Past_Perfromance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 229 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV17R9997
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SUBJECT: Solicitation W56HZV-17-R-9997, Center for Military History, U.S. Army Women’s
Museum, Fort Lee, VA, Museum Exhibits Design and Build Services, Past Performance
Questionnaire
OFFEROR: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
MUSEUM DESIGN AND BUILD SERVICES SOLICITATION
1. The Center for Military History has a need for design and build services for the U.S.
Army Women’s Museum exhibits for Fort Lee, VA. The Unites States Army Contracting
Command- Warren (ACC-WRN) is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of possible contract award.
2. Offerors interested in quoting on this work have been requested to send the attached
Past Performance Questionnaire to points of contact on recent and relevant contracts as defined in provision 52.212-1 Addendum of the solicitation. In this regard, we are requesting your assistance in completing this questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror in the area of past performance. The attached questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion.
Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the contractor’s performance in each of the three areas of consideration in the gray boxes for the identified contract. Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcomed by our evaluation team. If a question on the questionnaire is not applicable, please so indicate. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate, and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.
3. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic mail to Roxanne
Dunn at roxanne.L.dunn.civ@mail.mil.
4. Please complete and submit the questionnaire by July 14, 2017. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Dawn M. VanHulle
Procurement Contracting Officer
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
UNITED STATES ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-WARREN
6501 EAST 11 MILE ROAD
WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000
June 15, 2017 mailto:roxanne.L.dunn.civ@mail.mil
Once Filled In, this document is considered
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid response to the following questions. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward it by electronic e-mail to Roxanne Dunn at roxanne.L.dunn.civ@mail.mil by July 14, 2017. Thank you for your assistance.
PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. RELEVANT CONTRACT
Prime Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract/Task Order Number:
Contract Award Date:
Contract Period of Performance End Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:
B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
mailto:roxanne.L.dunn.civ@mail.mil
PART II - EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS
Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.
Table 1
1. Quality of Exhibit Design:
Assess the quality and workmanship of the contractor’s museum exhibit design (e.g., {insert any specific things you want to consider when they provide the rating here).
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.
2. Project Schedule:
Assess the timeliness of contractor performance (e.g. design reviews, etc) and completion of the overall project. This assessment of the contractor’s adherence to the required performance schedule should include the contractor’s efforts that contributed, negatively or positively, to the project schedule.
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
3. Management / Business Relations:
Assess the efforts of contractor’s management and business relations during the performance of the effort. (i.e. timely identification of deficiencies, effective and timely corrective action plans, ability to provide sufficient contractor staffing, etc.)
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
4. General Comments.
Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.
PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .