SOLICITATION_AMENDMENT_1_-_W911SG-18-R-0073.pdf
PDF 106 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ARROYO REPAIRS OWEN RD
- Solicitation number
- W911SG-18-R-ARROYO
About this file
SOLICITATION AMENDMENT 1 - W911SG-18-R-0073
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
0011148639
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The reason for this amendment is:
1. Incorporate the RFI questions and answ ers.
2. Update the draw ings and attaching Section 03 30 00 Cast in Place Concrete, Section 31 11 00 Clear and Grub, and Section 33 40 00 Storm Drainage Utilities
All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
1 5
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 06-Sep-2018
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911SG18R0073
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10-Aug-2018
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
06-Sep-2018
CODE
MICC-FT BLISS W911SG
111 PERSHING RD
FT BLISS TX 79916
W911SG 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
W911SG18R0073
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES
The following have been modified:
252.236-7001 CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS (AUG 2000)
(a) The Government will provide to the Contractor, without charge, one set of contract drawings and specifications, except publications incorporated into the technical provisions by reference, in electronic or paper media as chosen by the Contracting Officer.
(b) The Contractor shall--
(1) Check all drawings furnished immediately upon receipt;
(2) Compare all drawings and verify the figures before laying out the work;
(3) Promptly notify the Contracting Officer of any discrepancies;
(4) Be responsible for any errors that might have been avoided by complying with this paragraph (b); and
(5) Reproduce and print contract drawings and specifications as needed.
(c) In general--
(1) Large-scale drawings shall govern small-scale drawings; and
(2) The Contractor shall follow figures marked on drawings in preference to scale measurements.
(d) Omissions from the drawings or specifications or the misdescription of details of work that are manifestly necessary to carry out the intent of the drawings and specifications, or that are customarily performed, shall not relieve the Contractor from performing such omitted or misdescribed details of the work. The Contractor shall perform such details as if fully and correctly set forth and described in the drawings and specifications.
(e) The work shall conform to the specifications and the contract drawings identified on the following index of drawings:
Title File Drawing No.
DPW --FINAL PLANS-SOUTH ARROYO CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS-SEPTEMBER 2018
DPW --ADDENDUM-SOUTH ARROYO CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS-AUGUST 2018 ADDENDUM (1)
(End of clause)
SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
The following have been added by full text:
RFI QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
W911SG-18-R-ARROYO
RFI QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
1. Are surface mount guardrails being specified? No, install guardrails as per NMDOT Standard Drawing 606-GR31-16/20, “Drainage Structure Protection System” with W-beam guardrail attached to parapet wall of headwall when above culvert.
2. Is there a more detailed drawing on the waterbars? Water bar detail on sheet 4 and called for in specification Section 33 40 00, 2.2.2.
3. Is there a more in depth on the Guardrail install? Install guardrails as per NMDOT Standard Drawing 606-GR31-16/20, “Drainage Structure Protection System” with W-beam guardrail attached to parapet wall of headwall when above culvert.
4. Due to there being multiple projects bidding at the same time from multiple KO’s and some of them are due on the same day and will possibly be starting at the same time. If a contractor is awarded multiple projects will that contractor be able to stagger the contracts for their available construction crews?? When you are submitting bids/ proposals on multiple projects you are assuming the risk at that point.
5. On the plan sheets the box culvert dimensions do not seem accurate with what is shown on the plan view, cross section and the call out for the New Mexico Standard Drawings 511-2 series. On sheet 4 of the plans, the plan view calls out for a distance of 30’ for the overall width of the proposed culverts. This is not accurate as the clear span on each proposed culvert is 6’, without including wall thickness, this puts the overall width at 36’. With the 7” wall thickness, it should be 40’ – 1”. Is this what is intended? Yes, this was a typo, drawing sheet 4 is revised.
6. Clear and grub dimensions area. The plans do not give a scale for the given dimensions. Can we get an accurate assessment of the area that is intended for clearing and grubbing? Dimensions are provided to calculate area for clearing and grubbing. See revised drawing sheet 3, Demolition Plan labeling the Limits of Construction to clarify the project area.
7. In general, almost all of the dimensions shown are contradictory to what is or should be the actual measurement Use dimensions provided; see revised drawings.
8. The design of the culvert is generally based on the NMDOT standard specification. The standard spec only covers culverts up to 4 barrels. The proposed culvert is 6 barrels, is there any engineering documentation or certification that this 6 barrel culvert would not require different layout, thickness, concrete strength for the culverts and the attached wing walls and aprons? New Mexico DOT Standard Drawing 511- 59-1/2 covers the configuration of concrete box culverts (CBC) with more than 4 barrels, see specification Section 33 40 00, 2.1.3.
9. The culvert appears to be covered under the provided storm water specification. In that specification there is a reference to Section 03 30 00 Cast in Place Concrete but no such specification for this project is provided. Is it intended that these culverts are to be cast in place, if so will the intended CIP specification be provided? Yes.
10. Is precast an option? Not for bidding purposes.
11. What is the intended depth of the lowered water line? (42” to top of pipe?) See revised sheet 4, Site Plan, lowering waterline, for final cover of the proposed waterline to be 42” to the top of pipe.
12. Will the specifications for the connection materials needed for the waterline be provided? The materials for the waterline connections are as per industry standard, see attached Las Cruces Water Line Lowering.
13. Blow off valve. There does not appear to be any specifications, details or responsibility for connection of the proposed blow off valve? See revised drawings for correction: the existing blow off assembly is not a blow off valve. A Mueller gate valve is connected to the main 12” waterline with a ductile iron spool then rises up to above ground elevation with a 45-degree fitting and DI spool; once above ground there is a 90-degree bend fitting with a flap (Mueller) to direct discharge into the arroyo.
14. What is the communication line made up of (fiber optic, CAT type, Coax, etc..)? What is the minimum depth? Who is responsible for the communication line and conduit connections? Is there any conduit currently? If so, what type? The existing duct contains the following: 1 each 100 pair copper; 1 each 50 pair copper; 1 each 48 strand fiber optic cable. The contractor shall remove and replace both copper lines as necessary to accommodate the proposed vertical relocation, min. 2 ft depth.
No splicing will be acceptable. Provide concrete encasement as per the 13A Standard.
15. Will the governments Hydraulic Analysis for this drainage be provided? No
16. Existing topography and Design Elevations No question
17. Since no site survey or topography information is given and is required to be performed by the contractor, is there any relief language in the contract indemnifying the contractor of liability for project performance? For instance, without existing elevations, what certification is given that the proposed culverts will receive proper cover depth of the fill material, base and pavement? The contractor is responsible for construction of the project as per contract documents (scope of work, drawings, and specifications). At any time, the contractor has the right to notify the KO of any discrepancies with the project requirements upon new survey information. With the example given, the proper cover depth of the fill material, base and pavement required is certified because there are there are already 3 existing culverts with no problem.
18. With the considerable widening of the culverts at the roadway and the drainage ditch narrowing back to existing width approximately 300’ downstream, will the contractor be responsible for erosion control and bank scouring at this tapered point during construction and during the 1 year performance period? No;
the widening of the arroyo will actually dissipate the velocity and energy of the flows through the existing arroyo; thus, reducing its vulnerability to erosion and scouring.
19. Will there be relief/negotiation for any changes that are necessary from what is currently shown on plans and what will be mapped and checked after surveying is complete? No; there will be no changes to this project.
20. There is a call out for proposed guardrail on the plan sheets. How will the guardrail posts be installed over the proposed culverts? Install guardrails as per NMDOT Standard Drawing 606-GR31-16/20, “Drainage Structure Protection System” with W-beam guardrail attached to parapet wall of headwall when above culvert.
21. Does this proposed bypass road need to be paved? Yes, see Amendment 1, Bypass Road.
22. Is there a minimum storm water runoff volume requirement for culverts on this bypass? The contractor shall replace existing culverts with 6 new culverts.
23. Can the bypass simply divert down to the existing flowline of the ditch without utilizing culverts? No, the contractor shall construct the bypass road as per Amendment 1.
24. Does the Government have any estimated quantities for this project? The contractor can calculate quantities from dimensions given.
25. It does not appear that there is enough existing gabions to be removed and replaced to cover what is shown on the proposed plans. Do the existing gabions match what is being specified in the Technical Specifications for the proposed gabions? Correct, the existing gabions are shown on sheet 3, Demolition Plan with dimensions; subtract them from the proposed gabions shown on sheet 4, Site Plan to calculate the required amount of new gabions. Provide new gabions to meet specification Section 31 36 00, Wire Mesh Gabions.
26. Has the State of New Mexico and the New Mexico Society of Professional Land Surveyors been contacted in regards to removing and replacing the existing survey monument? This question is “N/A” since they do not have any jurisdiction in WSMR. We have our own National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Support Branch; they have been notified of the project disturbing the survey monument and they are willing to coordinate with the contractor to reset the monument as per key note 6.
27. Based on the plans, it does not appear as though the proposed apron of the box culverts will extend far enough to encompass the existing location of the survey monument. Will there be any necessary considerations made to extend the apron to the location of the survey monument or considerations made to the construction of the apron to ensure that the monument does not move, settle or shift after construction? A 7.62’ x 5’ extension to the concrete apron is shown on the Site Plan for the survey monument, keyed note 6. See revised drawing for clarification of the monument’s concrete base.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it.