Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Grease Traps and Interceptors Cleaning Services
- Solicitation number
- W911S8-18-R-0018
About this file
Attachment 5
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Contractor: ____________________________________________________________________________
1. Cage Code: ____________________________________________________________________________
1. Contract number: _______________________________________________________________________
1. Contract type: __________________________________________________________________________
1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
1. Period of performance: ___________________________________________________________________
1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________________________________________________
1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________________________________________
1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
1. Description of service provided: ______________________________________________________________
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
1. Customer or agency name:
1. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
1. Evaluator's name: ______________________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ______________________________________________________________________________________
1. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
US UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
NA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
| Technical Performance |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
Quality of operations & maintenance.
Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
| Program Management |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements
Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations
Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
| Employee Retention/Attraction |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes____ No ____ Default____ Convenience____ Pending Terminations____
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address:
Daniel Cotto
MCO-MICC-JBLM
Building 2015, Room 216 MS-19, Box 339500 JBLM, WA 98433-9500 Commercial: (253)966-3532, DSN: 347-3532
Or FAX / E-mail to:
Fax: (253)967-2772 Email: JBLMAMCMICCProposals@conus.army.mil, Attn: Daniel Cotto
File details come from the government source that posted it.