Amendment 2 W911S824R0005.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to post responses to questions and highlight changes in the PWS and Solicitation.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 23-Oct-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W911S824R0005

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-Sep-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

23-Oct-2024

CODE

MICC-JB LEWIS-MCCHORD

BUILDING 2015

JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD WA 98433-9500

W911S8 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911S824R0005

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

52.212-2 ADDENDUM

The Government will utilize a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable ("LPTA") evaluation method for this requirement. The Government will award a single contract to the offeror whose proposal is technically acceptable, the lowest price, is deemed responsible under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items, in conjunction with FAR 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS), and whose offer conforms to the solicitation’srequirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, and all other information required by the solicitation). Offers that fail to address all the requirements set forth in the Solicitation will be rejected. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors.

Therefore, the Offeror’s submission should contain their best terms from a cost and technical standpoint.

The Government reserves the right to reject an offer upon initial submission and not consider it for contract award if any required data is absent or the data received conveys a misunderstanding of the requirement.

EVALUATION FACTORS:

1. Evaluation criteria consist of the following factors and sub-factors. The proposals will be evaluated under two (2) evaluation factors:

Factor I - Technical Capability

Factor II – Price

Factor I: Technical Capability. The Government’s technical evaluation team will evaluate proposals to determine each offeror’s technical capability. The proposal must demonstrate a practical/functional approach that meets the requirements of the PWS. Failure to meet the criteria will render the proposal technically unacceptable and the proposal will not receive further consideration for award.

Sub-factor 1: Staffing Approach. The contractor shall submit a scheduling plan that identifies the proposed staff required to fulfill tasks outlined in this requirement and estimated workload highlighed in (TE 5 ESTIMATED WORKLOAD 19 July 2024). The Staffing Approach must demonstrate a complete understanding of the solicitation requirements. The following items shall also be included in the Staffing Approach.

i. A detailed list of the labor categories, number of personnel proposed for each labor category, and associated labor hours deemed necessary to perform the requirement relative to each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).

ii. Any other explanations or supporting data (matrix, charts, or other graphics) determined necessary for the Government to fully understand your methodology and approach;

iii. Job qualifications/certifications associated with each labor category that demonstrates the skills considered necessary for each labor category proposed.

Sub-factor 2: Management Approach – The contractor shall submit a Management Approach to include the following:

i. An organizational chart identifying the management structure of key personnel with a description of roles and responsibilities required to fulfill the tasks outlines in this requirement.

ii. A narrative fully describing the management control system that will be used to effectively accomplish task simultaneously.

The Technical Capability factor will be assigned an overall adjectival rating at the factor level. Subfactors will be evaluated but will not receive an individual adjectival ratings. The Technical Factor will receive one of the adjectival ratings defined below:

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Definition Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation

Factor II: Price. Price will not be scored or rated. Evaluation of price will be performed using one or more of the price analysis techniques as recited in FAR 15.404-1(b). Through these techniques the Government will determine whether prices are reasonable. To be viable for award, offeror’s price must be determined fair and reasonable by the Government. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the pricing is significantly unbalanced.

(a) The Government will evaluate the pricing proposed for each CLIN and the total price proposed. The Government will evaluate the price for award purposes by adding the price of the four option periods and comparing that total price for balance and against all of the proposals found to be technically acceptable.

Price will not be evaluated on those proposals found to be Technically Unacceptable.

(b) Options. As part of price evaluation, the government will evaluate its option to extend services (see FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding one-half of the offeror's fourth option year to the offeror's total price.

Thus, the offeror's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base year and four option years, and 1/2 of the four option year. Offerors are not required to enter a price for the six-month period.

(c) Unbalanced Pricing may be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g), as applicable, to assess potential performance risk which could result in unreasonably high prices.

(c) Definitions.

(e) Reasonableness. A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business.

(f) Completeness/Accuracy. The offeror’s proposal is in compliance with the Price Volume instructions in the solicitation.”

terrance.j.bond Highlight

(g) It is the intent to have the contractor sign the award.

ATTACHMENT LISTING

Type of Attachment Description Pages Date PWS PWS IT_Support Services

17Oct2025

27 17 OCT 2024

TE # 1 Performance Requirements Summary

(PRS)

1 No Date

TE# 2 Deliverables schedule 1 No Date TE# 3 Contractor non-

Disclosure Agreement 1 No Date

TE# 4 DD Form 254 3 APR 2018 TE# 5 Estimated Workload 19

July 2024 4 No Date

TE# 6 Estimated Inventory of equipment, assets and users

1 No Date

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)

The Government will utilize a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable ("LPTA") evaluation method for this requirement. The Government will award a single contract to the offeror whose proposal is technically acceptable, the lowest price, is deemed responsible under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items, in conjunction with FAR 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS), and whose offer conforms to the solicitation’srequirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, and all other information required by the solicitation). Offers that fail to address all the requirements set forth in the Solicitation will be rejected. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors.

Therefore, the Offeror’s submission should contain their best terms from a cost and technical standpoint.

The Government reserves the right to reject an offer upon initial submission and not consider it for contract award if any required data is absent or the data received conveys a misunderstanding of the requirement.

EVALUATION FACTORS:

1. Evaluation criteria consist of the following factors and sub-factors. The proposals will be evaluated under two (2) evaluation factors:

Factor I - Technical Capability:

Factor II – Price

Factor I: Technical Capability. The Government’s technical evaluation team will evaluate proposals to determine each offeror’s technical capability. The proposal must demonstrate a practical/functional approach that meets the requirements of the PWS. Failure to meet the criteria will render the proposal technically unacceptable and the proposal will not receive further consideration for award.

Sub-factor 1: Staffing Approach. The contractor shall submit a scheduling plan that identifies the proposed staff required to fulfill tasks outlined in this requirement and estimated workload highlighed in (TE 5 ESTIMATED WORKLOAD 19 July 2024). The Staffing Approach must demonstrate a complete understanding of the solicitation requirements. The following items shall also be included in the Staffing Approach.

i. A detailed list of the labor categories, number of personnel proposed for each labor category, and associated labor hours deemed necessary to perform the requirement relative to each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).

ii. Any other explanations or supporting data (matrix, charts, or other graphics) determined necessary for the Government to fully understand your methodology and approach;

iii. Job qualifications/certifications associated with each labor category that demonstrates the skills considered necessary for each labor category proposed.

Sub-factor 2: Management Approach – The contractor shall submit a Management Approach to include the following:

i. An organizational chart identifying the management structure of key personnel with a description of roles and responsibilities required to fulfill the tasks outlines in this requirement.

ii. A narrative fully describing the management control system that will be used to effectively accomplish task simultaneously.

The Technical Capability factor will be assigned an overall adjectival rating at the factor level. Subfactors will be evaluated but will not receive an individual adjectival ratings. The Technical Factor will receive one of the adjectival ratings defined below:

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable

Ratings

Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation

Factor II: Price. Price will not be scored or rated. Evaluation of price will be performed using one or more of the price analysis techniques as recited in FAR 15.404-1(b). Through these techniques the Government will determine whether prices are reasonable. To be viable for award, offeror’s price must be determined fair and reasonable by the Government. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the pricing is significantly unbalanced.

(a) The Government will evaluate the pricing proposed for each CLIN and the total price proposed. The Government will evaluate the price for award purposes by adding the price of the four option periods and comparing that total price for balance and against all of the proposals found to be technically acceptable.

Price will not be evaluated on those proposals found to be Technically Unacceptable.

(b) Options. As part of price evaluation, the government will evaluate its option to extend services (see FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding one-half of the offeror's fourth option year to the offeror's total price.

Thus, the offeror's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base year and four option years, and 1/2 of the fourth option year. Offerors are not required to enter a price for the six-month period.

(c) Unbalanced Pricing may be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g), as applicable, to assess potential performance risk which could result in unreasonably high prices.

(c) Definitions.

(e) Reasonableness. A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business.

(f) Completeness/Accuracy. The offeror’s proposal is in compliance with the Price Volume instructions in the solicitation.”

(g) It is the intent to have the contractor sign the award.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes) terrance.j.bond Highlight