EXHIBIT_C_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 51 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Household Appliances IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- W564KV-16-R-0004
About this file
EXHIBIT C - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SOLICITATION
United States Army Europe Appliances
(W564KV-16-R-0004)
This past performance evaluation is solicited in anticipation of a US government contract for United States Army Europe Appliances. Your input is critical to our efforts; it should take no more than 10 minutes of your time. Please be as detailed as possible.
Evaluated Firm:
Respondent Firm:
Name of Point of Contact:
Phone Number:
Email address:
Contract Number:
Period of Performance:
(Must be within the last three (3) years)
Brief Description of Effort:
| Question |
| Satisfactory |
Unsatisfactory
1. Rate the firm’s conformance to contract terms and conditions. Have there been any contract disputes/subsequent defaults? Did contractor perform contract objective?
Comments:
2. How would you rate the quality of the overall delivery service provided?? If not, please elaborate what steps were taken (if any) to rectify situation(s).
3. Would you contract with the contractor again? Yes, maybe, No (If no or maybe, please briefly state the primary reason)
RESPONSE PROVIDED BY:
(Organization, Individual Name, Title and Telephone #)
SIGNATURE
DATE
(End of Past Performance Questionnaire)
Meets All Some Miery Good, Above Average) Exceeds Some –
EVALUATION RATINGS DEFINITIONS
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| NOTE |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency reports, or letters).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .