Word_document_versions_of_attachments_-_22_Oct_2015.docx

W911W4-15-R-0021

J.1.7 Template: Offeror Question Spreadsheet

Legend

J.1.9 Template: PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION TABLE - TRAIN AND SUSTAIN MISSION AREA

Introduction and Proposal Information

1 Original 6 Duplicates

1 Original 1 Duplicate

Volume 1 Table of Contents (L.5.2.2)

Standard Form 33 (L.5.5.1.3)

List of key corporate POCs (L.5.5.1.4)

Reps and Certs (Sec K, FAR 52.204-8) (L.5.5.1.5)

Executive Summary (L.5.5.1.6)

Proposal Master Table of Contents (L.5.5.1.7)

Proposal Cross Reference Matrix (L.5.5.1.8)

Proposal File Matrix – (L.5.5.1.9)

Proposal Adequacy Checklist (L.5.5.1.10)

Proposal Compliance Checklist (L.5.5.1.11)

Security Checklist (L.5.5.1.12.1)

Facility Clearance Information (L.5.5.1.12.2)

Access to a SCIF (L.5.5.1.12.3)

Volume 1 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms (L.5.5.1.14)

Technical – Train and Sustain (STO Bravo)

1 Original 6 Duplicates

Technical – Train and Sustain (STO Charlie)

6 Duplicates

Small Business

1 Original 4 Duplicates

Small Business Participation Plan (L.5.5.3.1)

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms (L.5.5.3.2.2)

Past Performance

4 Duplicates 1 Original

Price

1 Original 4 Duplicates

RFP Section B (L.5.5.5)

Accounting System (L.5.5.5.1.1)

Cost Accounting System (CAS) (L.5.5.5.1.2)

Price Summary Table (L.5.5.5.2)

STO-Bravo Price Proposal (L.5.5.5.4)

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms (L.5.5.5.5.2)

* QCP and Security Plan are not page restricted i.e. not included in page count ** Page limit for the Staffing Plan does not include key personnel resumes and job descriptions. Resumes are limited to 2 pages each with no limit on the number of resumes submitted.

J.1.10 Template/Example: Cross-Reference Matrix

J.1.11 Template: Force Projection Volume File Names Table

Force Projection Volume File Names

J.1.12 Template: Train and Sustain Volume File Names

Force Projection Volume File Names

Past Performance

J.1.13 Template: Cover Letter Attachment 1

Name of Offeror

Offeror’s Point of Contact (POC) for clarification (Title, Phone Number. E-mail)

Solicitation Number

Mission area (FP or T&S)

Commercial And Government Entity (CAGE) Code

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

Dunn & Bradstreet (DUNS) Number

DCMA POC (Phone Number. E-mail)

DCAA POC (Phone Number. E-mail)

Corporate Name, Address, Additional Details for award (if different than the submission)

Evidence that proposal signatory is authorized to legally bind the Offeror

J.1.14 Security Checklist

SECURITY CHECKLIST

Security Element Proposal Reference(s):

(volume, page, paragraph)

Policies & Procedures: Compliance with RFP Security Requirements and DD Form 254 for both the ID/IQ Contract and the applicable Sample Task Order

Registration in Army Contractor Automated Verification System (ACAVS)

National Industrial Security Program Manual (NISPOM) Accredited Contractor Special Security Officer (CSSO)

NISPOM Accredited Facility Security Officer (FSO)

Contractor Personnel Security Training Regimen

Status of Key Personnel Clearances

Key Security Personnel Point of Contact Identification

Name:

Title:

Phone No.

e-mail

J.1.15 Template: Personnel Security - listing of all key personnel identified in the offeror’s sample task order proposal

Name [Full]

Last, First, Middle

Date and Place of Birth

SSN

SSBI Date Clearance Held, Date Granted, By Whom Polygraph Type, Date of Polygraph, Agency Administering Polygraph (if applicable)

Government Sponsor

Mouse, Mitchell Moose 1950-11-31 Disney, FL 123-45- 2015-06-

TS 2015-06-20

by DIA

Superman, Clark Gale 1962-02-29 Hollywood, CA 987-65- 2015-02-

TS/SCI 2015-

05-10 by DIA

FS/2015-06-28,

NSA

DA G-2

J.1.16 Template: Percentage of Small Business Participation by Category

Offerors shall provide the Percentage of Small Business Participation using the following table format for the Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite –Quantity contract and each Task Order to which they are proposing:

Business Participation

SB

SDB

WOSB

VOSB

SDVOSB

HUBZone SB

J.1.17 Template: Percentage of Small Business Participation by Individual Business

Offerors shall provide information required under each column header using the following table format:

Base Period

Classification(s)

J.1.18 Template: Past Performance References List

Offerors shall provide a single page list of the past performance references submitted for each task order with the information specified in the following format:

J.1.19 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please DO NOT provide a copy of your responses to anyone else, including the company that is the subject of your responses. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within 3 days.

Adjectival Rating Definitions:

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact–Respondent)

A. Effectiveness of Linguist Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

1. How would you describe the overall service that the linguist contractor has provided?

2. Has the contractor provided linguists with the following characteristics as required by the contract? (Please provide examples of excellence and/or sub-par performance):

· Ability to write and speak in clear and concise grammar and pronunciation of the required native language.

· Capable of providing idiomatic translations of non-technical material using correct syntax and expression from English to the native language and vice versa.

· Ability to conduct consecutive, accurate translations/interpretation of ongoing conversations/activities.

· Familiarity with and ability to conduct oneself in accordance with the local culture and customs.

· Ability to deal unobtrusively with the local populace.

· Familiarity with and adherence to standards of conduct as prescribed by host nation laws, U.S. Army regulation(s) and policy, and the contract.

· Willing and capable to live and work in harsh environments.

3. Have any linguists presented security/force protection problems for your unit?

4. Have the linguists worked at least 8 hours per day, up to 7 days a week? (Linguists are obligated to work at least 8 hours per day up to 7 days a week. If necessary, they can work up to 12 hours and be on-call for the remaining 12 hours, depending on mission requirements.)

RATING:

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Management.

1. Is contractor management providing the resources and influence to meet the performance requirements of the contract?

2. Is contractor management responsive to customer needs and concerns?

3. Has contractor management been proactive in ensuring linguists are paid regularly and on time?

4. Have your linguists had any issues or concerns that have not been addressed in a timely manner by the contractor’s on-site management?

5. Has contractor management been effective in use and control of subcontractors?

Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs, preventing Cost Overruns, and accuracy, allowability and allocability of invoices submitted (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company? If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Thank you for your assistance. Please complete Part II of this Questionnaire and return the entire questionnaire via e-mail to at by the closing date of this RFP.

J.1.20 Sample Consent Letter

SUBCONTRACTOR/TEAMING PARTNER CONSENT LETTER

Date

MEMORANDUM FOR U.S. Army INSCOM 8825 Beulah Street Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5246

ATTN: IAPC-DOC (DLITE II KO)

SUBJECT: Consent Letter to Release Past Performance Information

1. We are currently participating as a (subcontractor/teaming partner) with (prime contractor) in response to the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command solicitation number W911W4-16-R-00XX, Request for Proposal for the Department of Defense Interpretation and Translation Enterprise II (DLITE II) Program.

2. We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on Past Performance in order to obtain Best Value in Source Selections. In order to facilitate the Performance Confidence Assessment process, we are signing this consent form in order to allow you to discuss our Past Performance information with the Prime Contractor during the Source Selection process.

Offeror Name:

Company (Teaming Partner/Subcontractor) Name: Address:

CAGE Code:

Phone Number and FAX:

Insert signature and title of individual with authority to sign for and legally bind the company.

J.1.21 STO Alpha Price Proposal Summary Table

Table L.1 Summary Table

X005 Labor

X009 ODC

X010 Travel

X011 DBA

Total

J.1.22 STO Alpha Fixed Price Annual Rate Table

J.1.23 STO Bravo Price Proposal Summary Table

Table L.1 Summary Table

X017 Labor

Total

J.1.24 Proposal Compliance Checklist

COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST FOR PROPOSAL REVIEW

Offeror’s Name: Solicitation: W911W4-15-R-0021

Reference: Proposal Submission “Instructions to Offerors” Section L

Files contained in the CD-R mirror the hard copy version and are divided into folders corresponding to the proposal volumes and their titles. (L.5.4.4.5)

Volume 1 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms (L.5.5.1.14)

A statement regarding the offeror’s compliance with FAR 9.104-1 (L.5.5.5.1.1.1) OR

- OR - Documentation requested in L.5.5.5.1.1.2

image1.emf

Microsoft_Excel_Worksheet1.xlsx Sheet1

Contractor Clearance (Yes / No)

Name, Address, and Zip Code Cage Code Cognizant Security Office (Name, Address, and Zip Code) TS Facility Clearance TS Safeguarding

1)

Subcontractor

Name, Address, and Zip Code Cage Code Cognizant Security Office (Name, Address, and Zip Code)

1)

2)

3)

N)

Sheet2

CUSTOMER / CLIENT REFERENCE LIST

OFFEROR: CONTRACT NUMBER:

COMPETITION POOL:

Project (Contract Number)

Project Name Company Name Perfoming As Customer Where Performed Contract Type Completion Date Value $(M) Facility Clearance Safeguarding Clearence

1 Offeror

2 Offeror

3 Offeror

4 Offeror

5 Offeror

6 Offeror

"Perfroming As" - insert "Prime", "Sub" (for subcontractor), "Team", or "Partner"

"Where Performed" - insert "CONUS", "OCONUS", or "BOTH"

"Contract Type" - insert FFP, CPFF, CPAF, etc…

"Completion Date" - The date that performance was completed

"Value $(M)" - annual dollar value in millions

Sheet3