Task 16-10 SSPD ISS Hosted Payloads.pdf

Omnibus Multidiscipline Engineering Services II

(OMES-II)

All deliverables and requirements must follow the guidelines in NNG17CR69C with no exceptions

Task Order Statement of Work (SOW) Date: December 31, 2021 Task Name: SSPD ISS Hosted Payloads Task No 16 / Mod: 10 Task Monitor (TM): Redacted Contract number: NNG17CR69C Contract SOW Reference: Function 1 Technology Development Services

Mod Summary: All other SOW requirements remain as is except make the following changes:

Please provide real-time support as required for the remaining RRM3 payload operations including contingency operations and de-orbit tasks per Subtask 1 direction below.

I. Scope

a. Background – The ISS Hosted Payloads office provides technology development services for the Satellite Servicing Projects Division to advance the technology readiness levels of key technologies needed to enable future in space servicing missions and provides hardware support for the ISS Program.

b. Summary of work – The paragraphs below document anticipated efforts that will be needed to support the ISS Hosted Payloads activities. As described in the Deliverable Items and Schedule section below, details of this work are subject to change at the discretion of the Task Monitor. The Contractor shall provide SSPD with appropriate manpower to support the ISS Hosted Payloads activities as described below:

1) Robotic Refueling Mission 3 (RRM3): RRM3 is the third payload in a series of technology demonstration payloads for the ISS. The goal of RRM3 is to demonstrate technologies required to service both conventional and cooperative cryogenic and xenon interfaces as well as advance robotic tool development, on-orbit vision systems, and sophisticated motor control. The RRM3 payload is comprised of an unpressurized complement and a pressurized complement. The unpressurized complement is referred to as the Fluid Transfer Module. The pressurized complement consists of three robotic tools, a tool stowage module, the Xenon Task board and an interface place for mounting the hardware to the Japanese JEM slide table. The unpressurized complement is manifested for launch on SpaceX 16 scheduled to launch November 29th, 2018. The goal for the pressurized complement is to launch on the same flight. The final

All deliverables and requirements must follow the guidelines in NNG17CR69C with no exceptions complement for the pressurized portion of SpaceX 16 has not been determined yet. To support this activity, the Contractor shall supply engineering services to include the completion of analysis, fabrication, integration, and test of the RRM3 payload and ground support equipment to support a Launch Readiness Date of October 24, 2018. Support in this category shall also include manpower to support on orbit operations of the RRM3 payload through the end of the payload mission up to two years on ISS.

2) Robotic External Leak Locator (RELL): RELL is a robotic instrument that is currently being successfully used on ISS. The RELL project leveraged SSPD expertise with ISS robotic tools from RRM to develop a highly sensitive leak detection tool for ISS. The tool combined existing SSPD RRM designs and added a ruggedized packaging of a COTS mass spectrometer to create a cost effective solution for ISS. The tool was used successfully on ISS in November 2016 and February 2017. The ISS program has requested another version of the tool to be provided build to print and delivered to ISS by the September 2018. FY19 support shall include engineering services to support verification efforts. Further definition of required support is outlined below in the Subtask Section.

3) EVA Tools to support the ISS Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) EVA repair effort:

SSPD has been asked by the ISS EVA Office/XX to design, evaluate, manufacture and assemble, flight qualify and deliver a suite of EVA tools and crew aids. These tools are required to remove components of the AMS to permit the installation of a new active thermal management system. Engineering tests will be conducted to determine maximum interface capabilities and provide a tool complement to satisfy these requirements. The preliminary suite of tools consists (but not limited to):

A. Socket Head Cap Screw (SHCS) Capture Tool B. Fastener Retention Block C. Debris Shield Hexagonal Capture Tool D. Debris Shield Capture Cage Tool E. Debris Shield Hexagonal Bit F. Vertical Support Beam (VSB) Cover Plate Handling Tool G. Vertical Support Beam (VSB) Spacer Retention Tool (Top & Bottom) H. VSB M4 Hexagonal Bit I. Additional Tools as specified by XX

All tools and crew aids shall be certified to the JSC 1E process and delivered fully certified by September 30, 2018. In support of this activity, the Contractor shall provide engineering services to design, manufacture, assemble and qualify the suite of tools defined above by the ISS program. Further definition of required support is outlined below in the Subtask Section.

4) Advance technologies to support future ISS Hosted Payloads activities. This category will cover a variety of activities including support for the Commercial Infrastructure for Robotic Assembly and Services (CIRAS), SSPD has been asked to provide a development unit of the Advanced Tool Drive System (ATDS) and supporting documentation for the ATDS to be incorporated into the Project’s in space assembly architecture through November 2018. Other activities that will be included in this category, but not limited to, are proposal efforts for new work on ISS including external robotic tool stowage architectures and rendezvous and imaging sensor. The contractor shall provide engineering services as defined by the Task Monitor. Further definition of required support is outlined below in the Subtask Section.

c. Required skills/knowledge – The contractor support team that will be needed to complete this work will consist of a mix of very experienced robotic and EVA tool engineers and mechanism experts, and an experienced team of mechanical, electrical and software engineers who understand the ISS interfaces, ground systems and documentation. The support team should be experienced with manned, unmanned, and robotic space flight missions and space environments. They should have an advanced working knowledge of space flight mechanisms with a focus on: materials, coatings, processes, power transmission, bearing design, electro-mechanical mechanisms, actuators, motors, and tribology. Also, a familiarization with General Environmental Verification Specification (GEVS), NASA-STD- 5017A, as well as JSC Design for Minimum Risk (DFMR) and EVA Generic Design Requirements Document (GDRD), JSC 26626 criteria is needed. A strong background in mechanical and electrical design & packaging is required with emphasis on miniature assemblies, mechanism analysis practices (kinematic, static/dynamic, environmental), drafting, fabrication practices, assembly, GSE, and space qualification\verification programs.

Comprehensive use and expertise with CREO\Windchill (experience with Mechanism and MECHANICA/Structure extensions) is also required. This experienced team can be paired with junior level engineers with the same skill set to complement each other.

II. Period of Performance The period of performance for this task shall be from task award through December 31, 2021

III. Subtask Description This task shall have multiple subtasks that align with the activities described in the above summary of work. The subtasks shall be defined as follows:

Subtask 1: The contractor will provide engineering services and robotic tool engineering support for RRM3. Responsibilities include:

1) Completion of design and development of non-flight and flight hardware, including tools, tool adaptors, tool boards and cryogenic and xenon systems to support RRM3 Phase 3 Safety Review and subsequently, the Operations Readiness Review (ORR).

2) Fabrication and testing of non-flight hardware. Also includes the design, planning and fabrication/procurements for follow-on flight hardware.

3) Provide all payload related documentation required for individual piece parts /assemblies / Interface Control Documents / Test Plans / End Item Data Packages (EIDPs) / analyses for Tool and Demonstration Technology Development.

4) Provide support and all payload related documentation required for ORR and other reviews for Robotic Tools and Technology Development.

5) Provide Robotic hardware and software support to facilitate the integration of the payload onto the Fanuc robotic systems into the Goddard Robotic Technology Development Lab.

6) Provide required system engineering (and safety and quality assurance support) to ensure hardware development is integrated with all program elements needed for mission success.

7) Provide the necessary contractual, technical and quality assurance support to procure non-fight and flight hardware components as required to support the hardware development process.

8) Provide support for on-orbit operations of RRM3 experiment including; procedure development and verification, mission operations simulations, as well as real-time mission operations support

9) The contractor will provide continued operations, verification and documentation support until all of the RRM3 hardware has been safely de-orbited from ISS.

Subtask 1 on-orbit operations are expected to occur in late calendar year 2021 with disposal planned for Spring of 2022. Support levels are expected to be minimal and will largely consist of ground operations and the close-out of paperwork. Any required support is to be coordinated with and approved by the task monitor.

Subtask 2: The contractor will provide engineering services and robotic tool engineering support for RELL. Responsibilities include:

1) Engineering, and technical support to complete the manufacture, integration and test for the second flight unit as defined in the SOW provided by the ISS program.

2) Provide required test reports to complete certification of RELL to the ISS requirements document.

3) Support on orbit operations and post flight analysis as requested by the ISS project office

Subtask 2 effort is complete and this subtask can be closed.

Subtask 3: The contractor will provide engineering services to support the ISS AMS EVA repair effort as described in the above summary of work. Responsibilities include:

1) Completion of design and development of non-flight and flight hardware, including tools, and crew aids to support the ISS AMS EVA repair effort.

2) Completion of analysis and design products, and test reports and certification documentation to support various milestones.

3) Support on orbit EVA operations as requested by the ISS Project.

Low levels of support for the EVA operations are currently expected through late calendar year 2019 or possibly early calendar year 2020. Specific support is to be coordinated with and approved by the task monitor.Subtask 4: The contractor will provide support for advance technologies to support future ISS Hosted Payloads activities as defined in the above Summary of Work. Responsibilities to include:

1) Provide support to the CIRAS project as defined in the SOW by the CIRAS procject.

Examples of support include providing ICDs, and ATDS specification, a breadboard ATDS unit as well as support of weekly telecons.

2) Provide support for future work for the ISS programs as defined by the Task Monitor.

Examples include: development of a concept and proposal package for future external robotic tool stowage solutions for ISS robotic tools, and development of a concept and proposal package for future rendesvouz and docking sensors as requested by the ISS program.

Any specific support is to be coordinated with and approved by the task monitor.

Subtask 5: The contractor will provide engineering services and engineering support for the external tool stowage carrier. Responsibilities include:

1) Provide engineering, and technical support to certify, build and deliver an EVA installed carrier for the Robotic External Leak Locator (RELL) hardware

2) Provide required test reports to complete certification of External Stowage Carrier to the ISS requirements document.

3) Support on orbit operations and post flight analysis as requested by the ISS project office

The expected launch of the RELL Carrier is anticipated in October 2019, or late calendar year 2019, depending on the final launch manifest. No specific engineering support is expected beyond September, however the task monitor may approve specific support on an as-needed basis.

IV. Deliverables/Schedules/Milestones

(See Contract sections B.1 and C.3) Deliverables for these tasks shall include reports and presentations describing system trade studies, design, participation in component, subsystem, and system-level reviews, ground tests, etc, and algorithm mathematical specifications, analysis and test results, and ground system software deliveries and delivery documentation as defined by the Task Monitor. Deliverables include the above items at the discretion of the Task Monitor, all of which will be produced by a multi-disciplinary team from multiple contracting sources, and thus not a direct deliverable from this Task. Specific deliverables for this task are monthly progress reports delivered to the Task Monitor and SSPD management.

Monthly Deliverable Report The contractor shall provide no later than the 10th working day following the close of the contractor’s monthly accounting period a 533M for each individual subtask and a summary 533M at the total task level. If it is not possible to provide the individual 533M at the subtask level, the contractor shall provide on the 10th working day following the close of the contractor’s monthly accounting period a break out of hours and costs by subtasks to the Contract Resource Analyst, Contracting Officer, and the Task Monitor. The report shall include current period hours and costs, cumulative to date hours and costs, and cumulative costs with a one-month cost plan. When needed, the contractor shall make adjustments to the distribution of costs, layout of the report and change reportable elements as specified by the Task Monitor and/or the Contract Resource Analyst.

A supplemental excel-based monthly report spreadsheet shall be provided that includes by element of cost, by Subtask identified within the SOW, the current period hours and costs, combination of performance metrics, technical quality of deliverables, cost control, significant events, innovations and meeting requirements set forth in the SOW.

The work performed for this task will be evaluated by the TM based on the technical merit and on the following performance metrics:

1) On-time delivery of technical deliverables as defined by the TM.

2) On-time delivery of status reports

f. Government Furnished Facilities, Equipment, Software and Other Resources The Government will provide account and passwords to government-furnished workstations where existing versions of various relevant software packages shall be maintained. It shall be the contractor’s responsibility to complete any GSFC required security-related training courses.

g. Quality Assurance Requirements The Quality Assurance Requirements for this task are outlined in the Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office (SSCO) Robotic Refueling Mission (RRM) Phase 2 & 3 and Hosted Payloads Mission Assurance Requirements (MAR) document, SSCO-RQMT-000008, Rev B.

The RRM3 Safety Critical hardware identified are the following:

1. Source Dewar Assembly, PN: 236-0001

2. Source Dewar Cryocooler, CT-F

3. Motor Control Board 4 (MCB4), PN: 2204976

Due to the high-risk mission classification (Do No Harm) of the RRM3 project the following exceptions to the above document are granted provided that the services or products being rendered are not destined for nor interface directly with RRM3 hardware which has been deemed safety critical

Exceptions to SSCO-RQMT-000008:

Section 2.0 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The Developer shall have a quality management system that meets the intent of SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace - Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and Servicing or otherwise have a GSFC-approved developer quality management system. The Developer’s Quality Manual shall be provided in accordance with the SOW (refer to DID 2-1).

Sub Section 2.2.5 Flow Down

The Developer shall apply system safety and mission assurance requirements to subcontractors and suppliers to the extent necessary to ensure that the delivered product meets applicable safety and performance requirements. Developers may use existing institutional practices and processes to the maximum extent, as long as they meet the intent of this MAR.

Section 11.0 PARTS REQUIREMENTS

Sub Section 11.1 General

All EEE parts are recommended to be selected, processed, and derated in accordance with GSFC EEE-INST-002, “Instructions for EEE Parts Selection, Screening, Qualification and Derating” for part quality Level 3 or better. For those parts not readily available at part quality Level 3, the Project shall consider alternate requests as proposed by the Parts Control Board (PCB). A detailed assessment of the likely part failure modes shall be provided by the PCB, including the impact on safe and reliable operation of the hardware, impact on mission success, and demonstration that no harm will propagate from the hardware to the host.

Sub Section 11.9 Parts Age and Storage Control

All parts planned for use with a Lot Date Code (LDC) older than 0107 (first week, year 2007) shall be submitted to the PCB for reliability review and possible verification testing prior to use in flight hardware. Alternate test plans may be used as proposed by the PCB and approved by the Project on a case-by-case basis.

Section 15.0 GIDEP ALERTS AND PROBLEM ADVISORIES

For vendors that do not participate in GIDEP, the vendor shall provide material traceability data traceable down to the raw material of the manufactured product. With the traceability documentation provided by the manufacturer, the task prime or the RRM3 Project Material Engineer will be able to perform GIDEP assessments, thus meeting the intent of the stated MAR requirement.

VI. ODC (Travel and Procurement)

(See I.1 1852.216-80 TASK ORDERING PROCEDURE d(6), please provide a BOE for all proposed ODC’s to determine the reasonableness)

Local and non-local travel is required for this task. Travel requirements will include, but are not limited to, Kennedy Space Center, Johnson Space Center, and vender site visits as required.

Foreign travel will also be required to MDA in Brampton Ontario to support robotic testing in November 2017 as well as a trip to CERN in Switzerland at least once during the period of performance. For foreign travel, refer contract clause 1852.242-71.

VII. Work Location

This work shall be performed primarily on-site at the Goddard Space Flight Center, but the contractor may be required to perform some work at the contractor’s facility, at the Naval Research Laboratory, and at several other NASA and contractor test facilities.

VIII. Reporting Requirements

The contractor shall report status in person or via teleconference to the TM or designated alternates on a monthly basis. Reports shall include informal presentation of interim results, status of development activities, and action item status. The contractor shall provide all reports at least one day in advance of the monthly meeting via email, and maintain an email distribution list with the concurrence of the TM. The contractor shall also support the TM in the preparation of status reviews for internal and external funding agencies. The contractor shall comply with any and all additional requests for status meetings and reports.

Monthly Subtask Report Spreadsheet

The contractor shall provide a break out of hours and costs by close of business on the 10th of each month to the Contract Officer, Contract Resource Analyst, and the Task Monitor. The report spreadsheet shall include current period hours, costs, cumulative-to-date hours and costs, and cumulative costs with a one-month cost plan. When needed, the contractor shall make adjustments to the distribution of costs, layout of the report and change reportable elements as specified by the Task Monitor and/or the Contract Resource Analyst.

IX. Security Requirements The contractor shall comply with Information Technology Security procedures and requirements as defined by NPR 2810.1A in the performance of this task. In addition, the contractor shall comply with all applicable federal rules and regulations and agency directives.

The Contractor shall adhere to project requirements regarding ITAR related information, as controlled by the ITAR, 22 CFR 120-130, by the U.S. Department of State. Any transfer of controlled information to a foreign person or entity requires an export license issued by the U.S.

Department of State or an ITAR exemption to the license requirement prior to the export or transfer. TAA’s will be required with international partners as well as establishing NDAs with NASA supply vendors.

NOTE: The contractor shall handle all classified data as defined by the level of classification..

X. Safety

The contractor shall develop and maintain a documented Quality Assurance (QA) program in compliance with the Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office (SSCO) Robotic Refueling Mission (RRM) Phase 2 & 3 and Hosted Payloads Mission Assurance Requirements (MAR) document, SSCO-RQMT-000008, Rev B.

XI. Data Rights

This SOW shall adhere to the following Data Rights clause, as stated in this contract: “the default Data Rights clause under this contract is FAR 52.227-14 RIGHTS IN DATA-GENERAL as modified by NASA FAR Supplement 1852.227-14-Alternate II and Alternate III and GSFC 52.227-90. Any exceptions to this clause will be covered by FAR 52.227-17 RIGHTS IN DATA-SPECIAL WORKS as modified by NASA FAR Supplement 1852.227-17, and, if applicable, GSFC 52-227.93.”

XII. Applicable Documents

In the performance of this task, the contractor shall comply with the following documents:

1. RRM3 Project Management Plan

2. Robotic Refueling Mission (RRM) Phase 2 & 3 and Hosted Payloads Mission Assurance

Requirements (MAR) document, SSCO-RQMT-000008, Rev B.

3. AMS Project Management Plan

XIII. References

a. Not applicable