W911W4-15-R-0021_-_DLITE_II_Amendment_09_-_26_OCT_2016.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See summary of changes in Contracting Officer's Memorandum, dated 26 October 2016.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 26-Oct-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911W4-15-R-0021

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Oct-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

26-Oct-2016

CODE

CDR, HQUSAINSCOM

8825 BEULAH ST.

FORT BELVOIR VA 22060-5847

W911W4 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

8825 BEULAH STREET

FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-5246

IAPC 26 October 2016

Reference: Amendment 0009 to W911W4-15-R-0021

The following modifications to the DLITE II Solicitation are indicated by red text.

1. Section M.4.6.1.1 is amended to read, Cost/price analysis will take into account adequate price competition within each mission area, comparison of the offeror’s proposed price to historical pricing for similar efforts, and comparison of the offeror’s proposed price to an independent Government cost estimate (IGCE) for the applicable effort, and a determination will be made as to whether the offeror’s proposed total price is fair and reasonable, complete, and realistic. The Government reserves the right to adopt one or multiple methodologies in its price evaluation.

2. Section M.4.6.2.3 is amended to read, Offerors are cautioned that an unrealistically low price may be a basis for eliminating the proposal from the competition.

3. Section M.4.6.1.3 Completeness, is amended to read, M.4.6.1.4 Completeness

4. Section M.4.6.1.3.1 is amended to read, M.4.6.1.4.1

5. Section M.4.6.1.3.2 is amended to read, M.4.6.1.4.2

6. Section M.4.6.1.4 is amended to read, M.4.6.2.1

7. Section M M.4.6.1.5 is amended to read M.4.6.2.2

If there are any discrepancies between this Memorandum and Amendment 0009, the language in Amendment 0009 shall govern.

All remaining terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Sincerely, Luis Cotto-Arroyo Contracting Officer United States Army Intelligence and Security Command

M.4.6.1.4 Completeness.

Cost/price proposals shall be evaluated for completeness by assessing the responsiveness of the proposed cost/price, by assessing the level of detail the offeror provided, and assessing the traceability and reliability of any estimates relied on by the offeror in determining the proposed cost/price. For the cost data to be complete, the offeror, or its subcontractors, must provide all backup data necessary to support the proposed cost/price.

M.4.6.1.4.1 Contractor supplied data other than certified cost and pricing data will be utilized to support a determination of fair and reasonable pricing. For a price to be reasonable, it should not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. For additional information see FAR 31.201-3.

M.4.6.1.4.2 To facilitate the evaluation of proposed costs and prices, information may be obtained from other sources including, but not limited to, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), Defense Contract Audit

Agency (DCAA), U.S. Department of Labor, available escalation or inflation factors or indices, and any other resource available to the Government.

M.4.6.2.1 When conducting price analysis, the Government will consider not only the total price, including options, but also the proposed prices for the individual CLINS to ensure they are not unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques.

W911W4-15-R-0021

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATIONS FACTORS

M.4.6.1.1 Cost/price analysis will take into account adequate price competition within each mission area, comparison of the offeror’s proposed price to historical pricing for similar efforts, and comparison of the offeror’s proposed price to an independent Government cost estimate (IGCE) for the applicable effort, and a determination will be made as to whether the offeror’s proposed total price is fair and reasonable, complete, and realistic. The Government reserves the right to adopt one or multiple methodologies in its price evaluation.

W911W4-15-R-0021

M.4.6.2.2 The Government reserves the right to reject an offeror’s proposed price if they determine that the proposed pricing poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

M.4.6.2.3 Offerors are cautioned that an unrealistically low price may be a basis for eliminating the proposal from the competition.

(End of Summary of Changes)