Attach 4_Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Anesthesia Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W81K00-24-R-0003
Issued by
Department of the Army Medical Command

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire for the solicitation W81K00-24-R-0003 seeking proposals for Anesthesia Services at William Beaumont Army Medical Center in Fort Bliss, Texas. The Medical Readiness Contracting Office - West is conducting the competitive acquisition for Certified Registered Nurse Anesthesia and Physician-Anesthesiologist Services in support of the Department of Anesthesia Services. Offerors must provide references to validate past performance on similar contracts or orders. The reference must complete the questionnaire, which requests contract details, performance issues, and ratings for quality of service and business relations. Responses are due by December 4, 2023. The questionnaire collects information on contract amounts, locations, services provided, performance problems requiring additional costs, and narrative explanations for any ratings other than satisfactory.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 4 W81K00-24-R-0003

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The Medical Readiness Contracting Office - West is conducting a competitive acquisition for Anesthesia Services for Certified Registered Nurse Anesthesia (CRNA) and Physician-Anesthesiologist Services at William Beaumont Army Medical Center in support of the Department of Anesthesia Services, Fort Bliss, El Paso, Texas. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the contractor’s past performance, and return to derek.t.meilinger.civ@health.mil and vickie.v.drumming.civ@health.mil by 4 December 2023, 10:00 AM CST (San Antonio, Texas). Note: Clearly identify and provide the name of the Prime Contractor and Subcontractor. Specify Prime Contractor/Subcontractor.

Name of Contractor being evaluated:

Contract/Order Number: __________________________________________________________________

1. Type of service being provided?

2. Where is the location of this service?

3. What is the contract amount?

4. Have there been any unsatisfactory performance resulting in additional contractual or administrative costs?

Yes |_| No |_| If “Yes,” explain:

The last two questions will discuss quality of service & customer relations. Please refer to the following:

Rating System:

1. Excellent – Overall performance exceeds contractual requirements and gives extra benefits to the customer. Problems, if any, were promptly corrected without negative impact to the customer.

1. Satisfactory – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory

1. Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractor’s proposed actions to correct any problems appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

1. Unsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

IMPORTANT NOTE: NARRATIVES MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ANY RATING OTHER THAN SATISFACTORY AND MUST SUPPORT THE RATING GIVEN.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE, Continued

5. Quality of Service – Please rate overall compliance with the contract Performance Work Statement.

(1) Excellent |_| (2) Satisfactory |_| (3) Marginal |_| (4) Unsatisfactory |_|

If other than “Satisfactory,” a narrative must be provided to explain how the overall performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

6. Business/Customer Relations – Please rate overall effective management; successfully managed services; reasonable/cooperative behavior; flexibility; business-like concern for customer’s interest.

(1) Excellent |_| (2) Satisfactory |_| (3) Marginal |_| (4) Unsatisfactory |_|

If other than “Satisfactory,” a narrative must be provided to explain how the overall performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Signature: Date:

Print Name: Company:

Title: Telephone:

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .