Appendix J - Evaluation Factors - Fire Inspections Maintenance and Repairs.pdf

Appendix J

Evaluation Criteria

There are three evaluation factors:

a. Technical

b. Past Performance

c. Price

The relative order of importance of these three factors is as follows: Technical is more important than Past Performance. Past Performance is more important than Price. The non-price factors, when combined, are more important than the Price Factor.

Factor 1: Technical

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s contractual license requirements as stated in 1.10 of the statement of work (SOW) on a met or not met basis.

Instructions - The Offeror shall provide documented proof of NICET certifications.

Factor 2: Past Performance

The Government will conduct a Performance Confidence Assessment to establish a Confidence Assessment Rating for each offeror. The Confidence Assessment Rating assigned will be based on the offeror’s Recent and Relevant performance record and the expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the requirements of the contract SOW.

Instructions - The Offeror shall submit at least 3 and no more than 5 past performance questionnaires which demonstrate recent and relevant past performance.

Relevant contracts are those that demonstrate experience in fire alarm, fire sprinkler, fire pump inspections and maintenance per Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-601-02.

Recent contracts are those performed within 5 years of the date of issuance of the RFP.

Factor 3: Price

The Price Factor evaluation will result in a determination of the Total Evaluated Price to the Government. The Government will also evaluate the offeror’s price proposal for price reasonableness. A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. The Government may make a determination of reasonableness by any means allowable under FAR 15.404-1.