18B0005_Questions_from_Industry_2018-4-2.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
Mill and Overlay, Various Locations, Fort Riley, KS
Solicitation number
W911RX-18-B-0005
Issued by

About this file

Responses to questions from industry updated 2 April 2018

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation W911RX-18-B-0005, Mill and Overlay Various Locations Ft. Riley Questions from Industry As of 29 March 2018

1. Q: Can we use Fort Riley RAP in lieu of AB-3 for the sub base under the 8"patching?

A: Yes you may use RAP from the project or the Camp Funston RAP mountain near the intersection of F & 12th St. Will revise the typical sections plan sheet.

2. Project B Smoky Hill Road

a. Q: What is the desired width of the aggregate shoulders on Smoky Hill?

A: 4’ Width

b. Q: Will the signs and signals on Smoky Hill be in conflict with construction?

A: The concrete pavement around CL Smoky Hill Sta 4+40 to 4+60 is exempt from the project except for the 4’ aggregate shoulders. Continue the 4’ aggregate shoulder through this area.

3. Project C Trooper Drive

a. Q: The sidewalk ramps that require detectable warning pads are existing. Are we to install attenuator mats in the existing ramps, or reconstruct?

A: Install the attenuator mats.

4. Project D Godfrey and Seitz

a. Q: It appears the utilities along Godfrey are in the way of construction for the curb and gutter. Will the power poles be moved prior to construction?

A: Adjust the location of the curb and gutter to avoid conflicts with power poles.

b. Q: North of the Conference center, the roadway has turf shoulders. Will we be required to shoulder up with topsoil and seed, or millings?

A: Place edge wedge with asphalt millings

c. Q: How much ditch grading do you expect at the end section replacements?

A: 5’ in front of the end section

5. Project E Estes Road

a.Q: Some of the Ramps requiring detectable warning pads are existing, some are not. Are we to construct all of the ramps, and install detectable warning pads?
A: Install the detectable warning pads on the existing ramps.

b. Q: What is the length of the sidewalk removed and replaced adjacent to Bldg. 7485?

A: Approximately 27’ of sidewalk where water is ponding on the sidewalk near Sta. 13+60 Rt.

File details come from the government source that posted it.