Spcifications_-_Comp_contracting_Evaluation_Criteria_(2).docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Third Party Elevator Inspections
Solicitation number
2026-14
Issued by
Essex County, New Jersey

About this file

This is an evaluation criteria document for a Request for Proposals issued by the City of Newark, New Jersey for Third Party Elevator Inspections (RFP 2026-14). Electronic proposals must be submitted through the City's e-Procurement Portal by 2:00 pm on Tuesday, July 7, 2026, at which time responses will be publicly opened and read aloud. The City will evaluate respondents based on three primary categories: technical qualifications, managerial capabilities, and costs. Technical evaluation includes assessment of the applicant's prior experience performing similar functions, company background and experience, list of municipalities served, capabilities to review plans and specifications to ensure compliance with applicable sub-codes, policies and procedures for hiring and training technical personnel, and a narrative addressing specified requirements. The RFP emphasizes that responses submitted after the deadline will not be accepted, and respondents are encouraged to complete the submission process well in advance to avoid system cutoff issues.

The managerial evaluation component assesses the financial integrity of the applicant and its principal officers, qualifications of management and technical personnel with a requirement that all technical personnel be certified in accordance with N.J.A.C. 5:23-5, a declaration of non-affiliation with product manufacturers or vendors, compliance with personnel and inspection time requirements, designation of personnel assigned, and company location information. The cost evaluation criterion requires adherence to billing criteria and submission of a range of salaries and compensation for all inspectors and technical personnel, including their education and training qualifications. The arrangement of these evaluation criteria does not necessarily indicate their order of importance, with specific weighting to be presented at the scheduled proposal opening.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

The criteria to be considered in the evaluation of each proposal is listed below. The arrangement of the criteria does not necessarily imply an order of importance in the selection process. The criteria weighting will be presented at the scheduled opening of proposals. All criteria will be used in the selection of the successful respondent.

1. TECHNICAL

· Prior experience of the applicant in performing similar or related functions.

· Company’s Background and Experience

· List of Municipalities Served

· Capabilities of the applicant to review plans and specifications and constructions to assure that the completed work complies with the appropriate sub-code.

· Policies and procedures of the applicant for the hiring, training and supervision of all technical personnel.

· Narrative Meeting Requirements

2. MANAGERIAL

· Financial integrity of the applicant and any of its principal officers

· Qualifications of the management and technical personnel of the applicant, including a statement that all technical personnel are certified in accordance with N.J.A.C. 5:23-5.

· A statement that the applicant is not affiliated with, influenced or controlled by any producer, manufacturer, supplier or vendor of products, supplies or equipment used in construction, components or assemblies.

· Meeting Personnel Requirements

· Meeting Inspection Times

· Inspector List Personnel assigned

· Company location

3. COSTS

· Adhere to billing criteria

· Range of salaries and other compensation of all the inspectors and other technical personnel, including education and training.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .