Attachment 5 Request for Tehnical Literature.pdf
PDF 243 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CONCRETE CRUSHING SERVICE Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911KF-20-Q-0077
About this file
This document is a request for technical literature related to a federal contract opportunity for concrete crushing services at Anniston Army Depot. The contractor will be required to mobilize, operate, and demobilize crushing equipment for multiple cycles during the base contract period and any subsequent option years to produce crushed concrete that meets Alabama Department of Transportation specifications for use as a substitute for purchased material. The technical literature requested must demonstrate the offeror's capability and include information on proposed equipment, site control documents, spill prevention plans, equipment maintenance plans, and examples of recent sieve tests. Failure to provide literature that demonstrates the service meets the requirements of the solicitation will result in rejection of the bid. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number W911KF-20-Q-0077 from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal for concrete crushing services at Anniston Army Depot.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 002.pdf | ||
| AMENDMENT 003-RELEASED.pdf | ||
| Amendment 001-Released.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 QASP.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Concrete Crushing - SOW.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 Past_Performance_Questionnaire-1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 APPENDIX DD.pdf | ||
| 20-Q-0077-Released.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Technical Literature
A. Proposal shall include technical information demonstrating offerer’s capability to provide rock crushing services at ANAD per the performance work statement. The literature will be used to technically evaluate the bid and shall describe how the service meets requirements of the specification;
specifically the paragraphs:
Ref. Paragraph Information Furnished
3.1.1.1, 3.6.6, 3.8.1, 3.11.2
Dust Suppression Plan demonstrating the contractor’s ability to provide dust suppression given the utility limitations described in 3.11.2.
3.1.1.4.1, 3.2.3, 3.7, 3.8.1
Technical literature on crushing and support equipment. The literature should include:
Listing of proposed equipment to include: crusher, loader, conveyor, screens, scales, cutting torch/saws for rebar, equipment to break down oversized concrete, fuel tanks, water tanks, vehicles, etc.
make, model, and year of major equipment (crusher, loader, conveyors, etc.)
maximum size of unprocessed material recommended for the crusher typical throughput of the crushing system in tons/hour any certifications or other QC documentation regarding accuracy of the output scales any cutting or hot-work certifications held by the team a complete listing of any equipment the contractor intends to rent in order to complete the work as described in the SOW.
3.6.7 Samples of daily progress reports. The reports should demonstrate the ability to report on all factors mentioned in 3.6.7 of the SOW.
3.6.8 Samples of site control documents, such as visitor logs and material in/out.
3.8.2 Inventory of stormwater and erosion-control measures to be kept on hand at the site.
3.7, 3.8.3 Site specific Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures Plan (SPCCP) for all tanks and containers of fuel, chemicals or other pollutants. Given the information in 3.7, If the proposal is to store fuel on site, include technical specs for a temporary above ground storage tank. Documentation should show:
Double wall construction
A way to monitor the interstitial space between the double wall a way to monitor the capacity of the tank i.e. clock gauge
Proper HAZCOM markings
SDS for the fuel to be stored
Impermeable secondary containment (catchment pan, etc.) for the tank
3.10 Equipment Support Plan demonstrating the contractor’s ability to operate and maintain their equipment. The document must show the contractor is prepared in one or more of the following ways:
Able/trained/resourced to perform onsite maintenance, or, service agreement for same, or, ready access to backup machinery
3.11 Statement of Self-Sufficiency. The document must confirm that the contractor is able to execute the work as described in the SOW, under the utility limitations described in 3.11.1 and 3.11.2.
4.1 Examples of recent sieve tests using the same equipment or similar to what they propose to bring on Depot. The tests must be results of the contractor’s own work.
b. The features, which must be addressed in the descriptive literature, are necessary to consider the bid responsive.
c. The failure of descriptive literature to show that the service offered conforms to the requirements of this solicitation will require rejection of the bid.
“Conditions”, or “prices are subject to change without notice” shall not be considered for an award. The government has no assurance the service offered will conform to the specification; therefore, the bid is not considered a firm bid and will not be considered for an award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .