Table_1_and_Table_2_for_pricing.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GENERAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
- Solicitation number
- Solicitation-2024-102
- Issued by
- Alachua County, Glencoe CDP, Florida
About this file
This document is a pricing table for a General Service Agreement issued by Gainesville Regional Utilities (GRU) in Florida, seeking licensed contractors for maintenance, alteration, construction, and infrastructure services across multiple utility and power generation sectors. GRU intends to award at least ten continuing construction service contracts with an initial three-year term and potential for two additional two-year extensions, contingent on satisfactory contractor performance. The contract will require contractors to submit proposals for projects valued at or above $300,000, with GRU soliciting three proposals for each qualifying project.
The pricing tables (Table 1 and Table 2) detail labor rates for 12 different job classifications, including Construction Project Managers, Superintendents, Electricians, and I&C Technicians, with specific estimated hours and cost structures for standard and emergency projects. Pricing evaluation will be based on a points system where 80% of points come from the standard project cost (Table 1) and 20% from the emergency project cost (Table 2). Contractors must provide firm-fixed prices for labor rates and markups, with the lowest-cost respondent receiving full points and other contractors scaled proportionally based on their cost differences. The document emphasizes that labor rates must include all associated employment costs such as taxes, benefits, workers' compensation, and personal protective equipment.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Provide billable labor rates in Table 1 for the job classifications below. Labor rates are to include taxes, benefits, workers compensation, required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), mobilization and demobilization, and any other salary burdens for the workers’ employment. Unit rates are not to include profit or overhead.
· Construction Project Manager
· Superintendent
· Foreman
· Equipment Operator
· Skilled Construction Laborer
· Construction Laborer
· Pipefitter
· Master Electrician
· Journeyman Electrician
· Master Mechanic
· I&C Technician
· I&C Programmer
See next page for Table 1
Table 1 provides the Cost Table for a Sample Project required from each respondent for a standard comparison project. Equipment costs and subcontracted labor and materials cost markups are required to be completed in the Table and will be used as a basis for scoring as described below.
Table 1 is to be filled out by the Respondent and submitted with their proposal submission for evaluation.
Table 1– COST TABLE FOR SAMPLE STANDARD PROJECT
| Labor Category |
| Estimated Hours |
| $/Hour |
| Total Cost |
| Construction Project Manager |
| 80 |
| Superintendent |
| 320 |
| Foreman |
| 320 |
| Equipment Operator |
| 160 |
| Skilled Construction Laborer |
| 320 |
| Construction Laborer |
| 320 |
| Pipefitter |
| 100 |
| Master Electrician |
| 100 |
| Journeyman Electrician |
| 100 |
| Master Mechanic |
| 150 |
| I&C Technician |
| 100 |
| I&C Programmer |
| 100 |
Subtotal Cost for Labor
| Estimated Amount** |
| Markup (%) |
| Extended Total |
| Mobilization/Demobilization |
| $100,000 |
$100,000
| Equipment Rental (or owned) |
| $15,000 |
| Subcontracted Labor and Materials |
| $350,000 |
Grand Total Project Cost (Labor PLUS Subcontractor Labor and Materials)
**These values will vary from project to project but are provided here as a basis for scoring and awarding.
Table 2 provides the cost table for a sample Emergency Project required from each respondent for an emergency comparison project. Contractors will be required to mobilize within 24 hours under emergency conditions. Equipment costs and subcontracted labor and materials cost markups are required to be completed in Table 2. The labor rates and markups the Contractor provides in Table 2 shall be used by GRU at its sole discretion for performing Emergency or Urgent work and may choose to not bid the work out between the selected Contractors. In such instances, billing shall be strictly in accordance with the labor rates and markups provided in Table 2 below.
This table is to be used for pricing submittal at the time of proposal submission for evaluation.
NOTE:
· The labor rates and percent markups quoted by Respondent in Table 1 and Table 2 must be firm-fixed prices, not estimates. Table 1 and Table 2 may not be changed by the Contractor to include additional categories or items.
· Eighty (80) percent of the category points (up to 24) will be scored based on the contractors total score for the Standard Example Project (Table 1). 20 percent of the category score (up to 6 points) will be scored based on the Contractors total score for the Emergency Example Project (Table 2).
Table 2– COST TABLE FOR SAMPLE EMERGENCY PROJECT
| Labor Category |
| Estimated Hours |
| $/Hour * |
| Markup % |
| Total Cost |
| Construction Project Manager |
| 40 |
| Superintendent |
| 60 |
| Foreman |
| 60 |
| Equipment Operator |
| 60 |
| Skilled Construction Laborer |
| 60 |
| Construction Laborer |
| 60 |
| Pipefitter |
| 40 |
| Master Electrician |
| 40 |
| Journeyman Electrician |
| 40 |
| Master Mechanic |
| 40 |
| I&C Technician |
| 40 |
| I&C Programmer |
| 40 |
Subtotal Cost for Labor
| Estimated Amount** |
| Markup (%) |
| Extended Total |
| Mobilization / Demobilization |
| $20,000 |
| Equipment Rental (or owned) |
| $5,000 |
| Subcontracted Labor and Materials |
| $20,000 |
Subtotal Cost Mobilization/Demobilization, Equipment, and Sub Labor & Materials
Grand Total Project Cost
**These values will vary from project to project but are provided here as a basis for scoring and awarding.
· GRU will scale points between Respondents. The lowest cost Respondent will receive full points, the remaining Respondents will be scaled based on the difference from the lowest cost, using a 3-percentile score difference for every 1 percentile difference in cost. For example, if a Contractor is 10% higher in total cost than the lowest cost for the Standard Project, that Contractor will receive 30% fewer points for the standard project category which calculates to 24*(1-0.3) =16.8 points.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .