AMDMT 4 - Attachment 4 - Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire.pdf

SUBJECT: Offeror’s Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W911S0-20-R-0001, Sustainment Center of Excellence (SCoE) Instructor, Training Support, And Development (ITSD) II

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The U.S. Army Mission and Installation Command-Fort Eustis is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offeror’s proposals in response to the subject RFP. The requirement consists of providing training and training support and development services, to the schools and headquarters in support of the training mission.

As a part of the evaluation, we have requested Offerors provide information regarding their past performance on recent and relevant government or commercial contracts. Please have the questionnaire completed by the person(s) most familiar with the Offeror’s performance on subject contract.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation and we appreciate your input. Please submit your completed questionnaire to Ms. Lindsey Nicolai, Contract Specialist, at lindsey.c.nicolai.civ@mail.mil and Ms. Sandra Schuck, Contracting Officer, at Sandra.j.schuck.civ@mail.mil no later than April 9, 2021.

Sandra J. Schuck

Contracting Officer

SCHUCK.SANDRA.

J.1230477864

Digitally signed by

SCHUCK.SANDRA.J.1230477864

Date: 2021.02.11 17:03:07 -05'00'

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the award of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Points of Contact identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Adjectival Rating Definitions:

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent Point of Contact)

A. Effectiveness of Staffing, Recruitment and Retention Plan to provide a qualified workforce to meet mission requirements and reduce turnover.

o Outstanding o Good o Acceptable o Marginal o Unsatisfactory

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of mechanisms and incentives to fill vacancies to mitigate adverse impacts o Outstanding o Good o Acceptable

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

o Outstanding o Good o Acceptable o Marginal

D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest (to include contract administration and management support).

o Outstanding o Good o Acceptable

E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter. Thank you for your assistance.