ISRMAT Industry QA_A0003.pdf
PDF 319 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance Mobile Advisory Team (ISRMAT) Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911S0-22-R-0002
About this file
This document contains an amendment to a solicitation for Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance Mobile Advisory Team (ISRMAT) support services. The amendment provides additional questions and answers to clarify requirements, including confirmation that the solicitation requires a total of 20 personnel, clarification around deployment locations and durations for optional tasks, and verification that the Program Manager and three CONUS-based CENTCOM Trainers are designated as key personnel. Offerors are advised to review the amendment closely to ensure accurate pricing of all personnel requirements. The underlying solicitation seeks proposals for ISRMAT support services with a one-year base period and four one-year option periods to be awarded as a single firm-fixed-price contract to an eligible Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business. Proposals are due by March 2, 2022.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ISRMAT Questions - Additional Questions A0006 FINAL.pdf | ||
| W911S022R0002 A0006.pdf | ||
| W911S022R0002 A0005.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 4 - Pricing Workbook (Rev 2 A0005).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ISRMAT Industry QA_A0005.pdf | ||
| W911S022R0002 A0005 Conformed.pdf | ||
| W911S022R0002 A0004.pdf | ||
| W911S022R0002 A0003.pdf | ||
| W911S022R0002 A0002 Conformed.pdf | ||
| W911S022R0002 A0002 Conformed.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 4 - Pricing Workbook (Rev 1).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W911S022R0002 A0002.pdf | ||
| W911S022R0002 A0002 Conformed.pdf | ||
| ISRMAT Industry QA_A0002.pdf | ||
| W911S022R0002 A001.pdf | ||
| W911S022R0002.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 1 - DD 254.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 2 - Fort Eustis WD 15-4341.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 3 - Performance Assessment Cover Letter and Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP Attachment 4 - Pricing Workbook.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W911S022R0002 Amendment 0003
Additional Industry Questions and Answers
No Source
Document
Page Para
Comment / Discussion Question(s) Government Responses
1 PWS 5.1.1 32
The total number of required personnel is not clear. Specifically, it is unclear whether the “7 SMEs
(including the program manager)” are inclusive of or in addition to the 5 SMEs at CENTCOM.
Additionally, there are 8 SMEs deployed but only 7 including the
PM CONUS, leaving 6 SMEs to replace the 8 SMEs OCONUS as the PM does not deploy.
Please confirm the breakdown is as follows or provide corrected numbers to ensure all Offerors price the correct the number of personnel.
We believe the new PWS 5.1.1 requires a total of 20 personnel broken down as follows:
3 SMEs in the Arabian
Gulf/Bahrain
1 SME at the CJFACC in Qatar
2 SMEs in Iraq
2 SMEs in Lebanon
1 Program Manager
6 SMEs CONUS as the rotational pool
3 CENTCOM Trainers
2 Mission Managers
1. Does PWS 5.1.1 require a total of
20 people ?
Yes, PWS para 5.1.1 requires a total of 20 people.
Page Para
Comment / Discussion Question(s) Government Responses
PWS
5.1.1, L4.2.3.1 paragraph and
The new PWS 5.1.1 states there are “5 SMEs at CENTCOM as the
CONUS based training element
(Trainers and 2 Mission
Managers).
Section L and other PWS references demonstrate the
Mission Manager deploying
OCONUS with a team of SMEs.
For example, one Mission
Deployed with 7 SMEs and one
Mission Manager CONUS with the rotational pool of SMEs.
The location of the Mission
Manager affects pricing.
Will the Government confirm both
Mission Managers will now be CONUS positions located at CENTCOM with the 3
CONUS trainers? Or will there be one
Mission Manager deployed and one
CONUS to rotate?
No. The Mission Managers associated with the CONUS-based CENTCOM training team are separate from the Mission
Managers associated with the deploying
OCONUS team. The CONUS-based
CENTCOM training team is not part of rotating OCONUS teams.
The CONUS-based CENTCOM training team may travel occasionally to teach a course, and can be available to deploy to support training missions.
Answer to
Question
23, 22, and 21
The answer to Question 23 states that the Optional SOCEUR team is not permanently stationed in theater, and this short term requirement can be filled with our
CONUS SME rotational pool.
It is not clear if the other Optional
Support, including the PWS 5.2.1
ISR Tactical Controller Support, and 5.2.3 ISR Tactical Controller
Trainer can also be filled with the
PWS 5.1.1 CONUS SME
rotational pool, or if the
Government expects additional
SMEs if these options are exercised.
The answer to this question is critical for accurate pricing.
Does the Government expect the
Contractor to fill PWS 5.2.3 and 5.2.1
Optional support with the PWS 5.1.1 rotational pool of SMEs? Or will these be additional permanent positions?
All optional support are separate, permanent positions when exercised.
Page Para
Comment / Discussion Question(s) Government Responses
4 RFP Section 5.1.1: "Planned distribution of teams are as follows: 3 SMEs in support of operations assisting in the Arabian
Gulf, currently based out of
Bahrain; 1 SME at the CJFACC in
Qatar; 2 SMEs in Iraq; 2 SMEs in support of operations in Lebanon."
The number of SMEs cited in RFP Section
5.1.1 add up to 8 total SMEs OCONUS, but the CONUS team that rotates
OCONUS has only 7 total SMEs. It seems that the Qatar-based SME may be double counted as one of the Arabian Gulf-based
SMEs. Should the Qatar SME be counted only as one of the 3 Arabian Gulf SMEs and not separately as it currently states, so that the total OCONUS SME count is 7 to equal the CONUS team that rotates with it?
See answer to Q#5 below. The rotational teams are not always equivalent.
5 RFP Section 5.1.1: "Planned distribution of teams are as follows: 3 SMEs in support of operations assisting in the Arabian
Gulf, currently based out of
Bahrain; 1 SME at the CJFACC in
Qatar; 2 SMEs in Iraq; 2 SMEs in support of operations in Lebanon;
7 SMEs (including the program manager) in CONUS as the rotational pool"
Can the Government please confirm that both the OCONUS and CONUS rotational teams should each have 7 SME's, so that the rotational teams are equivalent?
No, rotational teams are not always equivalent.
6 RFP Section 5.1.1: "7 SMEs
(including the mission manager) in CONUS as the rotational pool"
Does citing the program manager as 1 of the 7 CONUS rotational team mean that the program manager is expected to rotate regularly to the OCONUS team?
No. The PM may occasionally go down range if there is a problem or to liaison with officials in theater, but he/she is not expected to rotate regularly with the
OCONUS team.
7 RFP Section 5.1.1: "7 SMEs
(including the mission manager) in
CONUS as the rotational pool"
Can the Government please confirm that either the CONUS rotational pool is comprised of 6 SMEs plus the program manager, or that the CONUS rotational pool is comprised of 7 SMEs and the program manager is not included in that count of 7?
The Program Manager is not included in the rotational pool quantity.
8 Key Personnel 1.2.7: “The following personnel are identified as Key Personnel for the
There appears to be a contradiction between RFP Section 5.1.1 and the 2 Mar
2022 Q&A, question 15 answer on the
The 2 Mar 22 Q&A answer is correct, which corresponds to the Key Personnel
PWS paragraph. There is 1 Program
Page Para
Comment / Discussion Question(s) Government Responses performance of this contract: the
Program Manager and the
CONUS-based CENTCOM
Trainers”
RFP Section 5.1.1: “5 SMEs at
CENTCOM as the CONUS-based training element (Trainers and 2
Mission Managers).”
2 MAR 2022 Q&A question 15:
“Correct, there is 1 Program
Manager and a total of 3 CONUS based CENTCOM Trainers” number of CONUS-based training element personnel. Can the government please clarify how many individuals are on the
CONUS-based CENTCOM training team?
Are all members of the CONUS-based
CENTCOM training team considered Key
Personnel?
Manager and the 3 CONUS-based
CENTCOM Trainers comprised of the
Key Personnel, not the entire training team which consists of Mission Managers in addition to the Trainers.
9 PWS Section 5.2: "these tasks will be priced separately, based upon completed, firm fixed price amounts, and have its own contract line item in Section B of the awarded contract.
PWS Section 5.2.2: "Special
Operations Command Europe
(SOEUR) Support. Two (2)
ISRMAT SMEs on a 2-3 week rotation to the EUCOM theater to assist with SOCEUR's initiation of an ISR architecture in theater."
Can the Government please confirm that the 2 SMEs on 2-3 week rotations to the
EUCOM theater are SMEs from the
CONUS rotational team and we are not required to hire two additional SMEs with the additional incremental cost for this task?
See answer to Q#3.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .