W911KB-17-R-0021-0006.pdf

CLR043

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION: CLR043, FIRE STATION, CLEAR AFS, ALASKA

a. This amendment provides changes to the solicitation as indicated on the continuation pages of this document.

b. PROPOSAL DUE DATE IS: 6 June 2017 at 1400 hours ALASKA TIME. Proposals shall be submitted in accordance w ith Section 00 21 00, paragraph 1.10, Proposal Submittals.

c. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS AMENDMENT ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THE STANDARD FORM 1442.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 10-May-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB-17-R-0021

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Dec-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-May-2017

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK

CEPOA-CT (W911KB)

PO BOX 6898

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

a. The following drawings are substituted for the superseded documents/sections:

NONE

b. The following revised documents/sections are substituted for the superseded documents/sections. The identifier “AM 06” appears before and after new and/or revised materials, except as noted below.

SECTION 00 21 00 – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

-1.5.1 - Bidder Inquiry

SECTION 00 22 20 – PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS

OF AWARD

-Replace entire section

NOTE: Revisions within the following documents do not contain the above referenced identifiers:

c. The following sections are deleted:

d. The following documents are added:

e. The following revisions are incorporated:

f. Other:

(End of Summary of Changes)

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME.

It shall be the contractor’s responsibility to check the websites for any amendments. The offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation.

A list of interested vendors (potential offerors and subcontractors) is available on the federal business opportunities web site (registration required) is available at: http://www.fbo.gov/ via Quick Search (Solicitation No. W911KB-

17-R-0021).

1.5. OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via the Bidder Inquiry system as indicated below.

All questions and/or comments should be submitted no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the proposal due date.

1.5.1. Bidder Inquiry

Technical inquiries and questions relating to this solicitation are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at

(https://www.projnet.org) no later than 10 calendar days prior to the proposal due date. To submit and review inquiry items, prospective vendors will need to use the Bidder Inquiry Key presented below and follow the instructions listed below the key for access. A prospective vendor who submits a comment /question will receive an acknowledgement of their comment/question via email, followed by an answer to the comment/question after it has been processed by our technical team. Offerors are requested to review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

All timely questions and approved answers will be made available through ProjNet. Approved answers to all timely questions will also be posted as an amendment to the solicitation in the form of a report generated from ProjNet as soon as the comment/question entering period is over and all answers are finalized. In case of any conflicts between answers in ProjNet and the solicitation, the solicitation governs and any revisions to the solicitation will be made by formal amendment.

The Solicitation Number is: W911KB-17-R-0021

The Bidder Inquiry Key is: V4YFXX-96KH7H

Specific Instructions for ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

2. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

3. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

4. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.

AM 06

AM 06

AM 06

Section 00 22 20 - PHASE 2 DESIGN BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD

SECTION 00 22 20

PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF

AWARD

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 STIPEND FOR UNSUCCESSFUL PHASE 2 OFFERORS

4.0 PHASE 2 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS, SUBFACTORS

AND ELEMENTS

5.0 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 1 – DESIGN TECHNICAL

5.1. GENERAL

5.2. TAB A – SUBFACTOR 1 – BUILDING FUNCTIONAL, AESTHETICS AND SPACE

5.3. TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 – QUALITY OF BUILDING SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS

5.4. TAB C – SUBFACTOR 3 – SITE DESIGN

5.5. TAB D – SUBFACTOR 4 – PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY

SCHEDULE

6.1 VOLUME 2 - SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN, PRICE AND PRO FORMA

INFORMATION

6.2 TAB A – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

6.3 FACTOR 3 2 – PHASE 1 PROPOSAL ROLL-UP RATING

6.4 TAB B A – FACTOR 4 3 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442 AND CONTRACT

LINE ITEM SCHEDULE)

6.5 TAB C B – REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

6.6 TAB D – SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

7.0 EVALUATIONPROCEDURES

7.1. GENERAL

7.2. DISCUSSIONS (IF NECESSARY)

PHASE TWO – SECTION 00 22 20

ATTACHMENTS

W911KB-17-R-0021

CLR043

Section 00 22 20 Pg 1

J4RMMJCM

Cross-Out

J4RMMJCM

Cross-Out

6 – FORMAT FOR TABLE OF FACILITIES

7 – FORMAT FOR TABLE OF SPACES

8 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN FORMAT

9 – SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN FORMAT

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 2

1.0 OVERVIEW

The most highly qualified offerors selected in Phase 1 are invited to submit a Phase 2 proposal, as indicated below. The

Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria described herein, using the evaluation rating systems outlined in the Phase 1 Design-Build selection procedures. Price information will be evaluated for fairness, reasonableness, and for material unbalancing, as described herein. The Phase 2 evaluation will be conducted in accordance with FAR Part 15 and will utilize the Tradeoff Process described in FAR 15.101-1.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Contracting Officer will award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible Phase 2 Offeror whose proposal the

Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering the non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered significantly more important than the price, however, the Contract award may not exceed the cost limitation described in Section 00 21 00 for this project. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation. There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer. After the Government individually evaluates and rates each proposal, the Contracting Officer/Source Selection

Authority will compare proposals to determine which proposal represents the best value. Proposals will not be ranked.

The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Official must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal (within the cost limitation) would justify award to that Offeror.

2.1. As part of the evaluation, the Government will evaluate betterments in proposals relative to the minimum standards in the RFP to determine if they offer additional value to the Government. In addition, innovations in proposals will be evaluated to determine if creative ideas of the Offeror are a better value to the Government compared to the minimum criteria.

2.2 Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.0 STIPEND FOR UNSUCCESSFUL PHASE 2 OFFERORS

3.1. A stipends is not currently authorized for this acquisition.

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 3

4.0 PHASE 2 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS, SUBFACTORS

AND ELEMENTS

(VOLUME 1 – DESIGN TECHNICAL)

Factor/Sub Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 1 DESIGN TECHNICAL Most Important Factor

Subfactor 1 Vol. 1 TAB A Building Functional and Aesthetics Equally Important to Subfactor 2 (slightly more important than Subfactors 3)

Subfactor 2 Vol. 1 TAB B Quality of Building Systems and Materials

Equally Important to Subfactor 1 (slightly more important than Subfactors 3)

Subfactor 3 Vol. 1 TAB C Site Design 2nd Most Important Subfactor (slightly less important than Subfactors 1 and 2)

Subfactor 4 Vol. 1 TAB D Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule

3rd Most Important Subfactor (slightly less important than Subfactor 3)

(VOLUME 2 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN, PRICE, PRO FORMA IMFORMATION)

Factor/Sub Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 2 Vol. 2 TAB A SMALLBUSINESS

PARTICIPATIONPLAN

2nd Most Important Factor (significantly less important than Factor 1, equally important to Factor 3)

FACTOR 3 2 PHASE 1

PROPOSAL

PHASE 1 PROPOSAL ROLL-UP

RATING

2nd Most Important Factor (significantly less important than Factor 1, equally important to Factor 2)

FACTOR 4 3 Vol. 2 TAB B A PRICE (Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Schedule)

3rd Most Important Factor (significantly less important Factors 1 and 2 and 3 combined)

N/A Vol. 2 TAB C B Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

N/A Vol. 2 TAB D Subcontracting Plan Scored in accordance with AFARS Appendix DD

W911KB-17-R-0021

CLR043

Section 00 22 20 Pg 4

J4RMMJCM

Cross-Out

J4RMMJCM

Cross-Out

J4RMMJCM

Cross-Out

5.0 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 1 – DESIGN - TECHNICAL

5.1. GENERAL: The design-technical Factor consists of conceptual level presentation drawings, technical approach narratives and information regarding material and system quality. It must clearly define the proposed scope and quality levels that the design-build team is offering to the Government in enough detail for the Government and the Offeror to mutually understand whether or not the proposal meets or exceeds the minimum Solicitation requirements. The use of

BIM to prepare or submit proposals is NOT required. Fully developed drawings, details or specifications are not required or desired. Unless specifically stated herein, the Government will not be performing a detailed engineering analysis or design review at the proposal stage. The intent during the proposal submission and review process is not to require detailed design effort or to perform a detailed design engineering review but to focus on the proposed quality levels of materials and systems c o n s i s t e n t w i t h s u b f a c t o r s 1 t h r u 4. If the Government evaluators have actual knowledge or strong suspicion that a proposed product or solution is inappropriately sized, being used in the wrong application or otherwise does not meet the contract requirements, the Government will inform the proposer in the event that discussions are conducted with the firm. T h e Government is not asking for design analyses in the proposal and is not obligated to perform an engineering design review at this stage. After award, in the event of conflict between the contractor’s accepted proposal and the requirements in the final amended RFP, the order of precedence is indicated in

Clause 52.236-5000, “Design Build Order Of Precedence”. The Offeror shall identify what it considers to be Betterments in its proposal for Subfactors 1-4 of Factor 1 (See Section 00 73 00.00 29, SCR “Proposed Betterments”). Betterments included in the technical submission must also be included in the base price under Factor 4. Do not describe in the narratives or show in the drawings any betterments that are not included in the base price. The final design must comply with the RFP requirements except that accepted betterments become the new contract minimum requirements. Note that the

Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

5.2. VOLUME 1 - TAB A –SUBFACTOR 1 - BUILDING FUNCTIONAL, AESTHETICS AND SPACE

5.2.1. Submission Requirements:

5.2.1.1. Presentation Drawings: Limit presentation drawings to no more than twenty-five (25) drawings to include the following:

(a) Exterior Elevation(s) of the primary elevation(s) of the facility clearly noting proposed materials and colors.

(b) At least two (2) renderings: showing a perspective from a location northeast and southwest of the facility with enough realistic detail to aid in the evaluation of the exterior building aesthetics, as described in paragraph 5.2.2.2 (a), below. Renderings shall include a slightly overhead view of the entire building to encompass elevations and the roof configuration of the building (Reference Section 01 33 16).

Renderings should be at least 11" x 17" in order to show a detailed perspective view of the building.

(c) At least one building section demonstrating typical exterior wall sections, typical exterior construction materials, finished floor elevations, and ceiling heights.

NOTE: The Government will use this information to evaluate functional and aesthetic considerations, such as floor to ceiling heights and may use it to help evaluate exterior aesthetics and appearance. The

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 5

Government may also use this information in conjunction with the submission information under the subfactor:

QUALITY OF BUILDING SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS below, to evaluate quality of wall finishes as well as to look at how the proposer has considered air barrier.

(d) Schematic floor plans for each floor of the Fire Station. Floor plans shall show furnishings, equipment, and other specifically identified items.

(e) Offerors shall include one presentation drawing showing entire/overall floor plan of the fire station on one sheet.

5.2.1.2. Color Board

Provide a color board including primary interior and exterior finish materials. Format shall be in accordance with

Section 01 33 16, Attachment A, Structural Interior Design Requirements

5.2.1.3. Technical Approach Narrative

Provide technical approach narrative defining the elements of the proposal. This narrative shall be no longer than five

(5) typewritten pages. The page limit does not include the space and facility tables.

(a) Building Functional Arrangement. Describe the spaces provided for the fire station, and how the planning and design of the spaces accommodates Airman working conditions and the operations of the facility.

Preface the narrative with a design concepts narrative, providing the design rationale and basis of the proposal.

(b) Building Aesthetics. Describe the architectural themes of the various facilities and spaces which demonstrate how the proposal achieves the results desired by the Statement of Work. Narrative should address how the selection of materials and colors enhances the exterior and interior aesthetics of the facilities and improves the living and/or working conditions for the Airman populations who will utilize the facilities. This narrative is not intended to be a material listing, but to explain/reflect how the selections were made and how they address the requirements.

(c) Minimum Space and Facility Size. Provide a tabulation of the net square footage for rooms, zones, or other areas, the total gross square footage for each floor of each facility, and the total gross square footage for each facility to clearly demonstrate compliance with the project requirements. See the sample spreadsheets in Attachments 6 and 7 at the end of this section.

5.2.2. Evaluation Criteria:

The following three elements are equal in importance (not rated separately).

5.2.2.1. Building Functional Arrangement: This element considers the overall functional layout (Floor Plan) and interaction of the spaces in the facilities as well. This element considers the planning and design of the spaces with respect to Airman working conditions and the operations of the facility.

The following criteria will be considered in the evaluation of the functional arrangement of the various facilities:

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 6

How well the floor plan responds to the Functional Relationship requirements described in the Statement of

Work

(a) How well the floor plan and space arrangement facilitate work flow and access necessary to successfully operate this facility in accordance with its mission.

(b) Do the facilities provide acceptable life safety and fire safety measures?

(c) Do the proposed plans demonstrate compliance with the mandatory requirements for circulation, furnishings, equipment, and other specifically identified items in the Statement of Work?

5.2.2.2. Building Aesthetics: This element considers the overall “appeal” of the facility and the desire that both the interior and exterior of the facilities present a professional, attractive appearance. The following two areas will be considered under this element and are equal in consideration (not separately rated):

(a) Exterior Considerations:

To the extent possible within the government identified contract cost limitation (CCL), the proposal must comply with the look and feel of the Installation architectural theme identified in the solicitation. The first priority in order of importance is how well the proposal provides comparable building mass, size, height, and configuration in comparison with the architectural theme expressed in Section 01 10 00-6.5.2 and Appendix F of the Solicitation. The second priority in order of importance is how well the proposal provides compatible exterior skin appearance based upon façade, architectural character (period or style), exterior detailing, matching the architectural theme expressed in the

Solicitation.

• Proposals shall be evaluated on mass, size, height, and configuration in comparison with the architectural theme expressed in the Solicitation, design of facades, roof lines, delineation of entrances, proportions of fenestration in relation to elevations, shade and shadow effects, materials, textures, architectural character (period or style), exterior color schemes.

• How compatible is the proposed design with the installation architectural theme expressed in the solicitation? If not an exact "copy" of the theme, how well does it harmonize or blend with the expressed theme?

• How well does the proposal provide comparable building mass, size, height, and configuration in comparison with the architectural theme expressed in the Solicitation?

• How well does the proposal provide compatible exterior skin appearance based upon façade, architectural character (period or style), exterior detailing, matching the architectural theme expressed in the Solicitation?

• Is the buildings scale and proportion complimentary of the adjacent structures?

• Is the building an attractive addition to the Installation?

• How well does the building harmonize with its environment, including surrounding facilities?

• Has the proposer addressed/coordinated the arrangement of stacks, louvers, vents, and roof mounted equipment, etc. to provide a visually attractive structure?

(b) Interior Considerations:

• Are the proposed colors and material finishes conducive to the working environment of the facility?

• Has the proposal addressed/provided for natural and artificial light in working spaces and is the arrangement of fenestration and lighting fixtures in the spaces conducive to space usage?

• Has “support item” placement been considered and addressed in the proposal to enhance the environment? For example: placement of supply/exhaust devices, placement of electrical panels, and placement of exhaust fans, etc.

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 7

• Does the proposal provide for acoustic control of noise in the fire station?

5.2.2.3. Minimum Space and Facility Size: The proposal must include all the mandatory spaces in response to the requirements set forth in Section 01 10 00, Statement of Work. For this element, proposals will be evaluated on compliance with these requirements. Individual areas may slightly exceed the requirements, so long as building function is not compromised elsewhere and as long as the overall square footage is not greater than that as described in

Section 01 10 00, as authorized by Congress

5.3. VOLUME 1- TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 - QUALITY OF BUILDING SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS

5.3.1. General. As part of this Subfactor, the Government has identified certain items as desirable features or preferable items. Desirable features are identified below in the evaluation criteria. Preferable items are listed in order of priority. These items, along with any Offeror-identified betterment, will be given additional consideration during the evaluation process, provided that they are included in the proposed base price and are within the contract cost limitation

(CCL) identified in the Solicitation.

Preferable Items:

1. Day lighting via insulated translucent wall systems located on all four sides of apparatus bay. System shall consist of translucent wall panels with minimum light transmission of 17% and U-factor of 0.05 thermally broken.

2. Sound absorption panels/baffles in ceiling and/or on walls to reduce noise in the apparatus bay. Baffle face area will ideally total at least half of the total combined wall and ceiling area of the apparatus (less doors). Sound baffle core should be inert, mildew resistance and meet fire rating ASTM E- 84 class I.

Baffles will ideally have noise reduction capability of 25 STC or 0.80 NRC, minimum.

3. Laminate solar panels mounted to vertical building surfaces.

5.3.2. Submission Requirements:

5.3.2.1. Presentation Drawings

There are no specific drawings requirements for this Subfactor. However, the Offeror has the option of providing concept level drawing information for specific materials and/or systems which the Offeror feels are necessary to describe the proposed systems or materials in the drawings provided under Tab A.

5.3.2.2. Technical Approach Narrative:

Provide technical approach narrative, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the proposal. It is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that all aspects identified in the evaluation criteria below are addressed.

Maximum total length for the narrative shall be ten (10) typewritten pages.

(a) Architectural Finishes: Describe how the materials selected provide for a suitable environment for the expected population of the facility. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Narrative should focus on durability and maintenance of the finishes proposed. Provide duration of roof system warranty.

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 8

(b) Structural Systems: Describe design loads and structural member and wall framing deflection limits used for design. Describe the building's gravity system and lateral system. Describe exterior wall systems and building foundation. Describe how partitions and curtain walls are to be isolated from structural deflections. Discuss measures used to limit cracking in veneer, walls and slabs-on-grade. Discuss measures used to prevent slabs-on-grade from delaminating.

(c) Mechanical Systems: Describe how the mechanical systems selected provide for a highly efficient environmental control system including information about provisions for indoor air quality maintenance.

Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, limiting energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

(d) Plumbing Systems: Describe how the plumbing systems selected provide for a highly efficient domestic hot water system and an efficient piping system. Discuss how these selections provide value to the

Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

(e) Electrical Systems: Describe how the electrical power and lighting systems, telephone and data systems selected provide for a highly efficient electrical system. Discuss how these selections provide value to the

Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

(f) Fire Protection Systems: Describe the fire suppression, detection and alarm system with associated site and equipment needs. Discuss basic life safety and building code implications. Discuss how the systems provide value to the Government and address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Narrative should discuss maintenance considerations, and how the proposed systems will interface with existing and future facilities.

(g) Interoperability: Describe how systems integrated into the new facilities which require connection and interface with existing Installation wide systems will be accommodated in the proposed project. Narrative should address the following systems as minimum: Fire Alarm, Mass Notification System, Telephone and

Utility Monitoring and Control System (UMCS).

5.3.2.3 Proposed Material Identifications:

In the proposed material identification submission, the Offeror shall include only major materials in each of the areas shown below (there is no need to include materials such as fasteners, adhesives, wire, etc.). Provide this information in tabular form supported by catalog information. Table should include manufacturer’s name, model number if known or at least model series, length of warranty, size/capacity (where available), efficiency (where applicable), country of origin and any other notes or information selected by the Offeror. Catalog cuts shall be organized and tabbed in accordance with the disciplines listed below and each section shall contain a table of contents identifying the products included. On catalog cut sheets that show more than one product, clearly identify the specific

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 9 product proposed for this project. Provide only one hard copy of catalog cut sheets with original proposal. Provide

CD- ROM with catalog cut sheets for each copy of proposal. Information on CD shall be bookmarked.

The Government will evaluate and consider materials and equipment proposed by brand name and model series or number as a quality standard. Unless substitution of a manufacturer, brand name or model is otherwise specifically prohibited in the contract, if the successful Offeror desires to substitute manufacturers, brand names or models after award, the substituted product must meet the contract requirements and be approved by the designer of record and the

Government as equal in function, performance, quality and salient features to that initially proposed. Acceptance of the proposal is not a guaranty that the proposed products meet the contractual requirements. See below under Evaluation

Criteria for more explanation.

(a) Architectural Finishes

• Interior Walls

• Floors

• Ceilings

• Exterior Walls

• Any Special Features

• Hardware systems (not individual hardware sets)

• Door systems/types (not individual doors)

• Window systems/types (not individual windows)

• Roofing Systems

• Insulation Systems

(b) Mechanical Systems

• Central Heating/Cooling Equipment

• Pumps

• Air Handling Equipment

• HVAC System Control Equipment

• Energy Conservation Features

(c) Plumbing Systems

• Fixtures

• Domestic Hot Water Generator

• Oil/water separator

(d) Electrical Systems

• Lighting Fixtures

• Main Switchgear and Panels

• Emergency Generator or Energy Storage System

• Fire Alarm, DDC and Mass Notification Systems

• Data, Telephone and Other Special Systems as identified in the SOW

(e) Fire Protection Systems

• Fire Pumps

• Major components of the HEF foam system, such as foam, generators, proportioners and other equipment.

5.3.2.4 Quality Improvements:

Provide a list of quality improvements that are above the minimum stated in the performance specifications. Develop the following table, or similar, to identify desirable features (see 5.3.3.2), preferable items (see 5.3.1) and other

Offeror identified betterments (mark appropriate column). Desirable features, preferable items and offeror identified

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 10 betterments shall be included in the following table only if included in the base price.

Preferred Item

Desirable Feature

Contractor Betterment

Concise description of improved quality

Location of catalog information (page number)

Arch.

Finishes

Etc.

5.3.3. Evaluation Criteria:

5.3.3.1. General: It is the Air Force's objective that these buildings will have a 50 year useful life. The design and construction should provide an appropriate level of quality to ensure the continued use of the facility over that time period with the application of reasonable preventive maintenance and repairs that would be industry-acceptable to a major civilian sector project OWNER. The facility design should consider that the Air Force may repurpose the use of the facility over the 50 year life. The Air Force's intent is to install products and materials of good quality that meet industry standard average life that corresponds with the period of performance expected before a major renovation or repurpose.

The design should be flexible and adaptable to possible future uses different than the current to the extent practical while still meeting the operational and functional requirements defined within. Flexibility is achieved through design of more flexible structural load-bearing wall and column system arrangements. The site infrastructure will have at least a 50-year life expectancy with industry-accepted maintenance and repair cycles. Develop the project site for efficiency and to convey a sense of unity or connectivity with the adjacent buildings and with the Installation as a whole. Building useful life is defined by the length of service of the structural systems; concrete, masonry, steel, and wood in any combination.

These structural systems last a lifetime when properly constructed and maintained. The building systems; electrical, mechanical, interior finishes etc. vary in useful life based on quality of the products and materials. Generally speaking these systems will last an average of 20-30 years. Historically the Air Force has often performed a major renovation or changed the use of the facility once in the first 25 years. Within that overriding theme the Government will evaluate the

Offeror selected systems and components proposed in terms of extended warranties provided, maintenance considerations

(frequency, estimated cost, access, equipment locations), operability (ease of use, placement of control features, simplicity), durability (withstand troop usage, ease of cleaning), sustainability, and energy consumption (HVAC, lighting, power). The minimum acceptable level of quality for finishes and materials for these buildings are those materials suitable for the expected population and usage. Residential or similar grade finishes and materials are not acceptable for inclusion in these buildings, unless otherwise specifically allowed in Section 01 10 00. Acceptance of the proposal is not a guaranty that the proposed products meet the contractual requirements or that they are the appropriate size or application for the design which will be developed after award. The intent during the proposal submission and review process is not to require detailed design effort or to perform a detailed design engineering review but to focus on the proposed quality levels of materials and systems If the Government evaluators have actual knowledge or strong suspicion that a proposed product or solution is inappropriately sized, being used in the wrong application or otherwise won’t meet the contract requirements, the Government will inform the proposer in the event that discussions are conducted with the firm. But the Government is not asking for design analyses in the proposal and is not obligated to

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 11 perform an engineering design review at this stage. After award, in the event of conflict between the contractor’s accepted proposal and the requirements in the final, amended RFP, the order of precedence is indicated in Clause 52.236-

5000, “Design-Build Order Of Precedence”.

5.3.3.2. The Government encourages the Offeror to place emphasis on those design features which optimize and emphasize functional/operational requirements; interior/exterior finishes and systems; and life cycle/ energy efficiency.

The Offeror may choose the most economical “Type of Construction” allowed by the Building Code for this occupancy/project and put the money into durable finishes and efficient systems. The features that the Government has identified below as desirable features, the items that the Government has identified in paragraph 5.3.1 as preferable and

Offeror-identified betterments may be given additional consideration during the evaluation process provided they are included within contract cost limitation identified in the Solicitation and the offeror’s proposed base contract price. The order of importance for proposed betterments for rating purposes is as follows: desirable features, preferable items and other Offeror identified betterments. The Government will identify those Offeror identified betterments that are not desired, or are otherwise objectionable or unacceptable, if discussions are conducted with that Offeror. Unsubstantiated claims or narrative information will not be given evaluation credit during the evaluations. The following elements (not rated separately) will be considered in the evaluation of the building systems and materials of the various facilities:

(a) Architectural Finishes, Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include finishes, components and systems which provide usable spaces for the intended purposes. Proposals will receive additional consideration for materials and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

Desirable features: solid wood cabinetry; solid surface counter tops; ceramic tile; increased R-values for roof and walls; extended non-pro-rated, no-leak roof warranty; high efficiency windows and doors; welded door frames in heavy use/shop/storage areas.

(b) Structural Components and Systems: All proposals must be compliant with the structural requirements of the Statement of Work to be considered for award. Type I or type II construction as defined in the

International Building Code is considered more desirable than Type V construction.

(c) Mechanical Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic environmental control function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, reduce energy consumption, sustainability, maintainability (cyclical maintenance, access, equipment placement), and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

(d) Plumbing Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability

(stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

Desirable features: lifetime domestic hot water storage tank warranty; high efficiency equipment;

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 12 easy/local availability of replacement/repair parts; zoned/valved sub-systems to allow repair without building shutdown.

(e) Electrical Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability

(stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

Desirable features: all copper conductors.

(f) Fire Protection Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic suppression, detection, alarm, and life safety functions necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems that improve life safety, minimize collateral damage to building in the event of a fire incident, include extended warranties, improved maintainability, longer life expectancies, and improved interface with existing and future facilities.

(g) Interoperability: Fire Alarm, Telephone, Mass Notification System and UMCS must be integrated into the new facilities which require connection and interface with existing installation-wide systems and must be accommodated in the proposed project.

5.4. VOLUME 1 - TAB C – SUBFACTOR 3 – SITE DESIGN

Layout of site improvements as shown on the drawings in Appendix J is conceptual. Offerors are expected and encouraged to exercise ingenuity and innovativeness to propose a site design which meets the requirements of the

RFP while taking into account the existing site features and potential obstacles, including utilities. There is no intent or expectation that the site improvements must be laid out exactly as shown in the conceptual drawings. If the offeror identifies an existing utility that needs to be relocated to provide sufficient clearance for proposed site improvements, the offeror shall identify the specific utility feature(s) that needs to be relocated.

5.4.1. Submission Requirements:

5.4.1.1. Presentation Drawings: Limit presentation drawings to no more than five (5) drawings to include the following:

(a) Schematic/Conceptual Site Plans(s) for the Fire Station showing improvements for drainage, buildings, paving, walks, landscaping, and utilities and communications infrastructure. Indicate all building setbacks and separations, which must meet antiterrorism design requirements. Delineate vehicle circulation and pedestrian access to allow evaluation of the integration of this new development into the existing surrounding infrastructure.

(b) Include in the above drawing(s) or separately, an overall site plan with dimensions of all existing facilities and site improvements shown on Appendix J, sheet C101. Show all force protection setback distances, building footprints with dimensions, and building separation distances.

5.4.1.2. Technical Approach Narrative:

Provide a technical approach narrative, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the proposed site

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 13 design. Begin the narrative with a preface concerning the design concepts, providing the design rationale and basis of the proposal. It is the responsibility of the offeror to ensure that all aspects identified in the evaluation criteria below are addressed. Narrative shall not exceed five (5) pages.

(a) Geotechnical Considerations

• Soil compaction method

(b) Grading

• Drainage patterns

• Stormwater on site retention considerations

(c) Landscaping

• Plant Material Selection

• Site Lighting Considerations

(d) Pedestrian Circulation

• Development of Circulation Patterns

• Way Finding Between Facilities

• Separation from Vehicular Circulation

(e) Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection

• Compliance with the Statement of Work Requirements.

5.4.2. Evaluation Criteria:

5.4.2.1. This Subfactor considers the overall layout of the site and the various specialties which define a workable, pleasing environment for the Airman. The proposed site development plan must incorporate all the specific requirements from the Statement of Work as well as comply with all statutory and regulatory requirements outlined therein. All site related Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (ATFP) considerations must be included and/or addressed in the proposal.

Elements (1) through (4) below are of equal importance and are not separately rated.

(1) Geotechnical Considerations: Acceptable proposals include sound method of soil compaction and address liquefaction and other geotechnical issues. Proposal will be evaluated on measures planned to protect existing buildings and utilities as well as measures to repair damage caused by compaction.

(2) Grading and Landscaping: Acceptable proposals include reasonable amounts of cut/fill and regrading as necessary to ensure proper drainage and positive drainage away from the facility. Landscaping provided must meet the minimums required by the Statement of Work. Proposals which include innovative solutions to storm water management, landscaping to enhance the surrounding environment, or other similar improvements beyond the basic requirements will receive additional consideration during the proposal evaluation process.

(3) Pedestrian Circulation: Acceptable proposals address and include all the specific requirements of the Statement of Work.

The following items will be considered with respect to pedestrian and vehicle circulation and storage. These are not sub-factors.

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 14

Pedestrian Considerations:

• Are all facility entrances/exits served by a paved sidewalk system?

• Does the proposed sidewalk system provide direct, convenient access to all facilities?

(4) ATFP Considerations: This element verifies the proposal’s inclusion/compliance with the site related (setbacks, etc.) ATFP constraints included in the Statement of Work. The proposal must be compliant with the

ATFP requirements of the Statement of Work to be considered for award. Acceptable proposals are compliant with all

ATFP requirements. Acceptance of the successful proposal does not constitute acceptance of design that does not conform to ATFP requirements. The final design must comply with the ATFP requirements.

5.5. VOLUME 1 - TAB D – SUBFACTOR 4 – PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY

SCHEDULE

5.5.1 Submission Requirements:

5.5.1.1 Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror shall propose the contract duration where indicated in the CLIN

Schedule and in the narrative provide under this Tab. Proposed contract duration shall not exceed the maximum contract duration specified in FAR 52.211-10.

5.5.1.2 Summary Schedule: Submit a summary level schedule for integrated design and construction. Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be bound and clearly labeled as Tab D. This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32 01.00 10:

Project Schedule. The summary schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. For proposal purposes, utilize a Notice to Proceed date of April 12, 2017. This date is solely to assist in evaluation of offeror’s proposals and shall not be construed as a contractual NTP date. Offeror may use a critical path or other method of his choice; however, schedules shall be graphically represented.

The proposed project schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration. Give attention to the following features but limit narrative information to no more than three (3) pages total:

(1) Narrative:

(a) Provide the proposed contract duration.

(b) Provide a narrative, describing the design packaging plan for separate design packages, based on the Offeror’s plan for fast tracking. Describe all design and construction to be “fast-tracked” (See section 01 33 16: Design After Award). If long lead item equipment must be ordered prior to completion of a design phase, describe the requirement in the narrative and show the required ordering date in the schedule. Complete the following matrix summarizing the proposed design package review schedule (not included in schedule narrative page limit).

Submittal Package Name (eg Site / Utilities)

Stage (Interim, Final, Design Complete)

Submittal Date

Review Start Date

Review End Date

Review Conference Date (if applicable)

W911KB-17-R-0021

Section 00 22 20 Pg 15

(c) Provide a narrative describing how contractor plans on coordinating design efforts 21

CES/13 SWS. Describe the coordination, accommodations, scheduling, and procedures that will be employed to facilitate the provision of suitable connection points by 21 CES/13 SWS at main utility lines. Describe impacts and risks to schedule if 21 CES/13 SWS does not provide connection points or open valves/close switches at a time most convenient for contractor and what measures will be taken to mitigate risks to schedule and project costs.

(2) Summary Schedule:

(a) Show the design phase, including events associated with coordinating the interim and final design submittals for each package and the proper handling of the review comments for each design package (See section 01 33 16). For each submittal package noted in 5.5.1.2(1)(b) above, show date submitted to Government, Government review period and Review Conference on summary schedule.

(b) Show anticipated/preferred periods for installation of permanent water, sewer, steam/condensate, and electrical utility line taps/connection points by 21 CES/13 SWS CES.

(c) Show the overall construction phase for the facility, for the site work, and for utilities. Show fast track starts for design packages but it isn’t necessary to show the detailed breakdown construction (e.g., by trades) of the facility, site work and utilities.

(d) Show commissioning activities.

(e) Show turnover of the facility. Identify any proposed phased turnovers. The time to complete the facility and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the

Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspections.

(f) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, etc.).

Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

5.5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.5.2.1 Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror’s proposed contract duration will become the contractually binding completion period and will replace the duration stated in FAR 52.211-10 upon contract award. The Government will evaluate the contract duration, as proposed by the offeror under this Tab and in the Contract Line Item

Schedule, not to exceed the maximum allowed duration stated in FAR 52.211-10. In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration, as well as use other information, such as but not limited to independent judgment concerning logic, constraints and…