Attachment_3_CSD_ILA.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 184 KB Posted May 5, 2016

Attached to: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: W911SR-16-R-0001
Issued by: Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground

About this file

From the source

Attachment 3 CSD ILA

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Chemical Surface Detector (CSD), newest first.
File	Type	Posted
Exhibit_A_CSD_CDRLS_FINAL_amendment_4.pdf	PDF	Jun 15, 2016
CSD_Amendment_0004.pdf	PDF	Jun 15, 2016
W911SR-16-R-0001-0003_FINAL.pdf	PDF	Jun 8, 2016
W911SR-16-R-0001-0002.pdf	PDF	Jun 1, 2016
Cost_Proposal_Template _One_Period_of_Performance.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Jun 1, 2016
CSD_CDRLS_20160525_FINAL.docx	DOCX document	Jun 1, 2016
W911SR-16-R-0001-0001.pdf	PDF	May 27, 2016
CSD_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_19MAY2016.pdf	PDF	May 19, 2016
Attachment_8___CSD_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx	DOCX document	May 5, 2016
Attachment_2_Facility_Clearance_Sponsorship_Form.pdf	PDF	May 5, 2016
Attachment_1_DD_Form_254_Contract_Security.pdf	PDF	May 5, 2016
Exhibit_A__CSD_CDRLS_DD_FORM_1423.pdf	PDF	May 5, 2016
Attachment_9_JPEO_CBD_CIL.pdf	PDF	May 5, 2016
Attachment_6_PRD.pdf	PDF	May 5, 2016
W911SR-16-R-0001.pdf	PDF	May 5, 2016
Attachment_5_Cost_Proposal_Template.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	May 5, 2016

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Assessment_Areas

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST SCORESHEET
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	1 -Not Planned/Started	4 -Draft Coordinated & Agreed
Manufacturer:	2 -Concept/Plan Initiated	5 -Final Concept/Plan Available
System:	3 -Draft Available for review	6 -Final Concept/Plan Completed

Evaluation Criteria	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
DISCUSSION AREAS FOR Contactor Review
1.0 Design Interface
1.1 Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability
1.2 Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System
1.3 Parts and Material Selection
1.4 Manprint
1.5 System Safety
1.6 System Interoperability
2.0 Maintenance Planning
2.1 Maintenance Concept, Design, & Analyses
2.2 Maintenance Plan
2.3 Built In Tests (BIT) and Diagnostics
2.4 Maintenance Task Analyses
3.0 Support Equipment
3.1 Support Equipment Considerations
4.0 Supply Support
4.1 Supportability
4.2 Sparing Analyses
5.0 Manning, Personnel, and Training
5.1 Requirements	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
5.2 Human Systems Integration Analysis
5.3 Training
5.4 Training Outline and Curricula Design	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
5.5 Training Material
5.6 Training Devices/Simulators	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
5.7 Initial Training Requirements
6.0 Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation
6.1 Requirements
6.2 Testing	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
7.0 Configuration Management
7.1 Configuration Control	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
7.2 Configuration Status Accounting	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
8.0 Technical Data
8.1 Technical Data Package and Publications	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
8.2 Technical Manuals
9.0 Enviromental, Saftey, Hazardous Materials
9.1 Enviromental Compliance	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
9.2 Saftey and Health	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
9.3 Hazardous Material Management
10 Facilities
10.1 Facility Requirements
11.0 Computer Resources
11.1 Software Development

Assessment Areas &P

READ ME

This document's purpose is to provide clarification on the original Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Checklist on to what the government is evaluating in relation to the status of each discussion area. These discussion areas may or may not be discussed at: Technical Reviews, Design Reviews, Bi-Weekly Meetings, and Technical Readiness Reviews.

Design_Interface

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE		Response
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	DESIGN_INTERFACE
ILA Language	Contractor Requirements	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
1. Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM)	1. Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM) (Required in PWS C.3.2.4)
Are functional profiles prepared and detailed to the subsystem, assembly and part levels?	Describe or provide updates to the design and development of functional profiles prepared and detailed to the subsystem, assembly and part levels via System Block Diagram format.
Do the functional profiles, from above, describe the system functional requirements and their associated mission and life-cycle time-lines? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe or provide update to the system functional requirements, their associated mission(s), and life-cycle time-lines to include evaluations to the MTBOMF of the system via System Block Diagrams.
Has your organization defined RAM measures (e.g., Operational Availability (Ao), Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF), Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) and Mean Logistics Delay Time (MLDT)) in quantifiable and measurable terms? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Describe the efforts or provide updates to the RAM/testability requirements and integration into supporting efforts and documents such as ILS Design Analysis, test plans, SEMP, etc

Has your organization defined RAM/testability requirements and reflected them in supporting documents as appropriate?If so, please describe and provide documentation.
Has your organization properly phased into the program RAM/Testability/ILS design analyses/tests? If so, please describe and provide documentation.
2. Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS)	2. Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) (Required in PWS C.3.2.5)
Has your company used a Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) to identify failure modes, their frequency, their effects on performance and their criticality? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Does your FMECA predictions, analyses and test results support RAM requirements? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Has your company utilized a readiness model (e.g., TIGER and Availability Centered Inventory Models) to assess the effects of various levels of redundancies, spares, downtimes and maintenance concepts on operational availability? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Has your company established a FRACAS, and failures analyzed and trended for ILS visibility? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Provide documentation for all FRACAS performed.
Is the FRACAS, from above, being performed on engineering development models, pre-production units and production units? If so, please describe and provide documentation.
3. Parts and Materials Selection	3. Parts and Materials Selection -SEE MRA PWS C.3.2.15 ELIN A015 and MOSA PWS C.3.2.12
Has your company planned an order of precedence for parts selection with emphasis on the use of qualified manufacturers lists parts, particularly for applications requiring extended temperature ranges? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe or provide updates to the status of parts selection with emphasis on the use of qualified manufacturers lists parts, particularly for applications requiring extended temperature ranges.
Have you incorporated a maximum use of standardized items ? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe or provide updates to parts selection maximizing the use of standardized items (MOSA).
Have you identified shelf and operating life requirements? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe the efforts or provide updates on the identification and implementation of shelf life & operating life requirements on part selection.
In your system, is identification of Commercial-Off-The Shelf (COTS)/Non-Development Item (NDI) reliability required? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe the efforts or provide updates on the identification and implementation of Commercial-Off-The Shelf (COTS)/Non-Development Item (NDI) reliability requirements on parts selection.
In your system, are highly integrated parts (e.g., application specific integrated circuits) being used to reduce: (If so, please describe and provide documentation.)	Describe or provide update to design, develop and implement highly integrated parts (e.g., application specific integrated circuits) used to reduce:
- The number of individual discrete parts/chips?	- The number of individual discrete parts/chips
- The number of interconnections?	- The number of interconnections
- Size, power consumption and cooling requirements?	- Size, power consumption and cooling requirements
- Failure rates?	- Failure rates
Have you developed a critical items list been include: (If so, please describe and provide documentation.)	Describe or provide updates to the development and implementaiton of a critical items list to include:
- Any item of high technical risk with no workaround?	- Any item of high technical risk with no workaround
- Items with schedule/delivery risk?	- Items with schedule/delivery risk
- Sole source items?	- Sole source items
- High failure rate items?	- High failure rate items
- Safety, including safety of flight items?	- Safety, including safety of flight items
4. MANPRINT	4. MANPRINT
Have MANPRINT aspects, including tasks between people, hardware and software been considered in the system design? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Have human performance capabilities been considered when determining system performance?If so, please describe and provide documentation.
5.. System Safety	5.. System Safety - Part of the SAR PWS 3.2.10.2.2 ELIN A013
Have system safety design requirements been specified? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe or provide updates to how safety has been factored into the system design.
Have hazard risk and assessment criteria been specified for operating and support personnel, facilities and the weapon system? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe or provide updates to all hazard risks and assessments associated with operating personnel, support personnel, facilities, and the weapon system.
Has a hazard analysis been performed during the design process to identify and categorize hazards, including hazardous materials? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe or provide updates to any hazard analyses performed during the design process to identify and categorize hazards, including analyses of hazardous materials.
In your system, are corrective actions being taken to eliminate or control the hazards, or to reduce the hazard to an acceptable level? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe or provide updates to the actions being taken to eliminate or mitigate hazards to an acceptable level.
Have you incorporated a closed-loop hazard tracking system? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
6. System Interoperability	6. System Interoperability - Pspec 3.3
Have you considered and implemented Standardization and interoperability constraints and implications in the development and acquistion of the system?If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe or provide updates to the considerations and implementations of interoperability constraints (e.g., platforms, operators, parts/LRUs, communications, physical and electrical) and implications of those constraints in the development and acquistion of the system.

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Design Interface &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

Page &P

Scoring

Maint_Planning

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE		Response
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	MAINT_PLANNING
ILA Language	Contractor Requirements	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
1. Maintenance Concept, Design & Analyses	1. Maintenance Concept, Design & Analyses
Has a Calibration and Measurement Requirements Summary (CMRS) been developed (MIL-STD-1839C)? Comment: CMRS is a report which details the measurement specifications of a system, subsystem, or equipment; the TMDE, and the calibration standards and equipment required to assure measurement traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Government owned TMDE will be used when available in categories II and III. If so, please describe and provide documentation	Not applicable at this time.
Have requirements for manpower factors that impact system design utilization rates, system-to- operator/maintainer ratios and maintenance ratios been identified? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Not applicable at this time.
Have economic and non-economic Level of Repair Analyses (LORA) been performed? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Not applicable at this time.
Has the system maintenance concept been developed and incorporated into the logistics planning? If so, please describe and provide documentation	At the Final Review provide recommendations to the system maintenance concept and how it could be incorporated into the systems engineering process.
Has the ILS manager performed any analysis to determine if organic maintenance or contractor maintenance support is the most cost effective for the system? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Not applicable at this time.
Are all three levels of maintenance (O, I and D levels) planned to be included in system repair? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Not applicable at this time.
Have you conducted any analysis showing two levels of repair is the most cost effective? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Not applicable at this time.
2. Maintenance Plan	2. Maintenance Plan
Was the maintenance concept of your system developed early on in system development stage? If so, please describe and provide documentation	How will your hardware and software design meet the Army's 2-level maintenance concept (Organizational v Sustainment)
Has Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) analysis been initiated or completed? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Not applicable at this time.
Was maintenance plan developed early on in system development stage? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Provide updates to the system maintenance plan including:
Does your system maintenance plan: ( If so, please describe and provide documentation for each that apply)
Define specific criteria for repair and maintenance for all applicable maintenance levels in terms of time, accuracy, repair levels, built-in-test, testability, reliability, maintainability, nuclear hardening, support equipment requirements (including automatic test equipment), manpower skills and facility requirements for peacetime and wartime environments?	Not applicable at this time.
Define the maintenance approach including level of repair and include the results of the analysis to determine logical maintenance task intervals.	- The maintenance approach, including maintainability analyses (e.g MTTR), the level of repair (operator vs maintainer), and any analyses to determine logical maintenance task intervals.
Define the actions and support necessary to ensure that the system attains the specified Ao.	- Descibe support necessary to ensure that the system attains the specified Ao, i.e. module design, PMCS, and sparing concepts.
Were MANPRINT considerations included in emerging maintenance concepts when determining maintenance requirements and development?	- Describe how MANPRINT considerations were taken into account when determining maintenance requirements and development
Have maintenance task times have been derived from the following: ( If so, please describe and provide documentation for all that apply)	Not applicable at this time.
- Reliability (e.g., MTBF)?	Not applicable at this time.
- Maintainability (e.g., MTTR, maintenance task times)?	Not applicable at this time.
- Availability (e.g., task time limits)?	Not applicable at this time.
- Reliability and maintainability tests?	Not applicable at this time.
- Performance monitoring/fault detection/fault isolation and diagnostics?	Not applicable at this time.
Are validation tests being conducted under representative operating conditions? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Not applicable at this time.
3. Testability and Diagnostics	3. Built in Tests (BIT) and Diagnostics
Has the testability/BIT concept been defined with the operation concept and the maintenance concept for all levels of maintenance? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Describe or provide recommended updates to the testability/BIT concept as it relates to the operation concept and the maintenance concept for all levels of maintenance
Is the effectiveness of BIT being validated with tests? If so, please describe and provide documentation	If applicable, describe or provide recommended updates to test plans or test results relating to the effectiveness of any and all BIT.
Does the failure of the BIT circuitry precipitate other hardware/software failures? If so, please describe and provide documentation	If applicable, describe or provide updates to analyses to determine if a BIT failure precipitates other hardware/software failures.
Is BIT filtering being applied to minimize false alarms? If so, please describe and provide documentation	If applicable, describe or provide recommended updates to any techniques being applied to minimize BIT false positive alarms.
Are system anomalies and intermittents being analyzed for possible changes to the BIT design, thresholds/tolerances and/or filtering? If so, please describe and provide documentation	If applicable, describe any system anomalies and intermittents (momentary fluctuations that are inherent to the system) that have caused a BIT error, and describe any planned or performed analyses to determine if changes are needed in the BIT design, thresholds/tolerances, and/or filtering to correct those anomolies and intermittents.
Are BIT indications and false alarms being analyzed for corrective action? If so, please describe and provide documentation	If applicable, describe or provide updates to any planned or performed analyses to determine corrective actions for any ineffective BITs and BIT false alarms.
Can BIT software be revised independently and without change to the operating software? If so, please describe and provide documentation	If applicable, describe or provide recommended updates on the ability of BIT software to be revised independently and without changes to the operating software.
4. Maintenance Task Analysis	4. Maintenance Task Analysis
1. List all "operator Maintenance Tasks (IE: Tasks that require no tools, with on-board spares) Operator Maintenance: Maintenance performed by an operating unit on a day-to-day basis in support of its own operations. Organizational level maintenance can be grouped under the categories of inspections, servicing, handling, and preventive maintenance. The operator level maintenance mission is to maintain assigned equipment in a full mission-capable status.	Not applicable at this time.
2. List all "Field maintenance" tasks. (IE: On system maintenance, usually consisting of replacement of LRU (Line Replaceable Units) Field Maintenance: Maintenance that is the responsibility of, and performed by, designated maintenance activities in support of using organizations. It includes limited repair of components/end items, job shop, bay, and production line operations for special mission requirements: software maintenance, fabrication/manufacture of repair parts, assemblies, components, jigs, and fixtures. The filed level of maintenance mission is to enhance and sustain the combat readiness and mission capability of supported activities by providing materiel support at the nearest location with the lowest practical resource expenditure.	Not applicable at this time.
3. List all " Sustainment Maintenance Tasks" (IE: repair of LRUs) Sustainment Maintenance: materiel maintenance requiring major overhaul or a complete rebuilding of parts, assemblies, subassemblies, and end items, including the manufacture of parts, modifications, testing, and reclamation as required. Sustainment level maintenance mission supports lower categories of maintenance by providing technical assistance and performing maintenance beyond their responsibility. It has more extensive facilities for repair than lower maintenance activities (including all aspects of software maintenance). Therefore, it provides a stock of serviceable equipment	Not applicable at this time.

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Maintenance Planning &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

Spt_Equipmt

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE		Response
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	SPT_EQUIPMT
ILA Language	Contractor Requirements	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
1. Support Equipment Considerations	1. Support Equipment Considerations
	Describe or provide updates to the requirements for and the design and development of Support Equipment (SE) to include:
Have the environmental and physical constraints, such as size, weight, power, temperatures and interfaces been factored into Support Equipment (SE) design? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	- If applicable, environmental and physical constraints, such as size, weight, power, temperatures and interfaces
Have analyses to identify the optimum mix of automatic and manual fault detection and isolation equipment at each applicable maintenance level been conducted? If so, please describe and provide documentation	Not applicable
Have you defined manpower, training, maintenance levels and maintenance task requirements? If so, please describe and provide documentation	- If applicable, what maintenance does the support equipment require
Have the required technical documentation to support the SE been dentified to include: ( If so, please describe and provide documentation for all that apply)	Describe or provide updates to the status to any technical documentation to support any required SE including:
- Procedures to perform the required tests and diagnostics?	- Procedures to perform the required tests and diagnostics.
- Test measurement and diagnostic equipment calibration requirements and associated technical parameters?	- Test measurement and diagnostic equipment calibration requirements and associated technical parameters.
- All product/technical data required to support and operate required support equipment throughout the life cycle of that product?	- All product/technical data required to support and operate required support equipment throughout the life cycle of the SE.
- Test fixtures and/or interfaces to connect the system to the test equipment?	- Test fixtures and/or interfaces to connect the CSD system to the SE.
· Has provisioning documentation identified: ( If so, please describe and provide documentation for all that apply)	Not applicable
- Tools and test equipment by task function and maintenance level?	Not applicable
- Manufacturer's part numbers, nomenclatures, descriptions, estimated prices and recommended SE quantities?	Not applicable

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Support Equipment &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

Supply_Spt

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE		Response
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	SUPPLY_SPT
ILA Language	Contractor Requirements	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
1. Supportability	1. Supportability
Can the proposed system be operated and maintained with the quantity and skills of people available? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe the skill set required to operate and maintain the system.
Has a spare and repair parts determination been made? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Are parts being procurred or are they now available? If so, please describe and provide documentation.
1. Sparing Analyses	2. Sparing Analyses
Has a supportability analysis been conducted? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe any identified support cost drivers.
Have the supportability analyses defined the sparing approach (e.g., PBL, direct vendor delivery, inventory control point reprocurement and provisioning)? If so, please describe and provide documentation.
· Have support cost drivers been identified? If so, please describe and provide documentation.
Have provisioning data reports, such as the following, been generated: ( If so, please describe and provide documentation for all that apply).	Not applicable at this time.
Have the recommended repair parts list provided been prepared for repair parts and training equipment? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Have the Provisioning parts lists that determine the range and quantity of support items been prepared? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable at this time.

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Supply Support &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

MPT

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE		Response
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	MPT
ILA Language	Contractor Requirements	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
1. Requirements	1. Requirements
Have you made preliminary manpower estimates for your system?If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not Applicable
Have you identified manpower and personnel requirements including: (If so, please describe and provide documentation)
- Special skills?	Not Applicable
- Maintenance and operator labor hours by rate by year?	Not Applicable
- Number of personnel by rate, maintenance level and year?	Not Applicable
- Operator and maintainer organizational level assignments defined?	Not Applicable
Have maintenance task times, maintenance skill levels and number of maintenance personnel required been derived from the following: (If so, please describe and provide documentation.)	Not Applicable
- Reliability (e.g., MTBF)?	Not Applicable
- Maintainability (e.g., MTTR, and maintenance task analyses)?	Not Applicable
- Availability (e.g., task time limits)?	Not Applicable
- Reliability and maintainability tests?	Not Applicable
- Performance monitoring/fault detection/fault isolation and diagnostics?	Not Applicable
Have your manpower requirements/estimates being validated under representative operating conditions? (If so, please describe and provide documentation.)	Not Applicable
2. Have you complete a Human Systems Integration Analysis? (If so, please describe and provide documentation.)
Does the human systems integration (HSI) analysis address: (If so, please describe and provide documentation.)	Describe how the system design incorporates the following:
- Accessibility?	- Accessibility
- Visibility?	- Visibility
- Human factors/ergonomics?	- Human factors/ergonomics
- Testability/BIT?	- Testability/BIT
- Complexity?	- Complexity
- Standardization and interchangeability?	- Standardization and interchangeability
- Use of mock-ups, modeling and simulation?	- Use of mock-ups, modeling and simulation
- Operational experience?	- Operational experience
Have broad cognitive, physical and sensory requirements for the operators, maintainers and support personnel that contribute to and/or constrain the total system performance been analyzed for your system? (If so, please describe and provide documentation.)	Describe or provide updates to any broad cognitive, physical and sensory requirements for the operators, maintainers and support personnel that contribute to and/or constrain the total system performance.
3. Training	3. Training
Have you conducted a Training Planning Process Methodology ? (If so, please describe and provide documentation.)	Describe any Contractor Training curriculum that has been or will be developed for the system to include:
Have resource requirements been specified for training equipment, materials, facilities and personnel? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	- Resource requirements for training equipment, materials, facilities and personnel.
· Does formal instruction and on-the-job-training include: (If so, please describe and provide documentation.)	- System operation and maintenance intervals (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, semi-annually and on condition)
- System operation and maintenance levels (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, semi-annually and on condition)?	- Individual and team training (if required)
- Individual and team training?	- Instructor training
- Instructor training?	- Defined training objectives
· Do training requirements reflect configuration updates to the system?	- Specific criteria established to determine the success of training
	- Safety procedures incorporated into training curricula
4. Training Outline and Curricula Design	- Plans to update training based on changes to system (e.g. configuration control)
Have your training objectives been defined in detail? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not Applicable
Have specific criteria been established to determine the success of training? If so, please describe and provide documentation.
Are operator and maintainer training embedded in the Interactive Electronic Technical Manual (IETM)? Are job performance aids included? If so, please describe and provide documentation.
Have safety procedures been incorporated into training curricula? If so, please describe and provide documentation.
5. Training Material	4. Training Material

Have technical manuals or operator manuals been developed prior to the development of training materials? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable
Have instructor guides, course curriculum and student guides, as well as audio-visual training aids, been developed for classroom training? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable
Has the software been developed to disseminate computer-based training? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable
After development, has the training material been evaluated for content, clarity and accuracy, typically in a controlled environment of a pilot course?If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable
6. Training Devices/Simulators	5. Training Devices/Simulators
Have training devices to support operator or maintainer training been identified? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	If applicable, describe or provide updates to any plans for the development of training devices to support operator or maintainer training
Are simulation of scenarios reflecting the actual operating environment being used for operator training?If so, please describe and provide documentation.	If applicable, describe or provide updates to any plans to use simulation scenarios reflecting the actual operating environment being used for operator training
7. Initial Training Requirements	6. Initial Training Requirements
Are Contractor test and evaluation activities being used for validation of training requirements and initial fleet training for Operational Evaluation and fleet introduction? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Not applicable

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Manpower, Personnel, and Training &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

PHS&T

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE		Response
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	PHS&T
ILA Language	Contractor Requirements	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
1. Requirements	1. Requirements
Are there any potential packaging, handling, storage or transportation concerns associated with the system? If so, please describe and provide documentation.	Describe or provide updates to any packaging, handling, storage or transportation needs the system or the spare and repair parts.
Have you concidered MIL-STD-2073, Military Packaging, for: (If so, provide details and documentation for all that apply)	Not applicable
- Items that documented analyses have shown cannot be protected and preserved in a cost-effective manner using commercial packaging?	Not applicable
- Can packaging be decontaminated with standard decontaminants and withstand the decontamination process?	Not applicable
- Does packaging support recovery after issue if item is unused?	Not applicable
Has packaging intended for international use been approved by the Department of Transportation and/or United Nations performance specifications? (If so, provide details and documentation	If applicable, describe or provide updates of plans to develop packaging intended for international use in accordance with the Department of Transportation and/or United Nations performance specifications
Have storage monitoring requirements been incorporated into technical publications? (If so, provide details and documentation)	Describe or provide updates to storage facility requirements and/or any long-term system storage requirements (e.g. PMCS)
Have you addressed transportability problems, to include: ((If so, provide details and documentation for all that apply)	Describe or provide updates to any address transportability problems, to include:
- Items requiring special transportation modes?	- Items requiring special transportation modes
- Items that are classified?	- Items that are classified?
2. Storage
Have shelf-life requirements been identified?	Describe any identified shelf-life requirements for the system
Have time delivery requirements for all shipments to the Service from contractors been identified?	Describe any time delivery requirements for all shipments of systems and spare and repair parts to the Service from vendors
Are resources and procedures in place to ensure that all system equipment and support items are preserved, packaged, packed, marked, handled, transported, and stored properly for short- and long-term requirements?	Not applicable
2. Testing	3. Testing
Have hazardous material packages been tested in accordance with the applicable requirements for performance packaging contained in the International Air Transport Association Dangerous Goods Regulations or the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code and with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Titles 29, 40 and 49? (If so, provide details and documentation)	Not applicable

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Packaging, Handling, Storage, & Transportation &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

Config_Mgt

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE		Response
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	CONFIG_MGT
ILA Language	Contractor Requirements	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
1. Configuration Control	1. Configuration Control
Have you incorporated configuration control processes and proceduresincluding change initiation, evaluation and disposition into your program? If so, please provide details and documentation.	Not Applicable
Is an engineering release system utilized to control change, manufacturing and acceptance processes? If so, please provide details and documentation.	Not Applicable
Do you have a Configuration Manager been assigned?If so, please provide details and documentation.	Not Applicable
Do you have a configuration control board established that includes logistics representation? If so, please provide details and documentation.
Is each configuration item functionally audited to verify performance against design documentation? If so, please provide details and documentation.	Not Applicable
Is a physical configuration audit conducted to verify as-built hardware meets design documentation? If so, please provide details and documentation.	Not Applicable

2.. Configuration Status Accounting	2. Configuration Status Accounting
Have you recorded and reported the status of proposed engineering changes from initiation to final approval and contractual implementation?If so, please provide details and documentation.	Not Applicable

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Configuration Management &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

Tech Data

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE		Response
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	TECH DATA
ILA Language	Contractor Requirements	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
1. Technical Data Package and Publications	1. Technical Data Package and Publications
Is your technical data package consistent with the maintenance plan, and does it provide a sufficient level of detail for reprocurement, upgrade, maintenance and repair of hardware? If so, please provide details and documentation.	Not applicable
Does the product/technical data package include:	Not applicable
- Specifications, technical manuals, publications, engineering drawings/product data models and special instructions such as for unique manufacturing and test processes?If so, please provide details and documentation for all that apply.	Not applicable
- Interchangeability, form, fit and function information?	Not applicable
- Safety requirements?	Not applicable
- Preservation and packaging requirements?	Not applicable
- Test requirements data and quality provisions?	Not applicable
2 Technical Manuals	2. Technical Manuals
Have you developed a Technical Manual (TM) plan or equivalent?	Describe your plan to develop a manual to support Government tests and meet PWS requirements.
If so, please provide details and documentation.
- If not, how will the technical manual effort be managed?	Not applicable
Has a Technical Manual Contractual Requirement been requested and developed?If so, please provide details and documentation.	Not applicable
Has a management process been established for engineering drawings?	Not applicable
If so, is the process identified in the program documentation?	Not applicable
Do technical manuals include: If so, please provide details and documentation for all that apply.
- Required readability/comprehension levels?	Not applicable
- Operational and maintenance instructions?	Not applicable
- Parts lists and breakdowns?	Not applicable
- Hazard and Health Markings	Describe how the Technical Manuals will contain health and hazard markings to ensure safe and effective operation and maintenance.
- Related technical information or procedures exclusive of administrative procedures?	Not applicable
Have COTS manuals been evaluated using MIL-HDBK-1221? If so, please provide details and documentation.	Not applicable
· Have the contents of the product/technical manuals been integrated into the IETM, considering the following: If so, please provide details and documentation.
- The contents meet Web Enabled Service requirements as applicable?	Not applicable
- Is the phased development schedule in parallel with the system development, including validation and transition to the applicable Service?	Not applicable
- Are operator and maintainer training embedded, and are job performance aids included?	Not applicable

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Technical Data &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Product and Technical Data &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Technical Data &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

Env, Safety, etc.

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE		Response
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	ENV, SAFETY, ETC.
ILA Language	Contractor Requirements	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH	ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
DoD 5000.2 the ESH Evaluation is an integral part of the system in acquisition process and should be woven into all applicable program documents. Environmental Compliance, Hazardous Materials, Pollution Prevention, NEPA, System Safety and Occupational Health	Not applicable at this time.
1. Environmental Compliance –There are numerous national, state and local environmental laws and regulations that must not be violated under penalty of fine or imprisonment. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 42 USC 4321-4370d, 40 CFR 1500-1508, EO 12114 and EO 11514 is mandatory for all federal agencies. is the basic charter for protection of the environment. It establishes policy, sets goals and provides means for carrying out environmental policy. The following comprise the NEPA:	Not applicable at this time.
2. Safety and Health
With your system, is noise abatement compliant with all Federal and state standards? If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
In your system, Is material toxicity compliant with all Federal and state standards? If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
With your system, is personnel protective equipment compliant with all Federal and state standards? If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
What are the PPE requirements for your system? Provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
System Safety Program Plan (SSPP). Programs should manage the direction of their system safety program by means of a SSPP which should include:	Not applicable at this time.
Do you used a system safety hazard log? Also define the process for the collection, assessment and dissemination of historical safety data? If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Does you system have a Safety Assessment Report (SAR)? The purpose of this report is to document the assessment of mishap risk being assumed. The SAR should contain the following: If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
What are the safety criteria and methodology you use to classify and rank hazards, with any assumptions on which criteria or methodology? Please provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Identify any hazards with your system that have residual risk and the actions that have been taken to reduce associated risk. If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
5. Hazardous Material Management	3. Hazardous Material Management
Have hazardous materials prohibited in the weapon system design due to operation, maintenance and disposal costs associated with the use of such materials been identified with your system? If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Have hazardous materials whose use cannot be avoided been documented and communicated to the user and support installations? NOTE: This includes an inventory of materials incorporated into the weapon system during production and those materials required for maintenance. If so, provide details and documentation.
Does your program have a plan for tracking, storing, handling and disposing of hazardous materials? If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Have hazardous material findings and determinations been incorporated into the training program as applicable? If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Hazardous materials are describes as those materials, including any by-product generated during use or disposal that cause environmental, safety or occupational health compliance concerns and results in elevated level of effort to manage due to their chemical, physical, or biological nature. If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Hazardous materials are describes as those materials, including any by-product generated during use or disposal that cause environmental, safety or occupational health compliance concerns and results in elevated level of effort to manage due to their chem
Are there Lithium Batteries requirements for your program/system? The Navy Lithium Batteries Safety Program (NLBSP) reviews all equipment powered by lithium electrochemical power sources prior to testing or milestone reviews. The Safety Release is contingent upon completing a successful NLBSP review. Additional information can be found in NAVSEAINST 9310.1.	Describe or provide updates to the use of Lithium Ion Batteries within the system
Pollution Prevention Program must address all forms of pollution. The objective of P2 is to eliminate or reduce the use of pollutants, and reduce their environmental impact by changing the materials used in acquisition programs. The hierarchy for P2 is source reduction, substitution, recycling, treatment and disposal.	Not applicable at this time.
Do you have a pollution prevention program that identify impacts of your system on the environment, wastes released to the environment and associated source reduction opportunities? If so, provide details and documentation.	Not applicable at this time.
Does the program have a plan to recycle or dispose of system replaceable and disposable components, such as metals, plastics, electronic components, oils, coolants and refrigerants during system life and end of service life?	Not applicable at this time.

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health &"Times New Roman,Regular"&P &"Times New Roman,Regular"30 March 2004

Facilities

INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE		Response
PROGRAM: Chemical Surface Detector (CSD)	FACILITIES
ILA Language	Contractor Requirements	Proposal	Brassboard Design Review	Program Review #1	Final Prototype Design Review and Program Review #2	Program Review #3	Program Review #4
FACILITIES	FACILITIES
1. Facility Requirements	1. Facility Requirements
What types of facilities will be required to support and sustain your new or modified system been identified, such as:	Describe the types of facilities required to support and sustain the system such as:
- Support facilities, supply warehouses, transit sheds, maintenance facilities, and training facilities (for both classrooms and trainers for operational training and maintenance training, including required technical data to ensure efficient/effective support of facilities)? Please provide details and documentation.	- Support facilities, supply warehouses, maintenance facilities, and training facilities.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.