Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
Grease Traps and Interceptors Cleaning Services
Solicitation number
W911S8-18-R-0018
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 5

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
TE3_Locations-Estimated_Workload_v1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Performance_Work_Statement_v1.pdf PDF
TE4_Performance_Requirements_Summary_v1.pdf PDF
TE3_Locations-Estimated_Workload.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_6_Sample_Questionnair_Cover_Letter.docx DOCX document
TE4_Performance_Requirements_Summary.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_WD_15-5539_Rev_8_Pierce_14Aug2018.pdf PDF
FAR_Clause_52_212-1_Addendum_Instructions_to_Offerors--Commercial_Items.pdf PDF
Provisions_and_Clauses.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Specific_Relevant_Contracts_Sheet.docx DOCX document
TE2_Monthly_Grease_Trap-Interceptor_Disposal_and_Condition_Report.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FAR_Clause_52_212-2_Addendum_Evaluation--Commercial_Items.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_Sample_Consent_Letter.docx DOCX document
W911S818R0018_Schedule_of_Services.pdf PDF
TE1_Monthly_Recyclable_Cooking_Oil_Disposal_Report.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Provisions_and_Clauses.pdf PDF
TE1_Monthly_Recyclable_Cooking_Oil_Disposal_Report.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FAR_Clause_52_212-2_Addendum_Evaluation--Commercial_Items.pdf PDF
FAR_Clause_52_212-1_Addendum_Instructions_to_Offerors--Commercial_Items.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Specific_Relevant_Contracts_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_WD_15-5539_Rev_7_Pierce_16Jan2018.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_Sample_Questionnair_Cover_Letter.docx DOCX document
TE4_Performance_Requirements_Summary.pdf PDF
TE2_Monthly_Grease_Trap-Interceptor_Disposal_and_Condition_Report.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_3_Sample_Consent_Letter.docx DOCX document
W911S818R0018_Schedule_of_Services.pdf PDF
TE3_Locations-Estimated_Workload.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor: ____________________________________________________________________________

1. Cage Code: ____________________________________________________________________________

1. Contract number: _______________________________________________________________________

1. Contract type: __________________________________________________________________________

1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

1. Period of performance: ___________________________________________________________________

1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________________________________________________

1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________________________________________

1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

1. Description of service provided: ______________________________________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

1. Customer or agency name:

1. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Evaluator's name: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

US UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

Technical Performance
S
M
US
NA

Quality of operations & maintenance.

Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures

Program Management
S
M
US
NA

Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Employee Retention/Attraction
S
M
US
NA

Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes____ No ____ Default____ Convenience____ Pending Terminations____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

Daniel Cotto

MCO-MICC-JBLM

Building 2015, Room 216 MS-19, Box 339500 JBLM, WA 98433-9500 Commercial: (253)966-3532, DSN: 347-3532

Or FAX / E-mail to:

Fax: (253)967-2772 Email: JBLMAMCMICCProposals@conus.army.mil, Attn: Daniel Cotto

File details come from the government source that posted it.