MF4_CP1_Amendment_02.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment #02 provides the follow ing changes to the RFP:

-- Proposal Schedule (changes are not marked) -- Section 00 22 11, paragraph 5.1.1., 5.1.2., and 7.1.1.

-- 01 33 00 – Submittal Procedures – Paragraph 1.9.e. - Changed the submittal review period from 30 calendar days to 14 calendar days.

-- 01 33 00 – Submittal Procedures – Paragraph 1.9.f. - Changed the submittal review period from 30 calendar days to 14 calendar days.

-- Deleted Specification Section 01 33 29 – Sustainability Reporting in its entirety. Table of Contents w as updated show ing that this specification has been deleted. Submittal Register w as updated show ing that this specification has been deleted along w ith the specification submittals.

All changes are marked w ith "AM#02" Replacement Pages are Provided.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-Mar-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB18R0011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Feb-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-Mar-2018

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK

CEPOA-CT (W911KB)

PO BOX 6898

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

PS-1

PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

FTG218A MISSILE FIELD 4 CLEAR AND GRUB

FORT GREELY, ALASKA

BASE ITEMS

Item No.

Description Estimated Quantity

Unit Unit Price Amount

0001 Clear and Grub Missile Field 4 project site, laydown areas, re-routed Landfill road, and all other associated areas, complete.

1 Job $_________ $_________

Total of Base Items $_________

OPTION ITEMS

Item No.

Description Estimated Quantity

Unit Unit Price Amount

0002 Contaminated Soil (OPTION 1) 10 CY $___________ $____________ 0003 Additional mobilization costs required in the event that mobilization occurs during road restrictions. (OPTION 2)

1 Job $___________ $____________

Total of Optional Items $_________

TOTALS

Total of Base and Optional Items $_________

Proposed Contract Duration: ____________________

EVALUATION OF OFFERS.

1. AWARD: Award will be made in accordance with Section 00 22 30- EVALUATION FACTORS FOR

AWARD.

2. INCOMPLETE OFFERS: Failure to submit an offer on all items in the schedule constitutes an incomplete offer. Incomplete offers may be rejected. Lump sum or unit prices must be shown for each item within the schedule.

3. EXTENSIONS: All extensions of the unit prices shown will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the unit price and the extension, the unit price will be considered to be the offer.

PS-2

4. SPECIAL CONDITION: If a modification to an offer based on unit prices is submitted which provides for a lump sum adjustment to the total estimated cost, the application of the lump sum adjustment to each unit price in the proposal schedule must be stated. If it is not stated, the offeror agrees that the lump sum adjustment shall be applied on a pro rata basis to every unit price in the proposal schedule.

5. EXERCISE OF OPTIONS: The government reserves the right to exercise OPTION 1, contaminated soil, and OPTION 2 at any time throughout the duration of the contract.

6. OPTION 2: In the event that NTP (or limited NTP for mobilization) is issued during a period of time where the AKDOT has started to implement weight restrictions on the highways between the contractors current equipment location and Fort Greely, the government will exercise OPTION 2 which is intended to pay for additional costs associated with the contractor dis-assembling and then re-assembling equipment, utilizing trucks with more axles, and taking any additional measures that are more costly.

-- END OF PROPOSAL SCHEDULE --

SECTION 00 22 11

SELECTION PROCEDURES

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

ONE STEP - - LOWEST PRICE/TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

5.0 VOLUME 1 – TAB A - FACTOR 1: SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

6.0 VOLUME 1 – TAB B - FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE

7.0 VOLUME 1 - TAB C - FACTOR 2: SCHEDULE

8.0 VOLUME 2 – TAB A – FACTOR 3: STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET,

AND CONTRACT LINE ITEM SCHEDULE (PRICE)

9.0 VOLUME 2, TAB B – REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

10. 0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

ATTACHMENTS

1 - PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

2 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE FORM (PRIME CONTRACTOR)

3 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1. Interested firms (here after referred to as Offerors) shall submit proposals demonstrating their capability to successfully execute the construction contract resulting from this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein.

1.2 This is a lowest price technically acceptable source selection for the Missile Field 4, Construction Package #01, Clearing and Grubbing Project in, Fort Greely, Alaska. This project is for the clearing and grubbing of approximately 367 acres, at Fort Greely and adjacent to the Missile Defense Complex.

Clearing and grubbing this area is in preparation for follow-on contracts which will develop Missile Field

4. The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible offeror, whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government utilizing procedures in accordance FAR PART 15.101-2 Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection Process. The lowest price technically acceptable source selection process is appropriate when best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

2.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

2.1 The Contracting Officer will award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority has determined conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the “best value” to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price.

A. The evaluation factors and sub-factors that establish the requirements of acceptability shall be set forth in the solicitation.

B. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors.

C. Exchanges may occur (see FAR PART 15.306).

A firm-fixed-price construction contract will be awarded to the Offeror who submits a proposal which has the lowest price and is found to be technically acceptable.

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.1. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals. In accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Para. (f)(4), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint.

file://POA-NETAPP1.POA.DS.USACE.ARMY.MIL/POA/CT/Private/CT-CW/FY15/15R0024%20St%20Paul%20Harbor/B.8.9.1_Source_Selection_Plan/Source%20Selection%20Plan.docx#P289_46237

3.2 Submit proposal in a tabbed, three-ring binder. Page limitation for Volume 1 is 30 pages (not including Past Performance Questionnaires/Evaluations). Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits. Volume 2 has no page limitation.

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

Location Factor Number Description Rating

Volume 1, Tab A Factor 1 Specialized Experience Acceptable/Unacceptable

Volume 1, Tab B Factor 2 Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable

Volume 1, Tab C Factor 3 Schedule Acceptable/Unacceptable

Location Factor Number Description Relative Importance

Volume 2, Tab A Factor 4 Price (Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet Contract Line Item Schedule)

Lowest Price

Volume 2, Tab B N/A Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

5.0 VOLUME 1 – TAB A - FACTOR 1, SUBFACTOR 1: SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1. Submission Requirements:

5.1.1. The offer shall submit 2 projects which demonstrate experience using mechanical equipment to clear, grub, and dispose of at least 125 acres of land within a AM#02…6 week 2 Month duration…AM#02. Projects shall be at least 50% complete or completed within six (6) years prior to the date of this solicitation. Utilize the PRIME CONTRACTOR SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE FORM (Attachment 2) at the end of the section.

5.1.2. The minimum requirement for this evaluation factor has been met when the offeror demonstrates experience, as a Prime Contractor, on two (2) projects which each meets all the below criteria for minimum acceptability:

• Use of mechanical equipment to clear, grub and dispose of at least AM#02…150 125…AM#02 acres of land within a 2 month duration.

• Project is currently underway (at least 50% completed) or completed no longer than six (6) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

5.2. Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.1. The Government will evaluate the two submitted projects against the requirements listed in paragraph 5.1.1 and 5.1.2. To be acceptable, all of the criteria in the list in Section 5.1.1 and 5.1.2 shall be met.

6.0 VOLUME 1 – TAB B – FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1. Submission Requirements:

6.1.1. Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner's perspective.

Past performance evaluations or questionnaires shall be provided for at least two projects. For Federal projects, the offeror may rely on finalized CCASS or CPARS reports, otherwise the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included as Attachment 3 to this section is provided for the offeror to submit to the client for each project. Previously completed PPQ’s may be submitted; however, ensure a current phone number and email address is provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal and may be duplicated for submission on future solicitations. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first 2 pages of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Kimberly Tripp via email at kimberly.tripp@usace.army.mil prior to the proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

6.1.2. Projects cited shall be of a similar size, scope, or magnitude and currently well underway (at least 50% completed) or completed and turned over no longer than six (6) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

6.1.3. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may be include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS), inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. While the mailto:kimberly.tripp@usace.army.mil

Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

6.2. Evaluation Criteria:

6.2.1 Past Performance will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis using the ratings and descriptions shown below.

Acceptable – Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown (see note below).

Unacceptable – Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: An offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned will be determined to have ‘unknown’ past performance and shall not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably. Unknown past performance shall be considered “Acceptable”.

7.0 VOLUME 1 – TAB C – FACTOR 3: SUMMARY SCHEDULE AND NARRATIVE

7.1. Submission Requirements:

7.1.1. The offer shall submit a bar chart schedule for construction. The bar chart will be in graphic form and will be replaced with a final project schedule after contract award. The bar chart shall be task oriented, and shall assume an April 15th, 2018 NTP date and a completion date of ‘Area 1’ no later than June 1st, 2018 and a completion date of ‘Area 2’ no later than June 30th, 2018. A NTP for construction activities will not be issued until the FONSI is signed, which is expected to be no later than 14 April 2018. A limited NTP will be provided after receipt of bonds to allow for mobilization to the project site.

If the FONSI is not signed by 14 April AM#02… , or if the limited NTP is not issued prior to road restrictions, …AM#02 the contract completion date will be extended appropriately. The areas to be cleared are delineated on the contract drawings. In conjunction with the schedule, the offeror shall provide a narrative describing the following; proposed crew size, proposed equipment (size/type/make/model) to be used, planned acreage to be cleared/grubbed per day, and a description of how each of these items will contribute to the overall completion of the project by the 2 completion dates.

This narrative shall fully support the durations of the tasks identified on the summary bar chart schedule.

7.1.2. The minimum requirement for this evaluation factor has been met when the offeror’s submitted schedule indicates an understanding of the project scope, the work performance period and the narrative fully supports and justifies the submitted schedule.

7.2. Evaluation Criteria:

7.2.1. The Government will evaluate the schedule and narrative against the requirements listed in paragraph 7.1.1 and 7.1.2. To be acceptable, all of the criteria in the list in Section 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 shall be met.

8.0 VOLUME 2 – TAB A – FACTOR 4: PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL

DATA SHEET, AND CONTRACT LINE ITEM SCHEDULE)

8.1. Submission Requirements:

8.1.1. Submit the properly filled out and executed SF 1442, along with the CLIN Schedule, containing proposed line item and total pricing. See instructions in Section 00 21 00, “Instructions to Offerors.”

Submit the Proposal Data Sheet (Attachment 1).

8.1.2. Supplemental Price Breakdown. If deemed necessary to evaluate the price proposals, the Government will request a price breakdown of the Contract Line items in a sealed envelope marked “Price Breakdown Information,” in Excel format. The Government will provide details on where and how to send the breakdown. This information will not be needed sooner than three (3) working days after the proposal submission due date. This information may be required for the initial proposal and, if requested, for any revised proposals. This information is not an opportunity for an offeror to revise its non-price or price proposal.

8.2. Evaluation Criteria:

8.2.1 Price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis; comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation and comparison of proposed prices with the independent government estimate. The price evaluators will also check for appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Offerors are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor, equipment, subcontracts, etc., and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. Both parties shall presume that field overhead costs through the proposed contract duration are inclusive in the offered price for the contract.

8.2.2 If deemed necessary, the supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluations described above.

9.0 VOLUME 2, TAB B - REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

9.1 Submission Requirements:

9.1.1. Submit this information for the Contracting Officer’s determination of Offeror responsibility, which includes, but is not limited to the following:

(a) Joint Venture agreement or Limited Liability Company Certificate of Organization, Articles of Organization and Operating Agreement, if applicable.

(b) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value thereof, and name of the organization under which the work is being performed. Include names and telephone numbers of personnel within each organization who are familiar with the prospective contractor’s performance.

(c) A certified statement listing: (1) each contract awarded within the preceding three (3) month period exceeding $1,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract; and (2) each contract awarded within the preceding three (3) year period not already physically completed and exceeding $5,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract. If the prospective contractor is a joint venture, each joint venture member will be required to submit the above defined certification.

(d) Competed Representations and Certifications included by full text in Section 00 45 00. List any changes to SAM (System for Award Management) in 52.204-8 for FAR Clauses and 252.204- 7007 for DFAR clauses. Provide for any certification where vendor indicated in SAM that certification would be provided with specific offer.

(e) One copy of the following information:

(1) Proof of Financial Ability (Most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities)

(2) Number of years the firm has been in business

(3) Name, address and telephone number of firm’s bonding company

(4) Information showing offeror’s bondability for this project. Submit a letter from the prime contractor’s bonding company indicating the offeror’s ability to obtain performance and payment bonds in the amount of their proposal price.

(5) Name, address and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references.

9.2 Evaluation Criteria:

9.2.1. The Contracting Officer shall use this information in making an affirmative responsibility determination for award to the Successful Offeror, in accordance with FAR Part 9.

10. EVALUATION PROCEDURES

10.1. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

10.1.1 The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will be established to conduct the evaluation of proposals received in response to this solicitation. The SSEB will evaluate the proposals and assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor and sub-factor, utilizing the acceptable/unacceptable ratings described below, except for past performance which has its own acceptable/unacceptable ratings. The SSEB will not consider any information incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

10.2. EVALUATION

10.2.1. The SSEB will evaluate the proposals and assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor and subfactor.

10.2.2. The Government intends to award without discussions. Offerors are cautioned to put forth their best efforts, and to furnish all information clearly to allow the Government to evaluate proposals.

Offerors should not assume that they will have an opportunity to clarify or correct anything in their proposal after submitting it.

10.2.3. A “Competitive Range” will be established in the event that the Government decides that discussions with offerors are required or are considered to be in the Government’s best interests.

10.2.4. If discussions are held, the Government may engage in a broad give and take with those offerors in the competitive range, in accordance with FAR 15.306(d). During discussions, the Government may ask the Offeror to further explain its proposal and to answer questions about it.

10.2.5. Upon conclusion of discussions, offerors will be afforded an opportunity to submit their proposal revisions for final evaluation and selection.

10.3 EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

10.3.1 General: The Government will review the proposals against the minimum requirements stated in the solicitation. The Government will support each rating with a narrative that clearly states how the proposal met or did not meet the factor or sub-factor criteria as well as any required clarifications.

10.3.2 Rating System: After determining whether the criteria has been met, the Government will assign a rating of “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” to each factor and sub-factor.

10.3.3. Ratings: The following ratings will be used in the evaluation of all factors and sub-factors except past performance.

• Acceptable (A): The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

• Unacceptable (U): The proposal does not clearly meet the listed requirements of each sub-factor.

AM#02 MISSILE FIELD #4 - SITE CLEARING AND GRUBBING (CP#01) FTG218A

FORT GREELY, ALASKA

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK

01 19 30.00 29 SPECIAL ITEMS

01 22 00.00 10 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES

01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

01 33 29 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

01 36 00.00 29 RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS PROCEDURES

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 00.15 10 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE(RMS CM)

01 45 04.00 29 CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL

01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS

01 57 20.01 29 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

01 57 34.00 29 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES

01 74 19.01 29 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT

DIVISION 02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS

02 61 13 EXCAVATION AND HANDLING OF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL

DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK

31 00 00 EARTHWORK

31 09 20.00 29 FIELD SCREEN TESTING OF SOILS FOR CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION

31 11 00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING

DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS

32 31 13 CHAIN LINK FENCES AND GATES

DIVISION 33 - UTILITIES

33 40 00 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITIES

-- End of Project Table of Contents --

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1

22 FEB 2018 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 042986

AM#02 . . . . . . AM#02

AM#02

SUBMITTAL FORM,Jan 96 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE PAGE 1 OF 4 PAGES

CP#01 - Site Clearing and Grubbing

01 33 00 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

1.8 GSubmittal Register

01 35 26 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

1.7 GAccident Prevention Plan (APP)

SD-06 Test Reports

1.4Monthly Exposure Reports

1.12Notifications and Reports

1.12.2 GAccident Reports

1.12.3LHE Inspection Reports

SD-07 Certificates

1.6.1.4Crane Operators/Riggers

1.7.2.2 GStandard Lift Plan

1.7.2.3 GCritical Lift Plan

1.8Activity Hazard Analysis (AHA)

1.9.1Hot Work Permit

1.12.4Certificate of Compliance

1.14License Certificates

01 45 04.00 29 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

3.2 GContractor Quality Control (CQC)

Plan

SD-06 Test Reports

3.9Verification Statement

01 50 00 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

1.3 GConstruction Site Plan

3.4.1 GTraffic Control Plan

01 57 20.01 29 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

SUBMITTAL REGISTER

CONTRACT NO.

TITLE AND LOCATION CONTRACTOR

CONTRACTOR:

SCHEDULE DATES

CONTRACTOR

ACTION

APPROVING AUTHORITY

A C T I V I T Y

N O

T R A N S M I T T A L

N O

S P E C

S E C T

DESCRIPTION

ITEM SUBMITTED

P A R A G R A P H

C L A S S I F I C A T I O N

G O V T

O R

A E

R E V W

R SUBMIT

APPROVAL

NEEDED

BY

MATERIAL

NEEDED

BY

A C T I O N

C O D E

DATE

OF

ACTION

DATE FWD

TO APPR

AUTH/

DATE RCD

FROM

CONTR

DATE FWD

TO OTHER

REVIEWER

DATE RCD

FROM OTH

REVIEWER

A C T I O N

C O D E

DATE

OF

ACTION

MAILED

TO

CONTR/

DATE RCD

FRM APPR

AUTH REMARKS

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r)

AM#02 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SUBMITTAL FORM,Jan 96 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE PAGE 2 OF 4 PAGES

01 57 20.01 29 1.7 GEnvironmental Protection Plan

01 57 34.00 29 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

1.4.1 GStorm Water Pollution Prevention

Plan (SWPPP)

1.4.2 GNotice of Intent (NOI)

SD-11 Closeout Submittals

3.1.2 GRecords

1.4.4 GNotice of Termination (NOT)

01 74 19.01 29 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

1.6 GWaste Management Plan

SD-11 Closeout Submittals

1.7Records

02 61 13 SD-03 Product Data

1.5 GWork Plan

SD-06 Test Reports

3.6 GClosure Report

31 00 00 SD-03 Product Data

3.5 GUtilization of Excavated Materials

SD-06 Test Reports

3.10Testing

2.1Testing of Offsite Borrow Sources

SD-07 Certificates

3.10Testing

31 09 20.00 29 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

3.3 GSampling and Analysis Plan

(SAP)

SUBMITTAL REGISTER

CONTRACT NO.

TITLE AND LOCATION CONTRACTOR

CONTRACTOR:

SCHEDULE DATES

CONTRACTOR

ACTION

APPROVING AUTHORITY

A C T I V I T Y

N O

T R A N S M I T T A L

N O

S P E C

S E C T

DESCRIPTION

ITEM SUBMITTED

P A R A G R A P H

C L A S S I F I C A T I O N

G O V T

O R

A E

R E V W

R SUBMIT

APPROVAL

NEEDED

BY

MATERIAL

NEEDED

BY

A C T I O N

C O D E

DATE

OF

ACTION

DATE FWD

TO APPR

AUTH/

DATE RCD

FROM

CONTR

DATE FWD

TO OTHER

REVIEWER

DATE RCD

FROM OTH

REVIEWER

A C T I O N

C O D E

DATE

OF

ACTION

MAILED

TO

CONTR/

DATE RCD

FRM APPR

AUTH REMARKS

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r)

SUBMITTAL FORM,Jan 96 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE PAGE 3 OF 4 PAGES

31 09 20.00 29 3.8.1 GSafety and Health Program

(SHP)

SD-06 Test Reports

3.7 GField Report

3.1 GCorrespondence

SD-07 Certificates

3.4.1 GQualifications

31 11 00 SD-03 Product Data

3.3.1 GNonsaleable Materials

32 31 13 SD-02 Shop Drawings

2.1Fence Assembly

3.2.1.1Location of Gate, Corner, End, and Pull Posts

2.1Gate Assembly

2.2.11Gate Hardware and Accessories

Part 3Erection/Installation Drawings

SD-03 Product Data

2.1Fence Assembly

2.1Gate Assembly

2.2.11Gate Hardware and Accessories

2.3.1Zinc Coating

2.2.1Fabric

2.2.6Stretcher Bars

2.3.3Concrete

SD-04 Samples

2.3.2Tension Wire

SUBMITTAL REGISTER

CONTRACT NO.

TITLE AND LOCATION CONTRACTOR

CONTRACTOR:

SCHEDULE DATES

CONTRACTOR

ACTION

APPROVING AUTHORITY

A C T I V I T Y

N O

T R A N S M I T T A L

N O

S P E C

S E C T

DESCRIPTION

ITEM SUBMITTED

P A R A G R A P H

C L A S S I F I C A T I O N

G O V T

O R

A E

R E V W

R SUBMIT

APPROVAL

NEEDED

BY

MATERIAL

NEEDED

BY

A C T I O N

C O D E

DATE

OF

ACTION

DATE FWD

TO APPR

AUTH/

DATE RCD

FROM

CONTR

DATE FWD

TO OTHER

REVIEWER

DATE RCD

FROM OTH

REVIEWER

A C T I O N

C O D E

DATE

OF

ACTION

MAILED

TO

CONTR/

DATE RCD

FRM APPR

AUTH REMARKS

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r)

SUBMITTAL FORM,Jan 96 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE PAGE 4 OF 4 PAGES

32 31 13 2.2.6Stretcher Bars

2.2.9Gate Posts

2.2.11Gate Hardware and Accessories

2.2.14Padlocks

2.2.13Wire Ties

SD-07 Certificates

1.3.1Certificates of Compliance

SD-08 Manufacturer’s Instructions

2.1Fence Assembly

2.1Gate Assembly

2.1Hardware Assembly

2.1Accessories

33 40 00 SD-04 Samples

2.1Pipe for Culverts and Storm

Drains

SUBMITTAL REGISTER

CONTRACT NO.

TITLE AND LOCATION CONTRACTOR

CONTRACTOR:

SCHEDULE DATES

CONTRACTOR

ACTION

APPROVING AUTHORITY

A C T I V I T Y

N O

T R A N S M I T T A L

N O

S P E C

S E C T

DESCRIPTION

ITEM SUBMITTED

P A R A G R A P H

C L A S S I F I C A T I O N

G O V T

O R

A E

R E V W

R SUBMIT

APPROVAL

NEEDED

BY

MATERIAL

NEEDED

BY

A C T I O N

C O D E

DATE

OF

ACTION

DATE FWD

TO APPR

AUTH/

DATE RCD

FROM

CONTR

DATE FWD

TO OTHER

REVIEWER

DATE RCD

FROM OTH

REVIEWER

A C T I O N

C O D E

DATE

OF

ACTION

MAILED

TO

CONTR/

DATE RCD

FRM APPR

AUTH REMARKS

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r)

AM#02 MISSILE FIELD #4 - SITE CLEARING AND GRUBBING (CP#01) FTG218A

FORT GREELY, ALASKA

submittal processing. Allow for potential resubmittal of requirements.

b. Submittals called for by the contract documents will be listed on the register. If a submittal is called for but does not pertain to the contract work, the Contractor is to include the submittal in the register and annotate it "N/A" with a brief explanation. Approval by the Contracting Officer does not relieve the Contractor of supplying submittals required by the contract documents but which have been omitted from the register or marked "N/A."

c. Re-submit register and annotate monthly by the Contractor with actual submission and approval dates. When all items on the register have been fully approved, no further re-submittal is required.

d. Carefully control procurement operations to ensure that each individual submittal is made on or before the Contractor scheduled submittal date shown on the approved "Submittal Register."

e. Except as specified otherwise, allow review period, beginning with receipt by approving authority, that includes at least AM#02...14 ...AM#0 2 calendar days for submittals for Contracting Officer approval. Period of review for submittals with Contracting Officer approval begins when Government receives submittal from QC organization.

f. For submittals requiring review by fire protection engineer, allow review period, beginning when Government receives submittal from QC organization, of AM#02...14...AM#02 calendar days for return of submittal to the Contractor.

g. Period of review for each resubmittal is the same as for initial submittal.

1.10 GOVERNMENT APPROVING AUTHORITY

When approving authority is Contracting Officer, the Government will:

a. Note date on which submittal was received.

b. Review submittals for approval within scheduling period specified and only for conformance with project design concepts and compliance with contract documents.

c. Identify returned submittals with one of the actions defined in paragraph REVIEW NOTATIONS and with markings appropriate for action indicated.

Upon completion of review of submittals requiring Government approval, stamp and date submittals. One copy of the submittal will be retained by the Contracting Officer and an electonic copy of the submittal will be returned to the Contractor.

1.10.1 Review Notations

Submittals will be returned to the Contractor with the following notations:

a. Submittals marked "approved" or "accepted" authorize the Contractor to proceed with the work covered.

SECTION 01 33 00 Page 9