Tree Maintenance_Eval Criteria_FY26_Fort Sam Houston.pdf
PDF 123 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C78626Q50251
About this file
This is a Source Selection Plan and Evaluation Factors document for a tree maintenance contract at Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery administered by the NCA Contracting Office under FAR Part 13 procedures.
The Government will award the contract to the responsible offeror offering the lowest price with a reasonable quoted price and technically acceptable proposal. Award is contingent upon meeting all technical acceptability evaluation factors. The evaluation comprises three factors: (1) Technical Approach and Understanding of the Work, which assesses the contractor's experience, approach, and ability to perform tree maintenance tasks as described in the Statement of Work, requires International Society of Arboriculture Arborist Certification, and mandates a resume demonstrating a minimum of three years' experience as a direct supervisor of commercial tree maintenance operations including removal, trimming, and stump removal at commercial, industrial, or public sites; (2) Past Performance, evaluated based on technical qualifications on comparable projects within the last five years using the Contracting Officer's previous experience knowledge, contractor-provided descriptions of a minimum of three recent similar projects, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), or other reasonable bases; and (3) Price, evaluated for lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) status and completeness/accuracy in the provided CLIN structure.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QSE_36C78626Q50251.pdf | ||
| Tree Maint Map_FY26_Fort Sam Houston.pdf | ||
| TreeMaintWorksheet_FY26_Fort Sam Houston.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| QSE_36C78626Q50251.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Plan / Evaluation Factors
Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery – Tree Maintenance
I. BACKGROUND
A. Purpose. The purpose of this Source Selection Plan is to set forth the process by which the NCA
Contracting Office will evaluate offers received in response to the solicitation for Tree
Maintenance at Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery.
B. Source selection approach. This plan covers the approach for soliciting and evaluating offers, provides the source selection organizational structure, and designates persons who will perform the evaluation.
II. BASIS OF AWARD: This procurement is being conducted pursuant to FAR Part 13 procedures.
The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror who offers the lowest price, whose quoted price is found to be reasonable, and whose quote is found to be technically acceptable when considering the non-price evaluation factors described below. Offerors who fail to meet any technical acceptability evaluation factors below will not be eligible to receive contract award.
III. EVALUTION FACTORS
1) Factor 1: Technical Approach and Understanding of the Work: Proposal shall be evaluated in accordance with the criteria contained in the Statement of Work and on how well the technical approach meets the Government requirements. The proposal shall be more than restating the SOW.
Technical approach will be evaluated for the following:
a) Contractor-provided statements and/or literature that clearly explains their experience, approach and/or abilities to perform the tasks described in the Statement of Work (SOW).
b) Arborist Certification from International Society of Arboriculture
c) Resume for Certified Arborist demonstrating a minimum of three (3) years’ experience as a direct supervisor of a commercial tree maintenance operation that included removal, trimming, and stump removal in commercial, industrial, or public sites.
2) Factor 2: Past Performances: Past performance shall be evaluated based on the Contractor’s technical qualifications on projects within the last 5 years that are comparable in size, complexity, and scope. Past Performance information shall be obtained by the following methods.
a) The Contracting Officer’s knowledge of previous experience with the supply or service being acquired.
b) Contractor’s past performance descriptions of a minimum of 3 recent (within the last 5 years) projects of similar size and scope
c) The Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) at https://www.cpars.gov
d) Any other reasonable basis.
3) Factor 3: Price: Proposed price will be evaluated for LPTA and completeness/accuracy in the provided CLIN structure.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .