Att_0005_-_Data_Items_Descriptions_(DIDS)_Index.docx

Attachment 0005

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION (DID) INDEX

For PA161 and PA103A2 Metal Containers and Covers

W15QKN-19-R-0008

CDRL

Number

DID

Number

A001

29 Nov 06

A002

DI-MGMT-80004A

Management Plan 30 Oct 06

Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes 20 Nov 95

25 Feb 14

Report (FACAR) 28 Mar 12

A006

07 Sep 89

Engineering Change Proposal 28 Feb 13

Notice of Revision (NOR)

Test/Inspection Report 24 Jan 97

Accident/Incident Report 02 Jun 98

DI-QCIC-81722 (Quality Program Plan).pdf

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Title: Quality Program Plan (QPP)

Number: DI-QCIC-81722 Approval Date: 29 NOV 2006 AMSC Number: 7676 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: NS/I5223 Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/Relationship:

The Quality Program Plan (QPP) describes the methodology that will be used to meet the quality requirements needed for the specific program. The object of the plan is to define and document what, where, and how to procure, fabricate, assemble, inspect, test and deliver only units and other end products that conform to quality standards. The QPP should start with the contractor’s standard quality system and detail changes to that. The QPP shall be used to verify attainability of contract objectives in the area of producing reliable, quality products. This DID is applicable to development, low rate initial production and full rate production efforts.

a. This DID contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific requirement delineated in the contract and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001, Quality Management Systems – Requirements (Entire Document).

b. The prime contractor is required to include information from significant suppliers (eg, PWAs) or teammates regarding their standard quality system requirements and any deviations specific to this program.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents: The applicable issue of the documents herein, including, their approval dates and the dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in the current issue of the DODISS at the time of the solicitation; or, for non DODISS-listed documents, as stated herein. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001 Quality Management Systems – Requirements, current edition, is available at International Organization for Standardization website http://www.iso.org/iso/en/ISOOnline.frontpage.

2. Format: Contractor format is acceptable using 8 ½ x 11 in. paper.

3. Content:

3.1 The data item shall have a Title page containing the following information as a minimum:

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T12:39Z

Check the source to verify that this is the current version before use.

DI-QCIC-81722

3.1.1 Title

3.1.2 CDRL exhibit number

3.1.3 Revision level

3.1.4 Approval/submission

3.1.5 Date

3.1.6 Program name

3.1.7 Contract number

3.1.8 Contractor’s name and address

3.1.9 Data item author

3.1.10 Signature

3.1.11 Approval record

3.2 The data item shall have a table of contents if the length of the document warrants.

3.3 The data item shall have a revision status log page which includes the various revision levels, dates, and summary description of the changes made.

3.4 The QPP shall reference any Industry standard for which the contractor has a current certification. The plan shall reference the contractor’s current Quality Manual, number or identification, and date. The plan shall then detail any changes, deletions or additions to the contractor’s standard requirements, and shall delineate the specific Industry workmanship standards and levels for soldering, printed wiring assembly, etc, that are to be applied to the program. The government shall concur in use of any standard repair procedures and conditions for use on the program.

3.5 The QPP shall include an organizational chart identifying the Product Assurance (PA) organization, names and titles of key PA personnel assigned to the program, and how the PA organization relates to the corporate structure.

3.6 The QPP shall include a proposed end item product flow including test & inspection points. The plan shall briefly address the following topics if different from or not included in the quality manual: quality audit frequency, depth, and independence; process certification and control of automated processes; “cannot duplicate” (CND) and nonconforming material processes; incoming inspection/test, certified supplier program and parts control; and any unique requirements for the program.

4. END OF DI-QCIC-81722

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T12:39Z image3.emf

DI-MGMT-80004 (Management Plan).pdf

Title: Management Plan

Number: DI-MGMT-80004A Approval Date: 30 OCT 2006 AMSC Number: 7621 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: NS/DA02 Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: The management plan describes the contractor’s organization, assignment of functions, duties, and responsibilities, management procedures and policies, and reporting requirements for the conduct of contractually-imposed tasks, projects, or programs.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement as delineated in the contract.

This DID may be applied in any contract or program phase where the contract management is under the direction and control of the contractor.

Requirements:

1. Reference documents. None.

2. Format. The plan shall be in a format that the contractor devises and conforms to the following:

a. Identification. The plan shall be identified with the preparing office or contractors title, the identifying numbers or designation of the Contract/Procurement Request, the identify and/or nomenclature of the system/component/program/project, the security classification and the Government activity issuing the controlling contract.

b. Descriptive material. As may be needed to clarify or explain matters in the text, the plan may include descriptive material, sketches, drawings, photographs, tables, forms, graphs, worksheets, charts, etc.

c. Page size. The plan may be typewritten or printed on standard size paper, e.g., 8 ½ x 11 inches or metric A4. The pages shall be sequentially numbered and security bound together. As necessary, graphic material may be one-way fold-outs. All attachments shall be identified and referenced in the text. Each section and paragraph shall be numbered.

d. Table of contents and index. Plans of more than 30 pages in length shall contain a

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-04T20:35Z

h. delivery procedures table of contents. Plans more than 120 pages in length shall also include an Index.

e. Legibility. The document shall be legible and reproducible.

3.1 General. The Management Plan shall consist of the organizational structure, the assignment of functions, duties, and responsibilities, the procedures and policies and the reporting requirements that are established for the initiation, monitoring, control, completion, test and verification, and reporting of contractual tasks, projects, and programs.

3.2 Specific contents. The Management Plan shall cover the organizational structure, program management methodology, personnel, security, and the reports as described herein. Other subjects to be included are as follows:

a. design control

b. reliability

c. configuration control

d. standardization

e. quality assurance

f. provisioning

g. control of Government property

i. tests

j. certifications

k. packaging

l. shipping

m. other

3.3 Organizational structure. The plan shall present an organizational chart and supporting narrative portraying the contractor’s business (corporate) structure. It shall describe the functional relationships and responsibilities among the organizational elements that will participate in the accomplishment of the contractual commitments.

3.4 Program management. The plan shall present an organizational chart and supporting narrative describing the management office the contractor establishes to manage the contractual commitments. The plan shall define the direct lines of control, responsibilities, functional relationships, and authority between the management office and the contractor’s other organizational elements. The plan shall also describe all interfaces between the contractor and the Government and between the contractor and other contractors which are necessary and pertinent to the accomplishment of contractual tasks, projects and programs.

3.5 Methodology.

a. The plan include a narrative description of the technical approach or methods the contractor will employ to accomplish contractual tasks, projects, and programs, including, as applicable, development, tests, manufacture, construction, formulation, installation, logistics support, training, maintenance documentation, and configuration controls.

b. The plan shall include a milestone chart graphically depicting the schedule of events associated with accomplishing each contractual commitment.

3.6 Personnel.

a. The plan shall list the personnel staffing of the contractor’s management office that directs the contractual tasks, projects, and programs and assist in completing the contract. The listing shall include the education, training, skills, experience, and security clearance that personnel require to fill each such position and shall state the identity, background, and work experience of the personnel assigned to fill these positions.

b. The plan shall also describe the staffing required for proper accomplishment of each contractual task by skill type, skill level, number of personnel, and security clearance. When submitted as part of a proposal, the plan shall state how many such personnel are currently available and how many new hires are required to staff fully to accomplish each task as scheduled.

3.7 Security.

a. Provide a Standard Practice Procedure (SPP) which fully describes the security program, safeguards emergency procedures to be established to the protection of Government-furnished and contractor-developed classified materials prepared In conjunction with the project. The SPP shall be prepared in accordance with guidelines contained in the Industrial Security Manual, Purchase Description, and such additional requirements as may be stipulated by the cognizant security compliance organization. The SPP shall require approval by the Government.

b. Develop a comprehensive security accreditation plan to demonstrate how the computer security requirements stipulated in the PD, as applicable, have been accounted for in the system design, and how satisfaction of each requirement will be explicitly demonstrated in the test program. This plan shall also identify any specific support equipment or software to be provided for demonstration of design compliance and/or system compliance with the planned security requirements. The plan shall require approval by the Government prior to implementation.

c. Reports. The plan shall describe the management methods the contractor will employ to ensure meeting all preparations, format, and submittal requirements established by the CDRL (DD Form 1423) for data to be delivered to the Government.

4. END OF DI-MGMT-80004A

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Requirements:

image4.emf

DI-ADMIN-81505.pdf

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T12:43Z image5.emf

DI-QCIC-81960 (MEASUREMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION (MSE)).pdf

DI-QCIC-81960

Title: MEASUREMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION (MSE) – MEASUREMENT AND INSPECTION

EQUIPMENT SYSTEM DESIGN DOCUMENTATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRODUCT

Number: DI-QCIC-81960 Approval Date: 25 February 2014 ASMC Number: 9461 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: (AR) , RDAR-EIQ-SE Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: The Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design documentation for Acceptance of Product describes the Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE), Automated AIE (AAIE), and various measurement systems, used to meet the inspection and test requirements to deliver units and other end products that conform to contract, specification, QAP and drawing requirements. This documentation is used to evaluate the acceptability of these designs to meet contract requirements.

a. This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific requirement delineated in the contract.

b. This DID is applicable to all AIE as required by the contract.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents. The applicable documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in contract documentation.

2. Format. Contractor’s format is acceptable.

3. Content. An AIE package shall include the following (as applicable).

3.1 Cover Sheet. Cover sheet information includes the following:

a. Prime contractor name, address, and contact information.

b. Contract number.

c. Nomenclature of item(s) being produced under contract.

d. Applicable drawing(s), specifications and Quality Assurance Provisions (QAPs).

e. Date and revision of “New” or “Revised” documentation.

f. Sub-component or assembly (if applicable).

g. Subcontractor(s) name, address, and contact information (if applicable).

3.2 Measuring and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation. Measuring and inspection equipment system design documentation covers a variety of measurement systems and equipment used to evaluate acceptability of units to meet requirements. See ISO 9000 paragraph 3.8.2, Inspection and 3.10.4, Measuring Equipment.

3.3 Master List / Matrix. A detailed Master List or Matrix cross references each characteristic and its inspection requirement from the applicable drawings, specifications and QAPs with the proposed inspection methods and equipment. The Master List or Matrix information includes the following:

a. Drawing, specification or QAP number with revision and date of item being inspected.

b. Amendments, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), Notices of Revision (NORs), etc.

c. Specification or QAP paragraph number.

d. Drawing, specification, or QAP characteristic letter/number, description, and inspection requirement.

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-04T20:40Z

e. Inspection method with AIE identification with description, revision, and date.

f. Clearly indicate any revisions from previous submission(s).

3.4 Go-No Go/Functional Gages. Gage information includes the following:

a. Gage drawing number (design identification) with revision and date.

b. Drawings showing gage dimensions with tolerances.

c. Drawings showing gage material with surface finish and hardness of contacting gage elements.

d. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).

3.5 Standard Measurement Equipment (SME). SME information includes the following:

a. Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy.

b. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).

3.6 Special Inspection Equipment/Methods. It includes Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), Tool Control (TC), Non-Destructive Testing (NDT), Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE), Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. It also includes inspection equipment that is not commercially available along with the corresponding design drawings.

a. Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). CMM information includes the following per ASME

B89.4.10360.2-2008:

i. Establishment of the geometry (Datums) and inspection process of the desired characteristic by the CMM. Include the number and location of probe hits to establish geometry (Datums) and any axis necessary to adequately inspect the feature.

ii. Environmental conditions and limits which may influence measurements.

iii. Operating procedures including machine start/warm up cycles, probing system qualification, probe cleaning, and probe calibrations.

iv. Periodic reverification tests in accordance with the user's specification and manufacturer’s procedures including repeatability of point coordinates and length measurement and repeatability.

v. Interim checks between periodic reverifications.

vi. Procedure for checking the CMM immediately after a significant event which could impact CMM performance.

b. Tool Control (TC). Tool Control information includes the following:

i. Measurements of form tools (punches, dies, molds, etc.) and correlation data between tool dimension and component dimension.

ii. Inspection frequency and gages used to measure the form tooling.

iii. Process control parameters that affect the component dimension.

iv. Procedures for tool control inspection including out of tolerance tool control dimension procedures, corrective action plans, and segregation of product since last successful inspection.

c. Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). NDT information includes the following:

i. Written procedures for the qualification and certification of NDT personnel and the certification records for each inspector, as described in NAS410 (NAS Certification & Qualification of NDT Personnel), ANSI/ASNT-CP-189 (ASNT Standard for Qualification and Certification of NDT Personnel), or SNT-TC-1A (Recommended

Practice for Personnel Qualification and Certification in NDT), and additional procedures identified by the Government.

ii. Records for other certification standards shall identify the applicable standard and confirm the levels of qualification of individuals responsible for acceptance of product to be consistent with those defined in the standard.

iii. The design documentation, specific application techniques, and operating procedures in accordance with ASTM E 543 (Standard Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive Testing) and the applicable nationally recognized standard practice(s) specific to the NDT method(s) employed on the contract, such as ASTM E-1742 (Standard Practice for Radiographic Examination) and SAE-AMS- STD-2154 (Inspection, Ultrasonic, Wrought Metals, Process For).

iv. Documentation on application techniques shall identify the applicable standard(s) utilized.

d. Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE) & Complex Designs. For AIE designs that are complex in nature, (e.g., open set-up, computer controlled, numerically controlled, multistation, and acceptance inspection equipment which is part of an integrated production and assembly system) the following information is to be provided:

i. Concept designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 3, paragraph 3.2.1) includes:

(1) Sketches of the inspecting elements.

(2) Theory of operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams.

(3) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.

(4) Description of all fail-safe measures that lead to rejection of Unit Under Test

(UUT).

(5) A proposed test plan to qualify the accuracy of inspection and correctness of accept or reject decisions and resultant actions.

(6) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design.

(7) A method for verifying the integrity of the code (e.g., checksum or cyclic redundancy check).

ii. Detailed proposed designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 4, paragraph 3.2.2) include:

a. After concept approval and before any fabrication:

(1) Drawings of the inspecting elements.

(2) Proposed system operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams. Drawings of the calibration or verification standards.

(3) The computer test program to include software version, software design parameters, and flow charts showing acceptance/rejection settings and computer generated test stimuli (as differentiated from computer controlled standard test equipment stimuli).

(4) Schematic or block diagram of test and measuring circuits where applicable.

(5) Layout or block diagram showing overall equipment arrangement and interconnection, including the Unit Under Test (UUT).

(6) Details of adapters, cables, holding fixtures and like items as applicable.

b. Before performing the test to qualify the AIE:

(1) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification instructions.

(2) The final test plan.

(3) Computer test program, acceptance/rejection settings and a flow diagram.

(4) Detailed operating instructions indicating application of the AIE and the acceptance/rejection settings.

(5) The calibration program for each item of computer controlled test equipment and a sample printout of an actual test and calibration.

(6) A printout of the work instructions which are displayed for the operator.

iii. Final designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 6, paragraph 3.2.5) include:

(1) Results of the test including data generated, printout of test results (when normally generated), unique software test results, and calibration results.

(2) Design depicting the equipment as it was tested.

(3) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures

(4) Calibration and verification records.

e. Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. For Destructive, Environmental, and Functional (DEF) test equipment, the following information is to be provided:

i. Proposed AIE designs include:

(1) Theory of operation.

(2) Detailed drawings or sketches of the inspecting and testing elements and sufficient detail for supporting elements to facilitate evaluation for adequacy.

(3) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design along with any modifications in design or use.

(4) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.

accept or reject decisions and resultant actions (as required).

(6) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures and parameters.

(7) Settings, test conditions, calculations, and verification.

(8) Calibration and verification records.

ii. When DEF test equipment consists of AAIE or complex Designs, AIE design submissions shall include the requirements of paragraph 3.6.d above.

f. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA). MSA is any of a number of specialized methods useful for studying a measurement system and its properties (ASTM E2782, paragraph 3.1.7).

There are several basic properties of measurement systems that are widely recognized among practitioners. These are repeatability, reproducibility, linearity, bias, stability, consistency, and resolution (ASTM E2782, paragraph 5.4). An MSA is to include these properties, as applicable.

End of DI-QCIC-81960 image6.emf

DI-SESS-81315B (Failure Analysis Corr Action Rept).pdf

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-04T20:42Z image7.emf

DI-MGMT-80899 (Hazardous Waste Report).pdf

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T12:29Z image8.emf

DI-SESS-81880 (Engineering Change Proposal).pdf

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION (DID)

Title: ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSAL (ECP) (MIL-STD-3046)

Number: DI-SESS-81880 Approval Date: 28 February 2013 AMSC Number: 9301 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: A/ARDEC(AR) Applicable Forms: DD FORM 1692

Use/Relationship: An ECP provides the documentation in which the engineering change is described. It includes change impacts to systems, configuration items and other associated configuration documentation affected by the proposed change. In addition, it typically describes how the proposed change will be implemented along with providing estimated schedules and associated costs.

This DID contains the format, content and preparation instructions for the data product resulting from the work task specified in the solicitation. This DID is generally used in conjunction with a Notice of Revision (NOR) (DI-SESS-81881) per the requirements of MIL-STD-3046. A requirement for NORs should be contractually imposed in conjunction with this DID.

This DID is approved for use by the US Army to support the Army interim standard MIL-STD-3046, which will be canceled when a suitable non-government standard is developed or until two years from the date of the standard. When MIL-STD-3046 is canceled, this DID will also be canceled.

1. Reference documents. The applicable issue of any documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in the current issue of the DODISS at the time of the solicitation, or for non-DODISS listed documents as stated herein.

2. Content. The ECP shall be prepared in accordance with MIL-STD-3046. Other formats and submittal means are acceptable provided the data content requirements of MIL-STD-3046 are met.

3. The following references may be useful in defining content: MIL-HDBK-61A Configuration Management Guidance and ANSI/EIA-649B National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management.

(Copies of ANSI/EIA-649B are available online at www.techamerica.org/ or from TechAmerica, 601 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, North Building, Ste 600, Washington DC 20004-2650.)

END OF DI-SESS-81880

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T12:50Z image9.emf

DI-SESS-81883 (Request for Variance).pdf

Title: MEASUREMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION (MSE) – MEASUREMENT AND INSPECTION

EQUIPMENT SYSTEM DESIGN DOCUMENTATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRODUCT

Number: DI-QCIC-81960 Approval Date: 25 February 2014 ASMC Number: 9461 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: (AR) , RDAR-EIQ-SE Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: The Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design documentation for Acceptance of Product describes the Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE), Automated AIE (AAIE), and various measurement systems, used to meet the inspection and test requirements to deliver units and other end products that conform to contract, specification, QAP and drawing requirements. This documentation is used to evaluate the acceptability of these designs to meet contract requirements.

a. This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific requirement delineated in the contract.

b. This DID is applicable to all AIE as required by the contract.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents. The applicable documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in contract documentation.

2. Format. Contractor’s format is acceptable.

3. Content. An AIE package shall include the following (as applicable).

3.1 Cover Sheet. Cover sheet information includes the following:

a. Prime contractor name, address, and contact information.

b. Contract number.

c. Nomenclature of item(s) being produced under contract.

d. Applicable drawing(s), specifications and Quality Assurance Provisions (QAPs).

e. Date and revision of “New” or “Revised” documentation.

f. Sub-component or assembly (if applicable).

g. Subcontractor(s) name, address, and contact information (if applicable).

3.2 Measuring and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation. Measuring and inspection equipment system design documentation covers a variety of measurement systems and equipment used to evaluate acceptability of units to meet requirements. See ISO 9000 paragraph 3.8.2, Inspection and 3.10.4, Measuring Equipment.

3.3 Master List / Matrix. A detailed Master List or Matrix cross references each characteristic and its inspection requirement from the applicable drawings, specifications and QAPs with the proposed inspection methods and equipment. The Master List or Matrix information includes the following:

a. Drawing, specification or QAP number with revision and date of item being inspected.

b. Amendments, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), Notices of Revision (NORs), etc.

c. Specification or QAP paragraph number.

d. Drawing, specification, or QAP characteristic letter/number, description, and inspection requirement.

e. Inspection method with AIE identification with description, revision, and date.

f. Clearly indicate any revisions from previous submission(s).

3.4 Go-No Go/Functional Gages. Gage information includes the following:

a. Gage drawing number (design identification) with revision and date.

b. Drawings showing gage dimensions with tolerances.

c. Drawings showing gage material with surface finish and hardness of contacting gage elements.

d. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).

3.5 Standard Measurement Equipment (SME). SME information includes the following:

a. Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy.

b. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).

3.6 Special Inspection Equipment/Methods. It includes Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), Tool Control (TC), Non-Destructive Testing (NDT), Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE), Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. It also includes inspection equipment that is not commercially available along with the corresponding design drawings.

a. Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). CMM information includes the following per ASME

B89.4.10360.2-2008:

i. Establishment of the geometry (Datums) and inspection process of the desired characteristic by the CMM. Include the number and location of probe hits to establish geometry (Datums) and any axis necessary to adequately inspect the feature.

ii. Environmental conditions and limits which may influence measurements.

iii. Operating procedures including machine start/warm up cycles, probing system qualification, probe cleaning, and probe calibrations.

iv. Periodic reverification tests in accordance with the user's specification and manufacturer’s procedures including repeatability of point coordinates and length measurement and repeatability.

v. Interim checks between periodic reverifications.

vi. Procedure for checking the CMM immediately after a significant event which could impact CMM performance.

b. Tool Control (TC). Tool Control information includes the following:

i. Measurements of form tools (punches, dies, molds, etc.) and correlation data between tool dimension and component dimension.

ii. Inspection frequency and gages used to measure the form tooling.

iii. Process control parameters that affect the component dimension.

iv. Procedures for tool control inspection including out of tolerance tool control dimension procedures, corrective action plans, and segregation of product since last successful

c. Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). NDT information includes the following:

i. Written procedures for the qualification and certification of NDT personnel and the certification records for each inspector, as described in NAS410 (NAS Certification & Qualification of NDT Personnel), ANSI/ASNT-CP-189 (ASNT Standard for Qualification and Certification of NDT Personnel), or SNT-TC-1A (Recommended

Practice for Personnel Qualification and Certification in NDT), and additional procedures identified by the Government.

ii. Records for other certification standards shall identify the applicable standard and confirm the levels of qualification of individuals responsible for acceptance of product to be consistent with those defined in the standard.

iii. The design documentation, specific application techniques, and operating procedures in accordance with ASTM E 543 (Standard Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive Testing) and the applicable nationally recognized standard practice(s) specific to the NDT method(s) employed on the contract, such as ASTM E-1742 (Standard Practice for Radiographic Examination) and SAE-AMS- STD-2154 (Inspection, Ultrasonic, Wrought Metals, Process For).

iv. Documentation on application techniques shall identify the applicable standard(s) utilized.

d. Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE) & Complex Designs. For AIE designs that are complex in nature, (e.g., open set-up, computer controlled, numerically controlled, multistation, and acceptance inspection equipment which is part of an integrated production and assembly system) the following information is to be provided:

i. Concept designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 3, paragraph 3.2.1) includes:

(1) Sketches of the inspecting elements.

(2) Theory of operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams.

(3) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.

(4) Description of all fail-safe measures that lead to rejection of Unit Under Test

(UUT).

accept or reject decisions and resultant actions.

(6) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design.

(7) A method for verifying the integrity of the code (e.g., checksum or cyclic redundancy check).

ii. Detailed proposed designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 4, paragraph 3.2.2) include:

a. After concept approval and before any fabrication:

(1) Drawings of the inspecting elements.

(2) Proposed system operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams. Drawings of the calibration or verification standards.

(3) The computer test program to include software version, software design parameters, and flow charts showing acceptance/rejection settings and computer generated test stimuli (as differentiated from computer controlled standard test equipment stimuli).

(4) Schematic or block diagram of test and measuring circuits where applicable.

(5) Layout or block diagram showing overall equipment arrangement and interconnection, including the Unit Under Test (UUT).

(6) Details of adapters, cables, holding fixtures and like items as applicable.

b. Before performing the test to qualify the AIE:

(1) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification instructions.

(2) The final test plan.

(3) Computer test program, acceptance/rejection settings and a flow diagram.

(4) Detailed operating instructions indicating application of the AIE and the acceptance/rejection settings.

(5) The calibration program for each item of computer controlled test equipment and a sample printout of an actual test and calibration.

(6) A printout of the work instructions which are displayed for the operator.

iii. Final designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 6, paragraph 3.2.5) include:

(1) Results of the test including data generated, printout of test results (when normally generated), unique software test results, and calibration results.

(2) Design depicting the equipment as it was tested.

(3) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures

(4) Calibration and verification records.

e. Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. For Destructive, Environmental, and Functional (DEF) test equipment, the following information is to be provided:

i. Proposed AIE designs include:

(1) Theory of operation.

(2) Detailed drawings or sketches of the inspecting and testing elements and sufficient detail for supporting elements to facilitate evaluation for adequacy.

(3) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design along with any modifications in design or use.

(4) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.

accept or reject decisions and resultant actions (as required).

(6) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures and parameters.

(7) Settings, test conditions, calculations, and verification.

(8) Calibration and verification records.

ii. When DEF test equipment consists of AAIE or complex Designs, AIE design submissions shall include the requirements of paragraph 3.6.d above.

f. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA). MSA is any of a number of specialized methods useful for studying a measurement system and its properties (ASTM E2782, paragraph 3.1.7).

There are several basic properties of measurement systems that are widely recognized among practitioners. These are repeatability, reproducibility, linearity, bias, stability, consistency, and resolution (ASTM E2782, paragraph 5.4). An MSA is to include these properties, as applicable.

End of DI-QCIC-81960 image10.emf

DI-SESS-81881 (Notice of Revision)pdf.pdf

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION (DID)

Title: NOTICE OF REVISION (NOR) (MIL-STD-3046)

Number: DI-SESS-81881 Approval Date: 28 February 2013 AMSC Number: 9302 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: A/ARDEC(AR) Applicable Forms: DD FORM 1695

Use/Relationship: An NOR describes the proposed changes to a technical document being requested by an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP). After ECP approval, the NOR is forwarded to the custodian of each specification, drawing, associated list, or other applicable document(s) so they can make the required documentation changes.

This DID contains the format, content and preparation instructions for the data product resulting from the work task specified in the contract. This DID is used in conjunction with an ECP, DI-SESS-81881. A requirement for ECPs should be contractually imposed in conjunction with this

DID.

This DID is approved for use by the US Army to support the Army interim standard MIL-STD-3046, which will be canceled when a suitable non-government standard is developed or until two years from the date of the standard. When MIL-STD-3046 is canceled, this DID will also be canceled.

1. Reference documents. The applicable issue of any documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in the current issue of the DODISS at the time of the solicitation, or for non-DODISS listed documents as stated herein.

2. Content. The NOR shall be prepared in accordance with MIL-STD-3046. Other formats and submittal means are acceptable provided the data content requirements of MIL-STD-3046 are met.

3. The following references may be useful in defining content: MIL-HDBK-61A Configuration Management Guidance and ANSI/EIA-649B National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management.

(Copies of ANSI/EIA-649B are available online at www.techamerica.org/ or from TechAmerica, 601 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, North Building, Ste 600, Washington DC 20004-2650.)

END OF DI-SESS-81881

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T13:41Z image11.emf

DI-NDTI-80809B (Test_Insp Report).pdf

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION I Form Approved OMB No.0704.0188

1.nTLE 2.IOENTIFICATIONNUMBER

TEST/ INSPECTION REPORT DI-NM’I-80809B

L OESCRIPTlOtVPURPOSE

3.1 The testl inspection report is used to document testl inspection results, findings, and analyses that will enable the government or contracting agency to evaluate compliance with system requirements, performance objectives, specifications, and test linspection plans.

1.APPROVALDATE 5.OFFICEOFPRIMARYRESPONSIBILITY(OPB) Ea.DTICAPPLICABLE 6b.CWIEP AppliCable

(YVMMOD)

F/AFMC-DCJP

970124

,.APPLlCAT\0NflNTER7iElAT10NSH1P

7.1 This data item description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement

I as delineated in the contract.

I

7.2 This DID is applicable to engineering (developmental ), preliminary qualification, qualification, and acceptance testing.

7.3 This DID supersedes DI-NDTI-80809A and DI-MISC-80653

1.APPROVALLIMITATION 9a.APPLICABLEFORMS 9b.AMSCNUMBER

F7231

10,PREPARATIONlNSTRUCnONS

10.1 Format. Contractor format is acceptable.

paragraph 10.2 and its subparagraphs in a manner understanding

10.2 CQnL!aL. The test/inspection report shall

applicable.

Organize the information required by that facilitates presentation and contain the following information, as

10. 2.1 Cove. and tile uaae. The following information shall appear on the outside front :over and title page:

a. Report date.

b. Report number (contractor or government)

Contractor’ s name, address, and commercia 1 and government entity code.

Contract number and contract line item number or sequence number (if applicable)

e. ‘fvpe of test/inspection (for example. first article acceptance test, aualitv con formanc-e-inspection, d-evelopmental test-, qualification test, f Identification of item tested/inspected.

9. Date or period of test/inspection.

h. Name and address of requiring government activity.

i. Security classification, downgrading and declassifying environmental Lest) .“ information, if applicable.

(Continued on page 2 )

1.DIS77UBUTIONSTATEMEW

DISTRIBUTION STATEMRNT A : APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELBASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED.

ID Form 1664,APR 89 PreviOLIsedtliomwe obsdem. Page 1 of & Pages 39123

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T12:30Z

DI-NDTI-80809B

Block 10, Preparation Instructions (continued)

10.2.2 ~. The table of contents shall identify the

a. The title and starting page of each major section, paragraph, and apPendix of the report.

b. The page, identifying number, and title of each illustration (for example; figure, table, photograph, chart, and drawing)

10 .2.3 -ductim. The introduction shall include the following information:

10.2 .3.1 obyectlve W. The specific test/ inspection objective (s) as specified in the contract tasking document.

10. 2.3.2 L.temls) tes~. Complete identification of the item(s) testedl inspected including the following:

a. Nomenclature.

b. National stock number.

Model number, part number t and serial number :: Type of item (for example, prototype, production item, laboratory model )

e. Serial or lot number.

f. Applicable engineering changes

9. Production item specification, if applicable.

h. Date of manufacture.

10.2 .3.3 Complete inspection requirements correlated to contractual

Required testl inspection parameters :: Performance requirements, acceptance or environmental criteria.

10.2.4 ~. Complete test/inspection report identification of the testl requirements including the compliance limits, and summary including the

a. A brief discussion of the significant test/inspection results, ObSerVati Qns, conclusions, and recommendations covered in greater detail elsewhere in the report.

b. Proposed corrective actions and schedules for failures or problems encountered.

c. Identification of deviations, departures, or limitations encountered, referenced to the contract requirements.

d. Tables, graphs, illustrations, or charts as appropriate to simplify the summary data.

10.2.5 ~. Complete identification of all documents referenced in the test finspection report including the following, as applicable:

a. Prior testf inspection reports on the same item.

b. Test /inspection plans and procedure documents

c. Prior certifications of compliance.

d. Contractor’ s file designation where test/ inspection records are maintained.

e. Input parameters used.

The applicable issue of the documents cited therein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.

Page 2 of 4 Pages Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T12:30Z

10.2.6 ~. The body of the testlinspection report shall be as follows :

10 .2.6.1 KzZL_ + de.tlflca~.

Complete identification of each item of test equipment used in the testlinspection including the following:

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

9.

10. 2.6.2

Nomenclature.

Model number.

Serial number.

Manufacturer.

Calibration status.

Accuracy data.

Comments, if applicable.

Testlinmection kuhtv mstd.b&mn and set–w. Complete description of the physical set-up used in conducting the test/inspection to include the following:

a. Location or orientation of the item.

b. Location. orientation, or settinm of test equipment and instrumentation.

c. Location, orientation, or settings of sensors and probes

d. Location or orientation of interconnections, cables, and hoop-ups.

e. Electrical power, pneumatic, fluidic, and hydraulic requirements.

Drawings, illustrations, and photographs maY be used for clarification.

10 .2.6.3 wrocedur~. Complete description of the procedures used in conducting the test/inspection to include the following:

a. Item selection and inspection that verified suitability for test/

b. Summarized sequence of testing/inspection steps, including a description of how the item was operated during the test/inspection, and any control conditions imposed.

10 .2.6.4 A copy of all testlinspection results and analysis to include the following:

10.2.6 .4.1 ~. The actual recorded data (for example, log book entries, oscillographs, instrument readings, plotter graphs) If the recorded data is extensive, provide it in an appendix.

10. 2.6.4.2 Test/ insQec!iion resu. Identification of all testlinspection results to include the following:

a. Matrices comparing results achieved against test/inspection objectives or requirements

b. A discussion of these matrices as to their significance, and how they compare to any prior testlinspections.

Calculation examples.

;; Discussion of anomalies, deviations, discrepancies, or failures, including their impact, causes, and proposed corrective actions The discussion shall address discrepancies between design requirements and the tested/inspected Configuration.

10. 2.6.5 Conclusicxls Test/ inspection conclusions distinguished between objective and subjective to include the following:

a. The effectiveness of the testlinspection procedures in measuring item performance.

Page 3 of 4 PagesSource: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T12:30Z

b. The success or failure of the item to meet required test/inspection objectives.

c. The need for repeat, additional, or alternative tests linspections.

d. The need for item redesign or further development.

e. The need for improved test/inspection procedures, techniques, or facilities.

f. The adequacy and completeness of the test/inspection requirements.

10.2 .6.6 Recommendations appropriate to the test/inspection results and conclusions including the following:

a b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

9.

h.

Acceptability of the item tested/inspected (pass or fail) Additional testing/inspection required. ,.

Redesign required.

Problem resolution.

Test/inspection procedure or facility improvements Disposition of items tested/inspected.

Documentation changes required.

Testing/ inspection improvements

10.2.7 The following certifications shall be included, .as

applicable:

10.2 .7.1 A statement that the testlinspection was performed in accordance with applicable testlinspection plans and procedures, and that the results are true and accurate. The authentication shall include the signature of the contractor personnel that performed the test(s) /inspection(s) , a contractor representative authorized to make such certification, and any government witnesses

10.2 .7.2 A statement identifying those requirements not tested/inspected or measured that were previously validated.

Include identification of the data and method employed for such validation (for example, prior test/inspection, analytical verification, equivalent item, and so on) The authentication shall include the signature of a contractor representative authorized to make such authentication and any government witness.

10.2 .7.3 A statement that the item tested/ inspected either passed or failed item acceptability requirements This authentication shall include the signature of a contractor representative authorized to make such authentication and any government witness

10.2.8 Appendices shall be used to append detailed

test/inspection daia, drawings, photographs , or other documentation too voluminous to include in the main body of the report This includes referenced documentation not previously provided by the government, and test/ inspection reports from any associated test/inspection activity that may have performed some of the testing/inspecting requirements.

Page 4 of 4 Pages Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T12:30Z image12.emf

DI-SAFT-81563 (Accident_Incident Report).pdf

Title: Accidertflncident Report

Number DI-SAFT-8 1563 Approved Date: 2 Jun 98 AMSC Numbec A7315 Limitation:

DT3C Applicable: GIDEP Application:

Office of Primary Respomibility A/AR Applicable Fornw Use/relationship: This reportprovides tAeprocuring agency with immediate notification and information concerning any mrjor acciderrthncident (including fire) resulting in any one or more of the following: causing one or more fatalities, or two or snore disabling injuries; damaging government property exceeding $10,000; atTecting program planning or production schedules;

degrading the safety of the equipment under contract, such that persomel injury or property darnage may be involved, identi@ng a potential hazard requiring corrective action.

a. This Data Item Description contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement as delineated in the contract.

b. This Data Item Description replaces DI-H-I 329A.

1. Format. Contractor format is acceptable

2. Content. Report without delay any serious accident or incident (i.e. explosioq fire, flood pressure rupture, major rndfunction) which will adversely affect capabtity to meet contractual obligations. The report shall be made by the fkstest means, giving the following information.

c.

d.

e.

f.

i.

1.

Name, organization, telephone number, and location of the contractor and general manager Name and title of the person(s) reporting Date and time of accidenthcident Location of accidentiiciden~ i.e., building number, fkcility name Brief summary of accidentkscidcnt giving pertinent details”iircludihgtype ‘md qtiti~”of -materiel Cause of accidentliicident Camalties (fatalities, disabling irjuries, exposed to CBR agents) Estimated property damage, if applicable Nature of darnage; effect on production, operations, training or other activity Action taken by contractor Other damage or injuries sustained (public or private) Other pertinent information

Source: http://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2019-02-05T13:43Z

DI-SAFT-81563

3. Malfunction. If a malfunction of equipment is involved, the following additional…