Attachment_9_LCPM_PPQ_for_Solicitation_W900KK-17-R-0023.pdf

PDF 184 KB Posted

Attached to
Life Cycle Product-line Management (LCPM) Draft Request for Proposal
Solicitation number
W900KK-17-R-0023
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 9 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
LCPM_Draft_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_9Jun2017.pdf PDF
Attachment_7.0_Draft_IMTS_DO_0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_Industry_Question-Comment_Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_6.0_Draft_HPL_DO_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_7.2_Draft_IMTS_Performance_Spec_01Feb17.pdf PDF
Attachment_6.1_LCPM_DO_0001_HPL_SOW_14Mar2017.pdf PDF
Attachment_6.3_LCPM_HPL_DO_0001_CostPrice_Workbook_8Feb17.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
LCPM_Draft_RFP_Amendment_1_SF33_Sections_A-M__14Mar17.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Work_Request_Procedures.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_LCPM_BASE_SOW_09Feb2017.pdf PDF
LCPM_Pre_Solicitation_Conference_Final.pdf PDF
LCPM_Presolicitation_Conference_Attendees.pdf PDF
Attachment_7.4_LCPM_IMTS_DO_0002_CostPrice_Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Draft_RFP-W900KK-17-R-0023_LCPM_(Sections_A-M).pdf PDF
Attachment_6.1_LCPM_DO_0001_HPL_SOW_02Nov16.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_Work_Requests.pdf PDF
Attachment_16_Delivery_Order_Procedures_DRAFT.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_SF1408-14.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_LCPM_BASE_SOW_02Nov16.pdf PDF
Attachment_7.2_Draft_IMTS_Performance_Specification.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_LCPM_Reference_Matrix-Needs_Updating_after_IMTS_SPEC_is_complete.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_10_Solicitation_Clarification_Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_LCPM_Solicitation_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_6.0_Draft_HPL_DO_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Data_Item_Transmittal.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_SB_Participation_Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_7.1_LCPM_DO_0002_SOW_02Nov_16.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Work_Request_Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_12_Inst_for_the_LT2_Portal.pdf PDF
Attachment_6.2_LCPM_DO_0001_HPL_CDRLS.pdf PDF
Attachment_6.3_LCPM_HPL_DO_0001_CostPrice_Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_7.3_LCPM_DO_0002_IMTS_CDRLS.pdf PDF
Attachment_13_LT2_Portal_Documents.pdf PDF
Attachment_7.0_Draft_IMTS_DO_0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_7.1_LCPM_DO_0002_SOW_02Nov_16.pdf PDF
LCPM_Presolicitation_and_Site_Visit_Registration_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_12_Inst_for_the_LT2_Portal.pdf PDF
Attachment_6.1_LCPM_DO_0001_HPL_SOW_02Nov16.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_LCPM_BASE_SOW_02Nov16.pdf PDF
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1 Attachment 9

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SOLICITATION W900KK-17-R-0023

Submit completed past performance questionnaire by 4:00 PM Eastern, proposal due date to: Jason Holden (Contract Specialist) jason.n.holden.civ@mail.mil and KeYanna Boone, Contracting Officer keyanna.r.boone.civ@mail.mil

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance.

Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary).

Part I

(1) Name of Contractor questionnaire is being completed for:

(2) Contract Number:

(3) Role Contractor played in Prior Contract x Prime Joint Venture Team Member Subcontractor

(4) Proposed Role in Pending Contract Prime Joint Venture Team Member x Subcontractor

(5) Award Date/Period of Performance:

(6) Contract type:

(7) Contract value:

(8) Description of service:

Part II

(9) Is Performance on this contract being reported in CPARS No, complete page 2 of questionnaire Yes, answer question (i) below

(i) Has the scope of work significantly changed since the last CPAR? No Yes, provide details in (iv) below

(ii) Have there been any significant changes in contractor performance between the last CPAR and now? No Yes, answer question (iii) below

(iii) Has an out-of-cycle CPAR been initiated to document changes in performance? No, provide details of changes in (iv) below Yes

(iv) Comments to support answers to questions (i), (ii) and (iii):

(10) Name of agency/company completing questionnaire:

(11) Name of person completing questionnaire:

(12) Email address of person completing questionnaire:

(13) Title of person completing questionnaire:

(14) Phone number of person completing questionnaire:

(15) Date questionnaire is being completed:

RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions on page 2.

Rating Definition

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Neutral No record exists.

N/A (Not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation

NOTE: For statements indicating “Outstanding”, Marginal, and “Unsatisfactory”, please provide a brief explanation in the comments section of the survey.

mailto:jason.n.holden.civ@mail.mil mailto:keyanna.r.boone.civ@mail.mil

2 Attachment 9

Part III

CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SURVEY FOR SERVICES N

/A

N eu tr al

U ns at is fa ct or y

M ar gi na l

S at is fa ct or y

V er y G oo d

E xc ep tio na l a.) QUALITY OF SERVICE:

(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(3) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

b.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

c.) SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

d.) BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, TPOC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(7) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

e.) MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:

(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

f.) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

(1) The services provided adequately met the needs of the program.

(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the TPOC.

(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.

COMMENTS:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .