Amendment_0001-SPE600-16-R-0526.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

See Block 14

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

Fort Hood, TX

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE SPE600 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SPE60016R0526

X

2016 SEP 29

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of OffersX is extended, X is not extended.

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning

DLA ENERGY

8725 JOHN J KINGMAN RD STE 4950

FT BELVOIR VA 22060-6222

USA

15C. DATE SIGNED 16C. DATE SIGNED

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

10/05/2016

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

See Attached Continuation Sheet(s).

(X)

CHECK ONE

PAGE OF PAGES

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

SPE600-16-R-0526

Ft. Hood, TX

Amendment 0001

A. Amendment 0001 under solicitation SPE600-16-R-0526, dated September 29, 2016 is hereby issued to incorporate the following changes:

1. Page 3, paragraph D. is revised to correct the number of volumes required and should read as follows:

D. FAXED PROPOSALS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED. Please e-mail your proposal to: bidcustodian@dla.mil.

All e-mail proposals MUST be followed-up with the hard copy (consisting of three volumes as outlined below) NO LATER THAN (5) business days after solicitation closing. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208 – Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals. Offeror’s proposals shall be prepared in three separate volumes and provided in the quantities shown below:

Volume Title No. of Copies Required Page Limit I Technical Proposal 1 original copy and 1 PDF electronic copy 70 II Offeror Submission

Package (OSP) includes Price Proposal

1 original and 1 PDF electronic copy of Attachment II – OFFEROR SUBMISSION

PACKAGE

None

III Past Performance (PPQ) 1 PDF electronic copy None

2. Page 92, SECTION J-ATTACHMENTS, ATTACHMENT IV-should read as follows… ATTACHMENT IV- DLA Form 2019, FEB 2013 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN.

3. Page 115, ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERS – COMERCIAL ITEMS (SEP 2016) paragraph a) is revised to correct the number of volumes required and should read as follows:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (SEP 2016)

Award will be made on the basis of the proposal that conforms to the solicitation and is determined to be the “Best Value” to the Government. The Government will establish a competitive range comprised of all of the highly rated proposals. The competitive range may be further reduced for purposes of efficiency (IAW FAR 15.306(c)(2) – Exchanges with Offerors after Receipt of Proposals). This solicitation does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal or for any other costs incurred by any firm submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation.

a) Offeror’s proposals shall be prepared in three separate volumes and provided in the quantities shown below.

Technical/Management proposals shall provide information following the technical proposal factors format.

Proposals that do not provide the required information in the prescribed format may be excluded from further consideration.

Volume Title No. of Copies Required Page Limit I Technical Proposal 1 original copy and 1 PDF electronic copy 70 II Offeror Submission

Package (OSP) includes Price Proposal

1 original and 1 PDF electronic copy of Attachment II – OFFEROR SUBMISSION

PACKAGE

None

III Past Performance (PPQ) 1 PDF electronic copy None

4. The following clause 52.222-24 PREAWARD ON-SITE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE EVALUATION (FEB 1999) has been added to Section L – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICE TO

OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS.

FAR 52.222-24 PREAWARD ON-SITE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE EVALUATION (FEB

1999). If a contract in the amount of $10 million or more will result from this solicitation, the prospective Contractor mailto:bidcustodian@dla.mil

Amendment 0001 and its known first-tier subcontractors with anticipated subcontracts of $10 million or more shall be subject to a preaward compliance evaluation by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), unless, within the preceding 24 months, OFCCP has conducted an evaluation and found the prospective Contractor and subcontractors to be in compliance with Executive Order 11246. (End of Provision)

5. The following paragraph has been added to this solicitation: SOCIOECONOMIC/SUBCONTRACTING PLAN:

The offeror (if a large business) shall complete and submit the DLA Form 2019, FEB 2013 (Formerly DLA Energy 19.3) (Attachment IV) to describe the extent of any planned subcontracting with small, small disadvantage, veteran-owned small, service-disabled veteran-owned small, HUBZone small businesses and Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions. Figures stated on the DLA Form 2019 should refer to intended subcontracted amounts for the base period only.

6. Paragraph four (4). FAXED PROPOSALS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED of the Offeror Submission Package (OSP) is changed to read as: Please e-mail your proposal to: bidcustodian@dla.mil and CC: robin.boateng@dla.mil. All e-mail proposals MUST be followed-up with the hard copy (consisting of three volumes as outlined below) NO LATER THAN (5) business days after solicitation closing. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208 – Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals.

Offeror’s proposals shall be prepared in three separate volumes and provided in the quantities shown below:

Volume Title No. of Copies Required Page Limit I Technical Proposal 1 original copy and 1 PDF electronic copy 70 II Offeror Submission

Package (OSP) includes Price Proposal

1 original and 1 PDF electronic copy of Attachment II – OFFEROR SUBMISSION

PACKAGE

None

III Past Performance (PPQ) 1 PDF electronic copy None

Note: The Offeror must submit one (1) submission of the technical proposal. The first 50 pages will address the PWS and 20 additional pages will address the Fort Hood, TX PWS Base Appendix that details the site specific requirements Total of 70 pages for submission.

7. Note: In order to be considered for an award for a location, an offeror must submit both a technical proposal and a properly completed Clause B-0001 B34.01 price proposal for that location.

8. Page 119, under the last paragraph of Volume III- Past Performance the following Note has been added:

Note: Offers submitted by Small Businesses need to address this in their proposal, however the DLA Energy Form DLA Energy Form 2019 Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required.

9. Page 122, DLA Energy Provision L-0004: L73 INSPECTION OF PREMISES (AARD) (DLA ENERGY FEB 1970) has been deleted in its entirety from this solicitation.

10. This amendment to the solicitation provides a detailed schedule for the pre-proposal conference and site visits.

L-0006 L198 PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE (SERVICES) (DLA ENERGY FEB 2009)

The Preproposal conference, in conjunction with the site visits, will be held to provide offerors an opportunity to be briefed on the work covered by the solicitation. Attendance at the conference is strongly encouraged. Any comments/remarks made by Government representatives at the conference should not be construed as a change. Any changes in terms or conditions must be accomplished by a written amendment to the solicitation. Offerors are

Amendment 0001 requested to submit acceptance to the Contracting Officer by letter, telephone, facsimile, or email of the name(s) of the individual(s) who plan to attend. Attendance is limited to a maximum of two (2) representatives per company.

The conference date and time is as set forth below:

Pre-Proposal Conference – Fort Hood, Texas Location: Logistics Readiness Center located at Building 89010 Clark Road (Room 136), Fort Hood, TX 76544 Date: October 18, 2016 Time: 0900 hours Local Time

The purpose of the Pre-Proposal Conference/Site Visit will be to address questions regarding the solicitation and tour the facility. We urge all prospective offerors to attend this conference.

*The event time on the schedule are subject to change based on the flow of events*

Attendee Registration Requirements – Offerors that do not possess a valid CAC and/or military ID (retiree, etc.) will be required to present a second from of ID (i.e. driver’s license, etc.). For vehicles to gain temporary access to installation (escorted on), a copy of the vehicle registration will be required.

Offerors are requested to provide full name (Last, First, MI), and company affiliation of all requesting attendees via email to: robin.boateng@dla.mil NLT October 4, 2016.

Offerors are requested to follow-up in writing NLT October 24, 2016 with all technical questions to ensure that the same response is provided to all attendees. All responses will be provided via an amendment to the solicitation.

Remarks and explanations provided at this conference shall not qualify as a change to the terms of the solicitation and Performance Work Statement. Unless the Solicitation is amended in writing, it will remain unchanged. Should an amendment be issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of the amendment shall apply.

Prospective offerors are requested to submit questions regarding the solicitation in writing via electronic mail to the above e-mail address five (5) days in advance of the conference to allow their inclusion in the agenda. Questions will be considered at any time prior to or during the conference; however, offerors will be asked to confirm verbal questions in writing.

The Government will not be liable for expenses incurred by an offeror prior to contract award.

Offerors are cautioned that remarks and explanations provided at the conference shall not change the terms of this solicitation unless the solicitation is amended in writing. Offerors may obtain a copy of the conference minutes from the Contracting Officer.

NOTE: Any additional technical questions pertaining to the solicitation must be in writing to robin.boateng@dla.mil no later than October 24, 2016. Answers to technical questions will be posted to FBO as an amendment to the solicitation. Please submit new questions in a word document, questions submitted prior to this amendment will not be answered. PLEASE note solicitation number and location in subject of email.

11. Incorporate directions to the Logistics Readiness Center (LRC) located at Building 89010 Clarke Road, (Room 136) Fort Hood, Texas.

mailto:robin.boateng@dla.mil mailto:robin.boateng@dla.mil

Amendment 0001

FORT HOOD TEXAS

*TRAVELING WEST TO THE MARVIN LEATH VISITORS CENTER FOR A VISITOR PASS AND THEN

TO THE LOGISTICS READINESS CENTER (LRC) LOCATED AT BUILDING 89010 CLARKE ROAD.

(ROOM 136)

Travel West on HWY 190 look for the sign that read TJ Mills BLVD and Bernie Beck Gate

Get off at this exit look for the Marvin Leath Visitor Center it will be on the right.

If you’re not a Military ID or CAC card holder you’ll need a pass.

Once you receive your pass proceed around the loop and back to HWY 190 going west travel about 1 mile and you will look for Clarke road Gate. Get off on the exit go to the light turn right proceed to the gate. Stay on Clarke road until you get to the first traffic light. Turn left onto Tank Destroy Blvd. look to your left and you will see a very large building on your left about 50 yard in front of you.

This is the 407th AFSB Logistics Readiness Center (LRC) where your conference will be held.

Amendment 0001

If the driver has a Military ID or CAC card start your direction traveling 190 WEST to Clarke Rd Gate.

12. Page 124, ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 – EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (SEP 2016) is revised to incorporate information on the Socioeconomic/Subcontracting Plan.

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 – EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (SEP 2016)

Basis for Award. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

There are three (3) evaluation factors: Factor 1-Technical/Management, Factor 2-Past Performance, and Factor 3- Price.

Awards will be made using formal source selection procedures with lowest price technically acceptable process in accordance with FAR 15.101-2. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) shall make final selections based on an overall assessment of each offerors' technical/management, past performance and price proposals. The resultant contracts shall represent the best overall value to the Government, after consideration of technical/management factors, past performance and price in accordance with the evaluations clause FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATIONS OF

OFFERS - COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014).

The Source Selection Authority will make the final decision as to which offeror will receive the award based on the Best Value offer.

Factor 1: Technical/Management The ratings are established in accordance with Clause FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014) and DLA Energy Contract Provision M-001-M72-EVALUATION OF OFFERS (EXCEPTIONS/DEVIATIONS) (DLA Energy, APR 1997). All seven subfactors are equal in importance to each other. After all subfactors have been rated, an overall Technical/Management rating will be assigned to the proposals to assure technical capability.

Table A-1 Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

RATING DESCRIPTION

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

The subfactors under Factor 1 – Technical/Management (Table A-1.1) to be addressed in the Technical Proposal are as follows:

Table A-1.1

SUBFACTORS ACCEPTABLE UNACCCEPABLE

Staffing Operations Maintenance Safety Security Environmental Training

OVERALL RATING

Amendment 0001

Subfactor 1 – Staffing: Technical, managerial, and operational details of manpower related issues to meet mission requirements. The proposal must provide a staffing approach which demonstrates understanding of the personnel requirements to successfully accomplish all PWS tasks. The proposal must provide a staffing matrix identifying manning by positions and shifts to perform all required tasks and cover required hours of operation for normal daily operations. The proposal must identify all required personnel positions and qualifications. The proposal must address requirements to respond to surge or contingency operations to ensure no mission delay or failure. The proposal must address any manpower issues such as compliance with Service specific requirements, impact of Status of Forces Agreements, recognition of security clearance requirements, or negotiating a Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Subfactor 2 - Operations: Technical, managerial, and operational details of supporting normal and contingency operations to meet mission requirements. The proposal must provide a concept of operations that demonstrates knowledge of product receipt, storage, issue, and transfer functions and should ensure requirements for normal daily operations are met. The proposal must address procedures to maintain accountability and quality of DWCF product which will ensure compliance with DLA Energy Policies.

Subfactor 3 - Maintenance: Technical, managerial, and operational details of maintaining operational capability of facilities, vehicles, and equipment to meet mission requirements. The proposal must demonstrate understanding of planning, conducting, monitoring, and documenting operator, preventive, and other maintenance of systems, equipment, buildings, and grounds as required and in accordance with regulations and best commercial practices.

Subfactor 4 - Safety: Technical, managerial, and operational details incorporating federal, state, and local laws and regulations to ensure safe working environment. The proposal must provide procedures to be implemented to ensure all operations are conducted in accordance with federal, state, local, and international safety laws, regulations, and best commercial practices. The proposal must demonstrate knowledge and understanding of safety issues and specifically address hazards of products, lockout/tagout procedures, and confined space work rules.

Subfactor 5 - Security: Technical, managerial, and operational details of meeting physical, information, and personnel security requirements. The proposal must provide procedures to be implemented to ensure all aspects of security are maintained. The proposal must indicate a good knowledge of security performance requirements and must specifically address key control, visitor access control, Force Protection condition requirements, contractor personnel security/background checks, and protection of government computer systems and information.

Subfactor 6 - Environmental: Technical, managerial, and operational details of planning and conducting operations in compliance with environmental laws and regulations. The proposal must provide environmental performance requirements details and must specifically address spill prevention and response pertaining to fuel receipt, storage, and issue operations to be to ensure strict compliance with all applicable base, local, state, federal, and international environmental laws, regulations, and plans.

Subfactor 7 - Training: Technical, managerial, and operational details to ensure contractor personnel have requisite skills and associated training to accomplish all government requirements. The proposal must provide procedures to be implemented to ensure all contractor personnel are qualified and certified to accomplish all required tasks. The proposal must identify required courses and frequencies for maintaining personnel competence and method of documentation and certification. The proposal must also address the requirements for providing training to government personnel.

FACTOR 2. Past Performance: Past Performance will be rated as Acceptable or Unacceptable. To be considered awardable, offerors must have an Acceptable Past Performance rating.

Amendment 0001

Offerors are instructed to submit three (3) Past Performance Questionnaires that may include the performance still in progress, however, it should have a minimum of one (1) year of performance history and no more than three (3) years old from the closing date of this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s submitted past performance to include questionnaire from (3) current or previous contracts for relevancy based on how well the contractor performed on projects of similar dollar value, scope, and complexity. The Past Performance questionnaire located Attachment B of this solicitation will be used to solicit information from Offeror’s submitted references in the following area: (1) Quality of Service (2) Schedule (3) Cost Controls (4) Management of Key Personnel, (5) Small Business (if applicable) and (6) Regulatory Compliance.

Recency and Relevancy are evaluated as part of the Acceptable/Unacceptable ratings. Recent past performance is defined as past performance on contracts performed within the past three years. The evaluation will determine the degree to which a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is relevant to the effort to be acquired through this acquisition. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration shall be given to those aspects of an offeror’s contract history that would give the greatest ability to measure whether the offeror will satisfy the current procurement. This relevancy assessment shall measure the extent of similarity between the service effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming arrangements, and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance. Relevancy and non-relevancy are defined in Table A-2 below.

Past Performance factor shall be evaluated using the following adjectival ratings:

Table A-2 Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

RATING DEFINITION

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Upon determining how recent past performance was, relevancy, and how well the offeror performed, past performance will be rated “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” using the ratings and descriptions outlined in the DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table A-3 as follows:

Table A-3 Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

RATING DESCRIPTION

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE 1: The adjectival ratings Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unacceptable reflect the ratings in the Contractor Performance Rating System (CPARS). However, under the DOD’s streamlined process for evaluating Past Performance under Lowest Price Technically Acceptable, ratings of Acceptable and Unacceptable must be used. The contracting officer has reviewed the CPARs rating standards at https://www.cpars.gov/pdfs/CPARSQualityChecklist.pdf and the Contractor Past Performance Questionnaire, Attachment B, and determined that CPARS and Questionnaire ratings of

Amendment 0001

Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory and Marginal will equate to an Acceptable rating. Ratings of Unacceptable will equate to an Unacceptable rating.

A record of poor performance may be considered an indication that the offeror has failed to conform to contract requirements and/or to standards of good workmanship; adhere to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance; provide reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and/or display a business-like concern for the interests of the customer. Offerors are advised that the Government may use past performance information obtained from centralized past performance databases and sources other than those identified by the offeror.

Note 2: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability, “Unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable”.

Evaluation for Joint Ventures and Teaming Arrangements will be performed by evaluating the performance of each partner in accordance with the procedures outlined above. The ratings for each partner will be combined and the Joint Venture or Teaming Arrangement will receive one rating.

Note 3: A Past Performance evaluation rating of Acceptable shall be required in order to be considered for award.

Factor 3: Price

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract will result from this solicitation. The SSEB will perform the evaluation of the offered prices. Price will always be evaluated for reasonableness. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes IAW FAR 52.212-2 – Evaluation – Commercial Items as follows:

1. A total M1GC price offered for CLIN 0001 (Base years 1-4) will be multiplied by 48 months. The total M1GC price offered for CLIN 0002 (Option years 5-9 will be multiplied by 60. Option (Extension Provision) price: In accordance with FAR 52.217-8 (NOV 1999) Option to Extend Services, the Government has the unilateral right to extend any resulting contract under the same terms and conditions for a total of not more than six months. To account for the opton period(s) possible under 52.217-8 (maximum of six months), the Government will evaluate the option to extend by adding six months of Offeror’s performance period price to the Offeror’s total price.

2. Option price: In Accordance with FAR 52.217-9 (MAR 2000) Option to Extend the Term of the Contract, the Government may extend the term of this contract by written notice to the Contractor within thirty (30) days;

provided the Government gives the contractor a preliminary written notice of its intent to extend at least sixty

(60) days before the contract expires. The preliminary notice does not commit the Government to an extension.

The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options does not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

The Government reserves the right to perform a price realism analysis to determine whether the offeror understands the requirements and to determine the firm’s responsibility IAW FAR 9.104-1(b). If price realism is performed and an unfavorable determination is made, the Government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest price offeror.

IAW 52.219-4, NOTICE OF PRICE EVALUATION PREFERENCE FOR HUBZONE SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN (OCT 2014), for evaluation purposes only, offerors will be evaluated by adding a factor of 10 percent to the offered price

Amendment 0001 unless the exceptions under Paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of that provision apply. The Government reserves the right to limit the number of offers included in the competitive range for the purposes of efficiency in accordance with FAR 15.306(c)(2).

Socioeconomic/ Subcontracting Plan: The offeror (if a large business) shall complete and submit the DLA Energy Form 2019 (Attachment IV) to describe the extent of any planned subcontracting with small, small disadvantaged, veteran-owned small, service- disabled veteran- owned small, and HUBZone small businesses and Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions. Figures stated on the DLA Energy Form 2019 should refer to intended subcontracted amounts for the base period only.

B. This Amendment 0001 also incorporates changes within the OSP as follows:

1. Page 4-5, Item No. 4. is revised to correct the number of volumes required and should read as follows:

4. FAXED PROPOSALS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED. Please e-mail your proposal to: bidcustodian@dla.mil.

All e-mail proposals MUST be followed-up with the hard copy (consisting of three volumes as outlined below) NO LATER THAN (5) business days after solicitation closing. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208 – Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals. Offeror’s proposals shall be prepared in three separate volumes and provided in the quantities shown below:

Volume Title No. of Copies Required Page Limit I Technical Proposal 1 original and 1 PDF electronic copy 70 II Offeror Submission

Package (OSP) includes Price Proposal

1 original and 1 PDF electronic copy of Attachment II – OFFEROR SUBMISSION

PACKAGE

None

III Past Performance (PPQ) I PDF electronic copy None

Page 5, The following sentence has been deleted in its entirety. “Note: In order to be considered for an award for a location, an offeror must submit both a technical proposal and a properly completed Clause B-0001 B34.01 price proposal for that location.”

Page 5, Item No. 5. of the OSP is changed to read as: A pre-proposal conference is scheduled at Fort Hood, TX October 18, 2016 for this solicitation. Interested parties planning to attend should submit names, phone numbers, email addresses, and company represented to Robin Boateng via email at robin.boateng@dla.mil by October 4, 2016.

Page 12, SECTION J-ATTACHMENTS, ATTACHMENT IV-should read as follows… ATTACHMENT IV- DLA Form 2019, FEB 2013 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN.

C. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

mailto:bidcustodian@dla.mil