Bid_Inquiry_Contracting_Officers_Report.pdf

Bid Inquiry Contracting Officers Report Closed Inquiries

Project: DLA - Construct New TMP Gas Station at JBLE Review: W91236-19-B-0008 (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 26 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec

8129122 Other Solicitation Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Project Duration: The SF 1442 and Pages 17/18 state a project duration of 300 calendar days, while Page 3 states a project duration of 365 calendar days. Please advise if the project duration is to be 300 or 365 calendar days.

By: Valerie Jackson; Greenland Enterprises, Inc.; (757.864.0640). On: Aug 07 2019.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Potential Time Impact. Recommend amending the SF 1442 Sec 00 21 00 pages 17-18 to reflect page 3's 365 calendar day project duration.

REASON: AE (DOR) design/cost estimate is based on 365 days. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 12

1-1 Government Response. Posted Amendment 0002 on FBO address this question.

By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 14 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8129133 Other Solicitation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Number/Type of Copies: The SF 1442 states (1) original and (1) copy, while Page 3 states (1) original and (1) CD copy. Please advise if the submission package should contain (1) original,

(1) hard copy, and (1) CD copy, OR (1) original and (1) CD copy.

By: Valerie Jackson; Greenland Enterprises, Inc.; (757.864.0640). On: Aug 07 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. 1 original & 1 CD copy By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 14 2019

1-1 Government Response. 1 original and 1 CD copy By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strReportType=AllCOR&RequestTimeout=1000&pagStrRowSort=CommentID https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strReportType=AllCOR&RequestTimeout=1000&pagStrRowSort=Discipline https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strReportType=AllCOR&RequestTimeout=1000&pagStrRowSort=Sheet https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strReportType=AllCOR&RequestTimeout=1000&pagStrRowSort=Detail https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strReportType=AllCOR&RequestTimeout=1000&pagStrRowSort=SpecText mailto:vjackson@greenlandenterprises.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8129122 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:vjackson@greenlandenterprises.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8129133 mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8129122 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8129133

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8129162 Other Solicitation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Contractor Performance and Banking Information (Page 6): Please confirm if the following is ALL that we are to submit in order to be compliant for this section, or if we are to submit additional information/documentation (and what all that entails).

"YOUR FIRM'S NAME

a. BANK: Branch/Location Point-of-Contact Telephone Number/Fax Number/Email Address

Please contact the bank in advance so they will release the necessary information regarding average balances in your operating accounts, lines of credit and credit history."

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Confirming Banking information needed as stated in the Solicitation. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201- 7310) On: Aug 14 2019

1-1 Government Response. Confirming Banking information needed as stated in the Solicitation. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201- 7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8129171 Other Solicitation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Period for Acceptance of Bids: Page 19 states this is to be 300 calendar days, while the SF 1442 states this is to be 90 calendar days. Please advise if the period for acceptance of bids is to be 300 or 90 calendar days.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Potential Cost Impact. Potential Time Impact. Recommend amending to indicate base bids need to be good for 90 days with expiration of the bid options/CLINs based on the BID SCHEDULE NOTES on solicitation pagees 15-16. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 12 2019 mailto:vjackson@greenlandenterprises.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8129162 mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:vjackson@greenlandenterprises.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8129171 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8129162 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8129171

1-1 Government Response. Posted Amendment 0002 on FBO addressing this question By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 14 2019

8129184 Other Solicitation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

IFB Submission Package: After reading through the solicitation, we are under the impression that a complete IFB package should consist of the following documents: 1. SF 1442; 2.

Schedule of Prices; 3. Bid Bond; 4. Contractor Performance and Banking Information (highly recommended); 5. JV Agreement (if applicable); 6. Completed Reps & Certs (from the solicitation). Please confirm if this is correct. If this is not correct, please provide a list of IFB package documents for submission.

By: Valerie Jackson; Greenland Enterprises, Inc.; (757.864.0640). On: Aug 07 2019.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Recommend clarifying proposal submission requirements to include what is outlined on solicitation pages 4-5 (paragraph F.

DRC). Paragraph E. DIB EVALUATION AND AWARD EVALUATIONS (solicitation page 4) may need to be clarified to as it says, "considering only price and the price-related factors included in the invitation for bid," unless the comments about "whose bid, conforming to the invitation" includes submission conforming/in-response-to the DRC part. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 12 2019

1-1 Government Response. Posted Amendment 0002 on FBO addressing this question By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 14 2019

8130110 Contracting Solicitation Document

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In the definitive responsibility criteria section- submission requirements-Would submission of projects that are commercial fueling (Non-DOD)be accepted to satisfy this requirement?

By: Matt Smith; KEAR Civil Corporation; (6237422329). On: Aug 07 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. In short, No. Recommend directing bidders back to the solicitation page 4 statement in "Submission Requirements" stating, "apparent successful bidder must have constructed a new ground fueling facility that mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8129184 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:matt.smith@kearcorp.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8130110 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8130110 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8129184 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8130110 complied with the criteria and standards within the DoD Unified Facilities Criteria

(UFC) 3-460-01...".

REASON: Many fuels Construction Contractors have built commercial gas stations, but DLA (project funder) requests a Construction Contractor with prior UFC 3-460-01 DoD standards experience. The potentially closest off-DoD installation commercial example would be a large truck-stop with includes above ground storage tanks. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 12 2019

1-1 Government Response. In short, No. Recommend directing bidders back to the solicitation page 4 statement in "Submission Requirements" stating, "apparent successful bidder must have constructed a new ground fueling facility that complied with the criteria and standards within the DoD Unified Facilities Criteria

(UFC) 3-460-01...".

REASON: Many fuels Construction Contractors have built commercial gas stations, but DLA (project funder) requests a Construction Contractor with prior UFC 3-460-01 DoD standards experience. The potentially closest off-DoD installation commercial example would be a large truck-stop with includes above ground storage tanks. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757- 201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8131194 Other Solicitation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

CLINs 0008 & 0009 Unit Pricing (Pages 11/12): For both of these CLINs, the "0 to 100 (est.)

cubic yards (CY)" unit pricing states "100 CY", while the "101 to 200 (est.) cubic yards (CY)" unit pricing does not. Please clarify if the unit price to be quoted on both of these lines is supposed to be for (1) CY, or for (100) CY.

By: Valerie Jackson; Greenland Enterprises, Inc.; (757.864.0640). On: Aug 08 2019.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Potential Cost Impact. I see the issue. CLINs 0008 & 0009 in the solicitation asks for a unit price of 100CY plus the extended cost (which would be 100CY), then requests the unit price of 1CY for 101 to 200CY and extended cost of all CYs between 101 and 200CYs.

Recommend amending using similar verbiage as CLIN 0010 (above); i.e. "For the first 100 cubic yards 0 - 100, UNIT PRICE CY $_____ EXTENDED COST $_____." The way the CLINs were laid out in the BID Item price schedule w options_DESC 1914" was to get a unit price (1CY within the 0-100 range) as well as the total cost for 100CYs (0-100 range), 99CYs (101-200 range), etc. By:

mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:vjackson@greenlandenterprises.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131194 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131194

Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On:

Aug 12 2019

1-1 Government Response. I see the issue. CLINs 0008 & 0009 in the solicitation asks for a unit price of 100CY plus the extended cost (which would be 100CY), then requests the unit price of 1CY for 101 to 200CY and extended cost of all CYs between 101 and 200CYs.

Recommend amending using similar verbiage as CLIN 0010 (above); i.e. "For the first 100 cubic yards 0 - 100, UNIT PRICE CY $_____ EXTENDED COST $_____." The way the CLINs were laid out in the BID Item price schedule w options_DESC 1914" was to get a unit price (1CY within the 0-100 range) as well as the total cost for 100CYs (0-100 range), 99CYs (101-200 range), etc. By: Kevin

1-2 Government Response. The text below appends or clarifies ALL previous replies.

Please provide pricing for CLINS 0008 & 0009 as follows: CY 0 to 100 Unit price + Total Extended

CY 101 to 200 Unit price + Total Extended

Total price for the above CY amounts By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8131203 Other Solicitation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

CLIN 0010 Unit Pricing (Page 13): Both unit pricing lines state "Over ten (10) 5,000 gal frac tanks 11 to 25". As there is no difference between either of these descriptions, we believe this may be in error. If so, please provide us with the corrected descriptions for both unit pricing lines.

By: Valerie Jackson; Greenland Enterprises, Inc.; (757.864.0640). On: Aug 08 2019.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Potential Cost Impact. Yes, it looks to be a duplication error, it was not written that way in the "BID Item price schedule w options_DESC 1914_190520.doc". When amended, recommend a response stating something to the point of the first set should read, "For the first ten (10) 5,000 gal frac tanks 0 to 10." By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 12 2019

1-1 Government Response. Yes, it looks to be a duplication error, it was not written that way in the "BID Item price schedule w options_DESC 1914_190520.doc".

mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:vjackson@greenlandenterprises.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131203 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131203

When amended, recommend a response stating something to the point of the first set should read, "For the first ten (10) 5,000 gal frac tanks 0 to 10." By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8131213 Other Solicitation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

CLIN 0015 & TOTALS (Page 15): It appears that the CLIN "TOTALS" section has inadvertently been placed in the middle of CLIN 0015. It is our understanding that this section should follow after the "NET AMT" for CLIN 0015. If so, please provide a corrected form.

By: Valerie Jackson; Greenland Enterprises, Inc.; (757.864.0640). On: Aug 08 2019.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. I concur with the bidder. Recommend amending and separating CLIN 0015 from the CLIN totals. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 12 2019

1-1 Government Response. I concur with the bidder. Recommend amending and separating CLIN 0015 from the CLIN totals. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT

8141226 Other n/a n/a n/a

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is there an expected period of performance? I understand the duration is 365 days, but when is this project expected to be mobilized?

By: Monica Massana; Cherokee Enterprises, Inc.; (305-828-3353). On: Aug 15

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Period of performance of 365 days starts after Notice to Proceed. By: erick cooper; CENAO-PM-M Military Branch; (757-201- 7195) On: Aug 16 2019

1-1 Government Response. Period of performance of 365 days starts after Notice to Proceed. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8142032 Other Spec Spec

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:vjackson@greenlandenterprises.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131213 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:mrm@cherokeecorp.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8141226 mailto:erick.b.cooper@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131213 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8141226

Will the government be removing fuel oil from the existing tanks and cleaning the tanks prior to removal? If not, provide amounts of fuel to be disposed of.

By: Valerie Jackson; Greenland Enterprises, Inc.; (757.864.0640). On: Aug 15 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Potential Cost Impact. Refer Bidders to G-005 Demolition Note 6. Bidders are to assume REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF 5,000

GALLONS OF RESIDUAL OILY WATER, SLUDGE, OR OFF-SPEC

PRODUCT. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 16 2019

1-1 Government Response. Refer Bidders to G-005 Demolition Note 6. Bidders are to assume REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF 5,000 GALLONS OF RESIDUAL OILY WATER, SLUDGE, OR OFF-SPEC PRODUCT By: Kevin

8142036 Other Spec Spec

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the government be removing fuel from the existing generator and belly tank prior to removal? If not provide amounts of fuel to be disposed of.

By: Valerie Jackson; Greenland Enterprises, Inc.; (757.864.0640). On: Aug 15

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Government will remove remaining fuel from the existing generator but must have 14 days written notice. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23

1-1 Government Response. Government will remove remaining fuel from the existing generator but must have 14 days written notice By: Kevin

8142039 Other Spec Spec

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Have previous plans and specs from the original construction determined existing deadmen utilization or is there possibility of a concrete pad under the existing tanks?

By: Valerie Jackson; Greenland Enterprises, Inc.; (757.864.0640). On: Aug 15 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8142032 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:vjackson@greenlandenterprises.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8142036 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:vjackson@greenlandenterprises.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8142039 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8142032 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8142036 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8142039

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. In short yes, Refer Bidders to D-101 Notes 3, 4, & 5 -stating "ABANDON UST CONCRETE ANHCORS IN PLACE". No amendment required. BACKGROUND: UST deadman utilization, concrete anchors, & buried concrete pads all provide some form of anchor/ballast that the Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) are attached to so the USTs don't float to the top during heavy rain. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402- 995-2410) On: Aug 16 2019

1-1 Government Response. In short yes, Refer Bidders to D-101 Notes 3, 4, & 5 -stating "ABANDON UST CONCRETE ANHCORS IN PLACE". No amendment required. BACKGROUND: UST deadman utilization, concrete anchors, & buried concrete pads all provide some form of anchor/ballast that the Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) are attached to so the USTs don't float to the top during heavy rain. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310)

8147205 Electrical E-601 26 32 14.00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference Contract Drawing Sheet E-601. This sheet denotes a "60 kW" generator. However, Specification Section 26 32 14.00, Paragraph 1.2.1 states the service load as "100 kW". Please clarify the required kW rating of the generator.

By: Manny Gonzalez; Brite Electric; (7574523118). On: Aug 19 2019. Forward

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. 60 kW is the correct size. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23

1-1 Government Response. 60 kW is the correct size. By: Kevin

8147863 Structural S401 B4 03 30 00.00 10 CAST-IN-PLACE

CONCRETE

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

May we saw cut the "1/2" x 2" deep formed joint filled with fuel resistant sealant" post concrete placement?

Or is it intended that this joint be truly formed, each side of the joint placed separately?

By: James Enochs; J. W. Enochs Inc.; (8043666409). On: Aug 19 2019. Forward mailto:mgonzalez@briteelec.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147205 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147205 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:wilson@jwenochs.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147863 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147863 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147205 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147863

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Joint may be installed post concrete placement. Joints must be installed as soon as possible to prevent undesired or sporadic cracking. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402- 995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. Joint may be installed post concrete placement. Joints must be installed as soon as possible to prevent undesired or sporadic cracking. By:

Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27

8147903 Civil C501 A1 03 20 00.00 10

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The reinforcing described at the bollard detail is described as "#4 bars at 12" OC EW" . Is it correct to assume circular bent #4 bars will ( standard T3 bend) will be required at 12" oc vertically?

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes, the circular bar spacing is 12" OC vertically. By:

Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On:

Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. Yes, the circular bar spacing is 12" OC vertically. By:

8147927 Structural S401 C4, D4, D5 03 30 00.00 10 CAST-IN-PLACE

May we form and pour the curb shown after pouring the slab below? Would a bonding agent be required similar to detail D4 on sheet S-501?

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. It is preferred the curb be placed with the slab for overall finish and quality. However, curb may be placed separately. A fuel resistant dumbbell water stop must be installed, the surface roughened, and a bonding agent applied prior to placing the curb. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019 mailto:wilson@jwenochs.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147903 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147903 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:wilson@jwenochs.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147927 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147927 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147903 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147927

1-1 Government Response. It is preferred the curb be placed with the slab for overall finish and quality. However, curb may be placed separately. A fuel resistant dumbbell water stop must be installed, the surface roughened, and a bonding agent applied prior to placing the curb By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8147942 Structural S404 C4 03 30 00.00 10 CAST-IN-PLACE

Can the 9" thick Floor of the trench be cast separately from the adjacent slab? thus allowing the trench walls to be formed and poured with the adjacent slab. If approved, would a bonding agent or water stop be required?

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The floor can be placed separately, but a fuel resistant dumbbell water stop must be installed, the surface roughened, and a bonding agent applied prior to placing the trench walls. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. The floor can be placed separately, but a fuel resistant applied prior to placing the trench walls. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT

8147984 Structural S501 B3 03 30 00.00 10 CAST-IN-PLACE

Can the floor (1'-6" thick ) of the sump be cast independently from the adjacent slab? Allowing the sump form itself to be attached thereto

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The floor can be placed separately, but a fuel resistant applied prior to placing the adjoining concrete. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. The floor can be placed separately, but a fuel resistant mailto:wilson@jwenochs.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147942 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147942 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:wilson@jwenochs.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147984 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147984 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147942 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147984 applied prior to placing the adjoining concrete By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8148393 General 2.1.2.2 01 32 01.00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFI questions for solicitation W9123619B0008

(Attachment: Ocean_Construction_Ground_Vehicle_RFI's.pdf) By: Kara Laskowski; Ocean Construction Services; (7572009590). On: Aug 19 2019. Forward

1-0 Evaluation For Information Only. The six submitted questions in the attached inquiry text will be evaluated/replied via the individual Bidder Inquiry numbers that follow. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-

1-1 Government Response. The six submitted questions in the attached inquiry text will be evaluated/replied via the individual Bidder Inquiry numbers that follow.

By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8150545 General 2.1.2.2. 2.1.2.2. 01 32 01.00 10

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

1. Section 01 32 01.00 10 Paragraph 2.1.2.2 states that if the Contractor uses any scheduling program other than P6 that the Contractor must provide the Government with 2 computers and provide training for the schedule program. Is this correct?

By: Kara Laskowski; Ocean Construction Services; (7572009590). On: Aug 20

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Primavera P6 is the preferred scheduling program. The contractor is allowed to use another scheduling program only if, "...Contractors must provide the Government with 2 computers and provide training for the schedule program...". Also the computers cannot use the Corps wide network so the computer will need to stand alone or the contractor will have to provide internet access. Note that the scheduling program used by the contractor needs to create a Standard Data Exchange Format (SDEF) file to import into RMS per requirements in Specification 01 45 00.15 10, paragraph 1.7.5. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special

1-1 Government Response. Primavera P6 is the preferred scheduling program. The contractor is allowed to use another scheduling program only if, "...Contractors https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicFileDownload&strApp=&strPrevCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strShown=Ocean_Construction_Ground_Vehicle_RFI's.pdf&intView=1 mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8148393 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8148393 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150545 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8148393 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150545 must provide the Government with 2 computers and provide training for the schedule program...". Also the computers cannot use the Corps wide network so the computer will need to stand alone or the contractor will have to provide internet access. Note that the scheduling program used by the contractor needs to create a Standard Data Exchange Format (SDEF) file to import into RMS per requirements in Specification 01 45 00.15 10, paragraph 1.7.5. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO- CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8150554 General 3.7 3.7 01 32 01.00 10

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that Progress Meetings will be weekly in lieu of bi-weekly.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Bids should be based on weekly progress meetings. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-

1-1 Government Response. Bids should be based on weekly progress meetings By:

8150556 General 1.5.1 1.5.1 01 35 29.13

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that the site SSHO must be an Industrial Hygienist certified by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Potential Cost Impact. The Industrial Hygienist requirement can be deleted. However the SSHO must meet the requirements of EM 385-1-1 paragraph 01.A.17. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. The Industrial Hygienist requirement can be deleted.

However the SSHO must meet the requirements of EM 385-1-1 paragraph 01.A.17. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150554 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150556 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150554 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150556

8150558 General 01 45 00.00 50

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

4. Section 01 45 00.00 50 states the QC Manager will have no other duties. Section 01 35

26.00 50 states the SSHO can't be the QC Manager. Can the Superintendent be the SSHO or will 3 people be required to fill the positions?

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Potential Cost Impact. The SSHO may also serve as the superintendent. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. The SSHO may also serve as the superintendent By:

8150561 General 01 45 00.15.10

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 01 45 00.15 10. Please confirm that this project will require using the RMS system.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. RMS system is required. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special

1-1 Government Response. RMS system is required. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO- CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8150564 General 3.1.2.B 01 45 35

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 01 45 35 Paragraph 3.1.2 b. Please confirm the Special Inspectors must attend all preparatory phase meetings related to the DFOW.

mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150558 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150561 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150564 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150558 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150561 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8150564

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes. The special inspectors must attend all preparatory phase meetings related to the DFOW. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. Yes. The special inspectors must attend all preparatory phase meetings related to the DFOW. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT

Report Complete