Specs Rose Lake Vol 2.pdf

Bidding and Contract Document (5/19) Project Name: Rose Lake Wildlife Area File No. 751/19255.KSZ

APPENDIX V

ASBESTOS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY

REPORT – DLZ

July 5, 2019

Ms. Kristi Zakrzewski, PE Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget Design and Construction Division 3111 West St. Joseph Street Lansing, MI 48909

RE: Asbestos and Hazardous Material Survey Report

7 Buildings in the Rose Lake Wildlife Area East Lansing, Michigan 48823

Dear Ms.: Zakrzewski

DLZ Michigan, Inc. is pleased to present this Report of the Asbestos and Hazardous Materials Survey for the above referenced site.

INTRODUCTION

DLZ was retained by DTMB to perform six asbestos and seven hazardous material surveys at the Rose Lake Wildlife Area located in East Lansing, Michigan. The buildings were inspected on May 31, 2019. The site contains seven buildings at various locations (Appendix D) to be demolished, with buildings being of various construction, including wood stud walls with drywall or wood panels, two Quonset huts with corrugated steel roofing and walls, two pole barns, an old Barn and a single car garage with wood studs and shingle roofing. Following is the list of seven buildings where the surveys were conducted by DLZ.

Building # Bldg. Description Bldg. Address County

Asbestos Survey

(Yes/No)

Hazardous Material Survey

(Yes/No)

81590 Field Office 8562 E. Stoll Rd., E. Lansing Clinton No* Yes

81557 Yellow Barn 8562 E. Stoll Rd., E. Lansing Clinton Yes Yes

82725 Small Quonset 9870 W. Stoll Rd., Haslett Shiawassee Yes Yes

83922 Seed Storage 8903 E. Stoll Rd., E. Lansing Clinton Yes Yes

81399 Pheasant Barn 8903 E. Stoll Rd., E. Lansing Clinton Yes Yes

81411 1 Car Garage 8903 E. Stoll Rd., E. Lansing Clinton Yes Yes

81756 Large Quonset Hut 9870 W. Stoll Rd., Haslett Shiawassee Yes Yes

*Asbestos survey of Field Office was previously completed by Trust Thermal in May 2017 (Appendix E)

Rose Lake Wildlife Area

Asbestos & Hazardous Materials Survey

PURPOSE

The structures located at the site are subject to the requirements of the federal National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for asbestos regulations contained in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 61, Subpart M, (40 CFR 61, Subpart M). The NESHAP regulations require the Owner/Operator to use an accredited asbestos inspector to thoroughly inspect the affected facility, or part of the facility, where the demolition or renovation will occur for the presence of asbestos including Category I Non-Friable and Category II Non-Friable asbestos containing material. The Owner/Operator is then required to have all Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) removed prior to any demolition activities that may result in the disturbance of these materials.

The purpose of this report is to document the location, quantity, and condition of the Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) and to document any hazardous materials and/or universal waste identified during the pre-demolition asbestos and hazardous materials survey, so these materials can be properly handled and removed prior to and during the demolition.

METHODOLOGY

DLZ conducted the asbestos and hazardous materials survey on May 31, 2019 using a State of Michigan Department of Consumer and Industry Services Accredited Asbestos Inspector. Mr. Dirk Anderson (State of Michigan Accreditation Number A11605, expiring Nov 18, 2019, performed the asbestos inspection and sample collection.

The inspection methodology included the following:

• Inspection of the building for potentially friable and non-friable ACM, delineation of the homogenous areas (materials which are uniform in color and texture), and the procurement of bulk samples from the suspect materials. Samples were collected from visible, suspect friable ACM and non-friable ACM.

• Sample procurement was performed according to the standards of the NESHAP regulations contained in 40 CFR 61, Subpart M.

• The asbestos inspection notes and site photographs included in Attachment A, shows the sample identification number, sample location, sample description, and other comments regarding the suspect ACM bulk samples that were used to document the inspection process.

• The samples were submitted under proper Chain-of-Custody protocol to Fibertec Environmental Services in Holt, Michigan for asbestos analysis.

• Analysis of potential ACM containing bulk samples was performed by Environmental testing Laboratories, Inc. a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) approved laboratory with NVLAP Accreditation number 201028-0. Bulk sample analysis was conducted by the Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) methodology in accordance with the U.S. EPA Method 600/R-93/116.

• The bulk sample results are compared to the NESHAP criteria as defined in 40 CFR 61, Subpart M. NESHAP defines an asbestos containing material as any material that contains greater that 1% asbestos.

• During the asbestos inspection, potential hazardous materials and universal waste were noted.

RESULTS

DLZ performed a NESHAP type inspection of the six buildings and identified four homogenous areas that were sampled for laboratory analysis. None of those suspect asbestos containing homogeneous areas were found to contain asbestos. Only materials visible and readily accessible were sampled at this time.

The complete laboratory report is included in Appendix A. Included in Appendix E is a is a previous asbestos survey for the Field Office building.

UNIVERSAL WASTE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

During the asbestos inspection, DLZ personnel were to identify and note any building contents or conditions, which may, in the professional opinion of the site inspectors, require special consideration or handling prior to, during, or after demolition of the building. The field notes are in Appendix B and the Photo Log of identified materials in Appendix C. The following items were observed:

Building #81756 Large Quonset Hut

• Fluorescent Fixture with Possible PCB ballasts o 4 - 4’- 2 lamp throughout the building.

o 2 - 8’- 2 lamp throughout the building.

• Fluorescent Fixture without Possible PCB ballasts o 10 - 4’- 2 lamp throughout the building.

o 5 - 8’- 2 lamp throughout the building.

Building #82725 Small Quonset Hut

• 2-A/C units to have Freon removed.

• Fluorescent lights with Possible PCB ballasts.

o 3 - 4’- 2 lamp throughout the building.

• Mercury containing devices o 1-Thermostat o 1-Gas Thermo couple o 2-Exterior lights

• Electronic Waste Security camera

Building #83922 Seed Storage

• A/C unit to have Freon removed (1)

• Mercury containing devices CFL bulbs (6)

• Electronic Waste Temperature controllers (8)

Building #81399 Pheasant Barn

• No universal waste

Building #81411 1 Car Garage

• Mercury Vapor Light Exterior of Garage

Building #81557 Yellow Barn

• Mercury o 2 - Exterior lights o 2 -8’ lamps with possible PCB ballasts

Building #81590 Field Office

• Sharps (Medical waste) container in bathroom 1/3 full and 2 - small sharps

• Fluorescent Fixture with Possible PCB ballasts o 75- 4’- 4 lamp throughout the building.

o 3- 2’- 1 lamp throughout the building.

o 3- 4’- 2 lamp throughout the building.

• Mercury containing devices o 6 - Thermostats with Thermometers o 1 - Thermostat o 1 - Thermometer o 6 - Exterior lights

• Fluorescent Fixture without Possible PCB ballasts o 55 - 2’- 3 lamp throughout the building.

o 4 - 3’ lamps only o 6 - 4’ lamps only o 2 - 2’ lamps only U shaped

• Fire Extinguishers (2)

• Batteries (3)

• Smoke Detector (2)

• Freon was removed from all air conditioning units prior to this project

• Electronic Waste o Phones o Computer o Motion Detectors (6) o CB Radio o Electronic White Board o Exit signs (2) o Surgical lamps (2) o TV and VCR

• Chemicals o Disinfectant spray o Comet o Waterless disinfectant 1-gal o “Summacall” Phosphoric Acid (H3PO4) 1-gal o Paint thinner 1-gal o Bleach 1-gal o Fix Crete o Lysol spray o Liquid Hand Soap o Paint 3-gal o Joint Compound o Grout o Concrete Patch o Polyurethane 1- pint o Floor Cleaner 1-qt o PVC cement 2- pints o Isopropyl alcohol 1-pint o Glycol in the boiler system

• Lead Based Paint (LBP) – Based on the age of the buildings, it will be assumed that any paint on the buildings contains lead. It is not anticipated that the presence of LBP will require special handling or disposal techniques. However, reasonable health and safety precautions must be implemented during any planned demolition activities to minimize dust generated that may contain LBP.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of the asbestos and hazardous materials survey, DLZ recommends the following:

• As required by NESHAP, 40 CFR 61, Subpart M, the Notice of Intent to Renovate/Demolish form must be submitted to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), 10 working days prior to the asbestos abatement and/or any demolition activities occurring at this site. The form must also be submitted to the Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Growth 10 working days prior to the commencement of the asbestos abatement.

• The non-asbestos containing material does not require abatement before demolition of the building. However, dust control measures should be used during the demolition to minimize exposure of workers to particulates.

• All asbestos containing materials are to be properly abated from all the buildings prior to demolition activities.

• The PCB ballasts require proper handling and disposal before demolition activities.

• The potential for hidden asbestos and universal wastes not identified during the inspection, and potential unknowns will be properly addressed in the bid specification package.

• Prior to building demolition, the Trade Contractor will be responsible for the removal and recycling/disposal of all equipment, cleaning supplies and other items in the building.

• Based on the age of the structure, it is likely that painted surfaces contain lead. Caution must be exercised during any planned demolition activities to minimize the amount of airborne dust created. This may include using water to control dust produced during demolition which will be addressed in the specifications.

• The Trade contractor will remove and properly dispose of the hazardous medical waste in the sharp’s container prior to the start of the asbestos abatement and demolition activities.

• Glycol in the boiler system to be removed and recycled before demolition activities.

LIMITATIONS

The asbestos inspection included only the sampling and quantification of all visible suspect ACM. The asbestos inspection did not include the removal of any permanent structures (i.e. walls, floors, and ceilings) to identify potential hidden ACM. As a result, the potential exists for unforeseen additional quantities of ACM to be present in these structures due to these materials not being readily observable or accessible.

The results of this inspection are based on the condition of the building and potential ACM on the date of the inspection. Any change in these conditions may result in different recommendations.

DLZ appreciates this opportunity to provide environmental services to MTDMB.

If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact our office.

Sincerely, DLZ MICHIGAN, INC.

Scott G. Park, CPG Environmental Department Manager

SB/SP/DA

Attachments

M:\Proj\1841\6830_DTMB_ISID\12_Rose_Lake_Wildlife_Area_Demolition\Asbetos Report Rose Lake\Rose Lake ACM Report for 7 Bldgs.docx

APPENDIX A

LABRATORY RESULTS

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To:

Attention:

DLZ Corporation

4041 Martel St

Melvindale, MI 48122

Project Location:

Dirk Anderson

Rose Lake Demo

Client Project: N/A

222451ETL Job:

Report Date: 6/4/2019

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1038037 Asbestos PLM01A 06/03/2019

1038038 Asbestos PLM01B 06/03/2019

1038039 Asbestos PLM02A 06/03/2019

1038040 Asbestos PLM02B 06/03/2019

Reviewed by:

Quality Assurance Coordinator

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Melvindale,MI 48122

DLZ Corporation

4041 Martel St

Rose Lake Demo

ETC Job :

Client Project :

222451

N/A

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/31/2019

06/03/2019

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1038037

01A PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glazing

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousWest Window Bldg #81411

Layer-1 Analyst: Erin Danhausen

Date Analyzed : 06/03/2019

PLM None Detected 1038038

01B PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glazing

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousEast Window Bldg #81411

Layer-1 Analyst: Erin Danhausen

Date Analyzed : 06/03/2019

PLM None Detected 1038039

02A PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseBlackShingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousRoof Bldg #81411

Layer-1 Analyst: Erin Danhausen

Date Analyzed : 06/03/2019

PLM None Detected 1038040

02B PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseBlackShingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousRoof Bldg #81411

Layer-1 Analyst: Erin Danhausen

Date Analyzed : 06/03/2019

Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory

Erin Danhausen

Analyst:

400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")

Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples

Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non -Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples

EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials

EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested.

PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com http://www.cutepdf.com

Laboratories, Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To:

Attention:

DLZ Corporation

4041 Martel St

Melvindale, MI 48122

Project Location:

Dirk Anderson

Rose Lake Demo

Client Project: N/A

222452ETL Job:

Report Date: 6/4/2019

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1038041 Asbestos PLM01A 06/03/2019

1038042 Asbestos PLM01B 06/03/2019

Reviewed by:

Quality Assurance Coordinator

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Melvindale,MI 48122

DLZ Corporation

4041 Martel St

Rose Lake Demo

ETC Job :

Client Project :

222452

N/A

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/31/2019

06/03/2019

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1038041

01A PLM 1% OtherPLM 99% CelluloseGray2x4 Dct Streaks

Fibrous

HomogenousOffice Bldg #81752

Analyst: Nathan McGee

Date Analyzed : 06/03/2019

PLM None Detected 1038042

01B PLM 1% OtherPLM 99% CelluloseGray2x4 Dct Streaks

Fibrous

HomogenousOffice Bldg #81725

Analyst: Nathan McGee

Date Analyzed : 06/03/2019

Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory

Nathan McGee

Analyst:

400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")

Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples

Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non -Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples

EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials

EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

Laboratories, Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To:

Attention:

DLZ Corporation

4041 Martel St

Melvindale, MI 48122

Project Location:

Dirk Anderson

Rose Lake Demo

Client Project: N/A

222453ETL Job:

Report Date: 6/4/2019

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1038043 Asbestos PLM01A 06/03/2019

1038044 Asbestos PLM01B 06/03/2019

Reviewed by:

Quality Assurance Coordinator

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Melvindale,MI 48122

DLZ Corporation

4041 Martel St

Rose Lake Demo

ETC Job :

Client Project :

222453

N/A

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/31/2019

06/03/2019

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1038043

01A PLM 84% OtherPLM 1% Cellulose

PLM 15% Fiberglass

GrayShingles

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousRoof Bldg #83922

Analyst: Nathan McGee

Date Analyzed : 06/03/2019

PLM None Detected 1038044

01B PLM 84% OtherPLM 1% Cellulose

PLM 15% Fiberglass

GrayShingles

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousRoof Bldg #83922

Analyst: Nathan McGee

Date Analyzed : 06/03/2019

Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory

Nathan McGee

Analyst:

400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")

Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples

Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non -Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples

EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials

EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

APPENDIX B

FIELD NOTES

CLIENT__________________________________________ PROJECT NO. _________________________

PROJECT_______________________________________ SHEET NO. ____________OF____________

ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING. PLANNING

SURVEYING • CONSTRUCTION SERVICES SUBJECT ‘— LI COMP. BY ___________________DATE ______________

_________________________________________________ CHECKED BY DATE ___________

4- ~‘ 2~ ~J~/i~ ~ ~/ 2-Lvv\~’ . ~

~ ~u1 ~ ~

APPENDIX C

PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

R o se L a k e W il d li fe

A re a

B u il d in g s

E st L a n si n g

M ic h ig n ld g p h o to

F ie ld O ff ic e B u il d in g p h o to

V en t fo r U

S T g p h o to

S h ar p s co n ta in er i n b at h ro o m

C o n ta in m ed ic al w as te g p h o to

P ai n t, d ry w al l m u d t o b e re m o v ed a n d C

B r ad io se L a k e W il d li fe

A u il d in st L a n si n g

M ic h ig g p h o to

T h er m o m et er i n u p p er l ev el b o il er r o o m a d ly co l to b e re m o v ed f ro m t h e sy st em g

(p h o to

C h em ic al t o b e re m o v g p h o to

M er cu ry v ap o r li g h ts E x te ri r g p h o to

E x it s ig n s w it h b at te ri es a n d F lo re sc en t fi x tu se L a k e W il d li fe

A u il d in st L a n si n g

M ic h ig g p h o to

T h er m o m et er a n d m er cu ry s w it ch t h er m o st at f g p h o to

L o o se b u lb s an d b at te ri es g p h o to

C h em ic al s to b e re m o g p h o to

C h em ic al s to b e re m o se L a k e W il d li fe

A u il d in st L a n si n g

M ic h ig g p h o to

E le ct ro n ic w as te a n d l o o se b u lb g p h o to

M o re e le ct ro n ic w as te g p h o to

B eh in d F ie ld o ff ic e st ee l co rn c ri b s to b e d em o li sh g p h o to

E x te ri o r li g h ts a n d t ra n si te o n c ei li n g o f lo w er p rc h a t th e fi el d o ff ic e se L a k e W il d li fe

A u il d in st L a n si n g

M ic h ig g p h o to

S in g le f lo re sc en t li g h t ab o v e a si n k a t th e fi el ff g p h o to

F ir e ex ti n g u is h er o f a t th e fi el d o ff g p h o to

L ar g e

Q u o n se t

H u t b u il d g p h o to

F lo re sc en t fi x tu re n o n -P

C se L a k e W il d li fe

A u il d in st L a n si n g

M ic h ig g p h o to

F lo re sc en t

F ix tu re s P o ss ib le

P C

’s g p h o to

S m al l

Q u o n se t H u t b u il d in g w it h e x te ri o r li g h t an d c am er g p h o to

M er cu ry s w it ch t h er m o at g p h o to

A

/C u n it t o h av e fr eo n r em o v ed o se L a k e W il d li fe

A u il d in st L a n si n g

M ic h ig g p h o to

P o ss ib le m er cu ry s w it ch t h er m o co u p le g p h o to

C h em ic al s p o ss ib ly s ti ll i n t h e b u il d g p h o to

S ee d S to ra g e b u il d in g w it h

A /C u n it t o h av e fr eo n r em o g p h o to

C F

L b u lb o se L a k e W il d li fe

A u il d in st L a n si n g

M ic h ig g p h o to

W at er W el l to b e p ro p er ly a b an d o n ed

N ea r S ee

S to ra g e b u il d g p h o to

-C ar G ar ag e b u il d in g w it h m er cu ry v ap o r li g h t g p h o to

Y el lo w

B ar n b u il d in g w it h m er cu ry v ap o r li g h ts g p h o to

F lo re sc en t fi x tu re s w it h p o ss ib le P

C B b al la

E..~Z CLIENT__________________________________________ PROJECT NO. _________________________PROJECT_______________________________________ SHEET NO. ____________OF____________

ARCHITECTURE~ ENGINEERING. PLANNING ~

SURVEYING • CONSTRUCTION SERVICES SUBJECT U I COMP. BY __________________DATE _____________

____________________________________________________ CHECKED BY DATE ___________

• 4’ ‘L LA~’ cThi~

2~ W~OcF* ~ ffl~p~ ?i~J .~t€ ~ c(yupLe

~-~&WtS ~-c~&~40~--

(Eq1~~~c i~cT~)

10 ~ • C L ~ T~u~5 ~ 4 ~ C~i U b

DLZT

ARCHITECTURE. ENGINEERING. PLANNING

SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES ci iR i~flT

I~cS~

~. ?r~o10 c~ rnz~—

PROJECT NO. ___________________________

SHEET NO. ______________OF______________

COMP. BY _______________DATE ___________

CHECKED BY DATE ___________

~A)c~ ~çw~ (~ ~ro~)

— CfL ~

- z cPL-~

Co u~-~S

T(~iO jt~3~

4.

~D~Z CUENT____________________________________________ PROJECT NO. __________________________PROJECT_______________________________________ SHEET NO. ____________OF____________

ARCHITECTURE. ENGINEERING PLANNING

SURVEYING . CONSTRUCTION SERVICES SUBJECT _________________________________________________________ COMP. BY ___________________DATE ______________

____________________________________________________ CHECKED BY DATE ___________

N~O s’~?~F 1~CM

1.1Z CLIENT_____________________________________________ PROJECT NO. __________________________PROJECT_____________________________________ SHEET NO. ___________OF___________

ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING

SURVEYING • CONSTRUCTION SERVICES SUBJECT_________________________________________________________ COMP. BY ___________________DATE ______________

____________________________________________________ CHECKED BY DATE ___________

~AU~ ~€~-

~ ~ ~oc~L&,

• ~ •~f F~ooL

?AUJ1~> tA3oo~ Oc~i~ i~i~_ iv~taj~cf ~po~ z_ \h~- L\~-W1~S

W joc~c~-~c

0 ~

~u~S~t3

C~R~-~ ~-‘~__\__ ~c__~’5

~LO TO 3~XcOV.) ~

CLIENT_

~i:~i~Z PROJECT.

ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING

SURVEYING • CONSTRUCTION SERVICES ci j~ icr’T

PROJECT NO.

SHEET NO. ______________OF______________

COMR BY _______________DATE ___________

CHECKED BY DATE ___________

F~C$.. iL~i(r

3S0 -~7~o3

L~Z CLIENT - PROJECT NO. __________________________PROJECT_______________________________________ SHEET NO. ( OF____________

ARCHITECTURE. ENGINEERING. PLANNING

SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES SUBJECT _____________________________________________________________ COMP. BY _____________________DATE

____________________________________________________ CHECKED BY DATE ___________

~ 7 z ME~WR~L1 o~p~s 5o~~ ~ ~ Se tU &~_ ~ôM~5 9I~f~ji ~ ~ ~s

~ çi~/f~o~~ ~‘~AV& ~

?~t~? \Wf~~C ~ ~fr’

4 ~ ü)4LK~ OVE~-~ ~6-~ i~JD ~ L~kit4-1S ~ ‘~L1ewAi.-Y-~1 I ‘~t ~MA.\.5~ c~LP9 ~

~c 4’ ~ L~~ ~ I Y~JW

\c v~~&9 j Eci1~ ~ L- ~~7~ ~E~5

2’x 4’ 4 L~ ~ ~ -~ii h~t ~ J~ ~-~r ~Ott~ ~ t1X~ S~L~3~-1M? ~i

~iv,~L GI_~tC0L V-~ tJj ~t~&~L

~ Li~4P ~ 4) c~r~ &“.~ ~ ~xz— c\

~L~t~Oi3t~ hi ~ch ~ .-. 4 ~( ~ __________________________________

Z CLIENT__________________________________________ PROJECT NO. _________________________PROJECT_______________________________________ SHEET NO. ____________OF____________ ARCHITECTURE.EHGIHEERINGPLANNING ~ t ~J f ___)

SURVEYING • CONSTRUCTION SERVICES SUBJECT P 1 ‘ COMP. BY __________________DATE _____________

____________________________________________________ CHECKED BY DATE ___________

CA ~ - A~-~ ~ Sc) MM ~ ~ (~ i>o~) -~~T~T ~ t ~

~ ~c≥-) J~~/\U V)~i 1~-~

~ ~tiwc 1~i trr

12 ~ ~ ~c~T~&~

~4 ~J ~~ ~~

~ V-TU~k~ •t~

~T ?O~-~1N~, \c~P.~TTV ~

N~or’~ ~Q ~1-~ £Th qT ~ L1

L ~ Nc c&~MT

~ n~ ~oc?_ o~- ~ (ucT) ?co~o~~~- ~ ‘~— 6o’4~- ?-~oVM_

4~ ?~- ~4O~ ~ps ~E~T8~T ~ir

~oT’~ ~]—~J~WT ~<~-‘~ ~N—\ ~

~*:~D \W~~~J~ -~ -