Answers_to_Industry_Questions122216.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-17-R-0018
About this file
Answers to questions from Industry on Draft Solicitation
View the file
Other files
Show all 44
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| 2017 PDSS Draft Solicitation Answers to Industry's Questions 122216 | |||||
| Section Reference | Para. | Page | Question/Comment/Suggestion | GOVERNMENT ANSWER/COMMENT | |
| 1 | Attachment_1_-_ListOf Labor Categories.pdf | Several labor category descriptions do not include education or experience requirements. Will the Government provide such requirements for those labor categories in the final solicitation? | Yes. | ||
| 2 | Attachment_1_-_ListOf Labor Categories.pdf | Some labor category descriptions include degree and education requirements, others include degree or education requirements. Will the Government permit substitutions of experience for education for all labor categories? | The Government will permit degree substitutions for specific labor categories only. These will be defined in the labor category definition attachment. | ||
| 3 | Section B | 7 | Please clarify that Janitorial and Alarm are not bid at the IDIQ level, but are bid at Task Level | Offerors' are not to propose to facility janitorial and/or security alarm services at the IDIQ level. Pricing will be negotiated at the task order level. | |
| 4 | Section C, PWS, 3.1.4 | 41 | Will the Government provide a list of existing software by quantities subject to annual (or other defined period) license renewals or maintenance renewals for a baseline? | Yes, This information will be provided to Offerors as part of the PDSS Technical Data Package (TDP). The TDP will not be posted on FedBizOps. The final solicitation will allow potential offerors' to request the TDP separately and be vetted for release of information. | |
| 5 | Section C, PWS, 3.5.3 | 52 | Is the contractor responsible for providing the equipment that does the UID marking, or just the design? | The contractor is responsible for providing the equipment that does the UID marking and the design. | |
| 6 | Section G | 62 | Clauses 252.204-0001, -0002, & -0003 are not listed in the current DFARAS at farsite.hill.af.mil. If clauses are active and should apply, please provide in full text. | Clauses are applicable. Reference: DFARS PGI 204-71 at the http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ for DFARS Clauses 252.204-0001 and -0002. DFARS Clause 252.204-0003 is not included in solicitation W900KK-17-R-0018. | |
| 7 | Section H, H.3 | 72 | Please clarify circumstances were there could be an entire COST (no fee) Task Order, since the Government determines the Task Order type. We understand that a Task Order could have Cost only Line Items, but are not sure of the circumstance or an entire COST only Task Order. | Reference H.2. Task Order Types: Historically, task orders issued for this effort have been a combination of Firm-Fixed-Price, Cost No-Fee, Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee and Time-and-Materials contract line items. At this time, the Government does not have and cannot provide the circumstances that would require an entire Cost No-Fee task order for this effort. However, this does not preclude the possibility that a Cost No-Fee task order may be required. | |
| 8 | Section I, FAR 52.241-6 | 99 | Please clarify applicability of this FAR clause. Contractor would purchase utilities for facility from the local municipal utility provider. | FAR Clause 52.241-6 is applicable. Reference: FAR 41.501( c)(5) at http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ and Solicitation W900KK-17-R-0018, Section C, Paragraph 3.4, "The contractor shall provide all utilities to have and operational facility and the…" The Government will reimburse the contractor for utility costs under CLINs 0010, 1010, 2010, 3010 and 4010. | |
| 9 | Section K, FAR 52.204-8, (c) (2) | 104 | Does the Contracting Officer intend to specifically check any of these clauses for response? If so, which? | Reference Section K, FAR Provision 52.204-8 (c )(2). All applicable representations or certifications have been checked. | |
| 10 | Section K, FAR 252.204-7007 Alt A (d) (2) | 107 | Does the Contracting Officer intend to specifically check any of these clauses for response? If so, which? | Reference Section K, DFARS Provision 252.204-7007 Alt A (d)(2). All applicable representations or certifications have been checked. | |
| 11 | Section L, L.9.1 | 121 | Should the 6 month FAR 52.217-8 option be added to the Pricing Template? | Reference L.9.0., second paragraph, "As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services by 6 months under the execution of FAR Clause 52.217-8. The Government will use the established year-5 labor rates to execute this extension." | |
| 12 | Section L, L.9.4.21 | 125 | It is unclear if raw direct labor rate support documentation, such as payroll records, wage surveys, commitment letters, etc should be provided by contractor with proposal. Please clarify if this is required, or optional, or not desired. | Reference L.9.4.2.1. No raw direct labor rate support documentation, such as payroll records, wage surveys, commitment letters, etc were requested. | |
| 13 | Section L, L.9.4.2.4 and L.9.7 | 125 and 127 | RFP requires Excel or Word documents. However, vendor quotes and DCAA/DCMA letters may not be available in those formats. Is Adobe .pdf acceptable for supporting documentation that is not available in Word or Excel formats? | Reference L.3.6. Electronic File Packaging. Offerors shall submit each proposal volume on a separate CD/DVD (number of electronic copies identified within L.3.1.), no paper copies accepted. CD/DVDs shall be appropriately marked with (1) Offerors’ Name and Address, (2) Solicitation Number, (3) Volume Title, and (4) Offerors’ Proposal Reference Number and (5) distribution restrictions. All files on each CD/DVD shall be directly supported by Microsoft Office (MS) 2013, and verified to be free of any virus or malware. Data submitted in spreadsheet/workbook format shall be readable by MS Excel 2013. All files shall be clearly identified with a filename appropriate to the content (e.g., Volume II Technical Appendix-A). Please note, self-extracting “.exe” files are not acceptable. Note: Offerors may submit back-up documentation (e.g. resumes/letters of commitment, DCAA and/or DCMA rate agreements and vendor quotes), not available in a compatible MS Office 2013 format, in Adobe Acrobat (pdf.) file format. | |
| 14 | Section L, L.9.4.2.6 | 126 | What is meant be “Profit shall be delineated by cost element”? Cost element is Labor, Subcontractor, Material, etc in this context, correct? Not showing fee pieces separately for each individual microelement such as OH, Fringe, G&A? | Reference L.9.4.2.7., Attachment 10, Tab CLIN COST Summary and Attachment 11, Tab CLIN COST Summary. "Profit shall be delineated by cost element and CLIN for the Offeror and each sub-contractor." | |
| 15 | Attachment 1 | Page 2 | Are any of these categories considered SCLS/SCA categories? If so, please specify and provide the applicable Wage Determination. | Reference Attachment 10 and Attachment 11, Tab - Labor Rates. The Offeror is required to provide the FSLA Exempt status for each Labor Category. | |
| 16 | Attachment 1 | 2 | Are any of these categories subject to a Collective Bargaining Agreement. If so, please specify and provide the applicable CBA. | Reference Attachment 10 and Attachment 11, Tab - Labor Rates. The Offeror is required to provide the FSLA Exempt status for each Labor Category. Note: There is no CBA associated with the current contract. | |
| 17 | Attachment 1, Attachment 10, & Attachment 11 | Multiple | Please clarify whether multiple levels of a category can be proposed. For example, the Attachment 1 lists an Test Engineer. If a contractor determines that a mid level and a senior level Test Engineer may be required, may it propose multiple levels of Test Engineer, or is it required to only propose a general Test Engineer that would encompass all experience and skill sets from the minimum specified up? | The Government will provide a structured set of labor categories. The Government has no intention of breaking these categories into more discreet levels. | |
| 18 | The current facility lease was signed in March 2016. Are we to assume the lease at the current monthly payment, and will the Government reimburse that lease payment at a fixed price that includes indirect burden in accordance with our approved rate structure? | Reference Section C, paragraph 3.4, "The contractor shall furnish, operate and maintain a Government approved CCTT PDSS laboratory facility for the performance of the requirements defined within this PWS,…" The Government will provide a monthly Firm-Fixed-Price dollar amount to pay for the contractor furnished facility. Note: The March 18, 2016 date refers to the day the lease agreement was executed. The actual "Commencement Date" of the lease is July 1, 2016 as defined in Section 1.10. Attachment 13 - Redacted Facility Lease. | |||
| 19 | What documentation does the government require for each proposed key person? Resume? Commitment letter? | Resumes for all key personnel will be required as a part of the proposal. Resumes will also be required for key personnel changes during the execution of the contract. Commitment letters are not required. | |||
| 20 | Do the resumes/letters of commitment count against the 20 page limit for Management Approach? | No, Reference Question Number 13 above. | |||
| 21 | Section L | Is the bidder required to address PWS sections other than those called out in Section L? | There is no requirement for offerors' to address PWS sections other than those called out in Section L. Offerrors shall ensure that each proposal volume submitted contains only the information relevant to that specific volume. | ||
| 22 | RFP, Page 53, PWS Paragraph 3.5.6, CCTT System Exercises | The requirement states “Contractor shall provide military SMEs who can plan, design and develop relevant scenarios and execute exercises.” Question: Since we cannot hire military personnel, request this requirement be amended to state “SMEs with military background”. | Concur. PWS has been updated. | ||
| 23 | RFP, Page 134, Section M.4.3.1, Subfactor 2.1, Staffing, Teaming and Key Personnel | Does the requirement to assign labor categories to the WBS pertain to the entire contract or only to Task Order 0001? | All categories need to be provided at the task order 0001 level and at the WBS level. |
24 RFP, Page 46, section 3.2.2 RFP, Page 46, section 3.2.2 indicates, "For all system enhancements performed under this contract the contractor shall update existing requirements, design, interface and test documentation as required to reflect all modifications to the CCTT." There are other places that also mention updating existing CCTT documentation. The next sentence refers to DI-ADMIN-80925 "Revisions to Existing Documents..." Do we have access to those documents? No, Offerors do not currently have access to existing CCTT documents. The awardee will receive access to existing CCTT documentation during contract transition. Throughout the life of the contract, the awardee will maintain all CCT PDSS documentation.
| 25 | Attachment 1 | The numbering on Page 2 does not match the numbering for the relevant job descriptions in the rest of the document. Will there be an update | Yes |
| 26 | Attachment 1 | Will labor category descriptions be provided for the following categories listed on Page 2? |
• Engineer, Software
• Engineer, Systems
• Engineer, Systems Engineer Lead (Key Personnel)
• Engineer, Mission Command Lead (Key Personnel)
• Engineer, Integration and Test Lead (Key Personnel)
| Yes | |||||
| 27 | Attachment 1 - Labor Categories | Outline | 2 | The Integration and Test Lead, Mission Command Lead, and Systems Engineer Lead do not have a listed job description, but are listed as a key personnel. | Attachment 1 will be updated to fully clarify all labor categories and key personnel. |
| 28 | Attachment 1 - Labor Categories | Outline | 2 | The position of Programmer does not have a listed job description. Please clarify as to if there will be more labor category definitions provided in the final RFP or if Industry is to define this category? | Attachment 1 will be updated to fully clarify all labor categories and key personnel. |
| 29 | Section C - PWS | 3.1.5.2 | 42 | PWS 3.1.5.2: There is discussion about the position for an Information System Security Officer (ISSO) yet there isn’t a labor category for that position. Please clarify as to if there will be more labor categories added to the final RFP? | Attachment 1 will be updated to fully clarify all labor categories and key personnel. |
| 30 | Section C - PWS | 3.5.8.1 | 53 | PWS 3.5.8.1: There is discussion about the position for an IT support staff yet there isn’t a labor category for that position. Please clarify as to if there will be more labor categories added to the final RFP? | Attachment 1 will be updated to fully clarify all labor categories and key personnel. |
| 31 | Section C - PWS | 3.1.3 | 40 | PWS 3.1.3 – Can the government confirm that the CCTT PDSS will have distribution rights to all components needed to fulfill the CCTT PDSS requirement of providing, “all software necessary to build a software load to include source code, load build instructions, software version description (SVD), and other documentation.”? | Yes. |
| 32 | Attachments 1-8 and Exhibits A-F | All | All of the CDRLs have an incorrect RFP number identified in the forms. Request that the Government change this to the current draft solicitation number W900KK-17-R-0018. | All documents will be updated with the correct solicitation number. | |
| 33 | Section J; Attachment 9 - Section B | 7-Jan | SECTION J ATTACHMENT 9 There are numerous references to this Attachment for T.O. 0001 requirements. Many of these references identify specific paragraphs for technical and administrative information. Section J Attachment 9 contains only the RFP Section B CLIN/Price information and the references in the CLIN descriptions are inaccurate. Please clarify if the Attachment references are accurate. Also, request that the Government change this to the current draft solicitation number W900KK-17-R-0018. | The attachment references are correct and the solicitation number has been changed to W900KK-17-R-0018. | |
| 34 | Section C - PWS | 2 | 37 | Section 1, Para 2 – Is the DSTS still supported? | Yes |
| 35 | Section C - PWS | 2 | 37 | Section 1, Para 2 – Can more detail be provided as to which exterior programs have been provided CCTT Software? | Executable CCTT software is provided to a large number of contractors and organizations, which will not be provided here. CCTT source code is only provided to contractors supporting the existing PDSS contract, the Concurrency contract and Army Research Lab (ARL) Science and Technology efforts. |
| 36 | Section C - PWS | 3.1.5 | 41 | Section 3.1.5 – Is it the role of the PDSS contractor to enforce Cyber Security on the 3rd party contractor’s development environment and/or delivered product? | 3rd party contractors will be responsible for meeting current (at time of development) Cybersecurity requirements on developed capabilities up until Government acceptance of 3rd party development efforts. The Government acceptance will consider whether the 3rd party contractor met Cybersecurity requirements. Once accepted, the capability becomes a core part of the CCTT baseline, which falls under the responsibility of PDSS. PDSS is responsible for ensuring that all fielded software is compliant with Cybersecurity requirements. To that end the PDSS contractor is required to assist the Government in verifying that CyberSecurity requirements are met for all third party product deliveries prior to and after Government acceptance. |
| 37 | Section L | L.1.4; L.1.5; L.2.1 | 112-114 | Section L.1.4, L.1.5, and L.2.1 list the former solicitation number for this effort in the POC and APOC address blocks. Request that the Government change this to the current draft solicitation number W900KK-17-R-0018. | Reference sections L.1.4, L.1.5, and L.2.1 The solicitation number has been corrected to read W900KK-17-R-0018. |
| 38 | Section C - PWS; Attachment 4 - TO 0001 PWS | 3.1.2 | 40; 5 | The Section C PWS and the Task Order 0001 PWS in paragraph 3.1.2 states that the COR can approve individuals to work without a clearance. The draft solicitation states that this will be a cleared program and a DD 254 will be issued. It is our understanding that a COR does not have this authority. Will the Government remove the statement that the COR can approve individuals to work without a clearance? | COR does not have the authority to approve individuals to work without a clearance PWS paragraph 3.1.2. has been updated. |
| 39 | Section C - PWS | 3.1.2.1 | 40 | The Section C PWS has two paragraphs numbered 3.1.2.1. Please change the second one to 3.1.2.2. | PWS has been updated. |
| 40 | Section C - PWS; Attachment 4 - TO 0001 PWS | 3.1.2.2 | 40; 6 | The Section C PWS paragraph and TO 0001 paragraph 3.1.2.2 states that the indicated requirements must be met within six months of appointment to IA/IT functions. It also says that the requirements must be met upon contract award. This is contradictory. Is the 6th month after appointment requirement correct? | The first paragraph in paragraph 3.1.2.2 is referring specifically to annual IA training requirements. The second paragraph in 3.1.2.2 is referring to certification requirements. The certifications are required upon contract award. |
| 41 | Section F | F.1 | 60 | Section F.1 states that the Period of Performance is the Date of Award through sixty (60) months. Section B states that all CLINs outside of the Transition in Period and the Base Year are options. This is inconsistent. Is the Period of Performance the Date of Award continuing for sixty (60) months, or is it the Transition In Period followed by the 12 month Base period, potentially followed by four (4) twelve (12) month options, followed by a transition out period? | The F.1. Period of Performance in the Final solicitation has been corrected to read" (a) The contract shall commence on Date of Award and shall continue for a period of 12 months. However, the period of performance may be extended in accordance with the option clause contained herein. |
(b) FAR Clause 52.216-18, Ordering has been incorporated into this contract. (a) Any supplies and services to be furnished under this contract shall be ordered by issuance of delivery orders or task orders by the individuals or activities designated in the Schedule. Such orders may be issued for an ordering period 60 months from contract award."
| 42 | Section I | I | 86 | FAR 52.223-16 is in Section I of the draft solicitation. FAR 52.223-16 is currently RESERVED. Will the Government remove this FAR clause? | Clause is applicable and available for use. Reference: FAR 23.705(d)(1) at the http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ for FARS Clauses. |
| 43 | Section I | I | 86 | FAR 52.227-14 is in the draft solicitation. DFAR 252.227-7014 is also in the draft solicitation. When more than one data rights clause is included in a solicitation or contract, the PCO must state which clause covers which part of the contract. Please clarify what rights each of these data rights clauses control. | DFAR Clause 252.227-7014 is applicable. FAR Clause 52.227-17 will be removed from the final solicitation. |
44 Section C - PWS; Section H 3.1.7; H.9 43; 74 Section C, PWS Paragraph 3.1.7, and Section H.9 are conflicting. If the Govt requires GPR in accordance with 3.1.7 then will the Govt remove section H.9? Section 3.1.7 is referring the minimum level of technical data rights that shall be afforded to the Government. This includes data rights for third party software that is approved for integration into the CCTT baseline.
Section H.9 is specifically referring to technical data and software developed in whole by the PDSS contractor. In those instances the technical data shall in whole be the property of the Government.
| 45 | Section L | L.9.4 | 122 | Are direct labor cost for cost plus rates binding? | Yes |
| 46 | Section L | L.9.4.2.1 | 125 | Is a man year defined as 1880 hours or 1920 hours? Both are referenced. | The man year is defined as 1920 hours for evaluation purposes only. The Final solicitation has removed all references to 1880 hours. |
| 47 | Attachment 9 - Section B | TO 01 | 7-Jan | Will the Government specify what tasks will be T&M, CPFF, or FFP? | The Government will provide a WBS that ties specific tasks to CLIN type and PWS paragraphs. |
| 48 | Reference: Attachment 1 – ListOfLaborCategories | Question: Are offerors limited to the labor categories identified in Attachment 1 or can additional labor categories be added? | The labor categories are limited to what is provided in attachment 1. | ||
| 49 | Reference: Attachment 11 – Cost-Price-TO 0001 (Excel) Worksheet, Tab Schedule B | Question: What PWS paragraphs are mapped to CLIN 0004 PDSS T&M requirements versus CLIN 0005 PDSS CPFF requirements of the Schedule B? | The Government will provide a WBS that ties specific tasks to CLIN type and PWS paragraphs. | ||
| 50 | Reference: L.3.1 Proposal Files | Question: It is unclear what the purpose of the following RFP requirement is: “The offeror shall restrict the use of company identifying information (e.g. logos, company name), specifically in the proposal information provided in volumes II Technical Approach, III Management Approach and V Cost/Price.” Please clarify how and where company names and logos can be used. | Reference Section L.3.1. - The purpose is to limit the use of company identifying information in the documents that will be evaluated to support a fair and open competition. | ||
| 51 | Reference: L.3.3 Format. …“Volumes I, II, III, IV and V text shall be single-spaced, using Arial Font Size 12 on 8 1/2 x 11 inch paper, fold-out pages are not permitted, with a minimum one-inch margin all around, and shall be oriented in portrait and single column format.” | Question: Will the Government consider allowing a text font with a size of 10 for text and tables? | Reference L.3.3. For ease of reading during evaluation, the Government will not consider allowing a font size of 10 for "text" content. | ||
| 52 | Reference: L.3.4 Illustrations | Question: Will the Government consider allowing fold-out pages for illustrations and tables? | Reference L3.4. "Illustrations, such as graphics, figures, graphs, embedded screen shots (or graphics) and tables may use fold-out pages that do not exceed 11 x 17 inch paper and shall be a minimum 8 –point using Arial font. Pages containing illustrations may be oriented in landscape format. Note: with regards to the page count limitations, the 11 x 17 inch fold-out is a two sheet equivalent." | ||
| 53 | Reference: L.3.4 Illustrations | Question: Will the Government considering allowing a font size within illustrations of 8 point. | Reference L3.4. "Illustrations, such as graphics, figures, graphs, embedded screen shots (or graphics) and tables may use fold-out pages that do not exceed 11 x 17 inch paper and shall be a minimum 8 –point using Arial font. Pages containing illustrations may be oriented in landscape format. Note: with regards to the page count limitations, the 11 x 17 inch fold-out is a two sheet equivalent." | ||
| 54 | Reference: Sub-factor 2.3 Scheduling/Planning and PWS 3.1.1.2 Financial Management and Integrated Master Schedule | Question: Is an IMS required to be included as part of the proposal? If so, does it count against page count limitations? | No | ||
| 55 | Reference: Attachment 2 and 2A GFP | Question: Are all lab assets, including the development environment, Government owned? | Yes | ||
| 56 | Reference: Attachment 4 Draft PWS for TO 0001, Paragraph 3.2.2 Enhancements | Question: A proposal write-up describing offeror’s solution/approach for the system enhancements does not appear to be required. Is this a correct interpretation of RFP requirements? If a write-up is required, will the Government add additional page count for these write-ups? | Reference Section C, paragraphs 3.2.2, 3.2.3.3, 3.2.3.4, 3.5.2 and 3.5.9.2. The requirements for contractor provided "enhancements" is not limited to the requirement at paragraph 3.2.2. No, the Government will not be adding additonal page count. | ||
| 57 | Reference: Attachment 4 Draft PWS for TO 0001, Paragraph 3.5.9.4 Database Generation | Question: It is our understanding that the majority of databases utilized by CCTT are provided by the Government via the SE Core contract. For TO 0001, we understand the requirement to integrate and test the eight databases and moving models. For TO 0001 is there a requirement to generate new databases? If so, can the government provide more specifics regarding the requirement to generate databases for TO 0001? | Task order 1 does not include the development of terrain databases or moving models by the PDSS contractor. It includes integration of these products from SE Core or other third parties. | ||
| 58 | Reference: PWS 3.4.4.2 Preventive Maintenance. “The contractor shall perform preventive maintenance on the equipment in the PDSS Lab in accordance with the maintenance procedures.” | Question: Are these procedures government provided or developed by the contractor, post award? | CCTT maintains operation and maintenance manuals that define the maintenance concept for the system. These will be provided as GFI. The PDSS contractor will not be required to develop these procedures. | ||
| 59 | Reference: PWS 3.6.1 Transition Phase-in (Transition with current contractor). | Question: Will the lease on the current PDSS facility be transferred to the Awardee and therefore require no movement of the physical assets? | Yes | ||
| 60 | Reference: Attachment 4 – Draft PWS Paragraph - 3.2.2 Enhancements System Modification Tasks Sub Paragraph 1 | Question: There may be program personnel like Administrative Assistants, Program Control Personnel, etc. who will never require access to classified information nor facilities. Additionally, there are currently significant delays in granting even interim security clearances with a continued pressure from DSS to reduce the number of unnecessary clearances. Taking the above into account and in an effort to attract young engineers and other personnel without clearances to enter the simulation market for programs like CCTT PDSS, would the government consider changing the statement “Contractor personnel and subcontractors performing the work tasks associated with this contract shall require access to classified information or facilities that process classified information. All contractor personnel working on this effort shall be U.S. Citizens, possess and maintain an active Secret security clearance…” to “Contractor personnel and subcontractors performing the work tasks associated with this contract that require access to classified information or facilities that process classified information shall have appropriate security clearances. All personnel working at the facility will be U.S. citizens.” Similar terminology has been used on other PEO STRI programs with similar requirements. | All personnel will require a SECRET clearance. Paragraph 3.1.2 has been updated. | ||
| 61 | Draft RFP Para 3.1.3 | “The contractor shall create and deliver complete software baselines to 3rd party contractors who are either developing new CCTT capabilities or modifying the baseline. The deliverable shall include all software necessary to build a software load to include source code, load build instructions, software version description (SVD), and other documentation.” Does this mean our team will farm out software development activities to the appropriate vendor(s) and we will function as the integrator? | PDSS does not farm out software development activities. This paragraph is referring to future CCTT concurrency and tech refresh efforts where the 3rd party contractor will be fully responsible for all hardware and software developments. PDSS is responsible for integration and CM of the full CCTT software baseline and documentation after handover from the 3rd party. PDSS owns the process to allow for a 3rd party developer to develop off the software baseline, review code and document changes, and integrate 3rd party code back into future release software baselines. PDSS is responsible for integrating third party software into common baselines with PDSS developed software, testing and supporting Government validation of the software and fielding the software. | ||
| 62 | PWS Para – 3.5.5 | Will the government provide the Live Virtual Constructive collaboration tool or is it up to the vendor to deliver a solution? | If this is referring to the Transmitter PDU implementation (task order 1 paragraph 3.5.5), that requirement has been removed from task order 01. |
&P of &N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .