Government's_Response_to_Questions.pdf
PDF 85 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 7, 000 GALLON ROUND HORIZONTAL TANK
- Solicitation number
- SPMYM2-19-Q-1056
About this file
Government's Response to Questions (A0001 to SPMYM2-19-Q-1056)
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
A0001 to SPMYM2-19-Q-1056 Government’S Response to Questions
Question 1: General note #M3 states one piece seamless heads. Can two pieces be used if seam is 100% R. (X-Ray)?
Answer 1: A two piece head that is 100% R (X-Ray) is not acceptable. Head must be one piece (seamless) as stated in the general note #M3.
Question 2: Dwg. M-1480 Sheet 24. The entire header would need to be installed before the head is put on. It would facilitate installation and/ or future removal of the header if there was an internal flange. This would also facilitate the hydro-testing of the header.
Answer 2: No flanges internal to the tank are allowed in the 4” inlet line (vertical pipe) or the diffuser pipe (horizon
Question 3: The MTO or BOM does not designate the (a) or (b) clause for all of the items that pertain to the modified vessels. Is this an oversight?
Answer 3: The (a) and (b) notes (clauses) associated with the MTO/BOM were only referenced on items that used a different quantity of material between the two types of tanks. Indicate in your offer if you have a specific item referencing either note.
File details come from the government source that posted it.