should the offeror discover during proposal preparation that the project cannot be completed within the required contract performance period, please notify the Contracting Officer immediately.)

e. The Government’s requirement is that all design and construction on this project be completed within 10 days after receiving a Notice to Proceed, inclusive of all review periods and Government phasing requirements specified. The offeror may propose a completion period of lesser duration, subject to the following conditions.

(1). If the offeror proposes a completion period of lesser duration than the performance period in item #01 of attachment 2 included in the solicitation, a compliance statement completed by the offeror and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company must be included in the technical proposal. If a contract is awarded to an offeror proposing a completion period of lesser duration than the performance period specified in item #11 of attachment 4, that shorter performance period will be incorporated into and made a part of the resulting contract. Additionally, any assessment of liquidated damages will be based on the shortened performance period accepted by the Government.

(2). A compliance statement completed by the offeror and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company must be included in the technical proposal under this tab. Failure to include this signed statement may render an offer which proposes a completion period of lesser duration ineligible for contract award.

f. As the NAS project schedule that is required to be included as part of the Technical Approach/Solution is a preliminary schedule for pre-award evaluation purposes only, the actual NAS project schedule submitted in the offeror’s Technical Proposal will not be incorporated into the contract. Therefore, the Government may at its discretion consider minor irregularities to be weaknesses in the proposal, rather than deficiencies.

Nonetheless, the successful offeror will be required to submit a schedule after contract award that fully complies with all of the requirements, whether or not all pre-award discrepancies were noted or corrected during negotiations. Although the schedule will need to be redone, the proposed period of performance will remain as proposed.

g. Formatting and Other Restrictions.

(1). Include both a hard copy NAS Project Schedule in each copy of the technical proposal and an electronic file “.prx” of the NAS Project Schedule (Primavera P3 preferred) on the CD containing the technical proposal.

(2). There is not a page limitation for this submission; however, pages must not exceed 11” x 17” in size.

Ensure the font size is legible so each activity and its duration can be read.

(3). Number line items on the NAS Project Schedule for easy reference.

h. Evaluation Criteria.

(1). The Government will evaluate the NAS Project Schedule to determine the extent to which it demonstrates (1) the Offeror’s understanding of the unique requirements and challenges of this project and (2) the Offeror’s ability to schedule and integrate the design and/or major work elements, construction and close-out activities critical to meeting the contract performance schedule specified in the solicitation. As part of its evaluation, the Government may consider whether the Offeror’s approach to the scheduling/phasing of these major activities appears reasonable, realistic, and achievable. The Government may also consider whether the Offeror’s approach to scheduling/phasing of major activities reflects logical sequencing and progression of activities; inclusion of all of the important features of the work; milestones along the critical path, incorporation of time for Government activities such as submittal review; and appropriate consideration of recognizable constraints, including material and equipment lead times and the impacts on construction activities of adverse weather typical for the construction site.

(2). Proposed schedule and approach that clearly reflect an understanding of the complexity of this project will be evaluated more favorably. Schedule and approach demonstrating professionalism and thoroughness will be evaluated more favorably. In addition, proposed schedules that reasonably demonstrate the ability to reduce the period of performance completion period from initial notice to proceed through completion of construction of all options will be evaluated more favorably. Preparation of the NAS schedule using Primavera (P3) and the Corps’ Standard Data Exchange Format (SDEF) format in accordance with Appendix A to ER 1-1-11 will be considered an advantage.

(3). Offerors will receive a rating of no lower than “Marginal”, as long as the offeror has made a reasonable attempt to respond to the proposal submission requirements. Notwithstanding the above, an offeror who fails to provide the requested information for evaluation will receive an “Unacceptable” rating.

If the offeror proposes a completion period of lesser duration than the performance period in item #01 of attachment 2 included in the solicitation, a compliance statement completed by the offeror and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company must be included in the technical proposal. If a contract is awarded to an offeror proposing a completion period of lesser duration than the performance period specified in item #01 of attachment 2, that shorter performance period will be incorporated into and made a part of the resulting contract.

**Note: Missing items from above shall be considered non-compliant and will not be considered for award.

3.1.3 Factor 4 Tab 1C – Offeror’s Statement of Compliance with 10 U.S.C. 2858.

a. In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2858, funds appropriated for military construction may not be expended for additional costs involved in expediting a construction project without Secretarial level approval. Therefore, if the offeror proposes a completion period of lesser duration than the performance period in item #01 of attachment 2, a compliance statement completed by the offeror and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company must be included in the technical proposal. If a contract is awarded to an offeror proposing a completion period of lesser duration than the performance period specified in item#01 of attachment included in the solicitation, that shorter performance period will be incorporated into and made a part resulting contract.

b. If the offeror is proposing a completion period of lesser duration than the performance period stated on the in item #01 of attachment 2, a statement of compliance with 10 U.S.C. 2858 must be included in the technical proposal under this tab.

c. Formatting and Other Restrictions:

The format for the offeror’s statement of compliance with 10 U.S.C. 2858 follows:

OFFEROR’S STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH 10 U.S.C. 2858

[Insert name of the offeror] hereby proposes that the period of performance for all design and construction is _____ calendar days from Notice to Proceed, inclusive of Government review periods and Government phasing requirements specified.

[Insert name of the offeror] hereby states that the offer of this performance period is at no additional cost to the Government over the performance period specified in item #01 of attachment 2.

Specifically, the shortened performance period will not be achieved by the use of overtime, multiple shifts, or additional personnel nor does it include expedited materials handling/shipping costs.

I understand that making a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement may subject me to prosecution under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001.

SIGNATURE OF COMPANY OFFICIAL

(End of Compliance Statement)

The above compliance statement must be completed by the offeror and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company.

d. Evaluation Criteria.

(1). 10 U.S.C. 2858 requires Agency head approval to expedite the completion date of a contract funded by a Military Construction Appropriations Act, if additional costs are involved. This approval authority may not be redelegated. The contracting officer may approve an expedited completion date only if no additional costs are involved. For the purposes of this solicitation, if an offeror proposed a shorter schedule than that required by the Government, and did not submit the lowest priced offer, the price premium will be presumed to be attributable to the shortened schedule, unless the offeror has clearly stated in the offer that no price premiums were included in the offer that are directly attributable to the shortened schedule.

(2). If the offeror proposed a shorter schedule and failed to complete the statement that the offer included no additional costs attributable to the shortened schedule, the Government may determine that the offer is ineligible for award. The Government is under no obligation to open discussions with the offeror pertaining to the shortened schedule; nor is the Government obligated to request or obtain Secretarial level approval to expedite the contract completion date.

(3). If an offer is accepted which proposed a shorter schedule than that required by the Government, that proposed schedule will be incorporated into and become a binding part of the resultant contract at no additional cost to the Government as required IAW 10 USC 2858. Additionally, any assessment of liquidated damages would be based on the shortened schedule accepted by the Government.

**Note: Missing items from the list above shall be considered non-compliant and will not be considered for award.

Tab 2 - FACTOR 5 – MANAGEMENT APPROACH

3.2 – Factor 5 - Management Approach

3.2.1. Factor 5 Tab 2A - Project Organization Chart.

a. Provide an organizational chart that, at a minimum, graphically depicts the offeror’s proposed project team, to include “key” major work elements and identification of:

-- the prime contractor;

-- all key subcontractors by name; and

-- all key personnel by name.

b. Additionally, indicate the organizational placement of the prime’s On-Site Project Superintendant, On-Site

CQS System Manager and the Design A-E Design Architect(s). (Note: Identification of non-key personnel by given name is not required.)

c. Indicate lines of authority using a separate depiction (either color, solid, etc. lines).

d. Provide legend.

e. Formatting and Other Restrictions.

This submission is limited to one page NTE 11” x 17” in size.

f. Evaluation Criteria.

Whether the proposed lines of authority, responsibility, and communications are appropriate and well-defined.

3.2.2. Factor 5 Tab 2B - Management Plan.

a. Provide a comprehensive Management Plan specifically developed for implementation of this project.

Discuss the management approach used to control design, construction, and closeout. Provide information that clearly demonstrates that the offeror has the ability to deliver a quality product; effectively manage the designers, consultants, and subcontractors on the team; and the ability to coordinate all work throughout the design and construction phases. Explanation to include: specific quality control procedures used; permit acquisition in a timely fashion; safety; preparation and submission of record (i.e. as-built) documents and all other required administrative and logistical requirements for successful completion of project.

b. Provide a separate, detailed discussion of how the prime contractor will pro-actively manage the design effort. The Government is especially interested in the offeror’s plan to ensure that the design is timely completed in accordance with the initial accepted schedule submitted as part of the Design Quality Control Plan (see Section 01 45 00.00, Design Quality Control (DQC).

c. Provide a discussion of the Project Manager’s access to higher levels of corporate management and ability to obtain support from other corporate elements and subcontractors.

d. Provide a discussion of the offeror’s plan for coordinating the information flow between the offeror (prime contractor) and any subcontractor(s) or other prime contractors who may be employed in the project area and between the offeror and the Government.

e. Provide a brief description of other technical and organizational resources (excluding key personnel and key subcontractors) necessary and available to be employed in the successful accomplishment of this project.

f. Provide a discussion on how other projects the offeror is, or may be performing, might impact on the resources to be utilized on this project (including the availability of key personnel), and address how the adverse impacts of such other work would be mitigated.

g. Formatting and Other Restrictions.

The submission may include narrative and/or graphics and is limited to five 8-1/2” x 11” pages. Although a standard format is not specified, the information should be presented in essentially the same order as discussed above.

h. Evaluation Criteria.

The Management Plan specifically developed for this project will be evaluate for its soundness and workability approach to control site clearing and construction ensuring a timely delivered quality product and safety control. Consideration will include:

(1). The proposed phasing of work and utilization of team members and the proposed use of key subcontractors to obtain required expertise throughout the construction phases;

(2). The on-site’s managers’ ability to obtain other corporate element and subcontractor support;

(3). The information flow coordination ensuring current communication to all parties;

(4). The availability of other technical and organizational resources;

(5). How other work offeror is or may be performing impacts the resources to be utilized for this project (including the availability of key personnel) and the mitigation of any adverse impact;

(6). Whether proposed management techniques will facilitate the early identification and resolution of problems and allow timely response to changes; and

(7). The proposed phasing of subcontractors; the proposed utilization of key personnel;

(8). The proposed use of key subcontractors to obtain required expertise;

3.2.3 Factor 5 Tab 2C - Approach to Project Quality Control

a. Provide a comprehensive Quality Control procedure specifically developed for implementation of this project. Provide a detailed narrative discussion of the offeror’s plan for ensuring quality control during both the design and construction phases of this project. The discussion should address the offeror’s understanding of, familiarity with, and intended use of Corps-specific procedures and automated information management/tracking systems related to quality control. The Government is interested in the offeror’s plan to build quality into the project during both the design and construction phases. Other areas of interest include:

(1). the planned involvement of both construction personnel during the design phase and design personnel during the construction phase.

(2). The offeror’s understanding of the roles and planned interaction between the various contractor personnel involved with QC activities, such as the prime’s D-B PM, the lead AE’s Design PM, the lead AE’s Design Quality Control Manager, the prime’s Design Coordination Manager, the Independent Technical Reviewers, and the prime’s CQC System Manager and his/her staff. (Note:

Identify non-key personnel only by position title, not by name.)

b. Formatting and Other Restrictions.

The submission may include narrative and/or graphics and is limited to five 8-1/2” x 11” pages.

c. Evaluation Criteria.

The Quality Control procedure specifically developed for this project will be evaluated for its soundness and workability ensuring quality control throughout this project. Considerations will also include: the proposed interaction between quality control personnel and construction personnel; and the understanding of and familiarity with Corps-specific procedures and automated information management/tracking systems.

(End of Summary of Changes)