The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
RFP-Q&As-Q001-006
| RFP - Q# | Reference | Relates to: | Reference Text if applicable | Question | Response |
| 001 | FBO posting dated 26 Oct 2016 | Volume IV (Factor 3- Past Performance) | Additionally, Volume IV (Factor 3- Past Performance) has been removed and will no longer be part of evaluations | Per USD AT&L memo, 1 April 2016, Department Defense Source Selection Procedures, para 2.3.4.2.2, a past performance evaluation is required in accordance with FAR 15.304(c)(3), unless the PCO documents the reason Past Performance is not an appropriate evaluation factor for the acquisition (FAR 15.304(c)(3)(iii). Based on the above and with the removal of Past Performance as an evaluation factor, why is Past Performance not considered an appropriate evaluation factor? Will the USG maintain the Best Value proposal evaluation approach without Past Performance discrimination? | IAW FAR 15.304(c )(3)(iii), the PCO has determined evaluation of past performance is not an appropriate evaluation factor for the acquisition and has documented appropriately, with concurrence of the necessary parties per the DOD Source Selection Procedures 2.3.4.2.2. The PCO does not find past performance to be a discriminator for award, nor would it likely change the award decision, therefore, it has been removed. |
| 002 | Final RFP posted 09 Nov 2016 | | | | |
| VOL I General- L.4a.5 | "The Offeror and each major subcontractor shall provide their current FPRA or FPRR by their cognizant ACO in support of future negotiations." | Please clarify what constitutes as "Major Subcontractor" for purposes of this procurement. | The Government inadvertently removed the definition of a major subcontractor. The following will be added to L.4(a) 5: a major subcontractor is defined as one that will be responsible for 10% or more of the yearly proposed ATMP value. |
| 003 | Final RFP posted 09 Nov 2016 | | |
| VOL I General- L.4a.5 | "The Offeror and each major subcontractor shall provide their current FPRA or FPRR by their cognizant ACO in support of future negotiations." | If an offeror or major subcontractor does not have an FPRA nor a FPRR from their ACO, would the Government accept a Forward Pricing Rate Proposal (FPRP) to meet requirement of L.4a.5? | Submitting a FPRP is not necessary. The Government will add "if available" to the end of this requirement. |
| 004 | Final RFP posted 09 Nov 2016 | | |
| VOL I General- L.4a.5 | "The Offeror and each major subcontractor shall provide their current FPRA or FPRR by their cognizant ACO in support of future negotiations." | With the removal of the Labor Rate Table from the ATMP DRFP, does the Government anticipate FAR 15.408-2 negotiated proposals for Additional Task Orders? This requirement could delay processing additional work on this IDIQ contract in a timely manner. | The Government is aware that there may be additional burden in negotiating post award task orders and efforts that may prolong negotiations. |
| 005 | Final RFP posted 09 Nov 2016 | | |
VOL V- Attachment 57 Pricing Workbook
| TO 29 FMS-GRC | | Attachment 57, Tab TO 29 FMS-GRC contains a hardcoded value in cell G74, which is marked as the Total for Ordering Period 7. Please clarify if this cell value is intended to be the Travel value for Item Number 6100, and correct cell G74 to include a summation formula for Ordering Period 7 subtotal. | Attachment 57 will be updated to convert the cell value to the Travel value for Item Number 6100 and add summation formula to cell G74. |
| 006 | Final RFP posted 09 Nov 2016 | |
Appendix B Locations Germany - Schinnen, Germany, Dal Din, and Germany - Ederle Would the Government please confirm the countries of these locations? Schinnen appears to be in Netherlands while Del Din and Ederle appear to be in Italy. Appendix B will be updated as follows:
FROM: Germany-Schinnen TO: Netherlands-Benelux;
FROM: Germany-Dal Din TO: Italy-Del Din; and FROM: Germany-Ederle TO: Italy-Ederle
| 007 |
| 008 |
| 009 |
| 010 |
| 011 |
| 012 |
| 013 |
| 014 |
| 015 |
| 016 |
| 017 |
| 018 |
| 019 |
| 020 |
| 021 |
| 022 |
| 023 |
| 024 |
| 025 |
| 026 |
| 027 |
| 028 |
| 029 |
| 030 |
| 031 |
| 032 |
| 033 |
| 034 |
| 035 |
| 036 |
| 037 |
| 038 |
| 039 |
| 040 |
| 041 |
| 042 |
| 043 |
| 044 |
| 045 |
| 046 |
| 047 |
| 048 |
| 049 |
| 050 |
| 051 |
| 052 |
| 053 |
| 054 |
| 055 |
| 056 |
| 057 |
| 058 |
| 059 |
| 060 |
| 061 |
| 062 |
| 063 |
| 064 |
| 065 |
| 066 |
| 067 |
| 068 |
| 069 |
| 070 |
| 071 |
| 072 |
| 073 |
| 074 |
| 075 |
| 076 |
| 077 |
| 078 |
| 079 |
| 080 |
| 081 |
| 082 |
| 083 |
| 084 |
| 085 |
| 086 |
| 087 |
| 088 |
| 089 |
| 090 |
| 091 |
| 092 |
| 093 |
| Questions and Answers | ATMP Draft RFP |
| W900KK-16-R-0034 | Page &P of &N |
| Questions and Answers | ATMP Draft RFP |
| W900KK-16-R-0034 | Page &P of &N |
| Questions and Answers | ATMP Draft RFP |
| W900KK-16-R-0034 | Page &P of &N |
