Attachment_8___CSD_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Chemical Surface Detector (CSD) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911SR-16-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground

About this file

Attachment 8 CSD Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Chemical Surface Detector (CSD), newest first.
File Type Posted
CSD_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CSD_CDRLS_FINAL_amendment_4.pdf PDF
W911SR-16-R-0001-0003_FINAL.pdf PDF
W911SR-16-R-0001-0002.pdf PDF
CSD_CDRLS_20160525_FINAL.docx DOCX document
Cost_Proposal_Template _One_Period_of_Performance.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911SR-16-R-0001-0001.pdf PDF
CSD_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_19MAY2016.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_DD_Form_254_Contract_Security.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_CSD_ILA.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_A__CSD_CDRLS_DD_FORM_1423.pdf PDF
Attachment_9_JPEO_CBD_CIL.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_PRD.pdf PDF
W911SR-16-R-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Cost_Proposal_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_2_Facility_Clearance_Sponsorship_Form.pdf PDF
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CSD PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past five years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I.

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE(To be completed by the Offeror)

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information: (To be completed by the Offeror)

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

_____________________________________________________
SignatureDate

Typed or Printed Name

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .