Attachment_D-Past_Perf_Questionnaire-DyFe.pdf

Attachment D: Past Performance Questionnaire

Ferro Dysprosium

SP8000-18-R-0008 Page 1 of 4

This questionnaire is designed to provide DLA Strategic Materials with basic information regarding the Contractor’s past performance on previous contracts they have been awarded and the satisfaction with their performance.

Please send this Questionnaire back to Ferro Dysprosium, SP8000-18-R-0008, Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials to Christopher.tull@dla.mil .

Please complete the following identifying information and past performance assessment:

A. Contractor: __________________________________________________________________ B. Contract number: ____________________________________________________________ C. Period of Performance: ________________________________________________________ D. Total Contract Amount (Including any Options): ___________________________________ E. Describe product acquired: _______________________________________________ ______

Point of Contact if the Government requires clarification on information filled out in this questionnaire: (name, title, organization, address, email, and phone):

Evaluator’s experience with this manufacturer (evaluator is the person filling out the questionnaire) (Evaluator’s name, title, and organization if different from POC):

mailto:Christopher.tull@dla.mil

Ferro dysprosium Past Performance Questionnaire

SP8000-18-R-0008 Source Selection Information Page 2 of 4 See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Rating Definition Notes

Acceptable

(A)

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/User’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element assessed is accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor is highly effective.

The Contractor must demonstrate past execution of similar contracts in terms of product quality (chemical compositions and particle size) and delivery time. Additionally, the performance must have occurred during the last three (3) years. The Contractor has demonstrated the ability and willingness to produce a quality product (i.e. the conformance to the chemical composition standards and particle size).

Timeliness of the contract with regard to delivery materials. If either product quality or delivery time is evaluated as “unacceptable,” the Past Performance shall be considered as “unacceptable.”

Unacceptable

(U)

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or are ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occur that the contractor has trouble overcoming and which impacts the Government/User. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

Not Applicable

(N/A)

No relevant past performance information available

In the case of a Contractor without a relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Contractor may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance

SP8000-18-R-0008 Source Selection Information Page 3 of 4 See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

When answering the questions below, please consider previous experiences with the Contractor and the quality of the products you have received from them.

Please use the rating system on page 2 above when answering questions #3-7 below:

1. Have you received the following materials from the manufacturer:

Ferro Dysprosium

Please check a box: ☐ Yes ☐ No Please indicate the grade/purity level, granule size, and material quantity you have received.

2. If applicable, please provide the contract name and number under which you procured these materials.

3. Cost—Rate the Contractor’s ability to control cost and deliver at the agreed-to price. Describe reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).

Please circle a rating: A U N/A Please add additional comments below.

4. Quality—

a) How well did the contractor adhere to the requirements of a Safety Data Sheet, Certificate of Analysis, or Performance Based Contracting requirements?

Please circle a rating: A U N/A Please add additional comments below.

b) Did the services provided meet the required level of quality or results?

Please circle a rating: A U N/A Please add additional comments below.

5. Performance— Rate the contractor's ability to comply successfully with the contract requirements and/or statement of work.

Please circle a rating: A U N/A Please add additional comments below.

SP8000-18-R-0008 Source Selection Information Page 4 of 4 See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

6. Schedule—

a) How well did the contractor adhere to the agreed-to schedule?

Please circle a rating: A U N/A Please add additional comments below.

b) What were the causes of any schedule variances?

Please circle a rating: A U N/A Please add additional comments below.

c) Were data reports and/or materials delivered on time?

Please circle a rating: A U N/A Please add additional comments below.

7. What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?

Please circle a rating: A U N/A Please add additional comments below.

8. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why/why not?

Please include any additional comments below that will assist in the evaluation of the technical competence and reliability of this material manufacturer.

Name and Date questionnaire was completed: ________________________________________