A07_Amendment_W56ZTN-16-R-0002-0006.Executed.pdf

PDF 479 KB Posted

Attached to
Basic Environmental Services Support III (BESS III) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W56ZTN-16-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground

About this file

AMENDMENT 0006

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide revisions of PWS (Section C), Proposal Submission (Section L), Government Evaluation (Section M), and Attachment 4 – Sample Tasks.

This amendment is also to extend the proposal due date from November 28th, 2016 to December 2nd, 2016.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

U 1 70

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Nov-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W56ZTN-16-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Sep-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Nov-2016

CODE

ACC-APG - GARRISON DIVISION (W56ZTN)

ACC-APG GARRISON DIVISION

6001 COMBAT DRIVE

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD 21005

W56ZTN 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W56ZTN-16-R-0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0006

Updates/changes for the following sections were based on all answers issued in Amendments of 0001 - 0005. The following updates/changes are in BLUE.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

SECTION C

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

FOR

BASIC ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT SERVICE III (BESS III)

Version 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

C.1 INTRODUCTION

C.1.1 Mission C.1.2 Background C.1.3 Objective:

C.1.4 General Information:

C.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

C.2.1 Scope of Work C.2.2 Start of Work Meeting

C.3. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

C.3.1 Installation Restoration Program/Military Munitions Response Program

(IRP/MMRP)

C.3.2 Compliance Support

C.3.3 Cultural Resources C.3.4 Natural Resources C.3.5 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) C.3.6 Other Environmental Requirements

C.4 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

C.4.1 Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) Related Guidance C.4.2 Health and Safety (H & S) Requirements

C.4.3 Quality Management (Quality Assurance/Quality Control) C.4.4 Project Repository/Admin Record C.4.5 Army Environment Data Base – Restoration (AEDB-R), Army Environmental Data Base Compliance clean-up (AEDB-CC) C.4.6 Disposal of Sample Waste C.4.7 Additional Site plans C.4.8 Protection of Property C.4.9 Project Stakeholders C.4.10 Regulatory Involvement C.4.11 Public Participation C.4.12 Deliverable Requirements

C.5 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS

C.5.1 Key Personnel C.5.2 Other Technical Resources – Potential Task Order Personnel C.5.3 Performance Metrics C.5.4 Contractor Personnel and Qualifications

C.6 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

C.6.1 Certification /approval of Milestones and Deliverables C.6.2 Travel C.6.3 Government furnished resources C.6.4 Contractor furnished resources C.6.5 Place of Performance C.6.6 Access and Security C.6.7 Government Rights C.6.8 Stop Work Authority C.6.9 Environmental Responsibility Considerations C.6.10 Organizational Conflicts of Interest C.6.11 Project Management

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment C.1 Acronyms Attachment C.2 Definitions Attachment C.3 Task Order Quality Assurance and Surveillance Plan (QASP) Template

1.0 Overview

Table 1: Performance Ratings Definitions

2.0 Roles and Responsibilities of Army Officials

3.0 Key Milestones/Deliverables to be assessed

4.0 Performance Standards for Key Milestones/Deliverables

5.0 Surveillance Methodology

6.0 Payment and Corrective Action

Attachment C.4 Minimum Requirements for Data Layers without an Established Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)

C.1 INTRODUCTION

C.1.1 Mission

The Environmental Division is committed to sustaining the military missions at all times at Aberdeen Proving Ground by providing the guidance, actions, and customer assistance necessary to comply with all environmental laws and regulations, prevent pollution where possible, protect and conserve vital natural resources, restore contaminated sites, and continually improve our operations.

C.1.2 Background

Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG) is divided into several geographic entities located in Harford County, Maryland, near the head of the Chesapeake Bay, with two portions of the installation, Carroll Island and Graces Quarters, located in Baltimore County, Maryland. The Harford County areas are Aberdeen Area (APG – North), Edgewood Area (APG – South). The Churchville Test Area is located on MD Route 136 and Harmony Church Road. All the locations require proactive action by APG to conduct operations in an environmentally sound and sustainable manner. All environmental matters at APG are under the guidance of the Chief of the Environmental Division of the Directorate of Public Works. The mission of the Environmental Division is to provide Installation-wide support in maintaining compliance with all applicable Federal and State environmental laws and regulations. In addition to ensuring regulatory compliance, the Environmental Division identifies existing or potential environmental risk and develops initiatives for risk mitigation or risk management with the objectives to enhance and protect APG’s natural, cultural, and archeological resources. The Environmental Division is also responsible for implementation of APG’s Installation Restoration Program (IRP) and Military Munitions Response Program.

C.1.3 Objective: The objective of this effort is to provide basic environmental services to US Army Garrison APG’s Directorate of Public Works - Environmental Division (DPW-ED) and to all tenants supported by DPW-ED in need of environmental services. The funding sources for this acquisition are therefore expected to vary. However, the primary objective remains, regardless of the proponent or funding source, and that is to provide a variety of environmental support services required for APG to achieve its collective missions.

C.1.4 General Information:

This is a non-personal services contract to provide basic environmental technical support services. The Government will not exercise supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein. Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the contractor who, in turn, is responsible to the Government.

C.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

C.2.1 Scope of Work The contractor shall provide a wide range of Environmental Services to include facility maintenance activities or construction and demolition or both to comply with environmental laws and regulations at properties within the control of APG and Garrison Supported Organizations (GSOs). The Contractor shall execute work to meet the objectives/milestones in specific task order performance work statements.

The contractor shall perform munitions response activities that may involve the remediation and disposition of Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC), which include Unexploded Ordnance (UXO), Discarded Military Munitions (DMM), and Munitions Constituents (MC). Pursuant to the 2012 Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) Manual, munitions responses will follow the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) process under the Military Munitions Response Program. In addition, the contractor may perform Quantitative Assessments on operational ranges that will provide information necessary to keep the ranges open for training and testing. The contractor may perform investigations to determine if there has been a release of Munitions Constituents of Concern (MCOC) to an off-range area and off-range release of MCOC that may pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. The following MEC related guidance includes but may not be limited to the following:

UXO, as defined in 10 United States Code (U.S.C.) 101(e)(5); DMM, as defined in 10 U.S.C. 2710(e)(2);

or MC, as defined in 10 U.S.C. 2710(e)(3) (Reference (ai)), present in high enough concentrations to pose an explosive hazard.

MEC distinguishes specific categories of military munitions that may pose unique explosives safety risks.

Because MEC being actively managed may be determined to be hazardous wastes, and because some of the activities conducted pursuant to this PWS will take place at a facility listed on the NPL, 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response, Section 1910.120 may apply.

Per the guidelines set forth in DoDI 4140.62 and Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB) Technical Paper 18, UXO qualified personnel will be responsible for determining the explosive safety status of all material recovered that may pose an explosive hazard (e.g., Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH)).

Should MEC be encountered during this response, UXO-qualified personnel will evaluate the explosive hazard and remove MEC to include open detonation in place. This process will be conducted per the CERCLA and the National Contingency Plan (NCP), applicable state and federal regulation, and applicable DoD and United States Army policies and procedures. The programmatic specifications for this acquisition are to be provided on a task order basis. The DoD revised Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards (DoD 6055.09-STD) (Feb 08) and PWS document must be adhered to in the investigation and remediation of sites with MEC. The specific requirements concerning explosives safety under the active Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) are further clarified in EP-385-1-95b, ER 385-1-95, EM 385-1-97, and EP 385-1-95a. Please refer to Section C.5.2.2 which contains training requirements for Ordnance and Explosive Safety personnel.

Examples of the types of environmental subject areas or tasks include the following:

Air Injection Air Quality surveys and/or Emissions Reporting Archeological Resources Asbestos Abatement Asbestos Regulations and Requirements Bald Eagle Monitoring and Research Bioremediation Chemical Oxidation/Ultraviolet (UV) Systems Compliance Cleanup (CC) Sites Conceptual Site Models for Installation Restoration Program (IRP), Military Munitions Response Program

(MMRP), and CC Sites Conventional Water Treatment Construction Cultural Resources Data Management Debris Removal Demolition Dredging Drinking Water Emergency Response related activities Endangered Species Energy Audit and Compliance Engineering including chemical, civil, electrical, environmental, mechanical, radiological Environmental Compliance Assessments/Surveys Environmental laws, regulations, and best Management Practices including Department of the Army, Department of Defense, and APG regulations and policies Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Support Excavation/Soil Management Facility Repair and Maintenance Geology Geotechnical Studies

Ground Water Assessment and Remediation – such as IRP, MMRP, CC Sites Groundwater Extraction/Dewatering – such as IRP, MMRP, CC Sites Hazardous Materials Management Hazardous Waste Management Health Physics support to include the following:

o Radiation Sampling o Monitoring o Inspection o Analysis;

o Training;

o Literature search of historic documents;

o Review of health and safety plans/work plans for radiological remediation efforts;

o Procedure writing;

o Inventory maintenance;

o Quality Control Audits;

o Radioactive waste handling and transport; and o Other tasks related to the radiation protection program as identified within the specifications of the initiating delivery order(s).

o Establish protocols, and /or schedules and coordinate them with the COR for approval before initiating data collection. Individual task orders will specify reporting requirements.

Heavy Metal Disposal/Treatment Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste (HTRW) Management Hydrogeology Installation Restoration Program (IRP) Laboratory Testing Landfill Closure And Long-Term Management Lead-Based Paint Surveys And Abatement Maryland Critical Area Requirements And Compliance Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) Modeling Including Fate And Transport Analysis National Environmental Policy Act Natural Attenuation Natural Resources National Contingency Plan (NCP) Reporting Noise Occupational Health and Safety Permitting Pest Control Pollution Prevention Quality Assurance/Quality Control Radiation Recovery Operations From Reportable Spills Regulatory Analysis For All Task Orders Response Action IRP And CC Sites Response Action Of Munitions Response Sites Response Action Of Radioactive Sites Risk Assessments (Human Health And Ecological) Sampling and Analysis Sediment and Erosion Control Measures Slurry Walls/Subsurface Barriers Soil Vapor Extraction Soil Washing Soil/Sludge Stabilization/Solidification Solid Waste Management Storm Water Management

Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Surface Water Quality Thermal Destruction/Desorption Treatment/Disposal Of Investigation-Derived Wastes and Decontamination-Derived Wastes Underground Storage Tank Removal/Closure/Replacement Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Detection Vapor Intrusion Wastewater Management Wetlands

C.2.2 Start of Work Meeting

C.2.2.1 The contractor shall host a start of work meeting at a government facility within ten (10) days after task award. The Government will notify the contractor within five (5) days after task award of the location of the start of work meeting.

C.2.2.2 The purpose of this meeting is to summarize its understanding of the tasks to be completed, ask and answer questions, and serve as a venue for all parties to make introductions. The Start of Work meeting shall include a verbal “walk-through” of this PWS.

C.2.2.3 The contractor shall provide Start of Work meeting minutes to the COR not later than (NLT) forty eight (48) hours after the Start of Work meeting.

C.2.2.4 The Start of Work meeting shall serve as the minimum guarantee in the event a contractor does not receive a task order award within the first year of the contract. This meeting will include key and administrative personnel as listed in section C.5.1 of the PWS.

C.3. Performance Requirements

C.3.1 Installation Restoration Program/Military Munitions Response Program

(IRP/MMRP).

C.3.1.1 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

The United States Army Environmental Command is responsible for cleanup at active/operating installations under the Installation Restoration Program (IRP) and the MMRP.

C.3.1.2 Performance Objectives

The level of detail, oversight, approvals, and performance objectives, may vary to meet requirements of individual task orders. The individual task order requirements will be specified in the PWS issued under this multiple award IDIQ contract in accordance with the various environmental subject areas or tasks identified in Section C.2.1.

The Government defines Performance Objectives as statements of a specific desired end result or outcome that are in clear, simple, concise, results-oriented, and measurable terms. The Government defines the completion of a Performance Objective as an outcome that has been 100% completed, approved, and accepted by the approval authority under the individual task orders that meet the objective or interim milestone. For example, submittal of a document for review is not the same as completion of an objective or interim milestone. Only upon the completion, approval, and acceptance will the Government pay for the objective or interim milestone.

C.3.1.3 Installation Restoration Program/Military Munitions Response Program (IRP/MMRP) Task Orders

The Individual task order PWS will typically contain objectives to achieve Remedy-in-Place (RIP) or Response Complete (RC) as defined and used in the DERP Management Manual, number 4715.20, dated 09 March 2012.

The contractor shall attain RIP or RC upon finalizing appropriate documentation from the Government certifying that the response actions conducted at the site have met the identified response action objectives and no further action is necessary, subject to all requirements for Response Action (Operations) [RA(O)] and/or Long Term Management (LTM). The contractor shall note if operations and/or long-term management/monitoring are necessary for the response action. The contractor shall be responsible for the following duration of the individual task order awarded and/or until achievement of Site Closeout (SC) whichever comes first:

a. Performing the required RA(O) at that site for the duration of the task order or until achievement of RC, whichever is first.

b. Performing the required LTM at that site for the duration of the task order or until achievement of SC, whichever is first.

c. Performing all Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) 121(c) or other Remedy reviews required at that site for the duration of the task order.

d. Correcting all deficiencies noted in the CERCLA 121(c) or other response action reviews performed at that site for the duration of the task order, including modifying the existing response action, implementing a contingent response action, modifying the monitoring parameters and or frequency, or other activities deemed necessary to correct the deficiencies.

e. Developing and implementing approved exit/ramp down strategies to reduce the Army’s long-term costs/liabilities associated with the site.

C.3.1.3.1 SITE ASSESSMENT/CHARACTERIZATION/INVESTIGATION

The contractor shall perform investigative services that generally consist of performing field activities to determine site geology and groundwater conditions, contaminant concentration, contaminant migration, survey and mapping, geophysical prove-outs, geophysical system verification (GSV), digital geophysical mapping (DGM) surveys, verification sampling, installation of monitoring wells or other monitoring devices, sampling and analysis, establishing a conceptual site model, chemical testing, and foundation characteristics in order to meet the performance objectives.

C.3.1.3.2 STUDIES AND REPORTS

The contractor shall perform and prepare investigations, surveys, plans, studies, and reports, to meet the performance objectives. The work may include but is not limited to risk assessments, military munitions surveys, Explosives of Concern (MEC) hazard assessments, fate and transport analyses, groundwater modeling or other techniques as necessary to determine the potential risks to human health and the environment and to determine remediation goals. For studies (e.g., Corrective Measures Study (CMS), Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Study (RI/FS), Range Assessment) the contractor shall summarize all known site information and develop, describe and evaluate potential alternatives for response action(s) and cost estimates. In addition, the study shall recommend a preferred alternative with cost estimates. Individual task orders will specify required deliverables.

The following is a discussion of potential MMRP requirements. The Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) requirements in 32 CFR Section 179 require the DoD to assign each MRS a relative priority for response actions. The initial MRSPP score for MRSs is developed during the Site Investigation (SI) phase. These MRSPP scores must be reviewed annually and must be revised whenever new data are obtained. Pursuant to this requirement, the contractor shall annually review, revise MRSPP scores based on new information, and submit to the Army for MRSs identified in the task order PWS. In addition, the contractor shall also include all information that may have influenced the MRS priority or MRS sequencing decision in the Administrative Record and the Information Repository. Furthermore, the FY02 Defense Authorization Act creating the MMRP requires DoD to develop and maintain an inventory of defense sites that are known or suspected to contain UXO, DMM or MC.

Pursuant to this requirement, the contractor shall submit annual updates to the Installation Munitions Response map in PDF format that reflect changes to the location, boundaries and/or extent of the MRSs in the task order PWS.

C.3.1.3.3 SUPPORT OF RESPONSE ACTIONS

The contractor shall provide a variety of engineering services to support response actions to meet the response action objectives (RAOs). These services may include, but are not limited to, the following: structural, mechanical, electrical, architectural, geotechnical, geological, civil, environmental, radiological, cost engineering, constructability reviews, military munitions management, and other engineering support services.

The contractor may be required to provide Explosives of Concern/Unexploded Ordnance (MEC/UXO) support during environmental investigations and/or response actions whenever a review of historical information indicates MEC may be present on the site being addressed. The engineering documents shall be representative of industry or Army standards for drawings and specifications or by performance specifications. The copies of all documents produced by the Contractor shall be provided to the Army and become Army property in accordance with individual task order List of Deliverables.

C.3.1.3.4 RESPONSE ACTIONS

The contractor shall perform all necessary fieldwork in order to meet the milestones/objectives stated in the individual awarded task orders. The contractor shall specify and perform all necessary quality controls to include but not limited to verification testing and monitoring, at required frequencies, in order to adequately control and monitor the response action. The response actions may or may not be performed in conjunction with site investigation/characterization activities. The contractor shall perform planning, fieldwork, incidental construction activities, intrusive activities, and implementation of response, removal or remediation activities, which may include, but are not limited to, final disposition of HTRW, low-level radioactive and mixed waste, medical waste, debris, demolition, buried drums, MEC, DMM and MC, Underground Storage Tanks (UST)/Above Ground Storage Tanks (AST), and/or contaminated media.

C.3.1.3.5 MONITORING

The contractor shall be required to provide for monitoring to meet the scope of services/milestone objectives or to provide pre-response action monitoring as a distinct performance objective as stated in the individual task orders.

These services may include, but are not limited to the following: groundwater sampling, surface water sampling, sediment sampling, soil sampling, and/or air sampling. All planned suite of analyses must receive prior approval by the Contracting Officer or designee. The contractor shall prepare a report describing the sampling methods/techniques, analyses, results, and recommendations, as required by the individual task order.

C.3.1.3.6 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

The contractor shall operate and maintain the existing systems as defined in the specific PWS of individual awarded task orders. In addition, the contractor shall perform the following requirements, including, but not limited to, sampling, perform and/or arrange for laboratory analyses of samples, perform evaluation and optimization services, provide training for follow-on users in accordance with regulatory requirements contained in the applicable operations and maintenance manuals; and perform necessary associated remedial actions.

C.3.1.4 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

The contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, permits and the Federal Facilities Agreement signed between the Army, APG, and United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region III (March 1990). In addition, the contractor shall fulfill the objectives of each individual task order awarded in a manner that is consistent with all applicable orders, decrees, or permits, existing cleanup agreements or Army guidance, and relevant Department of Defense (DoD) and Army directives, instructions, protocols, and policies for the duration of each individual task order awarded. The contractor shall perform all the necessary work as specified in individual task orders.

Pursuant to the DERP Management Manual Number 4715.20 dated 9 March 2012, the contractor shall conduct work pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), and National Contingency Plan (NCP) requirements, with regulatory coordination of the Maryland Department of the Environment and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). In addition, the contractor shall conduct work pursuant to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) or other applicable or relevant and appropriate regulations when implementing a CERCLA action.

Furthermore, when performing work on sites contaminated or potentially contaminated with MEC, the contractor shall adhere to DOD Manual 6055.09-M, Ammunition and Explosive Safety Standards Criteria for Unexploded Ordnance, Munitions Response, Waste Military Munitions, and Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard; DoD 4145.26-M, DOD Contractor’s Safety Manual For Ammunition and Explosives; Army Regulation 385-10, the Army Safety Program; Department of the Army Pamphlet 385-63, Range Safety; and Department of the Army Pamphlet 385-64, Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards. Work performed for the Operational Range Assessment Program shall comply with the provisions of Department of Defense Directive (DODD) 4715.11, Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 4715.14, and DODD 3200.15.

C.3.1.4.1 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT

(CERCLA)

For sites with unregulated contaminants and primarily under the jurisdiction of CERCLA, certain pollutants or contaminants (P/C) may be an issue at sites covered by this contract. Cleanup of P/C may be warranted if the P/C presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or welfare that results in an unacceptable risk for the current and reasonably anticipated future use of the site. P/C, as defined in CERCLA, typically does not have a federally promulgated maximum contaminant limit (MCL). For all such P/C, or all other chemical, that does not have a federally promulgated MCL, but does have a finalized reference dose (FRD) or slope factor listed in USEPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database, that FRD or slope factor shall be incorporated in the NCP risk assessment process. However, responses will not be paid that are not in full compliance with CERCLA, the DERP, and DoD and Army policy. Additionally, state standards will only be analyzed through the CERCLA applicable or relevant and appropriate requirement (ARAR) process.

C.3.1.4.2 RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)

For sites with unregulated contaminants and primarily under the jurisdiction of RCRA, certain P/C may be an issue at sites covered by this multiple IDIQ contract. The cleanup of P/C may be warranted if the P/C presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or welfare that results in an unacceptable risk, as determined by the government. The P/C typically does not have a federally promulgated MCL. For all such P/C or all other chemical, that does not have a federally promulgated MCL, but does have a finalized RfD or slope factor listed in USEPA's IRIS database, that RfD or slope factor should be incorporated in the risk assessment process.

However, responses will not be paid that are not in full compliance with RCRA, the DERP, and DoD and Army policy. Additionally, state standards will only be analyzed through the appropriate statutory analysis for applicable standards and requirements.

C.3.1.5 Types of Services The IRP/MMRP, may include but not limited to, site assessment, site inspection (SI), remedial investigation (RI), site characterization, feasibility study (FS), human health and/or ecological risk assessments, remedial design (RD), response action construction (RAC), proposed plan (PP) record of decision (ROD), remediation of contaminated sites, sampling and analysis, monitoring, response action operations (RA(O)), and long term management (LTM) required to address releases of hazardous substances or pollutants and contaminants, and to correct other environmental damage.

The Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) requirements in 32 CFR Section 179 require the DoD, in consultation with representatives of the states and Indian tribes, to assign each MRS a relative priority for response actions. The initial MRSPP score for MRSs is developed during the SI phase. These MRSPP scores must be reviewed annually and must be revised whenever new data are obtained. Pursuant to this requirement, the contractor shall annually review, revise MRSPP scores based on new information, and submit to the Army for MRSs identified in the individual task orders awarded PWS. In addition, the Contractor shall also include all information that may have influenced the MRS priority or MRS sequencing decision in the Administrative Record and the Information Repository. Furthermore, the FY02 Defense Authorization Act creating the MMRP requires DoD to develop and maintain an inventory of defense sites that are known or suspected to contain UXO, DMM or MC. The pursuant to this requirement, the contractor shall submit annual updates to the Installation Munitions Response map in PDF format that reflect changes to the location, boundaries and/or extent of the MRSs in the task order PWS.

C.3.2 COMPLIANCE SUPPORT

C.3.2.1 Risk and Performance Objectives

a. The performance objectives and performance standards for each task order will be described in individual task orders. The level of detail, oversight, approvals, and performance objectives, may vary to meet requirements of individual task orders. The Army will use this contract to perform a variety of environmental services at APG.

b. During task order competition, the selected contractors may be asked to propose task performance metrics and milestone billing schedule(s), , The Government will identify specific performance objectives or requirements pursuant to a permit, consent agreement, or other applicable regulations, e.g. Clean Water Act (CWA), Clean Air Act (CAA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Oil Pollution Act of 1990, Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), A-190 RCRA Permit, Emergency Planning and Community Right to Act (EPCRA) and Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act

(FIFRA)

C.3.2.1.1 Risks

APG provides notice of the following risks that contractors need to be cognizant of that could affect individual task orders awarded under this multiple IDIQ as follows:

C.3.2.1.2 The environmental regulations are rarely performance-based.

C.3.2.1.3 The environmental compliance outcomes are often dependent on regulator decision (for examples, permit application accepted or permit granted) or public input.

C.3.2.1.4 The installation data may not be complete, correct, or up-to-date.

C.3.2.1.5 The real property inventory data, especially for environmental compliance sites, may be incomplete and out of date.

C.3.2.1.6 The Garrison’s environmental inventories and surveys may not keep up with the pace of construction or renovation.

C.3.21.7 The Garrison’s supported organizations do not always coordinate with Directorate of Public Works and the Environmental Division before self-help renovations, implementing new equipment, or fielding new weapons systems.

C.3.2.1.8 Because of accelerated and ambitious schedules, installation master planning changes may affect tasks that are in progress.

C.3.2.1.9 The Secure areas are difficult to visit, inspect, and survey.

C.3.2.1.10 The military tenants are often deployed or otherwise unavailable.

C.3.2.1.11 The military specifications that govern how weapons systems are maintained are designed to ensure performance in all environments and often specify hazardous materials use.

C.3.2.2 Performance Objectives The contractor shall comply with the primary objectives of APG’s environmental compliance programs, which are to comply with all applicable Federal, State laws, Department of Defense, Department of the Army, and APG regulations, and permits; implement Executive Orders, Best Management Practices, and regulatory guidance to the maximum extent practicable; and minimize points of compliance through careful planning and coordination with GSOs. Achieving the programmatic performance objectives will sustain the installation by: minimizing or eliminating the environmental impacts to the surrounding community and ecosystems from military training; on- Post housing; facility construction; maintenance, repair, and renovation; and facility operation through regulatory compliance, source reduction, and waste minimization; and minimizing energy and water use. Additional objectives include; maintaining or returning to regulatory compliance; reducing enforcement actions, compliance sites, or compliance cost per unit production (for example gallons of wastewater treated, pounds of hazardous waste managed, number of vehicles maintained or number of soldiers trained); reducing hazardous chemical use and release; and anticipating and mitigating environmental impacts of planned actions .

Specific detailed requirements will be set forth in the PWS of individual awarded task orders under this multiple award IDIQ contract.

C.3.2.3 Regulatory Requirements

The contractor shall comply with the regulations for compliance task orders that include CAA, CWA, RCRA, SDWA, EPCRA, Oil Pollution Act of 1990, TSCA, and FIFRA.

In addition, APG has current permit requirements and potential future consent order requirements. The table 1 contains the major environmental laws impacting environmental actions at APG and table 2 contains a list of major APG permits as follows:

Clean Air Act (CAA)

APG is located in a “non‐attainment” area for ozone and fine particulate matter.

Consequently, development actions must be evaluated to determine whether their resulting air emissions may contribute to adverse air quality. APG has two

Title V permits with 132 permitted sources. In addition, APG’s air program supports 5‐10 new permits to construct annually.

Clean Water Act

(CWA), as amended

APG owns over 32,700 acres of the Chesapeake Bay. Under a General NPDES permit, APG is required to implement best management practices (including construction site runoff control, post construction storm water management, detection and elimination of illicit discharges, etc.) to prevent and control pollution from storm water. A State‐approved plan must be prepared for any earth disturbance of 5,000 square feet or more, or for 100 cubic yards or more of cut or fill, to prevent erosion and sediment from escaping the job site and entering the surface waters of Maryland. APG is also required to meet nutrient and sediment reductions for the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load

(TMDL) mandated by EPA in response to Executive Order 13508 to Protect and

Restore the Chesapeake Bay. APG is currently working with the state and four surrounding counties to implement measures to meet the allocations set in the

TMDL. Any impacts to wetlands, wetland buffer and 100 year floodplain must be authorized. Federal agencies are required to ensure that projects with the potential to impact wetlands are to first avoid wetland impacts, followed by minimization of impacts, and finally, appropriate compensation for unavoidable impacts. The CWA, as amended, also contains requirements applicable to APG relating to oil spill contingency planning. APG currently stores approximately 2.8 million gallons of oil subject to these contingency planning provisions. APG is in violation of new water quality standards that require enhanced nitrogen removal at the Edgewood Waste Water Treatment Plant.

Coastal Zone

Management Act

APG must evaluate every action on the installation for impacts on Maryland’s coastal resources and consistency to the maximum extent practicable with

Maryland’s Coastal Management Program and enforceable policies. Initially reviewed through the NEPA process, projects that have a reasonably foreseeable effect on Maryland’s coastal resources must provide more detailed information to the appropriate state agency.

Cultural Resources

Laws including

ARPA, NHPA and

NAGPRA

APG’s Cultural Resource Program tracks over 1137 historic or potentially historic buildings (many of them in poor condition), monitors/evaluates an estimated

9000 acres of land with high archaeological potential and over 1,100 known or suspected archaeological sites (58 documented with the State Historic

Preservation Office), and corresponds with ten federally recognized Indian tribes.

APG maintains and monitors 22 historic cemeteries. In the past 5 years, 435 acres underwent a Phase I archeological survey. Based on the results of that survey, 20 of these acres underwent a Phase II archeological survey.

Table 1

Major Environmental Laws Impacting Environmental Operations at APG

Emergency

Planning and

Community Right‐

To‐Know Act

APG’s 90+ tenants use over 19 million pounds of hazardous materials at over 300 locations. APG submits Tier II and Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) reports to EPA and MDE annually.

Endangered

Species Act (ESA) and Bald and

Golden Eagle

Protection Act

APG has two Federally listed endangered species (Shortnose Sturgeon and

Atlantic Sturgeon) and one Federally protected species (Bald Eagle). In addition, the installation has identified 41 species of State listed rare, threatened, or endangered vascular plants. Management plans are in development for the two sturgeon species. APG’s Bald Eagle Management Plan adaptively manages 500‐ meter buffer zones around active eagle nests and communal roosts to allow military missions to continue while limiting negative impacts to the eagles.

Impacts to State listed plants are minimized by avoidance procedures where possible.

Fish and Wildlife

Conservation Act

APG is required to protect and enhance existing fish and wildlife thorugh land and water conservation programs and utilization of sound management practices.

National

Environmental

Policy Act (NEPA)

APG’s NEPA program processes approximately 1000+ Records of Environmental

Consideration and 12 to 15 Environmental Assessments a year. Because of APG’s history, the presence of UXO, the extent of possible environmental contamination, and the bald eagle population, NEPA reviews are performed for every major and minor construction, demolition, and renovation action. APG’s

NEPA reviews also assess the impacts of training, testing and unique RDT&E missions at APG.

Pollution

Prevention Act

In accordance with Pollution Prevention Act, AR 200‐1 and EO 13423, APG’s

Pollution Prevention program encourages the use of environmentally preferable products, conducts pollution prevention opportunity assessments, manages reduce, reuse, recycle initiatives, and provides training (i.e. green procurement, hazardous materials tracking, and source reduction).

Resource

Conservation and

Recovery Act

(RCRA)

In accordance with RCRA Subtitle C and the COMAR 26.13, APG operates a permitted hazardous waste storage facility offering a post‐wide collection system, waste tracking, compliant storage, internal audits, and training. There are currently 9 RCRA Part B permitted facilities, 12 less than 90‐day sites, and 300‐400 satellite accumulation sites. Over 1,800 personnel are trained and over 2,695 tons of hazardous, industrial, medical, and universal waste were managed and tracked in CY2011 from cradle to grave. In accordance with Subtitle D of RCRA, the

Environmental Division’s solid waste program tracks solid waste generated, solid waste disposed, cost of solid waste disposal, amount of solid waste that is recycled, and costs and revenues associated with solid waste recycling.

Approximately 48,130 tons of solid waste are tracked and managed each year.

Over 52 USTs are managed in accordance with Subtitle I of RCRA, COMAR regulations, APG’s Oil Operations Permit, and amendments to the CWA.

Safe Drinking Water

Act (SDWA)

Approximately 2,380 acres of APG property lie within a portion of the groundwater recharge zone for the Harford County and the City of Aberdeen drinking water well fields. APG is required (by a memorandum of agreement between APG and the City of Aberdeen and APGR 200‐7), to restrict and monitor mission activities in these two Source Water Protection Areas where drinking water supplies, serving up to 30,000+ Harford County residents, are located. APG currently owns and operates the Van Bibber drinking water plant for the

Edgewood Area and is responsible for sampling and reporting on drinking water consumed by on post personnel that originates from the Van Bibber plant and from potable wells on the Aberdeen & Edgewood sides of Post.

Sikes Act

APG’s Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) is based on a prescription area approach that divides the installation into 33 geographic regions based on watersheds and military mission. 58 projects were projected for the

2009‐2014 time period covered by the INRMP. Of these, 24 projects are in progress or have been completed. Successful implementation of this INRMP requires cooperation with GSOs and Garrison activities.

Toxic Substances

Control Act (TSCA)

Because so many buildings at APG are at least 50 years old, many renovation and demolition projects need lead and asbestos surveys before work can proceed.

There are still some transformers in service at APG containing PCBs and there are

PCB‐contaminated areas in Edgewood.

Table 2 Major APG Permits

Type of Permit Regulatory Authority Permit Number Number of Active Sources or Units Air, Title V Aberdeen CAA 24-025-00081 62 Air, Title V Edgewood CAA 24-025-00082 69

Air, Permits to Construct COMAR 26.11

Approximately 200 Permits-to-Construct 200

Bald Eagle Take Permit

Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, 50 CFR 22.28 MB-218582-0 Not applicable

Hazardous Waste Air Emissions RCRA Subtitle C

Organic Air Emissions Control

Permit MD3210021355 6 storage and treatment units

Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage

COMAR and RCRA Subtitle C CHS Permit A-190 9 storage and treatment units

Oil Operations COMAR 26.10 and

RCRA Subtitle I 2010-OPT-2010

626 ASTS and 52 USTS storing 2.8 million gallons of oil

Solid Waste RCRA Subtitle D

2013-RSC-09049

2 closed rubble landfills, one scrap tire collection facility

2014-RTH-00965

2011-GWD-2567

20149-GWD-3049

Storm Water General Discharge Permit related to Construction Activity (NPDES)

Annotated Code of Maryland, CWA Project Dependent 101

Storm Water Management and Sediment and Erosion Control

Annotated Code of Maryland Project Dependent 69

Water Appropriations CWA Project Dependent 27

Wetlands CWA Project Dependent Approximately 40 open permits

C.3.2.4 Types of Services

3.2.4.1 For Compliance Program Task Orders, the Individual task order PWS will contain objectives to achieve regulatory compliance pursuant to a specific Act, listed in Table 1, achieve compliance to specific permit, i.e. National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), RCRA A-190 Hazardous Waste Permit, and others listed in Table 2, or achieve compliance to a specific plan, e.g. landfill post-closure care plan. The Compliance Program has several categories as discussed below.

3.2.4.2 The first category includes, surveys, inventories, and investigations. Within this category are 2 further subsets of services based on whether or not a permit is driving the action.

3.2.4.3 The common level of services, regardless of the subset, includes but is not limited to:

data gathering (includes developing or updating an inventory of installation compliance sites, sampling, and sample analysis); develop management strategies or conceptual designs; prepare, review and update applications/modifications/renewals and prepare, review and update management plans such as Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan; legally required reports such as the EPCRA toxic release inventory; studies for meeting new or existing compliance sites.

C.3.2.5 Permits As specified in the individual task order, the contractor shall complete permit application, request for modification and closure under the areas of air, water quality, drinking water, solid and hazardous wastes, oil control and radioactive materials & waste management. Providing this service may require site visits, personnel interviews, data collection and analysis, draft and final documents, certification by a state registered professional engineer or geologist, and data entry into Army databases.

C.3.2.5.1 The contractor shall provide all data collection and documentation required for applying for, renewing, modifying, and terminating environmental construction and operational permits and registrations.

C.3.2.5.2 The contractor shall provide all sampling and analysis, modeling, pathway analysis and risk assessments as required in the permitting process or as specified in individual permits.

C.3.2.5.3 The contractor shall participate in or conduct public meetings as required for the permitting process.

C.3.2.5.4 The contractor shall create and update permit required management plans and reports in accordance specific task order.

C.3.2.5.5 The contractor shall provide support for facilitating the purchase, exchange, and management of air emissions reduction credits.

C.3.2.5.6 The contractor shall provide technical support of Army environmental staff in meetings with regulators.

C.3.2.6 Non-permit Compliance Services As specified in the individual task order, the contractor shall provide non-permit compliance services. The studies, reports, and plans that are required by Federal, state, regional, local, or Army Regulation, not related to an installation permit may require site visits, personnel interviews, data collection, and analysis, sample collection and analysis, draft and final documents, certification by a state-registered professional engineer or geologist, and data entry into Army data bases. Examples of the service are, but not limited to the following C.3.2.6.1 The contractor shall prepare, review, and update required surveys, inventories, reports, and plans, including air emissions inventories, Air Risk Management Plans, Wellhead Protection Plan, New Source review (air), Installation Spill Contingency plan/Spill Prevention Control Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan; Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan, Pest Management Plan, Consumer Confidence reports; National Environmental Policy Act and cumulative impacts tracking as applicable and required, Ozone Depleting Sources (ODS) inventory, regulated facility closure plans, Water system vulnerability assessment and emergency response plan, hazardous waste annual or biennial reports, Army and legally-mandated hazardous waste management and minimization plans.

C.3.2.6.2 The contractor shall complete EPCRA, hazardous substance and toxic chemical release reporting, including threshold evaluations, completing forms, and providing records.

C.3.2.6.3 The contractor shall provide technical expertise to implement and monitor environmental compliance impact mitigation specified in Army NEPA Records of Decision.

C.3.2.6.4 The Environmental Closure Liability (ECL) reporting. The Army must report annually its environmental liability from clean up and clean closure of environmental compliance sites such as permitted and non-permitted hazardous waste facilities, underground storage tanks, buildings with asbestos or PCBs, electroplating facilities, and others.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .