SF 30_SPE60525R0200_Amd 0004.pdf

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF

CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS

DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

SEE CONTINUATION PAGE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

PAGE OF PAGES

1 5

6. ISSUED BY

DLA Energy CODE SPE605 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

1.6

CODE

Attn: Georgia Dotson 8725 John J. Kingman Rd, STE 3930 Ft Belvoir, VA 22060

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

SPE60525R0200

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

05/02/2025

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE

(X)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER

7008475704

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06/04/2025

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

1. The purpose of the Request for Proposal, SPE60525R0200, Amendment 0004 - Offerors must complete Block #8 and #15 and return with your updated COA/COQ. Amendment 0004 is to update Attachment 3 – Additional Text Instructions, Energy Quality Assurance Provision (E-QAP C16-64-1, Turbine Fuel, Aviation (JP8) (Inland East Gulf/Offshore) (Rocky Mountain/West) (WESTPAC) (ALT/EUR/MED) (PC&S) DLA Energy OCT 2022) as follows:

FROM:

C16.64-1 TURBINE FUEL, AVIATION (JP8) (INLAND EAST GULF/OFFSHORE) (ROCKY

MOUNTAIN/WEST) (WESTPAC) (ALT/EUR/MED) (PC&S) (DLA ENERGY OCT 2022)

NATIONAL STOCK NUMBER PRODUCT NOMENCLATURE DLA ENERGY PRODUCT CODE

9130-01-031-5816 Turbine Fuel, Aviation JP8

Aviation Turbine Fuel (JP8) shall conform to MIL-DTL-83133K, dated July 18, 2018

Supplies delivered under this contract shall conform to all Federal, State, and local environmental requirements applicable to the geographic location of the receiving activity on the date of delivery. This includes delivery of fuel and documentation in a manner consistent with any existing or after-imposed Title V (Clean Air Act) Permits. The list of such requirements contained in this contract is not intended to be a complete list, and the Contractor shall be responsible for determining the existence of all such requirements. Selected regional environmental requirements are highlighted in the SPECIFICATIONS (CONT’D) clause. In the event that a Federal, State, or local environmental requirement is more stringent than a fuel specification contained in this contract, the Contractor shall deliver product that complies with the more stringent fuel specification. Product that fails to meet the more stringent fuel specification will be considered to be a nonconforming supply. Product(s) to be supplied shall fully meet the requirements of the applicable specification(s) as cited above. In the event that compliance with the more stringent fuel specification causes the contractor to incur additional costs, the contractor may request an equitable adjustment.

(a) INCIDENTAL CONTAMINANTS. Particulate Matter and Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) content shall not exceed the limits outlined in Table IV of MIL-DTL-83133K, dated July 18, 2018.

(b) SPECIFICATION MODIFICATIONS. Aviation Turbine Fuel (JP8) shall conform to MIL-DTL-83133K, dated July 18, 2018, modified as follows:

(1) TESTING

(i) FILTRATION TIME TESTING. For filtration time testing round upwards when reporting the filtration time, in minutes. For example, a filtration time of 10 minutes, 18 seconds, would be reported as 11 minutes.

(ii) MICROSEPAROMETER (MSEP) RATING LIMITS. See MIL-DTL-83133K, dated July 18, 2018, Table 1, Note 15 for MSEP test method selection criteria.

(A) Prior to initial production under this contract, the Contractor shall elect, on a one-time basis, which

MSEP limit will be met for the balance of the contract. If the Contractor introduces fuel system icing inhibitor (FSII), corrosion inhibitor/lubricity improver (CI/LI), and/or static dissipater additive (SDA) after verification of product conformance with the MSEP requirement, the product is not required to meet a fixed limit on subsequent MSEP tests.

(B) If the Contractor elects to verify conformance with the MSEP requirement on a sample of product that does not contain FSII and CI/LI, an additional MSEP test shall be performed on a hand blend containing aviation turbine fuel, FSII, CI/LI, and antioxidant (AO) (AO only if required). The FSII shall be included in this hand blend at a concentration of 0.07 to 0.10 volume percent and the amount of the CI/LI included shall be within the concentration range specified in QPL-25017. The additional MSEP result of this hand blend is a REPORT ONLY requirement and shall be recorded corresponding to item 750X on the Standardized Report Form (see Attachment ).

This result shall be recorded with an asterisk next to it, and with a footnote below, stating, “*MSEP result is a ‘Report Only’ requirement. Original result of (fill in actual result) on product containing the following additives:

(fill in combination of additives).”

(iii) WORKMANSHIP. The workmanship criteria in MIL-DTL-83133K, dated July 18, 2018, paragraph 3.5, is revised to read, “At the custody transfer point, the finished fuel shall be clear and bright and visually free from undissolved water and particulate matter in accordance with the latest revisions of the approved test methods. ASTM D4176 or ASTM D6986, latest versions, may be used. In case of dispute as determined by sample results taken from the custody transfer point, the fuel shall be clear and bright at 21 degrees Celsius (°C) (70 degrees Fahrenheit [°F]) and shall contain no more than 1.0 mg/L of particulate matter. The sample in dispute shall be taken into an area where the sample is permitted to slowly equilibrate to 21°C (70°F); this shall apply to either D4176 or D6986.”

(A) ASTM D6986, latest revision, shall be the referee test method, see requirements, as drafted, in MIL-

DTL-83133K, dated July 18, 2018, section 3.5.

(B) For the latest revision of ASTM D 4176, Procedure 2, with a result of Rating 1, maximum. If the sample fails ASTM D4176 only because it contains visible particulate matter but meets the particulate matter requirements of 1.0 mg/L maximum as stated in MIL-DTL-83133K, Table IV, the workmanship criteria is met.

(2) SPECIAL LOCATION REQUIREMENTS

(i) Rocky Mountain/West. Aviation fuel movement via the Chevron Pipeline (Utah, Idaho, or Washington state entry points) shall be limited to total sulfur content of 0.15 mass percent, maximum.

(ii) Alaska. For fuels refined in Alaska and delivered to Alaska locations, the total acid number shall be relaxed to 0.020 mg KOH/g maximum.

(c) ADDITIVES. Additives are required for deliveries of JP8 per MIL-DTL-83133K, dated July 18, 2018, unless addition is excluded by specific solicitation line item, applicable contract clause, or another contractual requirement. (1) The CI/LI additive(s) used shall be of the type and concentration cited in QPL-25017. To locate this information:

(1) Go to the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST) Quick Search website (URL http://quicksearch.dla.mil/), (2) type "QPL-25017" in the Document ID field, press the Search button, (3) click the QPL- 25017 search result under Document ID, (4) click the "Qualification" link under Overview [or the "View QPD data" link under Revision History], and (5) click the “MIL-PRF- 25017 CATEGORY 1” link under Govt Designation. The concentration range for each additive is listed under the “Source Notes” link under the far-right column of the table.

(2) Metal deactivator additive (MDA) shall not be used in JP8 unless the Contractor has obtained written consent from the Contracting Officer.

(3) The requirement for SDA (see MIL-DTL-83133K, dated July 18, 2018, paragraph 3.3.3 and fuel electrical conductivity requirement in Table I) shall not apply unless stated otherwise in the Schedule. Line injection of additives (FSII, CI/LI, and SDA) from shipping tank to delivery conveyance is permitted under the following conditions:

(i) A laboratory hand blend containing the required additives and aviation turbine fuel shall be tested to verify compliance with the specification.

(ii) Additives shall be proportionately injected throughout the entire loading process to ensure the additive is homogeneously blended into the product. The Contractor shall maintain records evidencing the homogeneous blending of all line-injected additives. Such records shall include meter or tank gauge readings or test results taken at intervals to provide confidence in the injection process.

(iii) When FSII is line injected, additive concentration shall be verified based on a representative sample from each shipping conveyance.

(iv) When SDA is line-injected, and insufficient time is available for the fuel to reach equilibrium before departure of the shipping conveyance, the Contractor shall verify conductivity level on a representative sample from each shipping conveyance. The receiving activity will measure the conductivity and advise DLA Energy if it does not meet the specification requirements.

(4) SPECIAL LOCATION REQUIREMENTS (ATL/EUR/MED ONLY)

(i) For deliveries to La Spezia, Italy, the CI/LI shall be 3.5 g/m3 above the minimum effective concentration as identified in QPL-25017. See paragraph (c)(1) above.

(ii) When AO is added to the hydrotreated portion of the finished product, the percentage of the blend that has been hydrotreated shall be reported.

(iii) The requirement for SDA (see MIL-DTL-83133K, dated July 18, 2018, paragraph 3.3.3 and fuel electrical conductivity requirement in Table I) shall not apply unless stated otherwise in the Schedule.

TO:

C16.64-1 TURBINE FUEL, AVIATION (JP8) (DLA ENERGY JAN 2025)

NATIONAL STOCK NUMBER PRODUCT NOMENCLATURE DLA ENERGY PRODUCT CODE

9130-01-031-5816 Turbine Fuel, Aviation JP8

Aviation Turbine Fuel (JP8) shall conform to MIL-DTL-83133L, dated August 2, 2024.

Supplies delivered under this contract shall conform to all Federal, State, and local environmental requirements applicable to the geographic location of the receiving activity on the date of delivery. This includes delivery of fuel and documentation in a manner consistent with any existing or after-imposed Title V (Clean Air Act) Permits. The list of such requirements contained in this contract is not intended to be a complete list, and the Contractor shall be responsible for determining the existence of all such requirements. Selected regional environmental requirements are highlighted in the SPECIFICATIONS (CONT’D) clause. In the event that a Federal, State, or local environmental requirement is more stringent than a fuel specification contained in this contract, the Contractor shall deliver product that complies with the more stringent fuel specification. Product that fails to meet the more stringent fuel specification will be considered to be a nonconforming supply. Product(s) to be supplied shall fully meet the requirements of the applicable specification(s) as cited above. In the event that compliance with the more stringent fuel specification causes the contractor to incur additional costs, the contractor may request an equitable adjustment.

(a) INCIDENTAL CONTAMINANTS. Particulate Matter and Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) content shall not exceed the limits outlined in Table IV of MIL-DTL-83133L dated August 2, 2024.

(b) SPECIFICATION MODIFICATIONS. Aviation Turbine Fuel (JP8) shall conform to MIL-DTL-83133L, dated August 2, 2024, modified as follows:

(1) TESTING

(i) FILTRATION TIME TESTING. If filtration time testing is required by contract, round upwards when reporting the filtration time, in minutes. For example, a filtration time of 10 minutes, 18 seconds, would be reported as 11 minutes.

(ii) MICROSEPAROMETER (MSEP) RATING LIMITS. See MIL-DTL-83133L, dated August 2, 2024, Table 1, Note 15 for MSEP test method selection criteria.

(A) Prior to initial production under this contract, the Contractor shall elect, on a one-time basis, which MSEP limit will be met for the balance of the contract. If the Contractor introduces fuel system icing inhibitor (FSII), corrosion inhibitor/lubricity improver (CI/LI), and/or static dissipater additive (SDA) after verification of product conformance with the MSEP requirement, the product is not required to meet a fixed limit on subsequent MSEP tests.

(B) If the Contractor elects to verify conformance with the MSEP requirement on a sample of product that does not contain FSII and CI/LI, an additional MSEP test shall be performed on a hand blend containing aviation turbine fuel, FSII, CI/LI, and antioxidant (AO) (AO only if required). The FSII shall be included in this hand blend at a concentration of 0.07 to 0.10 volume percent and the amount of the CI/LI included shall be within the concentration range specified in QPL-25017.

(iii) WORKMANSHIP. The workmanship criteria in MIL-DTL-83133L, dated August 2, 2024, paragraph

3.8, is revised to read, “At the custody transfer point, the finished fuel shall be clear and bright and visually free from undissolved water and particulate matter in accordance with the latest revisions of the approved test methods.

ASTM D4176 or ASTM D6986, latest versions, may be used. In case of dispute as determined by sample results taken from the custody transfer point, the fuel shall be clear and bright at 21 degrees Celsius (°C) (70 degrees Fahrenheit [°F]) and shall contain no more than 1.0 mg/L of particulate matter. The sample in dispute shall be taken into an area where the sample is permitted to slowly equilibrate to 21°C (70°F); this shall apply to either D4176 or D6986.”

(A) ASTM D6986, latest revision, shall be the referee test method, see requirements, as drafted, in

MIL-DTL- 83133L, dated August 2, 2024, section 3.8.

(B) For the latest revision of ASTM D 4176, Procedure 2, with a result of Rating 1, maximum. If the sample fails ASTM D4176 only because it contains visible particulate matter but meets the particulate matter requirements of 1.0 mg/L maximum as stated in MIL-DTL-83133L, Table V, the workmanship criteria is met.

(2) SPECIAL LOCATION REQUIREMENTS

(i) Rocky Mountain/West. Aviation fuel movement via the Chevron Pipeline (Utah, Idaho, or Washington state entry points) shall be limited to total sulfur content of 0.15 mass percent, maximum.

(ii) Alaska. For fuels refined in Alaska and delivered to Alaska locations, the total acid number shall be relaxed to 0.020 mg KOH/g maximum.

(c) ADDITIVES. Additives are required for deliveries of JP8 per MIL-DTL-83133L, dated August 2, 2024, unless addition is excluded by specific solicitation line item, applicable contract clause, or another contractual requirement.

(1) The CI/LI additive(s) used shall be of the type and concentration cited in QPL-25017. To locate this information:

Go to https://qpldocs.dla.mil/. Type "QPL-25017" in the search area and press the Search button, click the “MIL-PRF- 25017. The concentration range for each additive is listed under the “Source Notes” link under the far-right column of the table.

(2) Metal deactivator additive (MDA) shall not be used in JP8 unless written consent from the Contracting Officer is obtained.

(3) The requirement for SDA (see MIL-DTL-83133L, dated August 2, 2024, paragraph 3.5.3 and fuel electrical conductivity requirement in Table I) shall not apply unless stated otherwise in the Schedule. Line injection of additives (FSII, CI/LI, and SDA) from shipping tank to delivery conveyance is permitted under the following conditions:

(i) A laboratory hand blend containing the required additives and aviation turbine fuel shall be tested to verify compliance with the specification.

(ii) Additives shall be proportionately injected throughout the entire loading process to ensure the additive is homogeneously blended into the product. The Contractor shall maintain records evidencing the homogeneous blending of all line-injected additives. Such records shall include meter or tank gauge readings or test results taken at intervals to provide confidence in the injection process.

(iii) When FSII is line injected, additive concentration shall be verified based on a representative sample from each shipping conveyance.

(iv) When SDA is line-injected, and insufficient time is available for the fuel to reach equilibrium before departure of the shipping conveyance, the Contractor shall verify conductivity level on a representative sample from each shipping conveyance. The receiving activity will measure the conductivity and advise DLA Energy if it does not meet the specification requirements.

(d) SYNTHETIC BLEND COMPONENT (SBC) and CO-HYDROPROCESSED SYNTHESIZED KEROSENE If a fuel containing an SBC or a co-hydroprocessed synthesized kerosene is being offered, notification shall be made to the contracting point of contact with submission of relevant details regarding the blend percentage and which Annex of ASTM D7566 for the synthetic blend component used, and which feedstocks and co-processing percentage for co-hydroprocessed synthesized kerosene. Only synthetic blend components approved in ASTM D7566, MIL-DTL-83133, and MIL-DTL-5624 and co-hydroprocessed synthesized kerosene produced from approved feedstock and percentage in ASTM D1655, MIL- DTL-83133, and MIL-DTL-5624 shall be acceptable to the government

(4) SPECIAL LOCATION REQUIREMENTS (ATL/EUR/MED ONLY)

(i) For deliveries to La Spezia, Italy, the CI/LI shall be 3.5 g/m3 above the minimum effective concentration as identified in QPL-25017. See paragraph (c)(1) above.

(ii) When AO is added to the hydrotreated portion of the finished product, the percentage of the blend that has been hydrotreated shall be reported.

The requirement for SDA (see MIL-DTL-83133L, dated August 2, 2024, paragraph 3.5.3 and fuel electrical conductivity requirement in Table I) shall not apply unless stated otherwise in the Schedule.

2. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.