Att_0009_-_Data_Item_Descriptions_(DIDS)_Index.docx

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION (DID) INDEX

For FMU-153A/B Fuze

W15QKN-18-R-0016

CDRL

Number

DID

Number

A001

A006

A017

DI-MISC-80508B

Technical Report–Study/Services

image3.emf

DI-QCIC-81960

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Title: MEASUREMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION (MSE) – MEASUREMENT AND INSPECTION

EQUIPMENT SYSTEM DESIGN DOCUMENTATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRODUCT

Number: DI-QCIC-81960 Approval Date: 25 February 2014 ASMC Number: 9461 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: (AR) , RDAR-EIQ-SE Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: The Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design documentation for Acceptance of Product describes the Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE), Automated AIE (AAIE), and various measurement systems, used to meet the inspection and test requirements to deliver units and other end products that conform to contract, specification, QAP and drawing requirements. This documentation is used to evaluate the acceptability of these designs to meet contract requirements.

a. This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific requirement delineated in the contract.

b. This DID is applicable to all AIE as required by the contract.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents. The applicable documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in contract documentation.

2. Format. Contractor’s format is acceptable.

3. Content. An AIE package shall include the following (as applicable).

3.1 Cover Sheet. Cover sheet information includes the following:

a. Prime contractor name, address, and contact information.

b. Contract number.

c. Nomenclature of item(s) being produced under contract.

d. Applicable drawing(s), specifications and Quality Assurance Provisions (QAPs).

e. Date and revision of “New” or “Revised” documentation.

f. Sub-component or assembly (if applicable).

g. Subcontractor(s) name, address, and contact information (if applicable).

3.2 Measuring and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation. Measuring and inspection equipment system design documentation covers a variety of measurement systems and equipment used to evaluate acceptability of units to meet requirements. See ISO 9000 paragraph 3.8.2, Inspection and 3.10.4, Measuring Equipment.

3.3 Master List / Matrix. A detailed Master List or Matrix cross references each characteristic and its inspection requirement from the applicable drawings, specifications and QAPs with the proposed inspection methods and equipment. The Master List or Matrix information includes the following:

a. Drawing, specification or QAP number with revision and date of item being inspected.

b. Amendments, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), Notices of Revision (NORs), etc.

c. Specification or QAP paragraph number.

d. Drawing, specification, or QAP characteristic letter/number, description, and inspection requirement.

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2015-09-28T17:38Z Check the source to verify that this is the current version before use.

e. Inspection method with AIE identification with description, revision, and date.

f. Clearly indicate any revisions from previous submission(s).

3.4 Go-No Go/Functional Gages. Gage information includes the following:

a. Gage drawing number (design identification) with revision and date.

b. Drawings showing gage dimensions with tolerances.

c. Drawings showing gage material with surface finish and hardness of contacting gage elements.

d. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).

3.5 Standard Measurement Equipment (SME). SME information includes the following:

a. Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy.

b. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).

3.6 Special Inspection Equipment/Methods. It includes Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), Tool Control (TC), Non-Destructive Testing (NDT), Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE), Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. It also includes inspection equipment that is not commercially available along with the corresponding design drawings.

a. Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). CMM information includes the following per ASME

B89.4.10360.2-2008:

i. Establishment of the geometry (Datums) and inspection process of the desired characteristic by the CMM. Include the number and location of probe hits to establish geometry (Datums) and any axis necessary to adequately inspect the feature.

ii. Environmental conditions and limits which may influence measurements.

iii. Operating procedures including machine start/warm up cycles, probing system qualification, probe cleaning, and probe calibrations.

iv. Periodic reverification tests in accordance with the user's specification and manufacturer’s procedures including repeatability of point coordinates and length measurement and repeatability.

v. Interim checks between periodic reverifications.

vi. Procedure for checking the CMM immediately after a significant event which could impact CMM performance.

b. Tool Control (TC). Tool Control information includes the following:

i. Measurements of form tools (punches, dies, molds, etc.) and correlation data between tool dimension and component dimension.

ii. Inspection frequency and gages used to measure the form tooling.

iii. Process control parameters that affect the component dimension.

iv. Procedures for tool control inspection including out of tolerance tool control dimension procedures, corrective action plans, and segregation of product since last successful inspection.

c. Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). NDT information includes the following:

i. Written procedures for the qualification and certification of NDT personnel and the certification records for each inspector, as described in NAS410 (NAS Certification & Qualification of NDT Personnel), ANSI/ASNT-CP-189 (ASNT Standard for Qualification and Certification of NDT Personnel), or SNT-TC-1A (Recommended

Practice for Personnel Qualification and Certification in NDT), and additional procedures identified by the Government.

ii. Records for other certification standards shall identify the applicable standard and confirm the levels of qualification of individuals responsible for acceptance of product to be consistent with those defined in the standard.

iii. The design documentation, specific application techniques, and operating procedures in accordance with ASTM E 543 (Standard Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive Testing) and the applicable nationally recognized standard practice(s) specific to the NDT method(s) employed on the contract, such as ASTM E-1742 (Standard Practice for Radiographic Examination) and SAE-AMS- STD-2154 (Inspection, Ultrasonic, Wrought Metals, Process For).

iv. Documentation on application techniques shall identify the applicable standard(s) utilized.

d. Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE) & Complex Designs. For AIE designs that are complex in nature, (e.g., open set-up, computer controlled, numerically controlled, multistation, and acceptance inspection equipment which is part of an integrated production and assembly system) the following information is to be provided:

i. Concept designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 3, paragraph 3.2.1) includes:

(1) Sketches of the inspecting elements.

(2) Theory of operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams.

(3) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.

(4) Description of all fail-safe measures that lead to rejection of Unit Under Test

(UUT).

(5) A proposed test plan to qualify the accuracy of inspection and correctness of accept or reject decisions and resultant actions.

(6) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design.

(7) A method for verifying the integrity of the code (e.g., checksum or cyclic redundancy check).

ii. Detailed proposed designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 4, paragraph 3.2.2) include:

a. After concept approval and before any fabrication:

(1) Drawings of the inspecting elements.

(2) Proposed system operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams. Drawings of the calibration or verification standards.

(3) The computer test program to include software version, software design parameters, and flow charts showing acceptance/rejection settings and computer generated test stimuli (as differentiated from computer controlled standard test equipment stimuli).

(4) Schematic or block diagram of test and measuring circuits where applicable.

(5) Layout or block diagram showing overall equipment arrangement and interconnection, including the Unit Under Test (UUT).

(6) Details of adapters, cables, holding fixtures and like items as applicable.

b. Before performing the test to qualify the AIE:

(1) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification instructions.

(2) The final test plan.

(3) Computer test program, acceptance/rejection settings and a flow diagram.

(4) Detailed operating instructions indicating application of the AIE and the acceptance/rejection settings.

(5) The calibration program for each item of computer controlled test equipment and a sample printout of an actual test and calibration.

(6) A printout of the work instructions which are displayed for the operator.

iii. Final designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 6, paragraph 3.2.5) include:

(1) Results of the test including data generated, printout of test results (when normally generated), unique software test results, and calibration results.

(2) Design depicting the equipment as it was tested.

(3) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures

(4) Calibration and verification records.

e. Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. For Destructive, Environmental, and Functional (DEF) test equipment, the following information is to be provided:

i. Proposed AIE designs include:

(1) Theory of operation.

(2) Detailed drawings or sketches of the inspecting and testing elements and sufficient detail for supporting elements to facilitate evaluation for adequacy.

(3) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design along with any modifications in design or use.

(4) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.

(5) A proposed test plan to qualify the accuracy of inspection and correctness of accept or reject decisions and resultant actions (as required).

(6) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures and parameters.

(7) Settings, test conditions, calculations, and verification.

(8) Calibration and verification records.

ii. When DEF test equipment consists of AAIE or complex Designs, AIE design submissions shall include the requirements of paragraph 3.6.d above.

f. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA). MSA is any of a number of specialized methods useful for studying a measurement system and its properties (ASTM E2782, paragraph 3.1.7).

There are several basic properties of measurement systems that are widely recognized among practitioners. These are repeatability, reproducibility, linearity, bias, stability, consistency, and resolution (ASTM E2782, paragraph 5.4). An MSA is to include these properties, as applicable.

End of DI-QCIC-81960 image4.emf

DI-SESS-80255A.pdf

Title: FAILURE SUMMARY & ANALYSIS REPORT

Number: DI-SESS-80255A Approval Date: 20141219 AMSC Number: 9506 Limitation: No DTIC Applicable: Yes GIDEP Applicable: Yes http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/submit http://www.gidep.org/data/submit.htm Preparing Activity: AS Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship:

This report presents a summary of the individual failures that occur prior to and during the reporting period and describes the analysis and corrective actions performed. This report is used to evaluate the contractor’s failure reporting, analysis, and corrective action efforts in accordance with the solicitation. This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format, intended use information, and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task described in the solicitation, and should be tailored appropriately.

This DID supersedes DI-RELI-80255.

Requirements:

1. Format. The Failure Summary and Analysis Report shall be in contractor’s format.

2. Content. The report shall summarize the results of the contractor’s Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) implementation required by the statement of work, and shall include a cumulative tabulation of failure data. Failures which occurred during the latest report period shall be identified by suitable notation. The report shall include the following elements at a minimum:

1. Failure number

2. Failure analysis number

3. Failure date

4. Name of engineer responsible for failure analysis

5. Failed part name

6. Failed part number (e.g. national stock number (NSN), logistics control number, work unit code)

7. Manufacturer of failed part

8. Subassembly name and number

9. Major assembly name and number

10. Equipment name and serial number

11. Failed part’s accumulated test or field operational life data

12. Test or mission being performed when the failure occurred

13. Test or mission mode of operation and environmental and use conditions when the failure occurred

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-05-09T15:48Z http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/submit http://www.gidep.org/data/submit.htm

DI-SESS-80255A

14. Failure symptoms and description of detection or diagnosis methods (e.g. Built In Test)

15. Failure effects (e.g. none, degradation, abort)

16. Repair action (e.g. remove/replace)

17. Failure mode description

18. Description of engineering analysis method employed in failure analysis

19. Failure mechanism/cause of failure

20. Contributing factors, including multiple factor interactions, or secondary effects of the failure

21. Categorization of failure (e.g. equipment design, equipment manufacturing workmanship, part design, part manufacturing workmanship software errors, unverified, intermittent, non-relevant)

22. Information on previous corrective actions for the same part and/or failure mode

23. Corrective action required to mitigate the failure mode, including:

i. Identification of the failure mode

ii. The recommended process or process control changes, when the failure cause is due to workmanship defects

iii. Proposals for retrofit of all equipment already delivered or assembled, including recommended effectivity, in accordance with the contract

iv. Disposition of all defective material and material rendered obsolete because of any necessary redesign, to assure their exclusion from production items

v. Identification of previous functional and environmental qualification tests, if any, invalidated by the corrective action changes and recommendation of those tests that should be repeated, in accordance with the terms of the contract, to demonstrate the corrective action’s effectiveness

vi. Effect on operational and diagnostic software programs and plan for changes, if necessary

24. Corrective action status

25. The recommended fix effectiveness factor (FEF) to be applied to the failure mode based on the proposed corrective action

26. Rationale for any open failure analyses past the contract-specified closeout time

27. Severity criticality ranking of the failure modes. The severity classification categories are:

i. Category I - Catastrophic - A failure which may cause death or system loss (i.e., aircraft, tank, missile, ship)

ii. Category II - Critical - A failure which may cause severe injury, major property damage, or major system damage resulting in mission loss.

iii. Category III - Marginal - A failure which may cause minor injury, minor property damage, or minor system damage which will result in delay or loss of availability or mission degradation.

iv. Category IV - Minor - A failure not serious enough to cause injury, property, or system damage, but which results in unscheduled maintenance or repair.

End of DI-SESS-80255A.

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-05-09T15:48Z image5.emf

DI-NDTI-80809B

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION I Form Approved OMB No.0704.0188

1.nTLE 2.IOENTIFICATIONNUMBER

TEST/ INSPECTION REPORT DI-NM’I-80809B

L OESCRIPTlOtVPURPOSE

3.1 The testl inspection report is used to document testl inspection results, findings, and analyses that will enable the government or contracting agency to evaluate compliance with system requirements, performance objectives, specifications, and test linspection plans.

1.APPROVALDATE 5.OFFICEOFPRIMARYRESPONSIBILITY(OPB) Ea.DTICAPPLICABLE 6b.CWIEP AppliCable

(YVMMOD)

F/AFMC-DCJP

970124

,.APPLlCAT\0NflNTER7iElAT10NSH1P

7.1 This data item description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement

I as delineated in the contract.

I

7.2 This DID is applicable to engineering (developmental ), preliminary qualification, qualification, and acceptance testing.

7.3 This DID supersedes DI-NDTI-80809A and DI-MISC-80653

1.APPROVALLIMITATION 9a.APPLICABLEFORMS 9b.AMSCNUMBER

F7231

10,PREPARATIONlNSTRUCnONS

10.1 Format. Contractor format is acceptable.

paragraph 10.2 and its subparagraphs in a manner understanding

10.2 CQnL!aL. The test/inspection report shall

applicable.

Organize the information required by that facilitates presentation and contain the following information, as

10. 2.1 Cove. and tile uaae. The following information shall appear on the outside front :over and title page:

a. Report date.

b. Report number (contractor or government)

Contractor’ s name, address, and commercia 1 and government entity code.

Contract number and contract line item number or sequence number (if applicable)

e. ‘fvpe of test/inspection (for example. first article acceptance test, aualitv con formanc-e-inspection, d-evelopmental test-, qualification test, f Identification of item tested/inspected.

9. Date or period of test/inspection.

h. Name and address of requiring government activity.

i. Security classification, downgrading and declassifying environmental Lest) .“ information, if applicable.

(Continued on page 2 )

1.DIS77UBUTIONSTATEMEW

DISTRIBUTION STATEMRNT A : APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELBASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED.

ID Form 1664,APR 89 PreviOLIsedtliomwe obsdem. Page 1 of & Pages 39123

Block 10, Preparation Instructions (continued)

10.2.2 ~. The table of contents shall identify the following:

a. The title and starting page of each major section, paragraph, and apPendix of the report.

b. The page, identifying number, and title of each illustration (for example; figure, table, photograph, chart, and drawing)

10 .2.3 -ductim. The introduction shall include the following information:

10.2 .3.1 obyectlve W. The specific test/ inspection objective (s) as specified in the contract tasking document.

10. 2.3.2 L.temls) tes~. Complete identification of the item(s) testedl inspected including the following:

a. Nomenclature.

b. National stock number.

Model number, part number t and serial number :: Type of item (for example, prototype, production item, laboratory model )

e. Serial or lot number.

f. Applicable engineering changes

9. Production item specification, if applicable.

h. Date of manufacture.

10.2 .3.3 Complete inspection requirements correlated to contractual

Required testl inspection parameters :: Performance requirements, acceptance or environmental criteria.

10.2.4 ~. Complete test/inspection report identification of the testl requirements including the compliance limits, and summary including the

a. A brief discussion of the significant test/inspection results, ObSerVati Qns, conclusions, and recommendations covered in greater detail elsewhere in the report.

b. Proposed corrective actions and schedules for failures or problems encountered.

c. Identification of deviations, departures, or limitations encountered, referenced to the contract requirements.

d. Tables, graphs, illustrations, or charts as appropriate to simplify the summary data.

10.2.5 ~. Complete identification of all documents referenced in the test finspection report including the following, as applicable:

a. Prior testf inspection reports on the same item.

b. Test /inspection plans and procedure documents

c. Prior certifications of compliance.

d. Contractor’ s file designation where test/ inspection records are maintained.

e. Input parameters used.

The applicable issue of the documents cited therein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.

Page 2 of 4 Pages

10.2.6 ~. The body of the testlinspection report shall be as follows :

10 .2.6.1 KzZL_ + de.tlflca~.

Complete identification of each item of test equipment used in the testlinspection including the following:

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

9.

10. 2.6.2

Nomenclature.

Model number.

Serial number.

Manufacturer.

Calibration status.

Accuracy data.

Comments, if applicable.

Testlinmection kuhtv mstd.b&mn and set–w. Complete description of the physical set-up used in conducting the test/inspection to include the following:

a. Location or orientation of the item.

b. Location. orientation, or settinm of test equipment and instrumentation.

c. Location, orientation, or settings of sensors and probes

d. Location or orientation of interconnections, cables, and hoop-ups.

e. Electrical power, pneumatic, fluidic, and hydraulic requirements.

Drawings, illustrations, and photographs maY be used for clarification.

10 .2.6.3 wrocedur~. Complete description of the procedures used in conducting the test/inspection to include the following:

a. Item selection and inspection that verified suitability for test/ inspection.

b. Summarized sequence of testing/inspection steps, including a description of how the item was operated during the test/inspection, and any control conditions imposed.

10 .2.6.4 A copy of all testlinspection results and analysis to include the following:

10.2.6 .4.1 ~. The actual recorded data (for example, log book entries, oscillographs, instrument readings, plotter graphs) If the recorded data is extensive, provide it in an appendix.

10. 2.6.4.2 Test/ insQec!iion resu. Identification of all testlinspection results to include the following:

a. Matrices comparing results achieved against test/inspection objectives or requirements

b. A discussion of these matrices as to their significance, and how they compare to any prior testlinspections.

Calculation examples.

;; Discussion of anomalies, deviations, discrepancies, or failures, including their impact, causes, and proposed corrective actions The discussion shall address discrepancies between design requirements and the tested/inspected Configuration.

10. 2.6.5 Conclusicxls Test/ inspection conclusions distinguished between objective and subjective to include the following:

a. The effectiveness of the testlinspection procedures in measuring item performance.

Page 3 of 4 Pages

b. The success or failure of the item to meet required test/inspection objectives.

c. The need for repeat, additional, or alternative tests linspections.

d. The need for item redesign or further development.

e. The need for improved test/inspection procedures, techniques, or facilities.

f. The adequacy and completeness of the test/inspection requirements.

10.2 .6.6 Recommendations appropriate to the test/inspection results and conclusions including the following:

a b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

9.

h.

Acceptability of the item tested/inspected (pass or fail) Additional testing/inspection required. ,.

Redesign required.

Problem resolution.

Test/inspection procedure or facility improvements Disposition of items tested/inspected.

Documentation changes required.

Testing/ inspection improvements

10.2.7 The following certifications shall be included, .as

applicable:

10.2 .7.1 A statement that the testlinspection was performed in accordance with applicable testlinspection plans and procedures, and that the results are true and accurate. The authentication shall include the signature of the contractor personnel that performed the test(s) /inspection(s) , a contractor representative authorized to make such certification, and any government witnesses

10.2 .7.2 A statement identifying those requirements not tested/inspected or measured that were previously validated.

Include identification of the data and method employed for such validation (for example, prior test/inspection, analytical verification, equivalent item, and so on) The authentication shall include the signature of a contractor representative authorized to make such authentication and any government witness.

10.2 .7.3 A statement that the item tested/ inspected either passed or failed item acceptability requirements This authentication shall include the signature of a contractor representative authorized to make such authentication and any government witness

10.2.8 Appendices shall be used to append detailed

test/inspection daia, drawings, photographs , or other documentation too voluminous to include in the main body of the report This includes referenced documentation not previously provided by the government, and test/ inspection reports from any associated test/inspection activity that may have performed some of the testing/inspecting requirements.

Page 4 of 4 Pages image6.emf

DI-MISC-80678

image7.emf

DI-MGMT-81978

Title: ACCEPTANCE DESCRIPTION SHEETS (ADS)

Number: DI-MGMT-81978 Approval Date: 20150714

AMSC Number: N9531 Limitation:

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No

Preparing Activity: SH Project Number: MGMT-2015-007

Applicable Forms:

Use/Relationship: The Acceptance and Description Sheet is a record showing the method of production and the results of inspection performed. In general, description sheets assist in the performance of such functions as determining the quality of propellants or explosives, comparing and evaluating the processes of various loading plans producing the same item, investigating the cause of trouble, and facilitating future surveillance and renovation.

The data contains the format and preparation instructions for the data product generated by the discrete task requirements specified in MIL-STD-1171, and associated Appendix.

The WARP User’s manual can be accessed at https://mhpwarp.redstone.army.mil.

1. Reference documents. The applicable issue of any documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in the current issue of the DODISS at the time of the solicitation, or, for non DODISS-listed documents, as stated herein.

2. Format and Content. The Acceptance Description sheets shall be in accordance with MIL-

STD-1171 and the WARP User’s Manual.

3. Media requirements. The Sheets shall be electronic files as specified in MIL-STD-1171 and the on-line WARP User’s Manual.

End of DI-MGMT-81978

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-12-21T13:32Z https://mhpwarp.redstone.army.mil/ image8.emf

DI-SESS-80858C

Title: SUPPLIER’S CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PLAN

Number: DI-SESS-80858C Approval Date: 20150407

AMSC Number: N9525 Limitation: N/A

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-015

Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: The Supplier’s Configuration Management (CM) Plan describes the organization, procedures, and controls of the Supplier’s CM program. The principle use is to provide the Government a basis for review, evaluation, and monitoring of the CM program and associated proposed components.

a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraph 3.1.2 (1) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.

b. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80858B and DI-SESS-81875.

c. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400

Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970

(outside USA).

d. Copies of ISO 10007 are available online at www.iso.org.

1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.

2. Format. The Supplier’s CM Plan shall be prepared in Supplier format.

3. Content. The CM plan shall identify the Supplier’s processes and procedures for:

a. Effective configuration identification.

b. Change control.

c. Status accounting.

d. Audits of the total configuration, including hardware, software, and firmware.

3.1 The following reference may be useful in defining content: ISO 10007, Quality management systems –

Guidelines for configuration management.

End of DI-SESS-80858C

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2015-11-06T17:43Z http://www.sae.org/ http://www.iso.org/ image9.emf

DI-SESS-80639D

Title: ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSAL (ECP)

Number: DI-SESS-80639D Approval Date: 20150407

AMSC Number: N9521 Limitation: N/A

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-011

Applicable Forms: DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)

Use/relationship: An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) provides the documentation in which the engineering change is described and how the proposed change will be implemented.

a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraph 3.3.1 (1) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.

b. This DID may be used in conjunction with DI-SESS-80642, Notice of Revision (NOR). A requirement for

NORs should be contractually imposed in conjunction with this DID.

c. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80639C and DI-SESS-81880.

d. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400

Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970

e. An electronic version of DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), is available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm.

1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and

2. Format. The ECP shall be in one of the following formats:

a. DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP),

b. The schema required by the Acquirer’s Integrated Digital Environment (IDE), or

c. The Supplier’s preferred format.

3. Content. The ECP shall contain all the information in DD Form 1692.

End of DI-SESS-80639D

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2015-09-28T17:01Z http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm image10.emf

DI-SESS-80640D

Title: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE (RFV)

Number: DI-SESS-80640D Approval Date: 20150407

AMSC Number: N9522 Limitation: N/A

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-012

Applicable Forms: DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV)

Use/relationship: A Request for Variance describes a proposed departure from (a non-conformance with) approved product definition information for a limited amount of time/specified effectivity or a product found to be nonconforming with product definition information after the product has been produced by the production process.

a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraphs 3.3.2 (1)-(6) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.

b. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80640C and DI-SESS-81883.

c. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970 (outside USA).

d. An electronic version of DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV), is available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and

2. Format. The RFV shall be in one of the following formats:

a. DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV),

b. The schema required by the Acquirer’s Integrated Data Environment (IDE), or

3. Content. The RFV shall contain all the information in DD Form 1694.

End of DI-SESS-80640D

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2015-09-28T17:14Z image11.emf

DI-SESS-80642D

Title: NOTICE OF REVISION (NOR)

Number: DI-SESS-80642D Approval Date: 20150407

AMSC Number: N9523 Limitation: N/A

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-013

Applicable Forms: DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR)

Use/relationship: A Notice of Revision (NOR) describes the proposed changes to a technical document being requested by an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP).

a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraph 3.3.4 (1)-(2) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.

b. This DID may be used in conjunction with DI-SESS-80639, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), and

DI-SESS-80643, Specification Change Notice (SCN).

c. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80642C and DI-SESS-81881.

d. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400

Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970

e. An electronic version of DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR), is available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm.

1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and

2. Format. The NOR shall be in one of the following formats:

a. DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR),

b. The schema required by the Acquirer’s Integrated Digital Environment (IDE), or

3. Content. The NOR shall contain all the information in DD Form 1695.

End of DI-SESS-80642D

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2015-09-28T17:25Z image12.emf

DI-MGMT-81987

Title: STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL (SPC) PLAN

Number: DI-MGMT-81987 Approval Date: 20150714

AMSC Number: N9564 Limitation:

Preparing Activity: SH Project Number: MGMT-2015-009

Applicable Forms:

Use/relationship: The Statistical Process Control (SPC) plan defines management’s SPC responsibilities, involvement, and commitment to continuous process improvement. The plan describes the contractor’s policy for applying SPC and information regarding the implementation of SPC. This plan also provides detail for specific manufacturing processes and operations parameters under control.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirements as delineated in the contract.

1. Format. The plan shall be in the Contractor’s format.

2. Content. The plan shall include a cover sheet identifying:

a. Contractor preparing office.

b. Contractor’s title.

c. Contract Number.

d. Procurement Request Number, if applicable.

e. Revision and date.

f. Nomenclature of the system/component/program/project.

h. Government activity issuing the controlling contract.

2.1. The plan shall include all descriptive material, sketches, drawings, photographs, tables, forms, graphs, worksheets, charts, etc. needed to show clarity in the text.

2.2 The plan shall contain a table of contents.

2.3 The plan shall include an index.

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-09-13T14:34Z

2.4 The plan shall contain the following sections:

2.4.1 Policy. This section of the plan shall describe the contractor’s policy for applying SPC, including goals and management commitment to SPC.

2.4.2 Applicable documents. This section shall include a list of documents that are the basis for the contractor’s SPC program (e.g. ANSI standard, textbooks, Government documents).

2.4.3 SPC management structure. This section shall define the SPC management structure within the organization. The identity and interrelationships of all departments involved in SPC

(e.g. Production, Quality, Engineering, Purchasing, etc.) shall also be specified.

2.4.4 SPC application personnel. All job titles and key personnel within departments involved in the application of SPC shall be identified. Also, a description of which functions are being performed by key personnel and when they are performed shall be included.

2.4.5 SPC inspection personnel. Personnel responsible for performing inspections/audits, charting and interpreting data, personnel responsible for determining, initiating and implementing corrective action upon detecting assignable causes, etc., shall be included.

2.4.6 SPC training. The section shall identify by job title and position.

a. The primary individual responsible for overseeing that SPC training is accomplished.

b. The qualification program required and in use for all personnel utilizing SPC techniques, including the qualification of trainers shall also be included.

c. The identification of who is to be trained and the type, extent and length of such training (e.g., on-the-job, classroom, etc.) and how personnel using SPC techniques are monitored when refresher training is required.

2.4.7 Manufacturing controls. The section shall identify the criteria for performing SPC capability studies and how and when these studies were applied. When gages are used, the gage repeatability and reproducibility analysis shall be completed, and accuracy shall be addressed.

2.4.8 Determination of SPC use. The section shall describe how the process/operation parameters are determined appropriate for SPC application and identify what actions are to be taken if SPC is not deemed appropriate for key or critical characteristics, special and major process/operation parameters (e.g., Pareto analysis; analysis of characteristics with tight tolerances, etc.).

2.4.9 Locating Strategy. The section shall identify how product locating is consistently used throughout production and product validation.

2.4.10 Process stability and capability criteria. The section shall identify the criteria for performing process capability studies and how and when these studies are applied. The section shall also describe how the process capability index is calculated and the frequency of these calculations.

2.4.11 Process stability and capability action and analysis. The section shall identify:

a. The actions taken as a result of each process capability study.

b. The contractor’s methodologies when process capability is for variable and attribute data.

c. The actions taken if process/operation is sub-marginal or marginal (Cpk less than 1.33 or 2.0 for criticals or grand average fraction defective is greater than 0.003 percent).

d. Analysis results of statistical distributions and all formulas and symbols utilized.

2.4.12 Control Chart policy. This section shall include the following:

a. Type of charts to be used (e.g., x bar/R x bar/S, etc.) and rationale for use.

b. Criteria for selection of sample size, frequency of sampling and rational subgroups.

c. Procedures for establishing and updating control limits, including frequency of adjustments.

d. Criteria for determining out-of-control conditions (e.g., trends, points beyond control limits, etc.) and the corrective action taken to include failure analysis when the process is unstable or when nonconforming product has resulted from unstable processes.

e. Illustration of out-of-control tests.

f. Description of method of recording pertinent facts on control charts such as changes in raw material, machines, manufacturing methods and environment, and corrective actions taken.

g. Description of how control charts are traceable to the product.

2.4.13 Vendor/subcontractor purchase controls. The section shall identify whether suppliers are required to utilize SPC and shall show the extent the vendor’s policies and procedures are consistent with in-house procedures of the prime contractor.

2.4.14 The Plan shall identify the following methods utilized to determine that suppliers have adequate controls to assure:

a. Defective products are not produced and delivered.

b. For the system utilized to audit suppliers, what will be audited, how often, and what action will be taken when out-of-control conditions exist at subcontractor/vendor facilities.

2.3.15 SPC Audit System. This section shall contain a description of the contractor’s SPC

Audit System and how the contractor plans to comply with auditing, plans for review and analysis of the outcomes, including implementation of necessary corrective action.

2.4.16 SPC records. The report shall identify various records to be used in support of SPC and describe their use. The retention periods shall also be included.

2.4.17 SPC detailed plans. The detailed plans shall describe control of specific manufacturing process/operation parameters or characteristics and shall include the following for each:

a. Identification of the process/operation by name or characteristic under control.

b. Rationale for selection or justification for non-selection if the parameter or characteristic is deemed impractical for the application of SPC techniques for parameters or characteristics identified as key, critical, special or major.

c. Description of how the characteristic is produced; the chain of events, type and number of machines involved, location of manufacturing facility, tolerances maintained, etc.

d. Production and inspection machinery used, including the production rate, number of shifts, length of shifts, whether inspection is fully or semi-automatic or manual; if the inspection is manual, identify the type of gages in use.

e. Identification of the type of charts to be maintained and whether the process/operation is performed in-house or subcontracted out.

f. Identification of the facility/vendor where process/operation parameters are targeted for

SPC.

3. Media requirements. The plan shall be in Adobe® electronic Portable Document Format

(pdf), version 2007-2010.

End of DI-MGMT-81987 image13.emf

DI-MGMT-81986

Title: CRITICAL CHARACTERISTICS CONTROL PLAN (CCCP)

Number: DI-MGMT-81986 Approval Date: 20150714

AMSC Number: N9563 Limitation:

Preparing Activity: SH Project Number: MGMT-2015-005

Use/relationship: The Critical Characteristics Control Plan (CCCP) forms a part of the

Contractor’s quality system and describes how the Contractor and all subcontractors will prevent the creation or occurrence of a critical non-conformance (defect), but in the event of its occurrence, assure its detection and control.

data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement as delineated in the

1. Reference documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in the current issue of the DODISS at the time of the solicitation; or, for non

DODISS-listed documents, as stated herein.

2. Format. The plan shall be in the Contractor’s format.

3. Content. The plan shall include a cover sheet specifying the following:

a. Contractor’s title

b. Contract number.

c. Revision and date.

d. Nomenclature of the system/component/program/project, the security classification, and the distribution restrictions.

e. Government activity issuing the controlling contract.

3.1 Table of contents. The plan shall contain a table of contents.

3.2 Index. The plan shall include an index.

3.3 Descriptive material. The plan shall include any descriptive material needed to provide comprehensibility of the content such as sketches, drawings, photographs, tables, forms, graphs, worksheets, charts, etc.

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-12-21T13:27Z

3.4 Key manufacturing processes. The plan shall identify those aspects of the manufacturing process that can influence the creation of a critical non-conformance including the production process, work instructions/procedures, process controls, mistake proofing, inspection systems (Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE), Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE)), materials, material handling, personnel, training, and the quality management system (calibration, corrective/preventive action, control of non-conforming product, and supply chain management).

3.4.1 The plan shall list all of the critical characteristics, the location/facility which produces the material affected by each critical characteristic, and the associated document(s) identifying the requirement (specification and revision, quality assurance arovision (QAP) number, drawing and revision).

3.4.2 The plan shall contain the critical characteristics management structure and roles/responsibilities including:

a. An organization chart addressing the critical characteristics control structure.

b. Personnel performing Quality Assurance (QA) inspections and verification inspections.

c. Relevant QA inspection validation.

d. Material Review Board (MRB) authority.

e. Access/disposition to critical non-conformances, accountability, and traceability.

f. Work stop authority.

g. Restart authority.

h. Notification to Government authority.

3.4.3 The plan shall contain the program management structure and roles/responsibilities including:

a. An organization chart with supporting narrative describing the management office the Contractor establishes to manage the contractual commitments.

b. The direct lines of control, responsibilities, functional relationships, and authority between the management office and the Contractor’s other organizational elements.

c. All interfaces between the Contractor and the Government and between the Contractor and other Contractors which are necessary and pertinent to the accomplishment of contractual tasks, projects, and programs.

3.4.4 The plan shall identify all appropriate critical process documents including:

a. Manufacturing processes and procedures.

b. Work instructions/procedures.

c. Handling instructions.

d. Process controls.

e. Inspection systems and procedures.

f. Accountability/traceability of non-conforming materials documentation.

g. Quality records maintaining an audit trail.

3.4.5 The plan shall contain detailed information about preventing critical non-conformances in the production process and it shall describe how the process is robust with high capability and effective controls including:

a. Process description.

b. Detailed flow chart including Inputs, Outputs, and Key Process

Parameters.

c. How key process parameters are identified, defined, and controlled.

d. Failure Modes analysis methodology.

e. Fail-safe methods, mistake proofing techniques, and assurance that the process is not bypassed.

f. Process control tools.

g. Feedback or in-process inspections.

h. Material handling.

i. Identification of Failure Modes and frequency of occurrence.

j. Method to assess that the system is robust, capable, and under control

(process prove-out; recent, relevant production data, SPC, etc.).

3.4.6 The plan shall contain the schedule for routinely assessing reliability and effectiveness including:

a. Frequency of verification (SPC, process capability, and audit schedules).

b. Monitoring appropriate metrics and reactions to trends.

c. Identification of actions to ensure process is reliable and effective.

d. Frequency for assessing the reliability and effectiveness of the production processes.

3.4.7 The plan shall contain a description of the inspection/verification system, equipment, and detailed information about preventing critical non-conformance escapes including:

a. Contractor’s process to verify that the design of the inspection/verification system is robust, capable, and effective to ensure that non-conformances are identified and correctly dispositioned.

b. Material handling and accountability of non-conforming material.

c. Methodology of inspection utilized (AIE, AAIE, visual, acceptance based on process control, etc.).

d. Identification of MIL-STD-1916 VL VII validation system or alternate proposed method.

e. Personnel involved in inspection and their required qualifications.

f. Throughput of inspections utilized (AIE, AAIE, visual inspections, etc.).

3.4.8 The plan shall identify any proposed referee gages and associated processes to include re-introduction of conforming material into the production process and maximum rates and quantities permitted for referee gages.

3.4.9 The plan shall include a detailed flow chart including Inputs, Outputs, and

Key Process Parameters and the following:

a. Failure Modes of the inspection system.

b. Fail-safe methods, mistake proofing techniques and assurance that the inspection system is not bypassed.

3.4.10 The plan shall include calculations, documentation, and identification of the reliability and effectiveness of the inspection system including:

a. Formula, methodology, or industry standard used to determine the inspection system reliability.

b. The results of the demonstrated reliability based on the verification/validation for each inspection system.

3.4.11 The plan shall identify the schedule for routinely assessing reliability and effectiveness including:

a. Frequency and method of routine verification (when and how many times defect masters/salters are run through and/or audit schedules).

b. Quantification of…