W52P1J19R0017-0006.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0006 2020APR10

W52P1J

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - RI

ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-8000

BLDGS 60 & 62

LAURA K. SPENCER

EMAIL: LAURA.K.SPENCER2.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W52P1J-19-R-0017

2019DEC20

X

X 2020MAY01 12:00pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 17

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: LAURA K. SPENCER

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCRI-AR/(309)782-0295

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

The purpose of Amendment 0006 to Solicitation W52P1J-19-R-0017 is for the following:

1. Due to the current travel restriction and social distancing requirements resulting from COVID-19, Section L and M of the solicitation is being revised to remove the requirement for oral presentations and replace the requirement with written proposals for the Technical Approach Sub-factors.

2. Offerors who submitted a complete proposal on or before 10 March 2020 shall submit a revised Technical Approach sub-factor in accordance with the revised section L and M included in this amendment. At this time, Offerors shall not change or submit any other part of their proposal. Any proposal revisions other than the Technical Approach sub-factor will be rejected. This request for a written Tehnical Approach sub-factor proposal does not constitute the opening of Discussions.

3. Proposals from Offerors who did not submit a proposal on or before 10 March 2020 will not be accepted.

4. As a result of the above changes to Section L and Section M, written proposals shall be submitted no later than 12:00 PM CT on 18

May 2020.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0007 ***

2 17

W52P1J-19-R-0017

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

L.1.1 Introduction: This section contains general proposal submission instructions as well as specific proposal requirements for the demil, treatment and disposal of the following groups of Conventional Ammunition and the identified Contract Line Item Number (CLIN):

CLIN Group 1 - 20mm Cartridges:

CLIN 0103: A677, Cartridge (Ctg), 20mm Semi-Armor Piercing High Explosive Incendiary (SAPHEI), PGU-28/B Single Round

A919 and A953, Ctg, 20mm, High Explosive Incendiary (HEI), M56 Series

CLIN Group 2 - 40mm Cartridges:

CLIN 0203: B470 and B481, Ctg, 40mm, HE (High Explosive), M384 Series

B568 and B570, Ctg, 40mm, HE, M406 Series

B542, Ctg, 40mm HEDP, M430 Series

B546, Ctg, 40mm HEDP, M433 Series

CLIN Group 3 - Fuzes:

CLIN 0303: N335, Fuze, Point Detonating (PD), M557 Series with Booster

N340, Fuze, PD, M737 Series with Booster

N411, Fuze, Proximity (PROX), M514 Series

N412, Fuze, PROX, M513 Series

CLIN Group 4 - 4.2 Inch Mortar Cartridges:

CLIN 0403: C706, Ctg, 4.2 Inch, Illuminating (ILLUM), M335 Series

C707, Ctg, 4.2 Inch, Smoke Sulphur Trioxide Chlorosulphonic Acid Solution (Smoke) (FS) M2

C710, Ctg, 4.2 Inch 107mm, Tactical O-Chloro-Benzamalononitrile (Riot Control Agent) (CS), M630 Series

CLIN Group 5 - Flare / Illumination:

CLIN 0503: L410, Flare, Aircraft Countermeasure, M206 Series

L463, Flare, MJU-7A/B Series

L461, Flare, Infrared (IR), MJU-10/B Series

L434, Flare, IR Countermeasure, RR-119/AL Series

CLIN Group 6 - Hexachloroethane (HC) Smoke:

CLIN 0603: K865, Smoke Pot, HC, M1

K866, Smoke Pot, HC, ABC-M5

K867, Smoke Pot, Floating, HC, M4 Series

K873, Smoke Pot, Floating, AN-M7

K874, Smoke Pot, Ground Type, HC, MK3 Series

K876, Smoke Pot, Ground Type, HC, M2

CLIN 0604: C396, Canister, Smoke, HC, M1

D445, Canister, Smoke, HC M1

D450, Canister, Smoke, HC, M2

CLIN 0605: C452, C479, and C540, Ctg, 105mm Smoke, HC, M84 Series

CLIN 0606: D506 and D548, Proj, 155mm Smoke, HC, M116 Series

CLIN 0607: G930, Grenade, Hand Smoke, HC, AN-M8

H051, Launcher & Grenade, Smoke, HC, XM/M226 Series

CLIN Group 7 - Rocket Motors:

CLIN 0703: Standard Rocket Motors (V178) Rocket Motor (RM), MK27 MOD 3A, Explosive Loaded, DTRM (Dual Thruster Rocket Motor) with

Ignitor

Standard Rocket Motors (V279) RM, MK27 MOD 2, Explosive Loaded

Standard Rocket Motors (V878) DTRM 56 2

CLIN 0704: Standard Rocket Motors (V284) RM, MK 30 MOD 2, 2A, Explosive Loaded

Standard Rocket Motors (V923) RM, 30-4

MLRS Rocket Motors

CLIN 0705: Standard Rocket Motors (V298) RM, MK12 MOD 0/1, Explosive Loaded Booster

CLIN Group 8 - Cluster Munitions:

CLIN 0803: D561, Improved Conventional Munitions (ICMs) Projectile (PROJ), 155mm, HE, Antipersonnel (APER), M449 Series

D562, ICM PROJ, 155mm, HE, APER, M449 Series

D864, ICM PROJ, 155mm, M864, Extended Range (ER), Dual Purpose (DP)

CLIN 0804: Cluster Bomb Units (CBUs) will include the following:

EA56, Dispenser and Bomb, Aircraft CBU-99B/B Rockeye

3 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

E819, Dispenser and Bomb, CBU-MK 20 MOD 4

E838, Dispenser and Bomb, Aircraft CBU-MK 20 MOD 6

E916, Dispenser and Bomb, CBU-99/B

E917, Dispenser and Bomb, CBU-99A/B

E918, Dispenser and Bomb, CBU-100/B

E173, Dispenser and Bomb, Aircraft CBU MK 20 MOD 2

CLIN 0805: MLRS Warheads

L.1.1.a. Offerors will have the opportunity to compete for a single Group or multiple Groups contained in this solicitation. The offeror shall be able to meet the requirements for all CLINs included in the group it is providing a proposal. Each CLIN is listed in Section B of this solicitation.

L.1.1.b. Additional details regarding these assets can be found in the GFM Asset List (Attachment 0003) and in the available technical information.

L.1.2. Each proposal shall contain the offerors best terms for award of a contract under the solicitation. Proposals shall be specific, complete and address each of the designated requirements listed below. Failure to provide the required information/documentation in response to these instructions may result in your proposal being rejected.

L.1.2.a. Offerors are responsible for confirming with the Contracting Officer and/or Contract Specialist to ensure that the proposal submitted has, in fact, been received by the Contracting Officer and/or Contract Specialist. This must be done by the date/time set forth in the solicitation for receipt of offers.

L.1.2.b. The U.S. Government anticipates awarding up to two Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts for each CLIN Group as a result of this solicitation. Offerors will have the opportunity to compete for a single group, all the groups, or a combination of groups contained in the solicitation. Each item is listed in Section B of the solicitation as a separate CLIN. The offeror shall submit a separate proposal for each CLIN Group to include all evaluation factors

(Technical, Past Performance, Small Business and Price). Each proposal received will be evaluated separately.

L.1.2.c. The offeror(s) whose proposal provides the overall best value to the U.S. Government, considering both non-price and price factors, will be awarded an IDIQ contract and will have the opportunity to compete for demil requirements during the period of the contract. Although the U.S. Government anticipates award of up to two IDIQ contracts per group, the U.S.

Government reserves the right to make a single award, per CLIN Group, if it is determined to be in the best interest of the U.S. Government.

L.1.2.d. The U.S. Government intends to include a small business reserve for CLIN Group 1 which includes the 20mm

Cartridge family. This reserve is intended to ensure a minimum of one small business award is made for this group. Award will be made to at least one small business for this CLIN Group as long as there is a small business that is determined to be within the competitive range. If there is more than one small business in the competitive range, the first award will be made to the small business that offers the best value to the U.S. Government. The second award can be made to a small business or large business; award would be determined by who offers the best value to the U.S. Government.

L.1.2.e. If an offeror receives multiple group awards, they will receive one contract that contains all awarded groups.

At the time of contract award, each successful offeror will be awarded the first delivery order to include the Minimum

Guaranteed Quantity (MGQ) per CLIN Group. The MGQ is as follows:

748,943 Each - CLIN Group 1, 20mm Cartridges

264,008 Each - CLIN Group 2, 40mm Cartridges

334,367 Each - CLIN Group 3, Fuzes

9,696 Each - CLIN Group 4, 4.2 inch Mortar Cartridges

455,338 Each - CLIN Group 5, Flares/Illumination

116,643 Each - CLIN Group 6, Hexachloroethane Smoke

1,397 Each - CLIN Group 7, Rocket Motors

49,900 Each - CLIN Group 8, Cluster Munitions

L.1.2.f. Each offeror shall provide the information as required by this solicitation (including attachments and exhibits) in the proper format. Proposals must contain all information as required by the solicitation and should be put into the format as described herein. Proposals that do not contain all of the information requested in the solicitation risk being determined unacceptable by the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government will not assume the offeror possesses any capability, understanding, or commitment not specified in the proposal.

L.1.2.g. The proposal must not merely repeat the solicitation requirements, but rather must provide documentary evidence explaining how contract requirements will be met. Offeror merely repeating the solicitation requirements may result in the

Government determining the proposal unacceptable.

4 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.1.2.h. Offerors should note the provisions at FAR 52.215-1, Alt 1 "Instructions To Offerors - Competitive Acquisition".

The U.S. Government intends to award the contract(s) resulting from this RFP with discussions with offerors. Offerors shall ensure its initial proposals contain the best terms and that proposals are complete, including all fill-ins and blanks. The

U.S. Government does reserve the right to not conduct discussions if determined not necessary, by the Contracting Officer, and in the best interest of the U.S. Government.

L.1.2.i. If discussions are conducted, offerors within the competitive range will be asked to respond to all Evaluation

Notices (ENs). Responses to ENs will be in narrative form along with the affected proposal pages with the necessary changes. Once all ENs have been answered, and the Contracting Officer determines it's appropriate to close discussions, the Contracting Officer will request Final Proposal Revisions (FPRs). If FPRs are requested by the Contracting Officer, offerors may revise any portion of the proposal if they choose and include them in the FPR.

L.1.2.j. The Offeror shall enter ceiling unit prices for all CLINs for each Ordering Periods for each CLIN Group they are proposing on the Price Evaluation Spreadsheet (Attachment 0001) for each CLIN Group they are proposing on. Failure to completely fill out the Price Evaluation Spreadsheet for each CLIN Group may result in the proposal being determined unacceptable. All unit prices proposed for each Ordering Period will be evaluated and binding. The ceiling prices will establish not to exceed prices for the demil items during the delivery order phase. The U.S. Government reserves the right to require the submission of data (i.e. certified cost or pricing data) necessary to validate the reasonableness of a proposal.

L.1.3. The Offeror shall enter Firm Fixed Unit Prices for the MGQ for each CLIN Group they wish to propose on in Attachment

0001, Price Evaluation Spreadsheet.

L.1.4. All questions concerning this procurement, either technical or contractual must be submitted in writing to the

Contracting Officer and/or Contract Specialist. No direct discussion between the technical representative and a prospective offeror shall be conducted. Questions shall be sent to the following points of contact: Bridget Kramer, Contracting Officer

(Bridget.L.Kramer.civ@mail.mil) and Laura Spencer, Contract Specialist (Laura.K.Spencer2.civ@mail.mil).

L.1.5. Proposals shall be submitted electronically to Bridget.L.Kramer.civ@mail.mil and Laura.K.Spencer2.civ@mail.mil. Due to file size restrictions, proposals may be submitted through DOD Secure Access file Exchange (SAFE),: //safe.apps.mil/.

L.1.6. Oral Presentations: As of 01 April 2020 this section has been deleted.

L.1.7. As of 01 April 2020 this section has been deleted.

L.1.8. Process and Facilities: As of 01 April 2020 this section has been deleted.

L.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

L.2.1. The proposal shall be submitted in the English language and include all of the following:

L.2.1.a. One completed signed electronic copy of the complete solicitation, Standard Form 33 (SF 33) and continuation sheets (Section A through M) and acknowledgement of all amendments. The solicitation and all applicable amendments must be signed by an individual authorized to bind the offeror.

L.2.1.b. Offeror must submit a completed Price Evaluation Spreadsheet for each CLIN Group as stated in Section L.3.11.

L.2.1.c. Offerors are directed to thoroughly read the solicitation and fill in information on appropriate clauses as stated in the solicitation. Specifically, the following clauses

/ attachments, which require fill-in information, but are not limited to:

-Attachment 0001 Price Evaluation Spreadsheet

-Attachment 0003 Government Furnished Material (GFM) Listing

-Attachment 0004 Past performance Questionnaire

-Attachment 0005 Small Business Participation Plan

-FAR 52.219-28 Post-award Small Business Program Representation

-DFARS 252.223-7001 Hazard Warning Labels

-FAR 52.223-3 Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data

-FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications

-DFARS 252.204-7007 Alternate A, Annual Representations and Certifications

-FAR 52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters

-H-4 - Place of Contract Shipping Point, Rail Information

L.2.1.d. For any fill-ins that are not applicable, the offeror must acknowledge by indicating N/A.

5 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.2.1.e. The offeror's proposal shall include computation for use of Government-Owned Property, if applicable as stated in Section L.3.11.e.

L.2.1.f. The proposal volumes, as reflected in L.2.2, shall be compiled using the Portable Document Format (.pdf) unless otherwise specified. Proposal volumes shall be submitted via email/electronic file transfer to the

Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist.

L.2.1.g. As a requirement under this solicitation, all offerors must submit Representations/Certifications data into the System for Award Management (SAM) Database at https://www.sam.gov/ . The purpose of electronic

Representations and Certifications is to provide all offerors with a portal in which to submit Reps/Certs in a publicly accessible format, nullifying the requirement to submit identical information in response to each and every Federal contract solicitation. Any offeror that has previously submitted Representations/Certified data into

SAM are reminded to update the data prior to submitting with the proposal and shall ensure its records are not expired.

L.2.1.h. The Offerors proposal shall be made valid for 180 days after the close of the RFP instead of the 60 days as stated on page one of this solicitation, block 12.

L.2.2. Proposal Submission Format

L.2.2.a. Proposal Structure: Each proposal shall be submitted in separate parts as set forth below:

L.2.2.a.1. Volume 1 Technical Proposal.

Sub-factor 1 - Technical Approach* (Written Proposal) (maximum 35 written pages per CLIN Group)

Sub-factor 2 - Safety (maximum 10 written pages)

Sub-factor 3 - Environmental (maximum 10 written pages)

Sub-factor 4 - Security (maximum 10 written pages)

Sub-factor 5 - Program Management (maximum 15 written pages)

* The offeror shall include a separate technical approach for EACH CLIN Group for which they are providing a proposal. If any of the remaining sub- factors/volumes differ between CLIN Groups the offeror shall make a very clear notation as to which CLIN it applies.

L.2.2.a.2. Volume 2 Past Performance Information

Cover Page Solicitation Number, Offeror Name, CAGE, and DUNS one page

Section 1 Contract References - Up to three references using the PPQ Form. Offerors shall complete sections IIA and IIB only.

Section 2 Relevant Delivery and Quality Performance Narratives Limited to two pages maximum for each contract reference

Section 3 Adverse Contract Performance - No page limitations

L.2.2.a.3. Volume 3 Price Proposal. The Price Factor shall be contained in a separate file from the non-price factors.

The Price Evaluation Spreadsheet shall be submitted electronically in MS Excel format. Unit prices shall be limited to two decimal places. No page limitation.

L.2.2.a.4. Volume 4 Small Business Participation. Maximum page allowance is 10 pages. Page limit excludes copies of

Individual Subcontracting Reports.

L.2.2.a.5 Volume 5 One signed copy of the cover page of the solicitation, Standard Form 33, and a signed acknowledgement of all amendments. Acknowledgements of all amendments to the solicitation and all continuation sheets are to be filled in as directed. Failure to sign or acknowledge all material amendments will result in the offer not being evaluated that it will not be considered for award.

L.2.3. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified to include the complete company name, date and solicitation number in the header and/or footer.

L.2.4. Submission Media and Format: As of 01 April 2020 this section has been deleted.

L.2.5 Written Proposal Format Limitations:

6 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.2.5.a. Each volume shall be as brief as possible. Pages shall not exceed 8- 1/2 inches in width by 11 inches in length;

flow diagrams and tables may exceed 8-1/2 inches in width by 11 inches in length. The font used shall not be less than 12 point. (Font smaller than 12 point is ONLY acceptable in graphics, sketches, tables, charts, price matrix, etc. but must be readable without magnification).

L.2.5.b. The offeror is responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of the proposal. Offerors shall provide a proposal that, at a minimum, addresses those evaluation Factors and Sub- factors required in Section L of the RFP. Each proposal shall address the requirements of Section C.

L.3. GENERAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL INFORMATION:

L.3.1. Each detailed proposal shall demonstrate a clear understanding and ability to comply with the requirements of the solicitation for the demilitarization of the CLIN Groups for which the offeror is providing a proposal.

L.3.2. The U.S. Governments review of the contractors technical proposal, any of its standard operating procedures, or any of its other technical documentation is intended to ensure only that the contractor has the technical ability to perform the contract. This review is not intended to be a warranty that the contractors plans, operations, etc., have met all required health, safety, security, and environmental laws and regulations. It remains the contractors responsibility to ensure compliance with all requirements of law and regulation, including, to the extent applicable, OSHA requirements. Additionally, as the U.S. Government does not create the actual working conditions, the U.S. Government assumes no responsibility for compliance with any such health, safety, security, and environmental laws and regulations.

L.3.3. Technical Approach Sub-factor (written proposal):

L.3.3.a. The Offeror shall submit separate proposals for each CLIN Group it chooses to be considered for an award.

L.3.3.b. The offerors proposal shall include the following:

L.3.3.b.1. Detailed description of the demilitarization and disposal process including facilitization, permitting and operations that demonstrate understanding of the critical operations and support requirements of demil of the proposed CLIN it wishes to provide a proposal for. The offeror shall identify in Attachment 0003, GFM Asset List, the place of performance for each CLIN Group.

L.3.3.b.2. Detailed description of storage capacity and monthly demil rate that identifies the storage and demil capacity the offeror has for the proposed CLIN. The offeror shall identify all major/key subcontractors, which is defined as those that provide critical demil services or whose subcontract is for any portion of the proposed price of the associated CLIN. Critical demil services is limited to energetic, sensitive components or hazardous waste stream materials.

L.3.3.b.3. Specific plan for the anticipated residual and/or unsalvageable material that includes identification of all waste streams for the proposed CLIN Group.

L.3.3.b.4. The offeror shall provide a detailed description of its approach for meeting the Quality requirements as defined in the solicitation. Offeror shall provide identification of its Quality Management

System (QMS) to be used and shall specify state whether or not it is certified or equivalent with Industry

Standards, such as ISO 9001, or equivalent system acceptable to the U.S. Government. Describe the system in sufficient detail to determine its suitability for use in performing the resultant contract, particularly if it is an equivalent system. Provide proof of certification, if any.

L.3.4. Safety Sub-factor (written proposal):

The offeror shall submit a detailed description of its Safety Site Plan demonstrating understanding and compliance with the applicable contractual and regulatory safety requirements including but not limited to the current DOD 4145.26 M

(including International, Federal, State, and Local regulatory guidance) for the proposed CLINs, which is consistent with the proposed technical approach. Offeror shall identify Safety Person(s), indicating qualifications and experience

(to include relative to ammunition and explosives (AE)). Offeror shall identify safety and AE-related training planned or completed consistent with the technical approach.

L.3.5. Environmental Sub-factor (written proposal):

The offeror shall submit a plan demonstrating its ability to comply with all International, Federal, State, and Local environmental regulations applicable to the chosen demil process, as well as an approach for managing all hazardous and non-hazardous waste streams generated during the demil operations. The offeror will identify the treatment, storage, and/or disposal of those waste streams, and indicate the permits(s) and/or licenses(s) required to be in place at the

7 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

start of the demil process. The offeror shall provide evidence that all environmental permits e.g., EPA identification number, needed for this proposed demil process are in place and that the facilities are in place to begin performance of the demilitarization. If an offeror does not have the necessary permits in place or an amendment to the existing EPA permit is required, the offeror shall include the details and associated time frames needed in order to have all necessary permits. If the offeror does not have the necessary facilities in place or modification is required, the offeror shall include the details and associated time frames needed in order to have all necessary facilities in place.

The plan shall also include regulatory required employee environmental training.

L.3.6. Security Sub-factor (written proposal):

The offeror shall submit a proposal demonstrating understanding and compliance with DOD 5100.76 M, Physical Security of

Sensitive Conventional Arms, Ammunition, and Explosives (AA&E), for storage areas, accountability procedures, demil areas and security expertise in performing demil operations or other related expertise, consistent with the proposed technical approach.

L.3.7. Program Management Sub-factor (written proposal):

L.3.7.a. The offeror shall submit an Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) with its Program

Management Plan submittal. Information provided for the IMP and IMS are required to address only the MGQ.

L.3.7.b. The offeror shall submit the following:

L.3.7.b.1. IMP describing the offeror's overall program management approach for implementation on this contract to meet all requirements. The IMP shall provide details for planning, establishing, and implementing all processes the offeror intends to use in managing the Conventional Ammo Demil program from contract award through final disposition of the MGQ.

L.3.7.b.2. IMS which identifies milestones and events described in the IMP and supported by the Technical

Proposal. The IMS shall be provided in MS Project format with milestones and events for the demil and final disposition of the MGQ, using contract award as the start date and highlighting the critical path. 01 September

2020 shall be used for estimated contract award date. The proposal shall include a description of tasks on the

IMS. IMS shall include all major/key subcontractor schedules. IMS shall clearly illustrate the interdependencies of all events, milestones, and activities. It shall also include a narrative of critical path and any unusual program aspects affecting it. The IMS is required to be submitted in Adobe .pdf and Microsoft Project format and shall be no larger than 11 inch x 17 inch printed.

L.3.7.b.3. A description of the organizational structure, requisite disciplines and responsibilities, experience, and expertise, which will be utilized to accomplish the contract. The description must clearly define the relationship between the program and higher-level management, reporting responsibilities, lines of authority, and the communication processes. The proposal shall describe the relationship between the program organization and all major/key subcontractors and suppliers as well as describe in detail the method or process for communicating with the U.S. Government team. Additionally, the proposal shall describe how technical and quality requirements will be identified.

L.3.7.b.4. A description of the proposed Risk Management Plan (RMP) shall be provided which identifies programmatic risks, to include cost, schedule, technical risk and mitigation strategies. The RMP shall address how the offeror will continuously update and review its risk management/mitigation process throughout the life of the contract. The RMP shall describe how risks are identified, mitigated, and managed. It shall include what the

Offeror considers to be significant risk areas and its plans for mitigating that risk.

L.3.8. Volume 2 Past Performance:

L.3.8.a. Past performance information is evaluated as a predictor of future contract performance. The U.S. Government will assess the degree of confidence it has that the offeror will successfully complete the requirements in accordance with the contract terms based on the offeror's demonstrated record of recent, relevant performance. Past Performance evaluation will be completed for each CLIN Group not each individual CLIN.

L.3.8.b. Contract References

L.3.8.b.1. The Offeror shall submit no more than three contract references with its proposal representing recent and relevant performance under U.S. Army, United States Marine Corp and FMS or other Military contracts. It is recommended that Offerors limit references to those involving its performance as a prime contractor only.

L.3.8.b.2. Recent projects/contracts are defined as prime contracts, task orders, delivery orders, or subcontracts where services or deliverables were performed or are still being performed anytime within three

8 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

years of issuance of this RFP. The U.S. Government reserves the right to consider any significant past performance after the solicitation closing date and prior to award.

L.3.8.b.3. Relevant means performance demonstrates the work efforts performed by the Offeror or its proposed subcontractors involving the same or similar manufacturing processes and quality assurance processes needed for demilitarization and disposal of energetic munitions or munitions constituents that are the same or similar in scope, complexity, and magnitude as described in the solicitation. The degree to which contracts are of comparable complexity, size or value to the proposed effort may also be considered in determining a level of relevance.

L.3.8.b.4. References that include open burning or open detonation of ammunition demilitarization are not relevant to this solicitation and shall not be submitted as a reference.

L.3.8.b.5. References provided on classified contracts cannot be verified and will not be evaluated. Recent contracts to foreign entities will only be evaluated when a U.S. Government Point of Contact (POC) is provided with phone and email.

L.3.8.b.6. It is recommended that the offeror limit references to those involving performance as a prime contractor or first tier subcontractor.

L.3.8.b.7. Letters of Consent: The offeror shall include a written Letter of Consent from each of its proposed

JVs, partnerships, and major subcontractors that allows the U.S. Government to discuss the JV's, partnerships, or major subcontractors past performance findings during evaluations with the offeror.

L.3.8.c. Past Performance Questionnaire

L.3.8.c.1. The information which shall be provided with each contract reference is located on the Past

Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), Attachment 0004. The offeror must complete PPQ Sections IIA and IIB for each contract reference and send copies of the PPQ to the respondent(s) POC, as identified in IIA, in a timely manner. The offeror shall include these documents in Volume 2, Section 2 of the proposal. The PPQ respondent(s) will send the completed questionnaire directly to the U.S. Government POC as shown in Section IV of the PPQ.

L.3.8.c.2. To ensure inclusion of all references in the evaluation process, the Offeror is encouraged to provide the U.S. Government with the most current data and POC information on each reference of the PPQ.

L.3.8.c.3. The U.S. Government is not required to interview any POCs identified by Offerors. The U.S. Government reserves the right to use data provided in the Offerors proposal and data obtained from other sources.

L.3.9. Relevant Delivery and Quality Performance Narratives:

The offeror shall provide a descriptive narrative of each submitted contract reference that describes the objectives of the contracted work effort detailing how the efforts are relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. The narrative description shall not exceed the two-page maximum for each contract reference.

L.3.10. Adverse Performance on Contracts with the U.S. Government

L.3.10.a. In addition to the contract references, the offeror shall identify every recent and relevant contract it was awarded that encountered any performance problems related to the demilitarization of ammunition. This includes every recent contract that was terminated for default or cause, in whole or in part within the past three years of issuance of this solicitation. For any contract falling under these descriptions, the offeror shall provide the following information:

i. Contract number and Order number, if applicable

ii. Point of contact to include; email addresses and telephone number

iii. Provide a copy of any Contract Deficiency Report (CDR) or Quality Deficiency Report (QDR)

iv. State any corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence

v. Describe the extent to which the corrective action has been successful, identifying points of contact who can confirm the success of the corrective measures

vi. Federal Legal Settlements or Fines. The offeror shall identify any DoD, Federal, or state settlements resulting from a legal action or legal decision (example OSHA, EPA, state, other)

vii. Cage code / DUNS

viii. U.S. Government Contracting Activity, address, telephone number

ix. Contracting Officer's name, telephone number and email

x. Contracting Officer Representative name, telephone number and email

xi. Contract type (i.e. FFP, CPFF etc.)

xii. Award Price

9 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

xiii. Final or projected final price

xiv. Major/Key Subcontractors who performed >25% of the award

L.3.10.b. The number of contracts and page counts provided in response to L.3.10.a is unlimited. If there are no contracts meeting the descriptions above, the offeror must state as such. Failure to include this information or a statement may be a cause for rejection of an offeror's proposal as incomplete.

L.3.11. Volume 3 Price:

L.3.11.a. The offeror shall complete the Price Evaluation Spreadsheet at Attachment 0001 in order to be considered for award. There is a separate tab included for each CLIN Group, the offeror shall ensure to complete each tab entirely for the group it is proposing.

L.3.11.b. The U.S. Government reserves the right to require submission of data other than certified cost or pricing data or certified cost and pricing data from the offeror that is adequate to determine the reasonableness of a proposal (See FAR

15.403-3).

L.3.11.c. The offeror shall propose ceiling unit prices (excluding transportation) for all quantity ranges for all Ordering

Periods for each CLIN Group they are providing a proposal for, on the Price Evaluation Spreadsheet. The ceiling prices will establish not to exceed prices for the CAD items during the delivery order phase. Unit prices shall be limited to two decimal places. No transportation costs should be included in the unit prices, as the U.S. Government will ship the assets to the contractors identified place of performance.

L.3.11.d. Offerors shall complete the Minimum Guarantee Quantity (MGQ) portion included on the Price Evaluation Spreadsheet included at Attachment 0001. The offeror shall propose a firm fixed unit price for the MGQ.

L.3.11.e. If an offeror plans to use any item of U.S. Government property in the possession of the offeror or its proposed subcontractors, for any performance resulting from this solicitation, the offeror shall submit the required information contained in contract clause 52.245-9, Uses and Charges. The offeror shall provide a Microsoft Excel file complete with supporting information that details the calculation of the evaluation factor. The MS Excel file shall contain functioning formulas. For the purpose of identifying the kinds and quantities of property and the rental time, the offeror shall base its estimate on the maximum estimated quantity for each Ordering Period for all five-Ordering Periods. Although FAR 52.245-

9(e) and the clause located in Section L entitled Submission Requirements for Use of Government-Owned Property require the offeror to calculate the rental evaluation factor, the U.S. Government reserves the right to make corrections as needed.

L.3.12. Volume 4 Small Business Participation:

L.3.12.a. The Offeror shall provide a separate Small Business Participation proposal for each CLIN Group in intends to propose on. The Total Contract Value shall match the value in the cell titled "CLIN Group # Small Business Total

Contract Value" on the Attachment 0001 Price Evaluation Spreadsheet for the specific CLIN Group being proposed.

The Offeror shall demonstrate small business participation by detailing its proposed approach to meet the requirements under this factor by addressing the following two areas in its Small Business Participation proposal:

L.3.12.a.1. Proposed Small Business Participation Plan in performance of the potential contract (applies to both

Other Than Small Businesses and Small Businesses)

L.3.12.a.2. Commitment to Small Business

i. Payment Procedures (applies to both Other Than Small Businesses and Small Businesses)

ii. Compliance with Small Business Subcontracting Plans (applies to Other Than Small Businesses only)

L.3.12.b. Proposed Small Business Participation Plan

L.3.12.b.1. The Offeror shall complete the Small Business Participation Plan Attachment 0005 to show maximum practicable opportunities to small businesses to compete on this requirement in accordance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns.

L.3.12.c. Commitment to Small Business

L.3.12.c.1. The Offeror shall include a written statement of its established procedures to ensure timely payments to small business subcontractors in accordance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (for those contracts under which it was required within the past three years from the closing date of this solicitation). If not required in any recent contracts, the Offeror shall so state.

10 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.3.12.b.2. Note: For Other than Small Businesses ONLY Compliance with terms and conditions of FAR 52.219-9, Small

Business Subcontracting Plan (if required on recent contracts). The Other than Small Business Offeror shall provide three Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for recent contracts (within the past three years from the closing date of this solicitation) that included a subcontracting plan. If not required in any recent contracts, the

Offeror shall so state. If the Offeror has less than three recent contracts, the Offeror shall provide the most recent ISR for each contract it has, and state that the Offeror does not have three recent contracts.

*** END OF NARRATIVE L0003 ***

11 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide complete and thorough explanations for each factor/sub-factor as required by Section

L for each CLIN included in its proposal. Each factor/sub-factor is required with the initial proposal, and the U.S. Government is not obligated to make another request for the required information. Performance or capabilities proposed that exceed mandatory minimum requirements may be incorporated into the contract IAW FAR 15.306(d)(4).

M.1. BASIS FOR AWARD:

M.1.a.The U.S. Government will evaluate proposals submitted in accordance with this section and will make a determination considering the following factors: Technical, Past Performance, Price, and Small Business Participation. Best Value Tradeoff

Processes in accordance with FAR 15.101-1 Alt 1 will be utilized to select the successful offeror(s). Award will be made to the offeror(s) that provides the best value to the U.S. Government considering the evaluation criteria stated herein.

M.1.b. The U.S. Government anticipates awarding up to two IDIQ contracts per each CLIN Group as a result of this solicitation. The offeror(s) whose proposal provides the best value to the U.S. Government, considering both price and non-price factors will be awarded an IDIQ contract. However, the U.S. Government reserves the right to make one award if its determined to be in the best interest of the Government.

M.1.c. The U.S. Government intends to include a small business reserve for CLIN Group 1, which includes the 20mm Cartridge family.

This reserve is intended to ensure a minimum of one small business award is made for this group. Award will be made to at least one small business for this CLIN Group as long as there is a small business that is determined to be within the competitive range. If there is more than one small business in the competitive range, the first award will be made to the small business that offers the best value to the U.S. Government. The second award can be made to a small business or large business; award would be determined by who offers the best value to the U.S. Government.

M.1.d. The U.S. Government will evaluate each proposal strictly in accordance with Section M.

M.1.e. Subsequent delivery orders for each group will be competed between all of the contractors that have been awarded an IDIQ contract for that CLIN Group. It is the U.S. Governments intent to award IDIQs to up to two independent offerors per group in order to reduce the risk of a single point of failure, enhance competition, and allow flexibility in executing delivery orders.

M.1.1. Discussions:

M.1.1.a. The U.S. Government intends to award the resultant contract(s) with discussions. The Contracting Officer may contact

Offerors for clarification, as described in FAR 15.306(a) and FAR 52.215-1, Alt 1 without opening discussions. However, the U.S.

Government reserves the right to not conduct discussions if determined not necessary by the Contracting Officer.

M.1.1.b. If the Contracting Officer determines discussions are necessary, they will be held in accordance with FAR 15.306.

M.1.2. Other Evaluation Considerations:

M.1.2.a. Proposals that are unreasonable in terms of technical or schedule commitments or contain unbalanced prices, may be considered an indication of a lack of understanding of the complexity and risk in the contract requirements and may be determined unacceptable.

M.1.2.b. Pursuant to FAR 9.103, contracts will only be awarded to offerors that the Contracting Officer determines to be responsible. Separate from the Best Value source selection criteria, offerors must be able to demonstrate that they meet the standards of responsibility set forth in FAR 9.104. To assist in the Contracting Officers determination of Contractor

Responsibility, the U.S. Government may conduct a pre-award survey IAW DFARS 223.370 on any offerors considered for award.

M.1.2.c. If information pertaining to one factor is included in the wrong factor it will not be evaluated. For example, if technical information is included in the price factor, it will not be evaluated.

M.1.3 Order of Importance:

M.1.3.a. Technical is the most important factor and is more important than the other factors when combined. Price is the next most important factor. Past Performance is more important than Small Business Participation. The evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are significantly more important than price.

M.1.3.b. Although price is not the most important factor, it could become a controlling factor if proposals under the non-price factors are determined to be relatively equal. The U.S. Government reserves the right to make an award to other than the offeror who submits the lowest overall evaluated price, using a Best Value trade-off analysis method of procurement.

12 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

M.1.3.c. The U.S. Government will evaluate the technical proposal to determine if the offeror demonstrates a clear understanding and ability to comply with the requirements of this solicitation. The U.S. Government will also evaluate the Offerors ability to meet the requirements schedule, based on production rates, facilities, and availability.

M.1.3.d. The Technical sub-factors will each receive a rating by the technical evaluation team that will aid in determining the final overall technical rating. These evaluations will be consolidated into one overall technical rating. The following combined

Technical/Risk Rating definitions will be utilized in the evaluation of the Technical Factor and Sub-factors:

Outstanding (Blue): Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good (Purple): Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable (Green): Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal (Yellow): Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable (Red): Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

M.1.3.e. The following definitions apply to the evaluation of the Offerors Technical factor (and sub-factors) as follows:

i. Risk is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an

Offerors proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or sub-factor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased U.S. Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

ii. Uncertainty is any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offer is unclear (e.g. more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

iii. Deficiency is a material failure of a proposal to meet a U.S. Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

iv. Weakness means a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

v. Significant Weakness in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See

FAR 15.001.

vi. Strength is an aspect of an Offerors proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the U.S. Government during contract performance.

M.1.3.f. An offeror who receives an Unacceptable rating in Technical, Small Business, No Confidence in Past Performance, or its proposal prices cannot be determined fair and reasonable, will not be considered for award.

M.2. Technical:

M.2.1. The Technical factor is comprised of five sub-factors: (a) Technical Approach, (b) Safety, (c) Environmental, (d) Security, and

(e) Program Management. Technical Approach is the most important sub-factor. Safety, Environmental, Security, and Program Management are equally important.

M.2.2. The U.S. Government will evaluate the technical proposal to determine if the offeror demonstrates a clear understanding and ability to comply with the requirements of this solicitation. Overall, the proposal shall demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the critical operations and support requirements of the demil process. If any Technical sub-factor is assigned a Red/Unacceptable rating, the overall Technical factor rating will be Red/Unacceptable.

M.2.3. Technical Approach Sub-factor (written proposal):

M.2.3.a. The U.S. Government will evaluate the detailed description of the offerors demilitarization and disposal process including facilitization, permitting, and operations for its capabilities and understanding of the critical operations and support requirements of the demil process. The place of performance for each CLIN is specified.

13 17

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

M.2.3.b. Demonstration that the offeror has the storage capability and monthly demilitarization rate capable to meet the demilitarization schedule. Offeror identified all key/major subcontractors.