ATTACH_05_Past_Performance_Questionnarie_form.pdf

PDF 18 KB Posted

Attached to
Fresno, CA and Ogden, UT Consolidated Armed Security Guard Services
Solicitation number
TIRMS-17-R-00010
Issued by

About this file

ATTACH 05 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
EXHIBIT_12__Physical_Ability_Test_REV1.pdf PDF
TIRMS17R00010-A0001_SF30.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_11_MEDICAL_QUESTIONNAIRE_REV1.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_05_Record_of_Training_Completion_FO.pdf PDF
TIRMS17R00010.pdf PDF
01-EXHIBIT_12__Physical_Ability_Test_Information_Sheet_FO.pdf PDF
ATTACH_06_Copy_of_IRS_UT_Seniority_LIST_(1).pdf PDF
Solicitation_Letter.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_03_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_FO.pdf PDF
ATTACH_04_WAGE_DETERMINATION_UT.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_02_Rev_1_Post_Hour_Requirements.pdf PDF
Exhibit_03b__Firearms_course_of_fire_FO.pdf PDF
01-EXHIBIT_11__Medical_Questionnaire_-_FINAL_MC.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_07__Onboarding_Training_Provided_By_The_Government_FO.pdf PDF
ATTACH_03___WAGE_DETERMINATION_CA.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_09__GSAFORM139_FO.pdf PDF
ATTACH_01_CBA__IRS_CA_2014-2017.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_09a__Form_139_instructions_FO.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_01__Post_Locations.pdf PDF
ATTACH_02__CBA_IRS_UT_2014-2017.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_03a__Criteria_for_Deduction__FO.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_08___Vehicle_Requirement_FO.pdf PDF
Exhibit_04__Firearm_Certification_FO.pdf PDF
01-EXHIBIT_10_Contractor_Post_inspection_form__FO.pdf PDF
ATTACH_07_Copy_of_IRS_UT_Seniority_LIST_(2).pdf PDF
ATTACH_08_Q&A_RESPONSES.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_06__Training_Requirements_FO.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION: TIRMS-17-R-00010

CONTRACTOR: _

Reference Point of Contact:

Company:

Title:

Telephone No:

E-mail Address: Fax No:

Contract No: Date of Award:

Contract Award Amount: Type of Contract:

Questions:

1. Quality of Services: Compliance with contract requirements, conformance to standards of good workmanship and technical excellence:

Rating:

Rationale for Rating:

2. Timeliness of Performance: adherence to contract schedules.

Rating:

Rationale for Rating:

3. Business practices: response to Government’s inquiries and technical/service/administrative issues. Offeror was reasonable and cooperative during performance.

Rating:

Rationale for Rating:

Subjective Technical Scoring:

ACCEPTABLE: satisfies contract criteria. Good probability of success; weaknesses can be readily and easily corrected.

UNACCEPTABLE: fails to minimally satisfy the contract criteria; significant deficiencies, not correctable without a major revision to the contract.

4. Has the contractor been given any of the following: Cure notice, show cause, letters or reprimand, suspension of payments, termination? If yes, explain:

Yes No

5. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If no, provide reasons for not recommending this contractor for additional work.

6. Has the contractor been provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings? If so, what were the results? N/A

7. Provide any additional comments:

Date:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SOLICITATION: TIRMS-17-R-00010
Questions:
Rating:
Rating:
Rating:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .