ATTACHMENT 8 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

ATTACHMENT 8 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

**Offeror on RFP SP4701-23-R-0020:

The Defense Logistics Agency intends to acquire Technical Data Management Transformation (TDMT) Support Services.

In order to accurately evaluate the Offeror’s past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying the past performance history of this Offeror.

Upon completion of this form, please submit it as an e-mailed attachment to Charles.Fitzsimmons@dla.mil.

Please make the subject line of the e-mail read “SP4701-23-R-0020 – Past Performance Questionnaire

– Insert Evaluated Company’s Name.”

The following standards will be considered in arriving at the Government’s evaluation and assessment of risk for Past Performance. The ratings descriptions are those utilized within PPIRS:

Exceptional: Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Very Good: Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Unsatisfactory: Contractor’s performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable: Should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Sensitive Information - See FAR 2.101 & 3.104

Performance Rating Form

NAME OF COMPANY EVALUATED:

ADDRESS OF COMPANY EVALUATED:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

TYPE OF SERVICES PERFORMED (ACTIVITY):

NAME OF EVALUATOR, COMPANY/AGENCY, ADDRESS, FAX AND TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS

DATE EVALUATION PROVIDED

1. QUALITY OF TECHNICAL APPROACH

How would you rate the contractor’s Overall Quality of Technical Approach? What was the level of quality for required reports and deliverables?

2. UNDERSTANDING OF REQUIREMENTS

What was the degree of conformance to contractual requirements?

2. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic schedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time, and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?)

4. CUSTOMER SERVICE

How would you rate the contractor’s customer service?

5. ADDRESSING ISSUES

How would you rate the contractor’s effectiveness in addressing issues?

6. COST CONTROL

Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic costs, monitoring performance, operating at or below budget, and implementing corrections/changes in a cost effective manner?