Questions from Industry - 10 Dec 2020.pdf

191 KB Posted

Attached to
Visual Roof Inspections, Infrared Surveys, and Core Sampling & Analyses
Solicitation number
W911RX-21-Q-0001
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 1 W911RX-21-Q-0001.pdf PDF
Tech Exhibit A- Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
Tech Exhibit B - Bid Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - Performance Requirements Summary.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Roof Section List Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 -Wage Determination-Riley County.pdf PDF
W911RX21Q0001 Combined Synopsis-Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 Past Performance Information.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4 - Deliverables.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Location Maps.docx DOCX document
Attachment 6 -Wage Determination-Geary County.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Questions from Industry

W911RX-21-Q-0001

As of 10 Dec 2020

1. I do not strictly meet these requirements as I have not had direct experience on DOD facilities and my roof surveys have not been conducted in accordance FM 93/11. As regards the latter, it is something that I would employ as required and as regards the former, 2.8.2 seems to indicate commensurate private sector work will qualify. Would these conditions make it a waste of effort for me to put together a bid for the work in your opinion?

Govt Response: The intent of paragraphs 2.8.2 and 2.8.3 is to contract with firms with personnel familiar with Sustainment Management System (SMS) Roofer Roof Maintenance Management Program and not firms with just roof consulting and installation observation knowledge. No experience with SMS Roofer would result in an adjectival rating for Technical Factor 2 Subfactor 1 and Technical Factor 3 Subfactor 1 of “Unacceptable” and per FAR 52.212-2, “If an offeror receives an adjectival rating of unacceptable in any factor they will not be eligible for contract award.

2. I find the bid schedule a little confusing in terms of the time frame. Specifically the 12 month up to 5 year '1st Year Option, 2nd Year Option' etc. What is the intent? It would seem to me the project could easily be completed in well under a year.

Govt Response: This will be awarded as a Requirements contract under FAR 16.503. The numbers on the bid schedule are government estimates, not hard numbers. The government intends to issue task orders annually based upon that year’s actual numbers; not all the buildings just one time. Fort Riley has just short of 3,000,000 SF of roofs that get inspected under this contract, with 1/3rd of the square footage getting inspected annually. Attachment 3, Roof Section List Report, breaks down the three year cycle. The oldest implementation index is what is scheduled to be ordered the next year. The base year is 1 Jan 2021-31 Dec 2021. The first option year is 1 Jan 2022-31 Dec 2022 and so forth thru the fourth option year.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .