W911S8-22-R-0025 0003.pdf

0011736323

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See Block 14 Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Nov-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911S822R0025

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07-Oct-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Nov-2022

CODE

MICC-JB LEWIS-MCCHORD

BUILDING 2015

JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD WA 98433-9500

W911S8 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911S822R0025

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

1. Update Technical Exhibit 1, Kitchen Hoods and Exhaust Systems Schedule and Locations.

2. Adjust quantities to SUB CLINs 0002AC, 0003AB, 0004AC, 1002AC, 1003AB, 1004AC, 2002AC, 2003AB, 2004AC, 3002AC, 3003AB, 3004AC, 4002AC, 4003AB, and 4004AC due changes made to the schedule and the addition of one large kitchen hood.

3. Add Updated Attachments Table

4. Remove Attachments Table from Addendum 52.212-2.

5. See Summary of Changes Below

6. The proposal response date and time remains unchanged.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

SUBCLIN 0002AC

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 4.00 from 300.00 to 304.00.

SUBCLIN 0003AB

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 2.00 from 58.00 to 60.00.

SUBCLIN 0004AC

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 2.00 from 29.00 to 31.00.

SUBCLIN 1002AC

SUBCLIN 1003AB

SUBCLIN 1004AC

SUBCLIN 2002AC

SUBCLIN 2003AB

SUBCLIN 2004AC

SUBCLIN 3002AC

SUBCLIN 3003AB

SUBCLIN 3004AC

SUBCLIN 4002AC

SUBCLIN 4003AB

SUBCLIN 4004AC

The following have been added by full text:

ATTACHMENTS TABLE

ATTACHMENTS

A. All documents are contractually binding B. Document Listing

Item Title Date Performance Work Statement Clean and Inspect Kitchen Hoods and Exhaust Systems 12 May 2022 Attachment A Common Levels of Support, Clean and Inspect Kitchen Hoods and Exhaust Systems 12 May 2022

TE 1 Technical Exhibit 1 Kitchen Hoods and Exhaust Systems Schedule and Locations

4 Nov 2022

TE 2 Technical Exhibit 2 Madigan Army Medical Center Entry Information

12 April 2022

TE 3 Technical Exhibit 3 Performance Requirements Summary 12 April 2022 TE 4 Contract Deliverables Requirements List (CDRL’s) 12 April 2022 TE 5 Maps and Locations of Hoods 2 Nov 2022 Wage Determination (JBLM) WD 2015-5539 (Revision 21) 21 July 2022 Wage Determination (YTC) WD 2015-5543 (Revision 18) 27 June 2022 L1 Question Submission Form 1 August 2022

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

ADDENDUM TO FAR PROVISION 52.212-2, EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (NOV 2021)

(Note: Provision has been tailored to reflect Agency requirements, as prescribed by 12.301(c))

For the purposes of award, offers will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

1. Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA)

1.1. Award will be made to the single (1) Offeror who is deemed responsible, whose proposal conforms to the Request For Proposal (RFP) requirements and is judged to represent the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) proposal to the Government. To be eligible for award, a proposal must meet all past performance and technical requirements, conform to all required terms and conditions, and include all information required in the solicitation. Therefore, the proposal shall contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. This will result in award being made to lowest-priced offer that the Contracting Officer has determined as acceptable in both past performance and technical areas.

1.2. While the Government and the Contracting Officer will strive for maximum objectivity, the evaluation process, by its nature, is subjective and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire evaluation process.

1.3. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the Offeror's initial proposal should contain the Offeror's best terms from a cost or price, past performance, and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

1.4. The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated and determined to be unacceptable, fails to comply with the contract terms and conditions, or is excessively high or low in cost/price.

2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

2.1. Technical Capability

2.1.1. The technical rating provides for an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” rating as indicated in the table below based on the information received and verified by the Government on the contractor’s technical approach and other required documentation.

Technical Capability Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

2.1.2. A Technically Acceptable proposal will provide the following:

2.1.2.1. A written technical approach that demonstrates the Offeror’s understanding of the requirement and its ability and capability to provide the required knowledge, skills, qualifications, and equipment necessary to fulfill the requirements of the PWS.

2.1.2.2. Offeror is certified as Kitchen Exhaust Hood Cleaning Service. A valid certificate awarded by an organization recognized by the National Fire Protection Association bearing the name of the Offeror.

2.2. Price

2.2.1. (A Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) price for each CLIN will be determined by multiplying the CLIN Unit Price by the CLIN Quantity. The CLIN prices for each period of performance, including the basic period and each option period, will be added together to determine a price for each period of performance. CLINs designated as optional work within each period of performance may be executed at any point during the applicable period of performance at government discretion and will be included in the calculation of the price for that period of performance. These annual prices will then be added to arrive at a total price.

2.2.2 Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are mathematically and materially unbalanced. Evaluation of the option(s) shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

2.2.3. As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (see FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding one-half of the Offeror's final option period price to the Offeror's total price. Thus, the Offeror's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period, 1st option period, 2nd option period, and one-half (1/2) of the 2nd option period. Offerors are not required to enter a price for this six-month period.

2.2.4. The total evaluated price will be evaluated to determine whether it is reasonable through price analysis. A reasonable price/cost represents a price/cost that provides best value to the government, taking into account market prices, the technical and functional capabilities of the Offeror, and risk. The existence of adequate price competition is expected to support a determination of reasonableness. Other price analysis techniques in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b) may be used to further validate price reasonableness.

2.2.5. Balanced Pricing. Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing.

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items (including Basic and Option Years) is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. Offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected, if the lack of balance poses a significant risk to the Government.

2.2.6. The Government reserves the right to, but is not required to, conduct a price realism analysis on offers that appear to be exceptionally low and not supported by the Offeror’s technical approach. In instances where an Offeror’s proposed price(s) appear exceptionally low, Offerors may be requested to address this disparity by providing evidence of their capability and/or performance at similar price(s). The burden of proof as to price credibility rests with the Offeror. An exceptionally or unrealistically low offer that’s left unexplained may pose an unacceptable risk to the government and may be a reason to reject an Offeror’s proposal.

(End of Addendum)

(End of Summary of Changes)