Attachment 3, Past Performance Questionnaire, 20-R-0002 Rev 1, 06 Feb 2020.docx
DOCX document 43 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W91151-20-R-0002
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a contractor responding to solicitation number W91151-20-R-0002 issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Hood. The solicitation seeks proposals for non-personal services to support the Dugway Proving Ground and Western Desert Test Center in Utah, including providing personnel, management, supervision, supplies, materials, equipment, and tools not otherwise provided by the government to perform services required for developmental and operational testing. Respondents are required to provide references that will complete the past performance questionnaire, evaluating the contractor's performance on a scale from outstanding to unsatisfactory in areas such as compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness, cost controls, and customer satisfaction. References must return the completed questionnaire by email to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist identified in the solicitation by the response date.
View the file
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Contractor: Contract No.:
Subcontract No. (if applicable):
| POC: | Title: | |
| (Name) | (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM) |
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division: Address:
Program Identification/Title: Contract Number:
ATTACHMENT 3 Revision 01
| Past Performance Questionnaire |
| Solicitation: W91151-20-R-0002 |
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Good
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist identified in Solicitation, W91151-20-R-0002.
Thank you for your assistance.
Signature Date
Typed or Printed Name
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .