CSD_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_19MAY2016.pdf

PDF 11 KB Posted

Attached to
Chemical Surface Detector (CSD) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911SR-16-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Chemical Surface Detector (CSD), newest first.
File Type Posted
CSD_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CSD_CDRLS_FINAL_amendment_4.pdf PDF
W911SR-16-R-0001-0003_FINAL.pdf PDF
W911SR-16-R-0001-0002.pdf PDF
Cost_Proposal_Template _One_Period_of_Performance.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CSD_CDRLS_20160525_FINAL.docx DOCX document
W911SR-16-R-0001-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_DD_Form_254_Contract_Security.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_CSD_ILA.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_A__CSD_CDRLS_DD_FORM_1423.pdf PDF
Attachment_8___CSD_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_Facility_Clearance_Sponsorship_Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_9_JPEO_CBD_CIL.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_PRD.pdf PDF
W911SR-16-R-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Cost_Proposal_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CSD RFP (W911SR-16-R-0001) Questions & Answers (Q&A)

1. Will the prototypes used in On the Move, False Alarm, EOA, CCSI, and MIL-STD-810 testing be returnable to the contractor between tests in the event the prototypes are in need of repair, maintenance, or requested changes by the Government since they are not scheduled for direct chemical exposure?

A. Yes, the prototypes may be returnable but only by Government discretion. The Government must ensure changes between tests do not affect attributes of the prototype that could influence test results and the test timeline must remain unaffected. The PWS will be updated.

2. The updated Performance Work Statement (PWS) indicates specific uses for each prototype. Are all prototypes required to be identical?

A. Yes, the final prototypes must be identical and be capable to integrate with contractor designed vehicle mounting hardware. The PWS will be updated.

3. The updated Performance Requirements Document (PRD) remains aligned with the Stryker NBCRV platform for requirements 3.2.1.3, 3.2.2.1.2, and 4.4.2.1.1. Are the prototypes be required to be capable of integration with the Stryker NBCRV platform?

A. Please refer to Section C.3.1.1.3 Table 1 of the Performance Work Statement for applicable PRD Requirements. PRD paragraphs 3.2.1.3, 3.2.2.1.2, and 4.4.2.1.1 will not apply in the TMRR phase and are only shown so that future requirements will be understood.

4. Based on requirements for integration with the platform CDPU (3.2.1.1, 3.2.1.5, 3.3.2.1.8, 3.3.2.8.7, 3.5.3.2, and Table 1), is the M998 HMMWV to be equipped with a CDPU?

A. No. For the TMRR phase the prototypes do not need to integrate with a CDPU but will have to be CCSI compliant.

5. Will the dimensions outlined in Paragraph 3.2.2.1, Dimensions, apply to prototypes that are to be trailer mounted?

A. Please refer to Performance Work Statement Section C.3.1.1.3 Table 1 for applicable PRD Requirements. PRD Section 3.2.2.1 does not apply in the TMRR phase and is only shown so that future requirements will be understood.

6. Please provide dimensions for the rear door indicated in requirement 3.2.2.1.2.

A. Please refer to Performance Work Statement Section C.3.1.1.3 Table 1 for applicable PRD

Requirements. PRD Section 3.2.2.1.2 does apply in the TMRR phase and is only shown so that future requirements will be understood. The rear opening is approximately 42.25 inches in height and approximately 20.25 inches in width.

7. PWS C.3.1.4.2 indicates a specific Final Prototype unit will be utilized for MIL-STD-810 tests. PWS

C.3.1.4.2.3 indicates that the MIL-STD-810 test article will be the same unit that undergoes False Alarm Testing. Will a dedicated MIL-STD-810 unit be required?

A. One Final Prototype will be delivered for MIL-STD-810 testing. PWS section 3.1.4.2.3 will be revised to delete the sentence “The Government will conduct MIL-STD-810G testing following the False Alarm Test utilizing the same prototypes from False Alarm Testing.”

8. PWS Table 2 indicates the operating condition humidity tests will be performed for 240 hours. Will the system be operated continuously or periodically over the 240 hours? Will the system be required to operate for the full 240 hours without replenishment or maintenance?

A. The Government will remove the humidity test from the TMRR acquisition phase PWS. The PWS will be updated. The humidity will also be removed from the Environmental challenge in section L.3.1.5.1 Brassboard Testing. Section L. will be updated.

9. Please provide the location, start date, and duration of the CCSI Demonstration in Table 3: Schedule of Events of the PWS.

A. The Government anticipates the CCSI Demonstration location will be at Dugway Proving Ground, Utah. The duration is approximately 1 day, conducted prior to on-the-move test approximately 526 CDAC. The Schedule of Events will be updated.

10. In Section L.3.4.2.2.3, what information does aforementioned refer to?

A. Aforementioned refers to all information required in paragraph L.3.4.2.2.2 as follows: “A detailed narrative for each contract cited and the similarities and relevance of that work to the work required by this solicitation, objectives achieved, and cost growths or schedule delays encountered. The Offeror shall provide copies of Quality Deficiency Reports and Corrective Actions submitted by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) office within the past five (5) years. For Government contracts that did not nor do not meet original requirements with regard to either cost, schedule, or technical performance the Offeror shall provide a brief explanation of the reasons(s) for such factor(s) and any corrective actions take to avoid recurrence.

11. In Section L.3.4.2.2.3, is the request for all terminations or only those for cause?

A. Section L.3.4.2.2.3 will be updated to clarify. The government is requesting all contract terminations for default in past five (5) years.

12. In L.3.4.2.2.4 it specifies to submit recent information on performance demonstrating compliance for FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan. Is this only required for the Past Performance examples provided in the Past Performance Section 1?

A. Yes, this information is only required for the recent and relevant Past Performance examples provided in Section 1.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .