A.07.24_W911KB-17-R-0003_AM_1.pdf

EIE378

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

PROJECT TITLE / LOCATION: F-35A AIRCRAFT WEATHER SHELTER, SQUAD #1, EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE (AFB), ALASKA (EIE378)

a. This amendment provides changes to the solicitation as indicated on the continuation pages of this document.

b. PROPOSAL DUE DATE IS HEREBY CHANGED TO 06 JULY 2017 AT 1400 ALASKA TIME. Proposals shall be submitted in accordance w ith Section 00 21 00, paragraph 1.10, Proposal Format.

c. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS AMENDMENT ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THE STANDARD FORM 1442.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Jun-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB-17-R-0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-May-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Jun-2017

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK

CEPOA-CT (W911KB)

PO BOX 6898

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911KB-17-R-0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

a. The following drawings are substituted for the superseded documents/sections:

NONE

b. The following revised documents/sections are substituted for the superseded documents/sections. The identifier “AM#1” appears before and after new and/or revised materials, except as noted below.

SECTION 00 22 10 – PHASE 1 OF 2 PHASE DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES

- Revised paragraphs 5.1, 5.1.2, 5.2.2, 6.1.2, 7.1.1 and Attachments 2 and 3 (Reissuing pages 3-

13 and Attachments 2 and 3)

NOTE: Revisions within the following documents do not contain the above referenced identifiers:

SECTION 00 11 00 – STANDARD FORM 1442, BLOCK 13

The required response date/time has changed from 22-Jun-2017 02:00 PM to 06-Jul-2017 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00 73 46, WAGE DETERMINATIONS

- Replaced with AK1, dated 26 May 2017

c. The following sections are deleted:

d. The following documents are added:

e. The following revisions are incorporated:

f. Other:

(End of Summary of Changes)

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME.

Section 00 22 10 W911KB-17-R-0003

Section 00 22 10 Page 3

Location Factor Number Description Relative Importance

Tab D Factor 3 Organization 2nd Most Important Factor (slightly less important than Factors 1 and 2 and more important than Factor 4)

Tab E Factor 4 Technical Approach 3rd Most Important Factor (less important than Factor 3)

4.0 TAB A - STANDARD FORM 1442 AND PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

4.1. Submit the SF 1442, completed and signed by a person authorized by the Offeror. Include the completed proposal data sheet (See attachment 1, provided at the end of this Section). Also include joint venture agreement or LLC Certificate of Organization, Articles of Organization and the Operating Agreement, if applicable (see Section 00 21 00, paragraph 1.11).

5.0 TAB B – FACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

The prime contractor and designer of record design firms for civil, architectural, geotechnical, fire protection, structural, mechanical, electrical and telecommunications design shall each demonstrate recent, relevant experience on similar projects, using Construction – Specialized Experience form – (Attachment 2), and Designer – Specialized Experience Form – (Attachment 3) at the end of the section (no more than 2 pages per project). Attachment 3 may also be used for consultants with aircraft weather shelter experience if included as part of the design build team.

Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements. If the offeror is a joint venture, each firm of the joint venture shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Submit projects that are currently well underway (designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than

AM#1…ten (10) six (6)…AM#1 years preceding the date of this Solicitation. An offeror may receive credit for relevant experience under a previous business arrangement (joint venture for example) if the offeror demonstrates that their role on the submitted project is relevant to their role on this project. The offeror shall select the design firm(s). Design firms may list projects of prime contractors they have worked for or projects directly contracted with government, private or commercial customers. If projects were design-build, so identify them. Submit no more than five (5) projects for the prime contractor (whether single entity or joint venture). Submit no more than twelve (12) projects total for the design firms and consultant, if applicable, and no more than five (5) projects for any individual design firm/consultant. Submit relevant projects for the below facility type or similar commercial or institutional type facility.

Aircraft Weather Shelter

5.1.1 Provide one page consolidated list of submitted projects for prime contractor and design firms to include a

Section 00 22 10 Page 4 matrix that identifies the Specialized Experience projects and the firms that worked on each (teaming). If needed, the Specialized Experience matrix may be submitted on one 11” x 17” sheet.

5.1.2 Provide a supplemental narrative, not to exceed two pages, to address any of the following that are applicable. The information shall be limited to projects that are well underway or that have been completed and turned over no longer than AM#1…ten (10) six…AM#1 years preceding the date of this solicitation.

(a) If submitting relevant experience under a previous business relationship, clearly describe the offeror’s role on the submitted project.

(b) Describe any previous teaming experience between current team members, if not described on the project experience forms and address how the team members worked together to achieve safety, quality and schedule compliance goals. Identify specific projects.

(c) Describe team members’ experience with Sustainable Design and Development, if not included on the project experience forms.

(d) Describe design-build experience on other types of projects. Identify specific projects.

5.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

5.2.1. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, relevant experience of the prime contractor and design firms in design, construction or design-build, with regard to their role on this project. If the design will be accomplished in-house, rather than by subcontract, then the design element of specialized experience will still be evaluated, realizing that the work is being done in-house. The Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations.

Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience. In assessing relevancy of Specialized Experience, the relevancy ratings included under the Past Performance evaluation factor will be utilized.

5.2.2. The offeror must submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience in both design and construction, for the facility type (which may include similar state or local government or private counterparts) included in this contract, as described in Section 00 22 10. Recent experience includes projects well underway (see above criteria) or those completed and turned over within AM#1…ten (10) six (6)…AM#1 years preceding the date of this solicitation for design or construction experience. Partners of Joint Venture offerors shall each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project.

5.2.3. The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), other DOD or Government appraisal systems or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

Section 00 22 10 Page 5

5.2.4. To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the offeror and its proposed design firm(s) shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project. Experience under a previous business arrangement will not be considered relevant if the offeror’s role on the project is not considered relevant.

5.2.5. The Government will consider the extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and experience with local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:

(1) Size, type of work and complexity

(2) Location of work and similarity to the climate of Climate Zone 8 as defined by ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169 climate zone map for the United States.

(3) Firm's role and extent of work self-performed (brokering out all work and simply “pouring the sidewalks” on a cited project are examples of less relevant experience)

5.2.6. Previous design-build experience is not necessary for an acceptable rating. The Government may consider previous D-B experience a strength, even if the experience is on different type projects than this project.

Similarly, the Government may consider previous recent teaming experience among the team members as value added, even if on different type design and/or construction projects than this project. The more relevant the experience, the more credit will be given.

6.0 TAB C – FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

6.1.1. Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner's perspective. The offeror shall provide customer reference name(s), company affiliation and current contact information (phone number and email address) on the specific project experience sheets submitted for TAB B and include the performance rating by the owner on the form, if the offeror was rated. For Federal projects submitted under Specialized Experience (Tab B), the offeror may submit finalized CCASS, ACASS or CPARS reports, otherwise the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project. Previously completed PPQ’s may be submitted however ensure current phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. The completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal and may be duplicated for submission on future solicitations. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first 2 pages of the PPQ (Attachment 4), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Kathy Kinnett via email at kathy.j.kinnett@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

mailto:kathy.j.kinnett@usace.army.mil

Section 00 22 10 Page 6

6.1.2. Projects cited shall be currently well underway (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or construction substantially completed within AM#1…ten (10) six (6)…AM#1 years preceding the date of this solicitation. Also include performance recognition documents received within the last AM#1…ten (10) six (6)…AM#1 years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

6.1.3. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture or teaming arrangement) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

6.1.4. An offeror may receive credit for relevant past performance under a previous business arrangement (joint venture for example) if the offeror demonstrates that their role on the submitted project is relevant to their role on this project.

6.1.5. The Government will evaluate past performance of the offerors in complying with requirement of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and, as applicable for large businesses only past performance compliance with FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan. The Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) will be utilized by the Government during evaluation of this factor.

6.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

6.2.1 The Government will first assess and rate the relevancy of recent projects accomplished by the offeror to the scope of this contract for overall application to the performance confidence assessment ratings described hereinafter. The projects will include those submitted under the Specialized Experience Factor as well as from other sources described above. This rating is not a separate proposal rating but is only used in developing overall past performance confidence assessment rating assigned to the Past Performance Factor. The past performance relevancy ratings are described below:

Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Section 00 22 10 Page 7

6.2.2 The Government will next consider how well the offeror performed on the contracts. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. With respect to relevancy, past performance on projects with more relevance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment rating than past performance on projects of lesser relevance. Past performance of a parent, affiliate or separate division will not be considered relevant unless the offeror demonstrates that the resources of the parent, affiliate or separate division will affect the performance of the offeror on this project. Past performance under a previous business arrangement will not be considered relevant if the offeror’s role on the project is not considered relevant. Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of design or construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and designer or contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, correcting design or construction errors, warranty work, etc. The Government will target areas covered in the requirements of this proposal including records of conforming to quality, schedule, cost control, customer satisfaction, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, problem resolution for design or construction errors, warranty work, and safety. The Government places a higher value on projects which provided particularly difficult or unique challenges and the innovative methods the contractor used to resolve problems successfully. The rating for this factor will be expressed as a degree of confidence in the offeror’s ability to successfully accomplish the contract requirements. The rating system used for the performance confidence assessment is described at the end of this section.

6.2.3 Each entity (firm) will be rated on its own performance or that of its predecessor, if relevant. An entity may not establish past performance based on the past performance of its proposed key personnel, apart from that of the entity. Past performance under a previous business arrangement will not be considered relevant if the offeror’s role on the project is not considered relevant. If the Government does not obtain past performance information for the projects identified by the offeror and cannot establish a past performance record for the offeror through other sources, past performance will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance confidence assessment will be considered “Unknown Confidence (Neutral)”.

7.0 TAB D – FACTOR 3 - ORGANIZATION

7.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

7.1.1. Provide a project-specific narrative that describes the offeror’s organization and the items below. Limit the information to two (2) pages or less and individually address each paragraph below. The page limit does not include resumes submitted for key personnel AM#1…or the organizational chart. One (1) 11” x 17” size sheet may be used for the organizational chart described in para 7.1.2. below….AM#1

7.1.2. Organization: Describe the prime contractor and design firms proposed to participate in this project, their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each firm’s roles and responsibilities on the project. Include an organizational chart with position title and job location for the following key personnel: project manager responsible for design and construction, onsite manager (if

Section 00 22 10 Page 8 applicable), general superintendent, design manager responsible for managing designers of record, Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD) and the designers of record for architecture, structural, civil, geotechnical, fire protection, electrical and mechanical. Describe the proposed management structure for the design-build team, describing how the design and construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team.

7.1.3. Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience:

Provide a brief resume (not included in the two page count limit above) using the Key Personnel Resume form (Attachment 5) at the end of this section for project manager responsible for design and construction, general superintendent, design manager and the designers of record for civil, architectural, structural, geotechnical, fire protection, electrical, telecommunications (RCDD) and mechanical. All designers of record must be registered in accordance with contract clause 52.236-25, Requirements for Registration of Designers and Section 01 33 16.00 29, Design After Award.

7.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

7.2.1. Organization: The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and any deficiencies in the offeror’s organization to evaluate the firm’s capability to execute the project. The Government will evaluate clarity and strength of the overall organization, the structure and staffing to execute the entire scope of work. Joint venture participant’s contribution to the organization should be commensurate with their skills and background.

7.2.2. Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience: The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary, which includes previous satisfactory experience in similar type work, to manage, control and perform the design, and to perform construction. Performance of key personnel proposed for this project may be taken into account when it comes to the attention of the Government. Government will evaluate how well the Offeror demonstrates that it has the necessary structure and experienced, qualified personnel within its organization to effectively manage, control, administer and execute the integrated design and construction operations, quality control program and subcontracts. This shall be achievable with other projected on-going work. Additional consideration will be given to previous design-build experience. Government will evaluate whether designers of record are registered (a requirement), experienced and qualified per requirements of the RFP. The fire protection engineer of record shall be a registered professional engineer (P.E.) who has passed the fire protection engineering written examination administered by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveys (NCEES), or a registered P.E. in a related engineering discipline with a minimum of five (5) years’ experience, dedicated to fire protection engineering that can be verified with documentation. The Designers of Record shall be licensed in the State of Alaska, except for Fire Protection, or shall have at least five (5) years of design experience in Climate Zone 8 as defined by ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169 climate zone map for the United States. The Geotechnical Engineer of record may be a licensed Civil Engineer with a minimum of five (5) years design experience in geotechnical engineering in the previously identified climate zone. The minimum experience requirements for Project Manager are at least five (5) years construction and construction management experience. The minimum experience requirements for the Design manager are at least five (5) years of design experience. The minimum experience

Section 00 22 10 Page 9 requirement for the superintendent is at least five (5) years’ experience as superintendent, managing multiple trades and subcontractors. The RCDD shall meet the requirements of a Building Industry Consulting Services International (BICSI) Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD) with at least two (2) years’ related experience.

If alternates are proposed for key positions, the evaluation rating will consider the lesser qualified or experienced person, if there is a difference.

8.0 TAB E – FACTOR 4 – TECHNICAL APPROACH

8.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

8.1.1. Provide a project-specific narrative that describes the offeror’s intended technical approach to executing this design-build contract per the detailed requirements herein. Clearly but concisely describe the technical approach to project management and execution. Limit the information to two (2) pages or less and individually address the paragraphs below.

8.1.2. Technical Approach for Design and Construction: Describe the technical approach to design and construction of these facilities.

(a) Include design and construction considerations for fast-tracking, cold climate environment and seismic conditions relevant to this project. In Phase 2, the offeror will describe its design packaging plan for fast-tracking.

That level of detail is not necessary in Phase 1.

(b) Describe measures which will be taken to ensure the design will acknowledge and be compatible, if not identical, with the architecture of nearby Aircraft Weather Shelter, Sqd #2 (EIE382, scheduled award April 2018), and measures to be taken to coordinate the construction with other facilities being constructed on adjacent sites at the same location.

8.1.3. Collaborative Approach for Design-Build:

(a) Describe interactions within the Design-Build team and with the Corps of Engineers during the design addressing management of design reviews and management of fast-tracked design packages (if applicable).

Discuss how the configuration management system will track and control design evolution and changes during design for quality control and to facilitate quicker Government reviews. Describe the role of the construction team members during design.

(b) Describe the role and interaction of the design team with the construction team during construction, addressing maintaining management of the design during construction, including control and approval of revisions to the accepted design; requests for information; shop drawing and submittal reviews and approvals; progress meetings;

site visits, if any; contract completion, closeout, as-built and completion documentation.

8.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

Section 00 22 10 Page 10

8.2.1. The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and any deficiencies in the offeror’s technical approach. The Government will evaluate the firm’s understanding of D-B and the capability to execute the project.

Some additional specific evaluation considerations are listed below. This list is not all-inclusive.

8.2.2. Technical Approach for Design and Construction:

(a) The Government places a higher value on an offer that provides proposed methods to streamline construction and demonstrates a good understanding of cold climate and seismic design and construction considerations relevant to this project. The Government will also consider whether the approach reduces susceptibility to inclement weather delays.

(b) The Government will evaluate the offeror’s approach and understanding of designing and constructing facilities in a campus setting with multiple facilities under construction at the same time.

8.2.3. Collaborative Approach for Design-Build: The Government will evaluate the integration of the design and construction firms and the staff during design and construction. The constructor must be actively involved in the design process, not just leaving it up to the designer (see Clause 5152.236-9007 “Contractor’s Role during Design Process”). The offeror must have an effective process for coordinating all efforts during design including facilitating coordination with the Government. The offeror must have an effective configuration management system to control and track revisions to the design. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s understanding of the design process and the roles of the designers of record and the Government reviewers. The Government will evaluate the role of the designer in maintaining design integrity throughout the process, including its key roles during construction.

Additional consideration will be given to a team that includes as many subcontractors as possible (e.g., the key subs for electrical and mechanical, the fire protection subcontractor, fabricators, etc.) during design development, prior to release of the applicable design packages for construction, so that systems and trade coordination can reduce interferences, increase constructability and speed up construction operations.

9.0 PHASE 1 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

9.1. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

9.1.1. The SSEB will be established to conduct the evaluation of proposals received in response to this solicitation. The evaluation will be based on the content of the proposal, proposal corrections and any information obtained from other sources, e.g. past performance information. The SSEB will not consider any proposal incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

9.2. EVALUATION

9.2.1. The SSEB will evaluate the proposals and assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor and subfactor. Offerors are cautioned to put forth their best efforts for the Phase 1 submission, and to furnish all information clearly to allow the Government to determine their performance capability. Offerors should not assume that they will have an opportunity to clarify or correct anything in their proposal after submitting it in response to Phase 1.

Section 00 22 10 Page 11

9.2.2. The Government reserves the right to allow proposal corrections, if deemed necessary to determine the most highly qualified offerors to shortlist for Phase 2.

9.2.3. The Contracting Officer, independently exercising prudent business judgment, will select the most highly qualified offerors and request that only those offerors submit phase-two proposals.

9.3. DEFINITIONS

9.3.1. Deficiency

A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

9.3.2. Weakness

A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

9.3.3. Significant Weakness

A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

9.3.4. Strength

Any aspect of a proposal that, when judged against a stated evaluation criterion, enhances the merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.

9.3.5. Significant Strength

A significant strength appreciably enhances the merit of a proposal or appreciably enhances the probability of successful contract performance.

9.3.6. Uncertainty

Any aspect of the proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear because there may be more than one way to interpret the offer or because inconsistencies in the offer indicate that there may be an error, omission, or mistake.

9.3.7. Deviation

Proposal implies or specifically offers a deviation below the specified criteria. The offeror may or may not have called the deviation to the Government’s attention. A deviation is a deficiency. The proposal must conform to the solicitation requirements for award.

9.4. EVALUATION AND RATING SYSTEM

9.4.1. General: The Government will review the proposals and rate the quality of each evaluation factor and subfactor (if any). The SSEB will rate each proposal against the specified evaluation criteria in the Solicitation requirements. They will not compare proposals at this time. After all proposals are rated, the Government will

Section 00 22 10 Page 12 compare the ratings and relative advantages and disadvantages of proposals against each other in order to determine which Offerors are the most highly qualified under Phase 1 to short-list for participation in Phase 2.

9.4.2. Review Write-up: The Government will support each rating with a narrative, separately listing all strengths or advantages, weaknesses or disadvantages, deficiencies, and required clarifications.

9.4.3. Rating System: After listing proposal strengths, weaknesses and deficiencies, the SSEB will assign an adjective rating of “Outstanding”, “Good”, “Acceptable”, “Marginal”, or “Unacceptable” to each factor and subfactor (except the Past Performance Factor), which reflect the Government's confidence in each offeror's ability, as demonstrated in its proposal, to perform the requirements stated in the RFP. The adjectival ratings shall be assigned, using the following criteria, which incorporate a proposal risk assessment:

9.4.3.1. Outstanding: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

9.4.3.2. Good: Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

9.4.3.3. Acceptable: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

9.4.3.4. Marginal: Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths.

Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

9.4.3.5. Unacceptable. Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

9.5. PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATING AND PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE

ASSESSMENT

10.5.1 Performance Confidence Assessment: Performance Confidence Assessments will assess each offeror’s likelihood of success in performing the requirements stated in the RFP based on the offeror's demonstrated performance on recent contracts and the relevance to the effort required under this solicitation. SSEB members and the SSA may use personal knowledge or information from other sources in its evaluation of an offeror’s past performance, provided such information is consistent with the established evaluation criteria of the RFP. Offerors that have no relevant performance record will be given an “unknown” performance confidence assessment. The performance confidence assessment rating shall be assigned using the following criteria:

10.5.1.1 Substantial Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Section 00 22 10 Page 13

10.5.1.2 Satisfactory Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

10.5.1.3 Limited Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

10.5.1.4 No Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

10.5.1.5 Unknown Confidence (Neutral): No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Section 00 22 10 Page 15

COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE - CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR

SECTION 00 22 10 - ATTACHMENT 2

Provide the following information to show examples of projects your company constructed within the last AM#1…ten (10) six…AM#1 years indicating experience with projects of similar type and scope. Use one form per project.

(a) Type of Facility Represented____________________________________________________________

(b) Your Firm’s Name ________________________________________________________________________

(c) Name of Project (Include contract number if Federal project)_______________________________________

(d) Location of Project________________________________________________________________________

(e) Owner _________________________________________________________________________________

(f) General Scope of Construction Project ________________________________________________________

(g) Your Role (Prime, Joint Venture, or Subcontractor, etc.) and Work Your Company Self-Performed :

(h) Construction Cost ________________________________________________________________________

(i) Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out _______________________________________________

(j) Dates Construction: Began___________________ Completed______________

(k) Your Performance Evaluation by Owner, if known _______________________________________________

(l) Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages? ________________________________________

(If either is “Yes”, attach an Explanation)

(m) Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference (Name and Company) _____________________________________

(n) Current Telephone Number of Reference POC__________________________________________________

(o) Current Email Address of Reference POC______________________________________________________

Section 00 22 10 Page 16

COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE - DESIGN FIRM OR IN-HOUSE DESIGN CAPABILITY

SECTION 00 22 10 - ATTACHMENT 3

Provide the following information to show examples of projects your company constructed within the last AM#1…ten (10) six…AM#1 years indicating experience with projects of similar type and scope. Use one form per project.

(a) Type of Facility Represented ___________________________________________________________

(b) Your Firm’s Name ________________________________________________________________________

(c) Name of Project (Include contract number if Federal project)_______________________________________

(d) Location of Project________________________________________________________________________

(e) Owner _________________________________________________________________________________

(f) General Scope of Construction Project _______________________________________________________

(g) Summary of Your Role in Design of this Project

(h) Identify Estimated (“E”) or Actual (“A”) Construction Cost _________________________________________

(i) Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted __________________________________________________

(j) Dates Design: Began___________________ Completed______________

(k) Dates Construction: Began___________________ Completed______________

(l) Your Performance Evaluation, if known ______________________________________________________

Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages? ___________________________________________

(If either is “Yes”, attach an Explanation)

(m) Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference (Name and Company) _____________________________________

(n) Current Telephone Number of Reference POC_________________________________________________

(o) Current Email Address of Reference POC_____________________________________________________

General Decision Number: AK170001 05/26/2017 AK1

Superseded General Decision Number: AK20160001

State: Alaska

Construction Types: Building and Heavy

Counties: Alaska Statewide.

BUILDING AND HEAVY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include residential construction consisting of single family homes and apartments up to and including 4 stories)

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.20 for calendar year 2017 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2015. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.20 (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2017.

The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/06/2017 1 01/20/2017 2 01/27/2017 3 02/17/2017 4 03/17/2017 5 03/31/2017 6 04/07/2017 7 04/21/2017 8 05/12/2017 9 05/19/2017 10 05/26/2017

ASBE0097-001 01/01/2017

Rates Fringes

Asbestos Workers/Insulator (includes application of all insulating materials protective coverings, coatings and finishings to all types of mechanical systems).........................$ 38.68 20.07

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL HANDLER

(includes preparation, wetting, stripping, removal scrapping, vacuming, bagging, and disposing of all insulation materials, whether they contain asbestos or not, from mechanical systems).........$ 37.38 19.55

BOIL0502-002 08/01/2016

Rates Fringes

BOILERMAKER......................$ 44.26 28.41

BRAK0001-002 07/01/2016

Rates Fringes

Bricklayer, Blocklayer, Stonemason, Marble Mason, Tile Setter, Terrazzo Worker.....$ 40.81 19.15 Tile & Terrazzo Finisher.........$ 34.79 19.15

CARP1501-001 09/01/2014

Rates Fringes

MILLWRIGHT.......................$ 35.74 21.29

* CARP2520-003 09/01/2016

Rates Fringes

Diver Stand-by....................$ 42.65 25.04 Tender......................$ 41.65 25.04 Working.....................$ 82.45 25.04 Piledriver Carpenter...................$ 38.34 25.04 Piledriver; Skiff Operator and Rigger..................$ 38.34 25.04 Sheet Stabber...............$ 38.34 25.04 Welder......................$ 43.90 25.04

DEPTH PAY PREMIUM FOR DIVERS BELOW WATER SURFACE:

50-100 feet $1.00 per foot 101 feet and deeper $2.00 per foot

ENCLOSURE PAY PREMIUM WITH NO VERTICAL ASCENT:

5-50 FEET $1.00 PER FOOT/DAY

51-100 FEET $2.00 PER FOOT/DAY

101 FEET AND ABOVE $3.00 PER FOOT/DAY

SATURATION DIVING:

The standby rate applies until saturation starts. The saturation diving rate applies when divers are under pressure continuously until work task and decompression are complete. the diver rate shall be paid for all saturation hours.

WORK IN COMBINATION OF CLASSIFICATIONS:

Employees working in any combination of classifications within the diving crew (except dive supervisor) in a shift are paid in the classification with the highest rate for that shift.

CARP4059-001 09/01/2014

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER

Carpenter...................$ 37.34 23.34 Lather/Drywall Applicator...$ 36.59 22.59

ELEC1547-004 04/01/2017

Rates Fringes

CABLE SPLICER....................$ 39.82 3%+25.44

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 39.49 3%+25.69

ELEC1547-005 04/01/2017

Line Construction

Rates Fringes

CABLE SPLICER....................$ 52.57 3%+30.81

Linemen (Including Equipment Operators, Technician)...........$ 50.52 3%+30.81 Powderman........................$ 48.52 3%+30.81

TREE TRIMMER.....................$ 35.84 3%+22.56

ELEV0019-002 01/01/2017

Rates Fringes

ELEVATOR MECHANIC................$ 53.76 31.585+a+b

FOOTNOTE: a. Employer contributes 8% of the basic hourly rate for over 5 year's service and 6% of the basic hourly rate for 6 months to 5 years' of service as vacation paid credit. b. Eight paid holidays:

New Year's Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day;

Labor Day; Veteran's Day; Thanksgiving Day; Friday after Thanksgiving, and Christmas Day

ENGI0302-002 01/01/2017

Rates Fringes

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

GROUP 1.....................$ 40.28 22.65

GROUP 1A....................$ 42.04 22.65

GROUP 2.....................$ 39.51 22.65

GROUP 3.....................$ 38.79 22.65

GROUP 4.....................$ 32.58 22.65

TUNNEL WORK

GROUP 1....................$ 44.31 22.65

GROUP 1A...................$ 46.24 22.65

GROUP 2....................$ 43.46 22.65

GROUP 3....................$ 42.67 22.65

GROUP 4....................$ 35.84 22.65

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR CLASSIFICATIONS

GROUP 1: Asphalt Roller: Breakdown, Intermediate, and Finish; Back Filler; Barrier Machine (Zipper); Beltcrete with power pack and similar conveyors; Bending Machine;

Boat Coxwains; Bulldozers; Cableways, Highlines and Cablecars; Cleaning Machine; Coating Machine; Concrete Hydro Blaster; Cranes-45 tons and under or 150 foot boom and under (including jib and attachments): (a) Hydralifts or Transporters, all track or truck type,(b) Derricks;

Crushers; Deck Winches-Double Drum; Ditching or Trenching Machine (16 inch or over); Drilling Machines, core, cable, rotary and exploration; Finishing Machine Operator, Concrete Paving, Laser Screed, Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Machine; Helicopters; Hover Craft, Flex Craft, Loadmaster, Air Cushion, All Terrain Vehicle, Rollagon, Bargecable, Nodwell, and Snow Cat; Hydro Ax: Feller Buncher and similar; Loaders (2 1/2 yards through 5 yards, including all attachments): Forklifts with telescopic boom and swing attachment, Overhead and front end, 2 1/2 yards through 5 yards, Loaders with forks or pipe clamps; Loaders, elevating belt type, Euclid and similar types; Mechanics, Bodyman; Micro Tunneling Machine; Mixers: Mobile type w/hoist combination; Motor Patrol Grader; Mucking Machines:

Mole, Tunnel Drill, Horizontal/Directional Drill Operator, and/or Shield; Operator on Dredges; Piledriver Engineers, L. B. Foster, Puller or similar Paving Breaker; Power Plant, Turbine Operator, 200 k.w. and over (power plants or combination of power units over 300 k.w.); Scrapers-through 40 yards; Service Oiler/Service Engineer; Sidebooms-under 45 tons; Shot Blast Machine; Shovels, Backhoes, Excavators with all attachments, and Gradealls (3 yards and under), Spreaders, Blaw Knox, Cedarapids, Barber Greene, Slurry Machine; Sub-grader (Gurries, Reclaimer, and similar types); Tack tractor; Truck mounted Concrete Pumps, Conveyor, Creter; Water Kote Machine; Unlicensed off road hauler

GROUP 1A: Camera/Tool/Video Operator (Slipline), Cranes-over 45 tons or 150 foot (including jib and attachments): (a) Clamshells and Draglines (over 3 yards),

(b) Tower cranes; Licensed Water/Waste Water Treatment Operator; Loaders over 5 yds.; Certified Welder, Electrical Mechanic, Camp Maintenance Engineer, Mechanic (over 10,000 hours); Motor Patrol Grader, Dozer, Grade Tractor, Roto-mill/Profiler (finish: when finishing to final grade and/or to hubs, or for asphalt); Power Plants: 1000 k.w.

and over; Quad; Screed; Shovels, Backhoes, Excavators with all attachments (over 3 yards), Sidebooms over 45 tons;

Slip Form Paver, C.M.I. and similar types; Scrapers over 40 yards;

GROUP 2: Boiler-fireman; Cement Hog and Concrete Pump Operator; Conveyors (except as listed in group 1); Hoist on steel erection; Towermobiles and Air Tuggers;

Horizontal/Directional Drill Locator;Licensed Grade Technician; Loaders, (i.e., Elevating Grader and Material Transfer Vehicle); Locomotives: rod and geared engines;

Mixers; Screening, Washing Plant; Sideboom (cradling rock drill regardless of size); Skidder; Trencing Machine under 16 inches; Waste/ Waste Water Treatment Operator.

GROUP 3: "A" Frame Trucks, Deck Winches: single power drum;

Bombardier (tack or tow rig); Boring Machine; Brooms-power;

Bump Cutter; Compressor; Farm tractor; Forklift, industrial type; Gin Truck or Winch Truck with poles when used for hoisting; Grade Checker and Stake Hopper; Hoist, Air Tuggers, Elevators; Loaders: (a) Elevating-Athey, Barber Green and similar types (b) Forklifts or Lumber Carrier (on construction job site) (c) Forklifts with Tower (d) Overhead and Front-end, under 2 1/2 yds. Locomotives:Dinkey (air, steam, gas and electric) Speeders; Mechanics (light duty); Oil, Blower Distribution; Post Hole Diggers, mechanical; Pot Fireman (power agitated); Power Plant, Turbine Operator, under 200 k.w.; Pumps-water; Roller-other than Plantmix; Saws, concrete; Skid Steer with all attachments; Straightening Machine; Tow Tractor

GROUP 4: Rig Oiler/Crane Assistant Engineer;Parts and Equipment Coordinator; Swamper (on trenching machines or shovel type equipment); Spotter; Steam Cleaner; Drill Helper.

FOOTNOTE: Groups 1-4 receive 10% premium while performing tunnel or underground work. Rig Oiler/Crane Assistant Engineer shall be required on cranes over 85 tons or over 100 feet of boom.

IRON0751-003 07/01/2015

Rates Fringes

Ironworkers:

BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL,

ORNAMENTAL, REINFORCING

MACHINERY MOVER, RIGGER,

SHEETER, STAGE RIGGER,

BENDER OPERATOR.............$ 36.25 28.05

FENCE, BARRIER INSTALLER....$ 32.75 28.05

GUARDRAIL INSTALLERS........$ 33.75 28.05

GUARDRAIL LAYOUT MAN........$ 33.49 28.05

HELICOPTER, TOWER..........