Amendment 0005.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment for Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) for Dam Maintenance and Repairs is to incorporate Tab 6 of the Technical Proposal for Past Performance Information; and to replace the Pricing Scedule in it's entirety w ith the revised Pricing Schedule for Task Orders 1 through 6.

The proposal due date of September 8, 2011, 1:00 pm local time and place remains unchanged.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 25-Aug-2011

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91238-11-R-0017

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Jul-2011

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25-Aug-2011

CODE

USACE SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

ATTN: CONTRACTING DIVISION

1325 J ST

SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922

W91238 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W91238-11-R-0017

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 2 Section 01 32 01.00 10 179 17-AUG-2011 Attachment 3 Section 02 83 30

"Removal And Disposal Of Coatings"

17 17-AUG-2011

Attachment 4 Section 09 96 20 "Coatings"

21 17-AUG-2011

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 2 Section 01 32 01.00 10 179 17-AUG-2011 Attachment 3 Section 02 83 30

"Removal And Disposal Of Coatings"

17 17-AUG-2011

Attachment 4 Section 09 96 20 "Coatings"

21 17-AUG-2011

Attachment 5 Tab 6 of the Technical Proposal: Factor 3 – Past Performance

14 23-AUG-2011

The following have been added by full text:

REVISED PRICING SCHEDULE

Item Description Quantity

Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Price

0001 Mobilization/Demobilization - Incl. temp office setup/staging area, all construction submittals, all required permits, records and as-builds, etc. 1 LS $ $

0002 Lead Base Paint Testing/Paint Chip

24 EA $ $

0003 Tainter Radial Gate (Incl. surface cleaning, surface repairs, surface primer, epoxy coating, etc. 6 EA $ $

0004 Upstream tainter gate debris collection apparatus 6 EA $ $

0005 Downstream tainter gate debris collection apparatus

6 EA $ $

0006 Scaffolding and/or associated temporary support facilities 6 EA $ $ 0007 All work associated with catwalk including preparation & coating, etc.

6 EA $ $

0008 Cleaning of downstream spillway and flip gate

6 EA $ $

1001 Mobilization/Demobilization

2 EA $ $

1002 Haul & Dispose of Non-Hazardous Material, Class 2 Fac. Per Tainter Gate

6 EA $ $

1003 Haul & Dispose of Hazardous Material, Class

1 Fac. (Assumed 10 each per gate) 60

55 GAL.

Drum $ $

TOTAL BASE ITEMS (0001-0008) $___________________

TOTAL BASE ITEMS & OPTION ITEMS (0001 - 0008 & 1001 - 1003) $_______________________

TASK ORDER NO. 1 - Pine Flat Dam Tainter Gate Painting

PRICING SCHEDULE

TOTAL OPTION ITEMS (1001 - 1003)$___________________

Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Price

0001 Mobilization/Demobilization - Incl. temp office setup/staging area, all construction submittals, all required permits, records and as-builds, etc.

1 LS $ $

0002 Lead Base Paint Testing

20 EA $ $

0003 Service Gates 1 thru 3 (up & Down Stream) &

Emergency Gates 1 thru 3 (Downstream only)

SURFACE PREPARATION

3 Pair $ $ 0004 Service Gates 1 thru 3 (up & Down Stream) &

Emergency Gates 1 thru 3 (Downstream only)

COATING INSTALLATION

3 Pair $ $ 0005 Service Gate 4 (up & Down Stream) & Emergency

Gate 4 (Downstream only) SURFACE

PREPARATION

1 Pair $ $ 0006 Service Gate 4 (up & Down Stream) & Emergency

Gate 4 (Downstream only) COATING

INSTALLATION

1 Pair $ $ 0007 Metal Conduit Liner surface prep 4 EA $ $ 0008 Metal Conduit Liner Repair

4 EA $ $

0009 Metal Conduit Liner Coating 4 EA $ $

1001 Mobilization/Demobilization

2 EA $ $

1002 Haul & Dispose of Non-Hazardous Material, Class 2 Fac. Per service/emergency gate pair

3 EA $ $

1003 Haul & Dispose of Hazardous Material, Class 1

Fac. (Assumed 5 each per pair of gate) 15

55 GAL.

Drum $ $

TASK ORDER NO. 2 - New Hogan Dam Service and Emergency Gates Coatings

PRICING SCHEDULE

TOTAL BASE ITEMS (0001-0009) $___________________

TOTAL OPTION ITEMS (1001 - 1003)$________________

TOTAL BASE ITEMS & OPTION ITEMS (0001 - 0009 & 1001 - 1003) $_______________________

Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Price

0001 Mobilization/Demobilization - Incl. temp office setup/staging area, all construction submittals, all required permits, records and as-builds, etc.

1 LS $ $

0002 Lead Base Paint Testing 20 EA $ $ 0003 Service Gates 1 thru 5 & Emergency Gates 1 thru 5 SURFACE PREPARATION 5 Pair $ $

0004 Service Gates 1 thru 5 & Emergency Gates 1 thru 5 COATING INSTALLATION 5 Pair $ $

0005 Metal Conduit Liner surface prep

5 EA $ $

0006 Metal Conduit Liner Repair

5 EA $ $

0007 Metal Conduit Liner Coating

5 EA $ $

0008 Repair Access Hatch (Incl. surface cleaning, surface repairs, surface primer, epoxy coating, etc.) 5 EA $ $

1001 Mobilization/Demobilization

2 EA $ $

1002 Haul & Dispose of Non-Hazardous Material, Class 2 Fac. Per emergency

5 EA $ $

1003 Haul & Dispose of Hazardous Material, Class 1

Fac. (Assumed 5 each per pair of gates)

55 GAL.

Drum $ $

TASK ORDER NO. 3 - Black Butte

PRICING SCHEDULE

TOTAL BASE ITEMS (0001-0008) $___________________

TOTAL BASE ITEMS & OPTION ITEMS (0001 - 0008 & 1001 - 1003) $_______________________

Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Price

0001 Mobilization/Demobilization - Incl. temp office setup/staging area, all construction submittals, all required permits, records and as-builds, etc.

1 LS $ $

0002 Lead Base Paint Testing

8 EA $ $

0003 Service Gates 1 thru 2 & Emergency Gates 1 thru 2

SURFACE PREPARATION

2 Pair $ $

0004 Service Gates 1 thru 2 & Emergency Gates 1 thru 2 COATING INSTALLATION 2 Pair $ $

0005 Metal Conduit Liner surface prep

2 EA $ $

0006 Metal Conduit Liner Repair

2 EA $ $

0007 Metal Conduit Liner Coating

2 EA $ $

0008 Repair Access Hatch (Incl. surface cleaning, surface repairs, surface primer, epoxy coating, etc.)

2 EA $ $

1001 Mobilization/Demobilization 2 EA $ $ 1002 Haul & Dispose of Non-Hazardous Material, Class 2

Fac. PER PAIR

2 EA $ $

1003 Haul & Dispose of Hazardous Material, Class 1 Fac.

(Assumed 5 each per pair of gates) 10

55 GAL.

Drum $ $

TASK ORDER NO. 4 - Buchanan Dam Slide Gate Repair & Coatings

PRICING SCHEDULE

TOTAL BASE ITEMS (0001-0008) $___________________

TOTAL BASE ITEMS & OPTION ITEMS (0001 - 0008 & 1001 - 1003) $_______________________

Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Price

0001 Mobilization/Demobilization - Incl. temp office setup/staging area, all construction submittals, all required permits, records and as-builds, etc. 1 LS $ $

0002 Lead Base Paint Testing

8 EA $ $

0003 Service Gates 1 thru 2 & Emergency Gates 1 thru 2 SURFACE PREPARATION

2 Pair $ $ 0004 Service Gates 1 thru 2 & Emergency Gates

1 thru 2 COATING INSTALLATION 2 Pair $ $

0005 Metal Conduit Liner surface prep 2 EA $ $ 0006 Metal Conduit Liner Repair

2 EA $ $

0007 Metal Conduit Liner Coating

2 EA $ $

0008 Repair Access Hatch (Incl. surface cleaning, surface repairs, surface primer, epoxy coating, etc.)

2 EA $ $

0009 Concrete Repair at flip bucket*

4 CY $ $

1001 Mobilization/Demobilization 2 EA $ $ 1002 Haul & Dispose of Non-Hazardous

Material, Class 2 Fac. Per Tainter Gate 2 EA $ $ 1003 Haul & Dispose of Hazardous Material, Class 1 Fac. (Assumed 5 each per pair of gates) 10

55 GAL.

Drum $ $

* QUANTITY IS AN ESTIMATED AMOUNT. SEE SECTION 00700, FAR 52.211-18, FOR VARIATION IN

ESTIMATED QUANTITY CONTRACT CLAUSE

TASK ORDER NO. 5 - Hidden Dam Slide Gate Repair & Coatings

PRICING SCHEDULE

TOTAL BASE ITEMS (0001-0009) $_________________

TOTAL OPTION ITEMS (1001 - 1003)$_______________

TOTAL BASE ITEMS & OPTION ITEMS (0001 - 0009 & 1001 - 1003) $_______________________

Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Price

0001 Mobilization/Demobilization - Incl.

temp office setup/staging area, all construction submittals, all required permits, records and as-builds, etc. 1 LS $ $

0002 Lead Base Paint Testing

8 EA $ $

0003 Service Gates 1 thru 2 & Emergency Gates 1 thru 2 SURFACE PREPARATION

2 Pair $ $ 0004 Service Gates 1 thru 2 & Emergency

Gates 1 thru 2 COATING INSTALLATION 2 Pair $ $ 0005 Metal Conduit Liner surface prep

2 EA $ $

0006 Metal Conduit Liner Repair

2 EA $ $

0007 Metal Conduit Liner Coating

2 EA $ $

0008 Repair Access Hatch (Incl. surface cleaning, surface repairs, surface primer, epoxy coating, etc.)

2 EA $ $

1001 Mobilization/Demobilization 2 EA $ $ 1002 Haul & Dispose of Non-Hazardous

Material, Class 2 Fac. Per Tainter Gate

2 EA $ $

1003 Haul & Dispose of Hazardous Material, Class 1 Fac. (Assumed 5 each per pair of gates)

55 GAL.

Drum $ $

TASK ORDER NO. 6 - Martis Creek Dam Slide Gate Repair & Coatings

PRICING SCHEDULE

TOTAL BASE ITEMS (0001-0008) $___________________

TOTAL OPTION ITEMS (1001 - 1003)$________________

TOTAL BASE ITEMS & OPTION ITEMS (0001 - 0008 & 1001 - 1003)

(End of Summary of Changes)

Tab 6 of the Technical Proposal: Factor 3 – Past Performance.

1. General.

a. The information provided under this tab will be used in conjunction with the evaluation of the relevant past performance record of the offeror and proposed key subcontractors. Information other than that supplied by the offeror under this tab may be utilized by the Government in its evaluation of past performance.

b. The more similarities an example project has with the prospective contract, the greater the degree of relevancy.

The Source Selection Authority shall determine the relevance of similar past performance information.

2. Prime Contractor/Key Subcontractor Past Performance.

a. Offerors are to provide past performance evaluation information on the example projects submitted under the Experience and Capability factor (e.g. Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS), questionnaire, similar performance evaluation, or other performance evaluations completed previously).

b. If an official written performance rating or evaluation is not available for the prime or a proposed key subcontractor, then send a copy of the completed* example “Project Information Form” to the reference along with a past performance questionnaire and a cover letter (see sample formats provided below). The cover letter must request that the reference return both the Project Information Form and the completed questionnaire to the Government no later than the date set for receipt of proposals. Provide the name and phone number of the person who was furnished a copy of the modified Project Information Form and the questionnaire.

[*Note: In order to protect sensitive source selection information, the copy of the Project Information Form that is sent to the references may be modified. The information can be limited to the information provided in block one through four of the Form.]

c. Provide the following additional information for each of the example projects submitted under the Experience and Capability factor.

(1). Compliance with Socio-Economic Requirements: (only applies to contract awarded by a federal agency.)

Address the contractor’s compliance with the requirements of FAR 52.219-8, currently titled “Utilization of Small Business Concerns” by listing the percentage participated by each small business concern category.

(2). Safety Record: Detailed information pertaining to reportable injuries with lost workdays or fatalities on this project. For contracts with reportable injuries (lost workdays or fatalities), also include the total number of hours worked under the contract. Provide frequency rate.

(3). Performance Problems: Describe any performance problems on this project about which a customer may make adverse remarks. Describe actions taken to correct any performance shortcomings. Describe any pending, on-going, or completed litigation. If no performance problems, provide a statement to this effect.

(4). Quality Awards: Any quality awards received for this project by a proposed team member.

(5). Contract Prices: Original and the final contract price. If different, provide brief explanation.

(6). Completion Dates: Original and the final completion date. If different, provide a brief explanation.

d. Formatting and Other Restrictions.

Start the information for each example project on a new page. There is not a page limitation for this submission.

e. Evaluation Criteria.

(1). The Government will evaluate past performance information to assess the level of performance risk associated with the offeror’s likelihood of success in performing the requirements stated in the solicitation. The currency and relevance of the information (as determined by the Government), the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the contractor’s performance may be considered.

(2). This comparative risk assessment of past performance information is separate from the responsibility determination required under FAR Subpart 9.1.

(3). The Government will evaluate the information submitted by the offeror pertaining to recent, relevant contracts.

The Government may also use data obtained from other sources, including automated databases and questionnaires.

References other than those identified by the offeror may be contacted by the Government. The Government may take into consideration the offeror’s performance of contracts with the agency; other Federal, State, and local government activities; and commercial concerns.

(4). In general, example projects that the Government did not consider relevant for the purposes of evaluating experience will not be considered relevant for the purposes of evaluating past performance.

(5). For the purpose of the past performance evaluation, offerors shall be defined as business arrangements and relationships, such as Joint Venture participants, teaming partners, and subcontractor(s). The past performance record of each firm in the business arrangement may be evaluated by the Government.

(6). The evaluation may take into consideration the offeror’s quality of workmanship; adherence to contract schedule; effectiveness of management, including the subcontracting aspect; compliance with labor standard;

compliance with safety standards; commitment to customer satisfaction; and business relationship.

(7). For Federal contracts, the evaluation will also include the offeror’s history of compliance with the requirements of FAR 52.219-8, currently titled “Utilization of Small Business Concerns”.

(8). The evaluation may take into account the number and severity of problems, the demonstrated effectiveness of corrective actions taken, and the overall work record.

(9). In the case of an offeror without a record of recent, relevant past performance (and for which there is also no recent, relevant past performance information for its predecessor companies or subcontractors), or for whom information on past performance is not available or cannot be verified, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. For the purpose of this procurement, an “Adequate” rating is considered to be a neutral rating that is neither favorable nor unfavorable. Notwithstanding the above, the Government is not precluded from making award to a higher-priced offeror with a favorable past performance record over a lower-priced offeror with a neutral past performance rating.

SAMPLE OF LETTER WITH ATTACHMENTS TO BE SENT TO THE REFERENCES

OF THE CONTRACTOR THAT PARTICIPATED IN THE EXAMPLE PROJECT

(TO BE USED ONLY IF AN OFFICIAL PERFORMANCE RATING OR EVALUATION OF THE

CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE ON THE EXAMPLE PROJECT WAS NOT PROVIDED IN THE

OFFEROR’S TECHNICAL PROPOSAL)

Date

Name and Address of Reference

Dear __________________:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, is conducting a past performance review of our firm’s past performance as part of an upcoming source selection acquisition, W91238-10-R-0026.

Your name was given by us to the government as a reference of our past performance on the following contracts with your agency/firm:

INSERT LIST

We have attached a “Project Information Form” describing our firm’s involvement for each of the above listed contracts. Please complete a questionnaire for each listed contract then FAX both our Project Information Form(s) and your completed questionnaire(s) directly to the Corps of Engineers, ATTN:

Monica Walker, at (916) 557-5182. The Corps has requested receipt of this information by close of business the day after proposals are due, as their evaluation will commence shortly thereafter.

Please note that if you have already completed a past performance questionnaire or customer survey for the listed project(s) and contractor in conjunction with another procurement, a copy of that survey or questionnaire may be submitted in lieu of completing the attached form.

You are advised that it is government policy that the identity of sources providing past performance information will not be released outside the government.

We appreciate your efforts to help the Government fairly evaluate our past performance. Should you have any questions related to this matter, please contact the Government’s contract specialist for this project, Monica Walker, at Monica.D.Walker@usace.army.mil.

Sincerely, Offeror’s Signature

Attachments

INSTRUCTIONS TO THE REFERENCE FOR COMPLETING

THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Handwritten completion of this questionnaire is acceptable, if legible.

Please include evaluation of contractor's performance based solely on the performance for which the contractor was/is liable. Do not let factors beyond the control of the contractor, which have resulted in performance delays or other problems bias the evaluation of the contractor's performance.

The following is a definition of the scoring system used:

Excellent (EX): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good (VG): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory (S): Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the area being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal (M): Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory (U): Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

In completing the questionnaire please check the box corresponding to your rating, or "N/A" if you are unable to provide an evaluation for any area.

Please provide clear and concise narrative explanations (both positive and negative) for your answers.

This is especially important for any rating above or below “satisfactory”. If more space is needed than is provided, you may attach additional sheets

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(To be completed and returned by the Reference along with the Project Information Form)

PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION FORM

The contractor for whom this reference is being requested has completed a Project Information Form in which they briefly describe their participation on this project. In regards to this form please select from the following statements.

I was not furnished with a copy of the Project Information Form.

If the Project Information Form was NOT provided, please provide the following information:

a. Contractor/Subcontractor whose performance is being evaluated:

b. Project Title/Brief Description of Work and Project Location:

c. Contract or Other Reference Number:

d. Date Work was Completed:

e. Total Dollar Value of Work Performed by this Contractor:

f. Please indicate if the contractor who performance is being evaluated was the prime contractor or a subcontractor on this project:

The attached Project Information Form is a fair description of both the project and the contractor’s/subcontractor’s involvement.

The attached Project Information Form is not accurate in the following respects: Please state your concerns.

(Past Performance Questionnaire, Con’t.)

PART II: PAST PERFORMANCE/QUALITY EVALUATION:

1. Quality Control – Assess the contractor’s quality control (workmanship, documentation, material, testing) conformance according to contract requirements and specifications:

EX VG S M U N/A UNKNOWN

Comments:

2. Overall Quality of Product or Service - Assess the contractor’s overall conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship:

3. Schedule - Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or effect the schedule variance):

4. Management: – Assess the contractor’s effectiveness of management to include the timely award and management of subcontracts:

5. Labor Standards: – Assess the contractor’s conformance to labor standard requirements:

6. Safety Standards: – Assess the contractor’s conformance to safety standard requirements:

7. Customer Relationship: – Assess the contractor’s customer relationship to include the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction:

8. Business Relationships - Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective actions plans, and proposal submittals:

9. Cost Control: Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing and controlling contract cost (e.g. claims, non-government required change orders):

10. Socio-economic Goals: If the contract was issued by a Federal/State agency, please assess the contractor’s good faith efforts to meet the various types of small business participation goals:

11. If you had a choice, would you use this company again? Yes No

Explain:

12. Other contacts who may be able to furnish past performance information:

PART III. EVALUATOR INFORMATION

IMPORTANT NOTE: THE NAME OF THE PERSON PROVIDING THE PAST PERFORMANCE

EVALUATION WILL NOT BE RELEASED OUTSIDE OF THE GOVERNMENT.

A. Name of evaluator:

B. Title:

C. Telephone number:

D. Company/Organization:

E. Position held in reference to the contract (Technical inspector, contract administrator, etc.):

F. Length of involvement in contract:

G. Was the contractor given the opportunity to respond to all adverse or unfavorable past performance information?

Yes No Not Applicable Unknown

Explain:

H. Date questionnaire completed/information provided:

I. If the information was submitted in writing, the signature of the evaluator:

J. If the information was obtained telephonically, the signature(s) of the government representative(s) documenting the phone call:

3. Key Subcontractor Commitment and Authorization Letters.

a. Provide a letter of commitment and authorization from each proposed key subcontractor that:

(1) States the business concern’s intent to work on this project in the proposed specified capacity if the offeror is awarded the contract; and

(2) Provides authorization for the Government to discuss the key subcontractor’s past performance record with the offeror in conjunction with the Government’s evaluation of the offeror’s technical proposal.

b. Formatting and Other Restrictions.

Each letter should be furnished on the business concern’s letterhead and signed by an authorized representative of the concern. There is not a page limitation for this submission.

c. Evaluation Criteria.

Failure of a key subcontractor to provide authorization for the Government to discuss their past performance record with the offeror will not be considered a proposal deficiency. However, the Government will not be able to discuss in detail any past performance problems with the offeror.

Tab 4 of the Technical Volume: Factor 4 – Key Personnel.

a. The information provided under this tab will be used in conjunction with the evaluation of the duties, responsibilities, experience, and the past performance record of the key personnel. The resumes and example projects will provide the primary basis for the Government’s evaluation of the key personnel’s experience.

b. The more similarities the key personnel’s example project has with the prospective contract, the greater degree of relevancy.

c. Please note that the minimum qualifications specified in Section 01 45 04 for the On-Site Project superintendent and On-Site Project Manager and On-Site Construction Quality Control (CQC) System Manager, and the minimum qualifications for the On-Site Safety and Health Officer in Sections 01 50 05, and 01 35 29 must be met and will be verified by the Contracting Officer prior to issuance of the notice to proceed.

2. Key Personnel Resumes and Example Projects Demonstrating Experience.

a. For each proposed position, submit a resume of the person proposed for each of the key personnel positions identified by the Government. Submit the resume of only one person for each key position (e.g., do not submit alternates), with the following exception. When there is more than one work site and different people will be performing the duties at the different work sites, submit a resume for each such person. If the same person is being proposed for more than one key position (where allowed), submit a resume for that person for each proposed position.

b. The resume must clearly substantiate with data that can be verified provide specific, detailed employment data.

Your attention is specifically directed to the minimum qualification criteria for the following key positions:

--On-Site Project Manager: Demonstrate five years experience as a project manager on construction projects with similar construction features as this project (i.e. of comparable complexity and physical size) that have been completed, or are substantially completed.

--Construction On-Site Project Superintendent: Demonstrate five years experience as a construction site project superintendent on construction projects with similar construction features as this project (i.e. of comparable complexity and physical size) that have been completed, or are substantially completed.

--Contractor Quality Control System Manager: Demonstrate meeting Section 01 45 04.00 10 requirements.

--Project Scheduler: In addition to demonstrating meeting Section 01 32 01.00 requirements, demonstrate one year experience with NAS schedules utilizing primavera software on construction projects with similar construction features as this project (i.e. of comparable complexity and physical size that have been completed, or are substantially completed.

c. The Government is especially interested in the experience of the proposed key personnel in the same capacity on relevant projects, as demonstrated by the example projects on their resumes. The greater the similarities between the example project and the prospective contract, the more relevant the example project will be considered. The greater the number of relevant experience years, the more favorable the rating.

d. Formatting and Other Restrictions.

(1). Begin each resume on a new page. The submission is limited to five 8-1/2” x 11” pages per resume.

(2). A sample format has been provided to illustrate the level of detail desired by the Government. Use of a different format could result in a lower rating if all of the requested information is not provided.

(3). If the proposed person received letters of appreciation, commendation, recommendation, etc., either during contract performance or in conjunction with the acceptance of the projects described in Block 3 of the resume (Relevant Projects), attach copies. The letters are not included in the page limitation. Note: The Government is not requesting the individual to submit letters written after the fact for the purpose of this procurement.

c. Evaluation Criteria.

a. The Government will evaluate the proposed key personnel’s duties and responsibilities for its soundness and workability. Consideration will include the amount of time(s) the key personnel will be at the construction site.

b. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s key personnel relevant experience. The more recent, and the greater the extent and relevance, of the key personnel’s experience, the higher the rating assigned. Key personnel with previous experience in the same capacity on prior relevant completed or substantially completed project are advantageous for evaluation purposes. Generally, projects that are not substantially complete will be given less consideration than projects which are either complete or substantially complete; however, for very large contracts spanning several years, the Government will determine whether sufficient progress has been made for the key personnel to have gained creditable relevant experience.

c. Failure of a key personnel to provide authorization for the Government to discuss their past performance record with the offeror will not be considered a proposal deficiency. However, the Government will not be able to discuss in detail any past performance problems with the offeror.

SAMPLE FORMAT FOR RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT

IMPORTANT NOTE: The resume must clearly substantiate with verifiable information that the proposed person meets any minimum qualification requirements established in the solicitation for the proposed position, to include minimum years of experience, specific education, training requirements, etc. Detailed, specific information must be provided; merely providing a general statement of compliance will not suffice.

1. Name of proposed person:

2. Key position for which the person is proposed and their Duties and Responsibilities. (Note: If your organization uses a different title other than the key position designation used by the Government, indicate both the “key position” designation and the title used by your organization (e.g., “CQC System Manager/Quality Control Manager.”): Briefly describe the duties, responsibilities, and authorities this person will have on the prospective contract.

3. Year’s Experience/Employment History by Relevant Project:

a. Total cumulative years of experience in the proposed position:

b. Total cumulative years of experience in other related positions (i.e., in other than the proposed position):

c. Employment history by relevant project: At a minimum, provide sufficient information (to include specific and verifiable dates of employment) to clearly substantiate that the proposed person meets any minimum experience requirements for the position and demonstrates the person’s capability relevant to her/his proposed role on the prospective contract. Recommended format for each relevant project:

1). Project Title and Location (City and State):

2). Customer/Project Owner

3). Firm that Proposed Person was Employed by When Work was Performed:

4). Dates Proposed Person Worked on this Project: Month/Year to Month/Year

5). Proposed Person’s Specific Position/Role/Title, Duties, Responsibilities, and Authority Held:

6). Brief Project Description (scope, physical size, price, etc.)

7). Specialized Experience Gained from the Example Project that is Relevant to the Prospective Contract:

4. Firm Name and Location:

a. Name, city and state of the firm where the person currently works.

b. Name, city and state of the firm where the person will work under the prospective contract.

c. Primary work site under the prospective contract.

5. Education: N/A

6. Current Professional Registration/License: N/A

7. Other Relevant Qualifications: N/A

8: Other:

a. Citizenship:

[Note: If the proposed person is a foreign national (e.g., not a U.S. citizen) and the offeror is selected for contract award, additional documentation pertaining to the proposed person must be provided post-award in accordance with Special Contract Requirement 52.204-4003 (see Section 00800).

b. Additional duties and responsibilities the proposed person will have under the prospective contract, in addition to those associated with the position for which she/he is proposed.

c. Additional duties and responsibilities the proposed person will have concurrently, in addition to work under this contract.

9. Commitment statement: Provide a statement indicating the person’s intent to work on this project in the specified capacity if the offeror is awarded the contract.

10. Consent for Release of Past Performance Information to the Offeror: Include the following statement: I hereby authorize the Government to discuss my past performance record with the offeror in conjunction with the Government’s evaluation of the offeror’s technical proposal.

11. Signature of the proposed person. Signing attests that the information furnished is current and factual.

ATTACHMENTS

END OF FORM

Tab 5 of the Technical Volume: Factor 5 – Socio-Economic Considerations.

a. All offerors, regardless of business size or status, are to address this factor.

b. Do not furnish a Small Business Subcontracting Plan as part of your technical proposal, either in lieu of or in addition to the information described below. When required as part of your offer, the Subcontracting Plan is to be provided in the Price Proposal volume.

2. Proposed Small Business Participation.

a. Address the proposed participation of Small Business Concerns (SBCs) in the performance of work under the prospective contract. Include the following information:

(1) The extent of proposed participation of SBCs in terms of the total value of the contract (dollars and percentage).

(2) Specific identification by name of the proposed SBCs;

(3) Extent of offeror’s commitment to use the specifically identified SBCs;

(4) The offeror’s teaming arrangement with the specifically identified SBCs (e.g., Joint Venture participant or subcontractor); and

(5) The complexity and variety of the work the specifically identified SBCs will perform.

Important Note: This submission includes the offeror’s proposed utilization of all small business concerns, irrespective of their classification into other subgroups (e.g., veteran-owned SBCs; service-disabled veteran-owned SBCs, HUBZone SBCs, Small Disadvantaged Business concerns; woman-owned SBCs, etc.) and whether or not participation is at the prime or subcontract level.

b. Formatting and Other Restrictions.

Your response may consist of narrative and/or charts. There is not a page limitation for the submittal; however, do not use a sheet size exceeding 11” x 17”. A sample format has been provided to illustrate the level of detail desired by the Government. Use of the sample format is encouraged, but is not mandatory. However, use of an alternate format could result in a lower rating if detailed specific information relevant to this procurement is not provided.

c. Evaluation Criteria.

(1). The Government will evaluate the extent of proposed participation by small business concerns as measured by dollar value and/or percentage of work. Considerations will include whether or not the technical proposal specifically identifies the proposed participants by name, the extent of the commitment to use the identified participants (i.e., whether or not there are enforceable agreements in place), and the complexity and variety of work the named participants would perform under the prospective contract.

(2). An offeror not in full compliance with the submission requirement will receive a rating no lower than “Marginal”, as long as the offeror has made a reasonable attempt to respond to the proposal submission requirements. Notwithstanding the above, an offeror who fails to provide any information for evaluation will receive an “Unacceptable” rating.

(3). Subcontracting plans will not be utilized by the Government in the technical evaluation for this factor, Socio- Economic Considerations.

PROPOSED SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION SAMPLE FORMAT

1. The total extent of proposed participation of SBCs (dollars and percentage) in terms of the total value of the contract:

Total Value of the Contract Proposed Value of SBC Participation $ [To be entered by the Government using the Offeror’s total proposed price] $ %

2. The following table

--Identifies the proposed small business concerns by name and physical location;

--Provides the name and telephone number of a point of contact for each SBC;

--Identifies the proposed teaming arrangement with the SBC (e.g., Prime Contractor, Joint Venture Participant or Subcontractor);

--Identifies the current level of commitment to use the named firm (e.g., “enforceable agreement”, “non-enforceable agreement”, or “none” if the named firm is under consideration for participation under the contract);

-- In the “Complexity of Work” column, states the technical skills and/or expertise each SBC will utilize in performance of work; and

--In the “Variety of Work” column, states the tasks each SBC will undertake in performance of work.

(Tab 5 of the Technical Proposal)

PROPOSED SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION

Business Name and Physical Location

Point of Contact & Phone Number

Type of Teaming Arrangement

Level of Commitment

Complexity of Work

Variety of Work

--End Section--