TIRNO-09-R-00012_Amendment 0010.doc

SOLICITATION NUMBER: TIRNO-09-R-00012

AMENDMENT NUMBER: 0010

The following changes to TIRNO-09-R-00012 are hereby incorporated via Amendment 0010:

1.

Section M.4

Evaluation Criteria

The Adjectival Ratings for Sub-factor 4 under Section M.4 is hereby deleted and replaced by the following:

Adjectival Ratings for Sub-factor 4

Excellent – Offeror’s record demonstrates that it constantly met its small business subcontracting goals and exceeded most of those goals during the past three years.

Good – Offeror’s record demonstrates that it constantly met and/or made a good faith effort to meet all of its small business subcontracting goals.

Unacceptable – Offeror’s record demonstrates that it did not meet all of its small business subcontracting goals, and in at least one area, did not make a good faith effort to meet those goals during the past three years.

Neither Favorable/Unfavorable – No record of relevant past/present performance exists or relevant past/present performance history is not available.

Not Applicable – This factor is only applicable to large businesses; therefore, small business offerors will not be evaluated.

2.

TIPSS-4 ITS

Questions & Answers

The answer to question #335 under the TIPSS-4 ITS Questions & Answers is hereby deleted and replaced by the following:

MITRE. They will be used to provide assistance to the evaluation teams in documenting their findings. MITRE personnel will not be voting members of any evaluation team. A copy of the TIPSS-4 NDA is attached.

3.

Additional Guidance

The proposal submission date remains unchanged. Offerors are permitted to use change pages to their proposals to incorporate the changes reflected in this modification. For example, instead of reprinting all of Section M the offeror may elect to just print and replace page M-8.

(End Modification)

PAGE